Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Chih-Wei Zeng.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising option for developing new treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI). They can help repair damaged tissue, making them an exciting area of research in regenerative medicine. It is important to study the safety, effectiveness, and best ways to use MSC-based therapies while addressing challenges in bringing these treatments to the clinic. Challenges include finding the best source of MSCs, determining when and how to administer them, and creating standardized methods for handling MSCs.

  • multipotent mesenchymal stem cells
  • spinal cord injury
  • neuroprotection

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are life-altering events with far-reaching consequences for both the individual and society. Each year, thousands of people suffer from SCI, often resulting in permanent disability, loss of independence, and a decreased quality of life [1]. Traditional treatment options have focused on rehabilitation and symptom management, but there remains a pressing need for innovative approaches to promote functional recovery and improve outcomes for SCI patients [2]. Advances in the field of regenerative medicine have led researchers to explore the potential of stem cells as a promising therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury [3]. Among the various types of stem cells, multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have gained particular attention due to their ability to differentiate into multiple cell types, including those of the nervous system [4]. These cells can be sourced from various tissues, such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood, making them a versatile option for potential therapies [5]. The application of MSCs in SCI treatment is based on their capacity to modulate the local environment, encourage tissue repair, and replace damaged cells [6]. As our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying MSC-mediated repair continues to grow, so too does the potential for their use in the development of novel therapies for SCI patients [7].
Recent studies offer a comprehensive analysis of current advancements in MSC research, emphasizing their potential to revolutionize SCI treatment [8]. The exploration of the molecular mechanisms behind MSC-mediated tissue repair highlights the versatility of these cells, which play a crucial role in various therapeutic processes, such as neuroprotection, neuronal regeneration, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, axonal regeneration, and glial scar reduction [9]. This multifaceted approach demonstrates the ability of MSCs to address the numerous challenges associated with SCIs, making them a promising candidate for future treatment strategies [10,11][10][11]. Researchers are also working to translate preclinical findings into real-world clinical applications for SCI patients [12]. Moreover, cell transplantation, tissue engineering, and cell-based therapies, such as MSC-derived exosomes, can harness the regenerative potential of MSCs to facilitate recovery and improve patients’ quality of life [13,14][13][14]. These therapeutic strategies hold immense promise for revolutionizing current treatment options and offering new hope for SCI patients [15]. However, there are challenges and limitations that must be overcome to bring MSC-based therapies into widespread clinical use [16]. These include optimizing the source, timing, and delivery methods of MSCs, as well as establishing standardized protocols for their isolation, expansion, and characterization [17,18][17][18]. Additionally, researchers must continue to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of MSC-based therapies to ensure their successful implementation in clinical settings [19].
In conclusion, the growing body of research on MSCs and their potential role in SCI treatment offers a valuable overview of the current state of the field. By examining the molecular mechanisms by which MSCs promote repair and exploring their potential clinical applications, researchers showcase the promise of MSC-based therapies for improving the lives of those affected by SCI [20]. As research progresses, it is essential to continue refining our understanding of MSCs, optimizing therapeutic strategies, and addressing the challenges that remain in translating these promising findings into routine clinical practice. By emphasizing the various molecular pathways and therapeutic strategies to which MSCs can contribute, the scientific community highlights the exciting future of MSC-based therapies for spinal cord injury patients while acknowledging the challenges that must be addressed to ensure their successful clinical translation.

2. Therapeutic Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury

Stem cells can be categorized based on their differentiation potential and developmental stages. Differentiation potential classifications include totipotent, pluripotent, multipotent, and unipotent cells, while developmental stage categories consist of embryonic, fetal, infant or umbilical cord blood, and adult stem cells (Figure 1). Among these, MSCs have garnered considerable interest as a promising candidate for SCI treatment due to their ability to differentiate into various cell types. Recent research has highlighted the multiple molecular mechanisms through which MSCs can promote recovery following SCI.
Biology 12 00653 g001
Figure 1. Overview of stem cell classifications based on differentiation potential and developmental stages. Stem cells are classified based on their differentiation potential, which reflects their ability to form various cell types. Totipotent stem cells, found in early-stage embryos, can differentiate into all three germ layers, as well as extra-embryonic tissues and placental cells. Pluripotent stem cells, present in the blastocyst stage of development, maintain the ability to self-renew and differentiate into the three germ layers and multiple lineages but cannot form extra-embryonic tissues or placental cells. Multipotent stem cells, also known as adult or somatic stem cells, are undifferentiated cells found in postnatal tissues. These specialized cells have limited self-renewal capabilities and are committed to specific lineages. Unipotent stem cells are the most restricted in their differentiation potential, as they can only give rise to a single cell type, although they still retain the capacity for self-renewal.

2.1. Neuroprotection

MSCs secrete a variety of growth factors and cytokines that exhibit neuroprotective effects, playing a pivotal role in supporting the recovery of damaged neurons after SCI [21]. Among these factors are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), all of which contribute to a supportive microenvironment for neuronal survival and regeneration [22]. VEGF, for instance, not only promotes angiogenesis but also exerts direct neuroprotective effects by inhibiting apoptosis, reducing oxidative stress, and promoting neurogenesis [23]. NGF, on the other hand, supports the survival and growth of neurons, particularly those in the peripheral nervous system (PNS), by binding to its receptors, TrkA and p75NTR, and activating intracellular signaling pathways that promote neuronal survival [24]. IGF-1 contributes to neuroprotection by promoting neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis [25]. It has been shown to reduce inflammation, inhibit neuronal apoptosis, and stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells [26]. BDNF, another critical neurotrophic factor secreted by MSCs, enhances neuronal survival and function by activating the TrkB receptor and downstream signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways [27]. Furthermore, MSCs can also modulate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), in microglia and astrocytes, and promote the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) from MSCs themselves as well as from other cell types, such as microglia and macrophages [28]. This modulation of the inflammatory milieu creates a more favorable environment for neuronal survival and recovery [29,30][29][30]. Overall, the neuroprotective effects of MSCs are multifaceted and involve a complex interplay of various growth factors and cytokines that work together to support the survival and regeneration of damaged neurons after SCI.

2.2. Promoting Neuronal Regeneration

MSCs possess the remarkable ability to differentiate into various neural cell types, including neurons and glial cells, such as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [31,32][31][32]. Recent studies have shown that the differentiation of MSCs towards neurons or glial cells is orchestrated by a complex interplay of signaling pathways, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications. For instance, key signaling pathways implicated in the neural differentiation of MSCs include the Notch, Wnt, and BMP signaling pathways [33,34][33][34]. Moreover, transcription factors such as Sox2, Pax6, and Neurogenin-2 play essential roles in guiding MSC differentiation toward neuronal and glial lineages [35,36,37][35][36][37]. The ratio of neurons to glial cells originating from MSCs is determined by the specific combination of signaling molecules and transcription factors present in the local microenvironment, which can be modulated by various extrinsic cues and experimental conditions. For example, the presence of growth factors like epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) can promote neuronal differentiation [38[38][39],39], while the addition of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) can drive glial differentiation. The delicate balance of these factors ultimately influences the cell fate of MSCs and their potential to contribute to neural regeneration following CNS injury. The pro-inflammatory niche within the SCI lesion can indeed affect the differentiation of MSCs. For instance, inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, have been reported to influence MSC differentiation, potentially biasing MSCs towards a particular cell phenotype, such as astrocytes. High levels of these pro-inflammatory cytokines have been shown to inhibit neuronal differentiation while promoting the differentiation of MSCs into astrocytes [40,41][40][41]. On the other hand, anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-10, have been reported to promote neuronal differentiation and inhibit glial differentiation of MSCs [42]. Importantly, MSCs also possess immunomodulatory properties, which may help mitigate inflammation and create a more favorable environment for tissue repair and regeneration [43,44][43][44]. MSCs can secrete various anti-inflammatory factors, such as TGF-β and IL-10, as well as modulate the function of immune cells, such as T cells and macrophages, to reduce inflammation and create a more permissive environment for tissue repair [45,46][45][46]. These MSC-mediated immunomodulatory effects can potentially counteract the negative influence of the pro-inflammatory niche on MSC differentiation, thus supporting their therapeutic potential in SCI. Most studies have demonstrated that the preferential differentiation of MSCs towards a particular cell phenotype in the context of the pro-inflammatory niche within the SCI lesion could be a potential hurdle in using MSCs for post-SCI tissue regeneration. For example, excessive differentiation of MSCs into astrocytes, potentially exacerbated by the overexpression of transcription factors like STAT3, may contribute to glial scar formation, impeding axonal regeneration and functional recovery [47,48][47][48]. On the other hand, insufficient differentiation into oligodendrocytes, possibly hindered by the presence of inhibitory factors such as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), might limit remyelination and restoration of neuronal connectivity [49,50][49][50]. To address these challenges, it is crucial to gain a better understanding of the factors that influence MSC differentiation in the SCI environment and develop strategies, such as genetic modifications or controlled release of growth factors, to direct MSC differentiation towards the desired cell types. For instance, overexpressing transcription factors like Olig2 in MSCs can enhance their differentiation into oligodendrocytes and promote remyelination [51[51][52],52], while engineering MSCs to secrete specific growth factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), can support neuronal survival and regeneration [53,54][53][54]. These examples highlight the importance of understanding and controlling MSC differentiation to maximize their therapeutic potential in post-SCI tissue regeneration. The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix (ECM), such as stiffness, topography, and 3D architecture, can significantly affect MSC differentiation [55]. MSCs sense and respond to their mechanical environment through mechanotransduction, which involves converting mechanical signals into biochemical and cellular responses [56]. For instance, studies have shown that MSCs cultured on softer substrates with a stiffness similar to that of the brain tend to differentiate into neural lineages, whereas those cultured on stiffer substrates resembling bone tissue preferentially differentiate into osteogenic lineages [57]. Additionally, the topography and 3D architecture of the ECM can guide MSC alignment, migration, and differentiation by providing physical cues that influence cell shape and cytoskeletal organization [58,59][58][59]. In the context of SCI, optimizing the mechanical properties of the ECM could potentially enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs by promoting their differentiation into the desired neural cell types and improving their integration with the host tissue. This unique characteristic enables MSCs to replace damaged neural tissue, promote the regeneration of neuronal circuits, and ultimately contribute to functional recovery after SCI [27]. The process of neuronal regeneration is facilitated by the secretion of several trophic factors, such as BDNF, GDNF, NGF, and CNTF, which stimulate the growth, differentiation, and survival of neural cells [60]. Additionally, MSCs can promote the activation and proliferation of endogenous neural stem cells (NSCs) and progenitor cells within the injured spinal cord, further enhancing the regenerative process [61]. While it is clear that MSCs can differentiate into the component parts of neural circuits, the evidence for their ability to reestablish the correct neural circuits that existed prior to injury is still emerging. A few studies have reported that MSCs, either directly or indirectly, can contribute to the formation of functional neural circuits after SCI. For instance, Zeng et al. (2015) demonstrated that MSCs transplanted into the injured spinal cord were able to differentiate into neurons and form synapses with host neurons, contributing to the restoration of motor function [62]. Another study by Nakajima et al. (2012) showed that MSC transplantation promoted the growth of host corticospinal tract axons and the formation of new synapses [63]. Another crucial aspect of MSC-mediated neuronal regeneration involves the modulation of ECM components, such as CSPGs and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [64,65][64][65]. By regulating the balance between ECM deposition and degradation, MSCs can create a more permissive environment for axonal growth and neural regeneration [66]. MSCs can also exert paracrine effects, which involve the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing various bioactive molecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [67]. These EVs can transfer their cargo to recipient cells in the injured spinal cord, influencing their gene expression, proliferation, and differentiation, ultimately contributing to neuronal regeneration [68]. In summary, MSCs promote neuronal regeneration through various mechanisms, including their capacity to differentiate into neural cell types, the secretion of trophic factors, stimulation of endogenous NSCs, modulation of ECM components, and paracrine effects. These concerted actions of MSCs contribute to the restoration of neuronal circuits and functional recovery following SCI.

2.3. Angiogenesis

MSCs play a critical role in promoting the formation of new blood vessels by secreting pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, angiopoietin-1, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [69,70][69][70]. The process of angiogenesis is crucial for the recovery of injured spinal cord tissue, as it improves blood supply, accelerates tissue repair, and supports the survival of neural cells [71,72][71][72]. In addition to the secretion of pro-angiogenic factors, MSCs can also modulate the expression of various cell adhesion molecules and integrins, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), which facilitate the recruitment and migration of endothelial cells to the injury site [73,74][73][74]. This process contributes to the formation of new blood vessels and enhances the overall regenerative capacity of the injured spinal cord [75]. MSC-derived EVs also contribute to the angiogenic process by transferring bioactive molecules, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and proteins, to the recipient endothelial cells [76]. These transferred molecules can regulate gene expression, promote endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation, ultimately stimulating angiogenesis in the injured spinal cord [77]. Additionally, MSCs can establish communication with other cell types, such as pericytes and astrocytes, which play essential roles in the stabilization and maturation of newly formed blood vessels [78]. By engaging in crosstalk with these cells, MSCs can ensure the proper development and functionality of the newly generated vascular network within the injured spinal cord [79]. In summary, MSCs contribute to angiogenesis through various mechanisms, including the secretion of pro-angiogenic factors, modulation of cell adhesion molecules, release of EVs, and interaction with other cell types involved in vascular development. These collective actions of MSCs help improve blood supply to the injured spinal cord, facilitate tissue repair, and support neural cell survival, ultimately contributing to functional recovery after SCI.

2.4. Immunomodulation

MSCs possess remarkable immunomodulatory properties that contribute to their therapeutic potential in SCI treatment [80]. Their ability to modulate the activity of various immune cells, such as macrophages, T-cells, B-cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, helps control inflammation, prevent autoimmune responses, and create a more favorable environment for tissue repair [81,82][81][82]. MSCs can regulate the polarization of macrophages, promoting a switch from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [83]. This shift in macrophage polarization is essential for controlling inflammation and fostering an environment that supports tissue repair and regeneration [84]. Additionally, MSCs can suppress the activation and proliferation of T-cells, modulate their cytokine secretion profile, and induce the generation of regulatory T-cells (Tregs), which play a crucial role in maintaining immune tolerance and preventing autoimmune responses [85,86][85][86]. MSCs can also inhibit B-cell activation, proliferation, and antibody production, further dampening the potential for harmful immune reactions [87]. MSCs can directly interact with NK cells, downregulating their cytotoxic activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine production [44,88][44][88]. Moreover, MSCs can secrete various soluble factors, such as TGF-β, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which contribute to their immunomodulatory effects [89]. Another important aspect of MSC-mediated immunomodulation is the release of EVs, which contain bioactive molecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [90,91][90][91]. These EVs can mediate intercellular communication and modulate the function of recipient immune cells, thus contributing to the overall immunomodulatory effects of MSCs [92]. In summary, MSCs exert their immunomodulatory effects through various mechanisms, including the modulation of immune cell polarization, secretion of soluble factors, and release of EVs. These actions help control inflammation, prevent autoimmune responses, and create a more favorable environment for tissue repair and regeneration following SCI.

2.5. Axonal Regeneration

MSCs play a crucial role in promoting axonal regeneration after SCI through various mechanisms, including the secretion of diverse neurotrophic factors, such as NGF, CNTF, and FGF [93,94,95][93][94][95]. These factors not only stimulate the growth of new axons but also support the survival and differentiation of neurons, ultimately leading to improved connectivity and functionality in the injured spinal cord [96]. In addition to secreting neurotrophic factors, MSCs can influence the local cellular environment by releasing cytokines and chemokines that recruit endogenous stem cells to the site of injury [97,98][97][98]. This recruitment of stem cells can further support axonal regeneration and promote tissue repair by providing additional cellular resources for the formation of new neuronal connections [99]. MSCs can also promote axonal regeneration by directly interacting with neurons and fostering the extension of growth cones [100]. This interaction can be mediated by various cell adhesion molecules and extracellular signaling molecules, such as N-cadherin and ephrin family members, which help guide axonal growth and encourage the formation of new synaptic connections [101]. Moreover, MSCs can enhance the intrinsic growth capacity of injured neurons, including both central nervous system (CNS) and PNS neurons, such as dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, by upregulating the expression of regeneration-associated genes (RAGs), such as growth-associated protein-43 (GAP-43), arginase-1 (Arg-1), and activating transcription factor-3 (ATF3) [102,103,104,105][102][103][104][105]. These RAGs play a critical role in the regenerative process by supporting the growth and guidance of axons and promoting synaptic plasticity [106]. Furthermore, MSCs can form cellular bridges at the injury site, which help guide regenerating axons across the lesion and re-establish connections with target neurons [107]. This scaffold-like structure created by MSCs can enhance the overall regenerative capacity of the injured spinal cord, leading to improved functional recovery. In summary, MSCs promote axonal regeneration through multiple mechanisms, including the secretion of neurotrophic factors, recruitment of endogenous stem cells, direct interaction with neurons, upregulation of regeneration-associated genes, and formation of cellular bridges. These combined actions contribute to enhanced axonal growth and improved functional recovery after SCI.

References

  1. Karsy, M.; Hawryluk, G. Modern Medical Management of Spinal Cord Injury. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2019, 19, 65.
  2. Venkatesh, K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Mullick, M.; Manivasagam, G.; Sen, D. Spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology, treatment strategies, associated challenges, and future implications. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 377, 125–151.
  3. Inoue, M.; Yamaguchi, R.; He, C.C.J.; Ikeda, A.; Okano, H.; Kohyama, J. Current status and prospects of regenerative medicine for spinal cord injury using human induced pluripotent stem cells: A review. Stem Cell Investig. 2023, 10, 6.
  4. Dalous, J.; Larghero, J.; Baud, O. Transplantation of umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stem cells as a novel strategy to protect the central nervous system: Technical aspects, preclinical studies, and clinical perspectives. Pediatric Res. 2012, 71, 482–490.
  5. Garcia, O.; Carraro, G.; Navarro, S.; Bertoncello, I.; McQualter, J.; Driscoll, B.; Jesudason, E.; Warburton, D. Cell-based therapies for lung disease. Br. Med. Bull. 2012, 101, 147–161.
  6. Vismara, I.; Papa, S.; Rossi, F.; Forloni, G.; Veglianese, P. Current Options for Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury. Trends Mol. Med. 2017, 23, 831–849.
  7. Kumar, H.; Ropper, A.E.; Lee, S.-H.; Han, I. Propitious Therapeutic Modulators to Prevent Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Disruption in Spinal Cord Injury. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 54, 3578–3590.
  8. Liu, G.; David, B.T.; Trawczynski, M.; Fessler, R.G. Advances in pluripotent stem cells: History, mechanisms, technologies, and applications. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2020, 16, 3–32.
  9. Alizadeh, A.; Dyck, S.M.; Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S. Traumatic spinal cord injury: An overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 282.
  10. Griffin, J.M.; Bradke, F. Therapeutic repair for spinal cord injury: Combinatory approaches to address a multifaceted problem. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e11505.
  11. Do, A.D.; Kurniawati, I.; Hsieh, C.L.; Wong, T.T.; Lin, Y.L.; Sung, S.Y. Application of mesenchymal stem cells in targeted delivery to the brain: Potential and challenges of the extracellular vesicle-based approach for brain tumor treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11187.
  12. Flack, J.A.; Sharma, K.D.; Xie, J.Y. Delving into the recent advancements of spinal cord injury treatment: A review of recent progress. Neural Regener. Res. 2022, 17, 283.
  13. Golpanian, S.; Wolf, A.; Hatzistergos, K.E.; Hare, J.M. Rebuilding the damaged heart: Mesenchymal stem cells, cell-based therapy, and engineered heart tissue. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1127–1168.
  14. Ahmed, L.; Al-Massri, K. New Approaches for Enhancement of the Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Cardiovascular Diseases. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2022, 19, 1129–1146.
  15. Anna, Z.; Katarzyna, J.-W.; Joanna, C.; Barczewska, M.; Joanna, W.; Wojciech, M. Therapeutic Potential of Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injuries. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 1–6.
  16. Lukomska, B.; Stanaszek, L.; Zuba-Surma, E.; Legosz, P.; Sarzynska, S.; Drela, K. Challenges and Controversies in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 1–10.
  17. Fernández-Santos, M.E.; Garcia-Arranz, M.; Andreu, E.J.; García-Hernández, A.M.; López-Parra, M.; Villarón, E.; Sepúlveda, P.; Fernández-Avilés, F.; García-Olmo, D.; Prosper, F.; et al. Optimization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell (MSC) Manufacturing Processes for a Better Therapeutic Outcome. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 918565.
  18. Zhuang, X.; Hu, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Y. Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Based Therapy as a New Approach for the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2022, 1–37.
  19. Aldrich, E.D.; Cui, X.; Murphy, C.A.; Lim, K.S.; Hooper, G.J.; McIlwraith, C.W.; Woodfield, T.B. Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Review of in Vitro Evaluation, Clinical Experience, and Translational Opportunities. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 1500–1515.
  20. Szymoniuk, M.; Litak, J.; Sakwa, L.; Dryla, A.; Zezuliński, W.; Czyżewski, W.; Kamieniak, P.; Blicharski, T. Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Application of Multipotent Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury. Cells 2022, 12, 120.
  21. Li, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W.; Lin, F.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: A look into treatment mechanism and therapeutic potential. J. Neurol. 2021, 268, 4095–4107.
  22. Wang, X.; Xuan, W.; Zhu, Z.-Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, L.; Fu, D.-Y.; Yang, L.-Q.; Li, P.-Y.; Yu, W.-F. The evolving role of neuro-immune interaction in brain repair after cerebral ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2018, 24, 1100–1114.
  23. Thompson, C.D.; Zurko, J.C.; Hanna, B.F.; Hellenbrand, D.J.; Hanna, A.; Chiu, C.-W.; Huang, W.-H.; Lin, S.-J.; Tsai, M.-J.; Ma, H.; et al. The Therapeutic Role of Interleukin-10 after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2013, 30, 1311–1324.
  24. Lee, S.Y.; Kwon, B.; Lee, K.; Son, Y.H.; Chung, S.G. Therapeutic mechanisms of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a rat tendon injury model. Am. J. Sports Med. 2017, 45, 1429–1439.
  25. Ren, Y.; Zhou, X.; He, X. Function of microglia and macrophages in secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 1787–1795.
  26. Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Ghamari, S.-H.; Safaeinejad, F.; Bahrami, S.; Niknejad, H. Potential Therapeutic Features of Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Multiple Sclerosis: Immunomodulation, Inflammation Suppression, Angiogenesis Promotion, Oxidative Stress Inhibition, Neurogenesis Induction, MMPs Regulation, and Remyelination Stimulation. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 238.
  27. Silva, N.A.; Sousa, N.; Reis, R.L.; Salgado, A.J. From basics to clinical: A comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 114, 25–57.
  28. Zeng, C.W. Macrophage–Neuroglia Interactions in Promoting Neuronal Regeneration in Zebrafish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6483.
  29. Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Yan, K.; Chen, L.; Chen, X.R.; Li, P.; Chen, F.-F.; Jiang, X.-D. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10, 1–12.
  30. De Cássia Noronha, N.; Mizukami, A.; Caliári-Oliveira, C.; Cominal, J.G.; Rocha, J.L.M.; Covas, D.T.; Swiech, K.; Malmegrim, K.C.R. Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 131.
  31. Zhang, Y.; Cai, W.; Huang, Q.; Gu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Q.; Wei, X.; Jin, M.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate bacteria-induced liver injury in mice by inducing regulatory dendritic cells. Hepatology 2013, 59, 671–682.
  32. Kaminska, A.; Radoszkiewicz, K.; Rybkowska, P.; Wedzinska, A.; Sarnowska, A. Interaction of Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) and Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) as a Promising Approach in Brain Study and Nerve Regeneration. Cells 2022, 11, 1464.
  33. Bhaskar, B.; Mekala, N.; Baadhe, R.R.; Rao, P. Role of Signaling Pathways in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 9, 508–512.
  34. Bagheri-Mohammadi, S. Adult neurogenesis and the molecular signalling pathways in brain: The role of stem cells in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Int. J. Neurosci. 2021, 132, 1165–1177.
  35. Blake, J.A.; Ziman, M. Pax genes: Regulators of lineage specification and progenitor cell maintenance. Development 2014, 141, 737–751.
  36. Gulaia, V.; Kumeiko, V.; Shved, N.; Cicinskas, E.; Rybtsov, S.; Ruzov, A.; Kagansky, A. Molecular mechanisms governing the stem cell’s fate in brain cancer: Factors of stemness and quiescence. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 388.
  37. Jiménez-Acosta, M.A.; Hernández, L.J.R.; Cristerna, M.L.P.; Tapia-Ramírez, J.; Meraz-Ríos, M.A. Review: Neuronal Differentiation Protocols of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 15–71.
  38. Zhao, H.; Zuo, X.; Ren, L.; Li, Y.; Tai, H.; Du, J.; Xie, X.; Zhang, X.; Han, Y.; Wu, Y.; et al. Combined use of bFGF/EGF and all-trans-retinoic acid cooperatively promotes neuronal differentiation and neurite outgrowth in neural stem cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 690, 61–68.
  39. Li, H.; Gan, X.; Pan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, Z. EGF/bFGF promotes survival, migration and differentiation into neurons of GFP-labeled rhesus monkey neural stem cells xenografted into the rat brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 620, 76–82.
  40. Sezer, G.; Yay, A.H.; Sarica, Z.S.; Gonen, Z.B.; Onder, G.O.; Alan, A.; Yilmaz, S.; Saraymen, B.; Bahar, D. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate paclitaxel-induced mechanical allodynia in rats. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2022, 36, e23207.
  41. Cao, H.; Ji, X.; Wang, Q.; Guan, X.; Wei, W.; Li, Y.; Zou, W.; Jing Liu, J. PTBP-1 and TNF-α/NF-κB are involved in repair mechanisms of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in mice with spinal cord injury. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2022, 14, 4443.
  42. Shen, H.; Xu, B.; Yang, C.; Xue, W.; You, Z.; Wu, X.; Ma, D.; Shao, D.; Leong, K.; Dai, J. A DAMP-scavenging, IL-10-releasing hydrogel promotes neural regeneration and motor function recovery after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 2021, 280, 121279.
  43. Noh, M.Y.; Lim, S.M.; Oh, K.-W.; Cho, K.-A.; Park, J.; Kim, K.-S.; Lee, S.-J.; Kwon, M.-S.; Kim, S.H. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulate the Functional Properties of Microglia via TGF-β Secretion. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 1538–1549.
  44. Jiang, W.; Xu, J. Immune modulation by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2019, 53, e12712.
  45. Koh, B.I.; Kang, Y. The pro-metastatic role of bone marrow-derived cells: A focus on MSCs and regulatory T cells. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 412–422.
  46. Putra, A.; Ridwan, F.B.; Putridewi, A.I.; Kustiyah, A.R.; Wirastuti, K.; Sadyah, N.A.C.; Rosdiana, I.; Munir, D. The Role of TNF-α induced MSCs on Suppressive Inflammation by Increasing TGF-β and IL-10. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 1779–1783.
  47. Li, X.; Tan, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Han, S.; Liu, D.; Yin, W.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Wanggou, S.; et al. Transplantation of hUC-MSCs seeded collagen scaffolds reduces scar formation and promotes functional recovery in canines with chronic spinal cord injury. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43559.
  48. Pang, Q.-M.; Chen, S.-Y.; Xu, Q.-J.; Fu, S.-P.; Yang, Y.-C.; Zou, W.-H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Wan, W.-H.; Peng, J.-C.; et al. Neuroinflammation and Scarring After Spinal Cord Injury: Therapeutic Roles of MSCs on Inflammation and Glial Scar. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 751021.
  49. Dyck, S.M.; Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans: Key modulators in the developing and pathologic central nervous system. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 269, 169–187.
  50. Pu, A.; Stephenson, E.L.; Yong, V.W. The extracellular matrix: F ocus on oligodendrocyte biology and targeting CSPG s for remyelination therapies. Glia 2018, 66, 1809–1825.
  51. George, S.; Hamblin, M.R.; Abrahamse, H. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to neuroglia: In the context of cell signalling. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2019, 15, 814–826.
  52. Vigo, T.; Voulgari-Kokota, A.; Errede, M.; Girolamo, F.; Ortolan, J.; Mariani, M.C.; Ferrara, G.; Virgintino, D.; Buffo, A.; Kerlero de Rosbo, N.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells instruct a beneficial phenotype in reactive astrocytes. Glia 2021, 69, 1204–1215.
  53. Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.-Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, X.-L.; Peng, J. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promote peripheral nerve repair via paracrine mechanisms. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 651–658.
  54. Choi, S.J.; Park, S.Y.; Shin, Y.H.; Heo, S.-H.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, H.I.; Kim, J.K. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Wharton’s Jelly Can Differentiate into Schwann Cell-Like Cells and Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in Acellular Nerve Grafts. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2021, 18, 467–478.
  55. Hao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, D.; Shen, Y.; Tang, G.; Huang, S.; Zhao, Z. Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells: Perspective into mechanical induction of MSC fate. Acta Biomater. 2015, 20, 1–9.
  56. Steward, A.J.; Kelly, D.J. Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. J. Anat. 2014, 227, 717–731.
  57. Ivanovska, I.L.; Shin, J.W.; Swift, J.; Discher, D.E. Stem cell mechanobiology: Diverse lessons from bone marrow. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, 25, 523–532.
  58. Nikkhah, M.; Edalat, F.; Manoucheri, S.; Khademhosseini, A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 5230–5246.
  59. Su, Y.; Toftdal, M.S.; Le Friec, A.; Dong, M.; Han, X.; Chen, M. 3D electrospun synthetic extracellular matrix for tissue regeneration. Small Sci. 2021, 1, 2100003.
  60. Lv, B.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Chen, Y.; Ding, H.; Cao, X.; Huang, A. Biomaterial-supported MSC transplantation enhances cell–cell communication for spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 1–16.
  61. Ahmadian-Moghadam, H.; Sadat-Shirazi, M.-S.; Zarrindast, M.-R. Therapeutic potential of stem cells for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 1073–1101.
  62. Zeng, X.; Qiu, X.-C.; Ma, Y.-H.; Duan, J.-J.; Chen, Y.-F.; Gu, H.-Y.; Wang, J.-M.; Ling, E.-A.; Wu, J.-L.; Wu, W.; et al. Integration of donor mesenchymal stem cell-derived neuron-like cells into host neural network after rat spinal cord transection. Biomaterials 2015, 53, 184–201.
  63. Nakajima, H.; Uchida, K.; Guerrero, A.R.; Watanabe, S.; Sugita, D.; Takeura, N.; Yoshida, A.; Long, G.; Wright, K.T.; Johnson, W.E.; et al. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells promotes an alternative pathway of macrophage activation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 1614–1625.
  64. Wright, K.T.; El Masri, W.; Osman, A.; Roberts, S.; Chamberlain, G.; Ashton, B.A.; Johnson, W.E. Bone marrow stromal cells stimulate neurite outgrowth over neural proteoglycans (CSPG), myelin associated glycoprotein and Nogo-A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 354, 559–566.
  65. Veeravalli, K.K.; Dasari, V.R.; Tsung, A.J.; Dinh, D.H.; Gujrati, M.; Fassett, D.; Rao, J.S. Human umbilical cord blood stem cells upregulate matrix metalloproteinase-2 in rats after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 36, 200–212.
  66. Lee, S.; Choi, E.; Cha, M.J.; Hwang, K.C. Cell adhesion and long-term survival of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells: A prerequisite for cell therapy. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 632902.
  67. Zhou, Y.; Xu, H.; Xu, W.; Wang, B.; Wu, H.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, M.; Mao, F.; Yan, Y.; et al. Exosomes released by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells protect against cisplatin-induced renal oxidative stress and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013, 4, 1–13.
  68. Zeng, X.; Zeng, Y.S.; Ma, Y.H.; Lu, L.Y.; Du, B.L.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Chan, W.Y. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional gelatin sponge scaffold attenuate inflammation, promote angiogenesis, and reduce cavity formation in experimental spinal cord injury. Cell Transpl. 2011, 20, 1881–1899.
  69. Srivastava, M.V.P.; Talwar, T. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor and other growth factors in post-stroke recovery. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2014, 17, 1–6.
  70. Motegi, S.-I.; Ishikawa, O. Mesenchymal stem cells: The roles and functions in cutaneous wound healing and tumor growth. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2016, 86, 83–89.
  71. Shechter, R.; Schwartz, M. CNS sterile injury: Just another wound healing? Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 135–143.
  72. Wang, L.; Shi, Q.; Dai, J.; Gu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Chen, L. Increased vascularization promotes functional recovery in the transected spinal cord rats by implanted vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting collagen scaffold. J. Orthop. Res. 2018, 36, 1024–1034.
  73. Ren, G.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; L’Huillier, A.; Ling, W.; Roberts, A.I.; Le, A.D.; Shi, S.; Shao, C.; et al. Inflammatory cytokine-induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in mesenchymal stem cells are critical for immunosuppression. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 2321–2328.
  74. Salem, H.K.; Thiemermann, C. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Current Understanding and Clinical Status. Stem Cells 2009, 28, 585–596.
  75. Cao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xie, H.; Lu, H.; Hu, J. Local delivery of USC-derived exosomes harboring ANGPTL3 enhances spinal cord functional recovery after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 1–17.
  76. Kogure, A.; Kosaka, N.; Ochiya, T. Cross-talk between cancer cells and their neighbors via miRNA in extracellular vesicles: An emerging player in cancer metastasis. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 1–8.
  77. Moghadasi, S.; Elveny, M.; Rahman, H.S.; Suksatan, W.; Jalil, A.T.; Abdelbasset, W.K.; Yumashev, A.V.; Shariatzadeh, S.; Motavalli, R.; Behzad, F.; et al. A paradigm shift in cell-free approach: The emerging role of MSCs-derived exosomes in regenerative medicine. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 1–21.
  78. Gökçinar-Yagci, B.; Uçkan-Çetinkaya, D.; Çelebi-Saltik, B. Pericytes: Properties, functions and applications in tissue engineering. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2015, 11, 549–559.
  79. Chung, E.; Son, Y. Crosstalk between mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages in tissue repair. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2014, 11, 431–438.
  80. Song, N.; Scholtemeijer, M.; Shah, K. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Immunomodulation: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 653–664.
  81. Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Fayyad-Kazan, H.; Bron, D.; Toungouz, M.; Lagneaux, L. Mesenchymal stromal cells and immunomodulation: A gathering of regulatory immune cells. Cytotherapy 2016, 18, 160–171.
  82. Rawat, S.; Gupta, S.; Mohanty, S. Mesenchymal stem cells modulate the immune system in developing therapeutic interventions. In Immune Response Act. Immunomodul; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019.
  83. Arabpour, M.; Saghazadeh, A.; Rezaei, N. Anti-inflammatory and M2 macrophage polarization-promoting effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 97, 107823.
  84. Villarreal-Leal, R.A.; Healey, G.D.; Corradetti, B. Biomimetic immunomodulation strategies for effective tissue repair and restoration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 179, 113913.
  85. Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.N.; Jeon, M.S.; Yi, T.; Song, S.U. ICOSL expression in human bone mar-row-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes induction of regulatory T cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–15.
  86. Roux, C.; Saviane, G.; Pini, J.; Belaïd, N.; Dhib, G.; Voha, C.; Ibáñez, L.; Boutin, A.; Mazure, N.M.; Wakkach, A.; et al. Immunosuppressive mesenchymal stromal cells derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells induce human regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. Front. Immunol. 2018, 8, 1991.
  87. Rosado, M.M.; Bernardo, M.E.; Scarsella, M.; Conforti, A.; Giorda, E.; Biagini, S.; Cascioli, S.; Rossi, F.; Guzzo, I.; Vivarelli, M.; et al. Inhibition of B-cell proliferation and antibody production by mesenchymal stromal cells is mediated by T cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 93–103.
  88. Gazdic, M.; Volarevic, V.; Arsenijevic, N.; Stojkovic, M. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Friend or Foe in Immune-Mediated Diseases. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2015, 11, 280–287.
  89. Li, M.; Sun, X.; Kuang, X.; Liao, Y.; Li, H.; Luo, D. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress CD8+ T cell-mediated activation by suppressing natural killer group 2, member D protein receptor expression and secretion of prostaglandin E2, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and transforming growth factor-β. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2014, 178, 516–524.
  90. Bazzoni, R.; Takam Kamga, P.; Tanasi, I.; Krampera, M. Extracellular vesicle-dependent communication between mesenchymal stromal cells and immune effector cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 596079.
  91. Luo, T.; Von der Ohe, J.; Hass, R. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles in tumors and therapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 5212.
  92. Mardpour, S.; Hamidieh, A.A.; Taleahmad, S.; Sharifzad, F.; Taghikhani, A.; Baharvand, H. Interaction between mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and immune cells by distinct protein content. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 234, 8249–8258.
  93. Uccelli, A.; Benvenuto, F.; Laroni, A.; Giunti, D. Neuroprotective features of mesenchymal stem cells. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2011, 24, 59–64.
  94. Oliveira, J.T.; Mostacada, K.; de Lima, S.; Martinez, A.M.B. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transp. for Improving Nerve Regeneration. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2013, 108, 59–77.
  95. Veneruso, V.; Rossi, F.; Villella, A.; Bena, A.; Forloni, G.; Veglianese, P. Stem cell paracrine effect and delivery strategies for spinal cord injury regeneration. J. Controll. Release 2019, 300, 141–153.
  96. Fischer, I.; Dulin, J.N.; Lane, M.A. Transplanting neural progenitor cells to restore connectivity after spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 366–383.
  97. Li, X.; He, X.T.; Yin, Y.; Wu, R.X.; Tian, B.M.; Chen, F.M. Administration of signalling molecules dictates stem cell homing for in situ regeneration. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 3162–3177.
  98. Xia, B.; Deng, Y.; Lv, Y.; Chen, G. Stem cell recruitment based on scaffold features for bone tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 9, 1189–1203.
  99. de Freria, C.M.; Van Niekerk, E.; Blesch, A.; Lu, P. Neural stem cells: Promoting axonal regeneration and spinal cord connectivity. Cells 2021, 10, 3296.
  100. Zhang, Y.; Chopp, M.; Liu, X.S.; Katakowski, M.; Wang, X.; Tian, X.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Z.G. Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Axonal Growth of Cortical Neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 54, 2659–2673.
  101. Missaire, M.; Hindges, R. The role of cell adhesion molecules in visual circuit formation: From neurite outgrowth to maps and synaptic specificity. Dev. Neurobiol. 2015, 75, 569–583.
  102. Srivastava, E.; Singh, A.; Kumar, A. Spinal cord regeneration: A brief overview of the present scenario and a sneak peek into the future. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 16, 2100167.
  103. Pradana, I.P.G.P.; Al Fauzi, A.; Suroto, H. Expression of Growth Associated Protein-43 (GAP-43) and Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) from Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ASC) with fresh frozen nerve scaffold in 5% hypoxic condition. Bali Med. J. 2021, 10, 887–894.
  104. Barati, S.; Ragerdi Kashani, I.; Moradi, F.; Tahmasebi, F.; Mehrabi, S.; Barati, M.; Joghataei, M.T. Mesenchymal stem cell mediated effects on microglial phenotype in cuprizone-induced demyelination model. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 13952–13964.
  105. Miyano, K.; Ikehata, M.; Ohshima, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Nose, Y.; Yoshihara, S.-I.; Oki, K.; Shiraishi, S.; Uzu, M.; Nonaka, M.; et al. Intravenous administration of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue and umbilical cord improves neuropathic pain via suppression of neuronal damage and anti-inflammatory actions in rats. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262892.
  106. Yang, X.; Liu, R.; Xu, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhou, B. The mechanisms of peripheral nerve preconditioning injury on promoting axonal regeneration. Neural Plast. 2021, 2021, 6648004.
  107. Shen, H.; Fan, C.; You, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Dai, J. Advances in Biomaterial-Based Spinal Cord Injury Repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 32, 2110628.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback