Pulsed Laser Deposited Films for Microbatteries: History Edit

It has been widely demonstrated that pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) based on the process of the transportation of a material (laser ablation) is a successful technique for the growth of
stoichiometric multicomponent oxide films [1,2]. Indeed, PLD has shown unique advantages for the formation of dense films for energy storage and conversion, namely a high reproducibility, easy control of the growth rate, and a high film purity with a variety of substrates, such as amorphous glass, oriented silicon [3], stainless steel [4], (001)Al2O3 [5], indium tin oxide (ITO)- and ZnO-coated glass, and ITO-coated Upilex polymer [6].

Generally, the stoichiometry of the target phase is preserved in PLD films of oxides but a deviation is observed for lithiated material that implies an Li-enriched target. Consequently, the loss of volatile Li during deposition is compensated for by using about a 15 wt. % excess of Li2O [7,8]. Accurate stoichiometry can be obtained by controlling several parameters of the process. The typical set-up for the fabrication of PLD films consists of a stainless-steel vacuum chamber evacuated down to a residual pressure less than 1 × 10−4 Pa before material deposition. Energy (laser fluence) in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 J·cm−2 is generated by a pulsed-laser beam, which falls onto the target surface with an incidence angle of approximately 45° (see Table 1 for laser characteristics). Indeed, four PLD parameters are of prime importance for the growth of films: The laser fluence; type of substrate; orientation and lattice parameters, which must match with those of the film for an efficient epitaxy process; substrate temperature (Ts); and the oxygen partial pressure (pO2). In addition, as the capacity of the microbattery depends on the electrode thickness, the duration of the deposition (tp) must also be considered. The activity of a thin-film electrode, i.e., specific discharge energy, is proportional to the thickness, thus an increase of the film thickness leads to a power limitation because of the slow transport kinetic of Li+ ions.

Consequently, PLD is a popular technique due to the growth of a compact and dense film, which is replaced by a thick and porous film. Another advantage of the physical vacuum-like deposition techniques is the possibility of depositing a thin layer on top of the microbattery, which protects the device against a reactivity toward moisture. Moreover, due to the well-defined surface area of PLD films, a direct comparison of the electrochemical activity of materials can be done for different morphologies, from amorphous to single-crystalline materials [9].