Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 2468 word(s) 2468 2021-04-01 04:26:36 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 2468 2021-04-15 06:08:47 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Krigas, N. Greek Tulips. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8465 (accessed on 29 March 2024).
Krigas N. Greek Tulips. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8465. Accessed March 29, 2024.
Krigas, Nikos. "Greek Tulips" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8465 (accessed March 29, 2024).
Krigas, N. (2021, April 06). Greek Tulips. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8465
Krigas, Nikos. "Greek Tulips." Encyclopedia. Web. 06 April, 2021.
Greek Tulips
Edit

From an ornamental viewpoint, tulips are famous clonally propagated crops. This research focuses on 15 wild-growing Greek tulip species including 11 range-restricted species, i.e., six Greek endemics and five Balkan or Aegean endemics and subendemics, among which seven are currently threatened with extinction (two Critically Endangered, three Endangered and two Vulnerable). The results of this study on the Greek tulips showed that there are both well-established value chains and gaps in the market regarding the “botanical tulips” of Greece.

biodiversity botanic gardens e-commerce Greek flora Liliaceae phytogenetic resources seed banks Tulipa

1. Introduction

The electronic plant trade over the Internet has been largely facilitated by social media and communication platforms resulting to date in a popular new way of easy plant trade worldwide [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This kind of uncontrolled e-trade can have devastating effects to wild-growing populations, and thus may undermine conservation efforts both nationally and globally due to unrestrained overexploitation of local single-country endemics and/or threatened species [2][3][9]. Theoretically, when the international e-commerce of plants is performed under the provisions of the Nagoya protocol and the EU Directive 511/2014 which regulate sovereign rights over phytogenetic resources and concomitant Access and Benefit Sharing mechanisms for their sustainable exploitation, it may secure local phytogenetic resources, also offering support to domestic subsistence economies [6][8][9][10][11][12].

Due to severe anthropogenic disturbance of wild habitats and under the threat of climate change, ex situ plant conservation serving as back-up of in situ conservation has become increasingly important over the last decades for the conservation of phytogenetic resources [13][14][15][16][17]. In this framework, botanic gardens (BGs) and seed banks (SBs) play a pivotal role in achieving effective species’ conservation [13][14], with their greatest concentration occurring in northern temperate regions (especially Europe) [13][14]. However, the need for such conservation initiatives is more intense in floristically diverse southern countries within this geographical context, and especially in the Mediterranean region which hosts many threatened plants [15][18][19][20][21], and in countries which are relatively poorly resourced in conservation facilities compared to less diverse northern ones [14]. Furthermore, BGs and SBs often house in man-made environments several socioeconomically important plants from around the globe. Therefore, they may be considered as sources of valuable donor material and species-specific propagation and cultivation know-how, activating considerable opportunities for the sustainable exploitation of phytogenetic resources in the short-term, medium-term or long-term [12][22][23]. This applies to major crop plants, including widely appreciated ornamentals such as tulips, but also to neglected and underutilized plants such as local endemics confined to specific regions [12][22].

In general, the domestication of wild-growing plants with interesting properties associated with plant rarity or endemism (uniqueness) has been extremely appreciated by the ornamental-horticultural sector, since the latter is always in quest of and sourcing for unique new crops with attractive features [6][22][24]. In this context, tulips are famous ornamental plants worldwide since the Middle Ages [11][24], and currently in Europe they are associated with a turnover of about half a billion euros yearly with increasing trends [24]. As a result of this long-lasting appreciation, to date there are hundreds of traded hybrid tulip varieties raised through breeding strategies from a few ancestral East Mediterranean and/or Asiatic species to satisfy commercial needs, as well as several nonimproved species of the genus Tulipa that are used for ornamental reasons, mainly by plant enthusiasts and garden lovers.

In line with the foregoing studies related to the electronic trade [3][7][11], the ex situ conservation of focal endemic plants [14] and the sustainable exploitation of neglected and underutilized phytogenetic resources [12], the study herein focuses on the wild-growing tulips of Greece. These phytogenetic resources comprise 15 Tulipa spp. which are nationally protected by the Greek Presidential Decree 67/1981, among which six are confined to the Greek territory (single-country endemics) and five are local Balkan or Aegean endemics and subendemics extending to adjacent countries. Seven of them are assessed as threatened (two Critically Endangered, three Endangered and two Vulnerable) according to the criteria of IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) [25][26][27]. In an attempt to explore the extant value chain associated with the Greek tulips internationally and to define the extent of the current commercialization of Greek tulips over the internet, an overview of their global electronic trade is presented herein and concomitant conservation implications are discussed. To promote the repatriation initiatives of well-documented plant material acquired in Greece but housed abroad, the global ex situ conservation of Greek tulips is overviewed according to the PlantSearch facility of the Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI). These efforts are envisaged in the frame of the newly launched efforts to create a national collection of wild Greek tulips, attempting to pave the way for the creation of a Greek national tulip collection and a sustainable value chain associated with them.

2. Electronic Trade of Greek Native Tulips

The traded Greek tulips are often classified by the nurseries involved as “botanical tulips” to contrast with commercialized hybrid tulips, thus reflecting their distinct origin. Botanical tulips (e.g., https://www.gardenia.net/plant/tulipa-saxatilis-lilac-wonder-botanical-tulip, etc. (accessed on 13 March 2021)) are ancestors of cultivated tulip hybrids and they are almost nonimproved by breeding strategies. Being evolved to adapt to natural conditions, quite often these botanical tulips are hardier and easier to grow compared to hybrids. When these are attractive but also rare, protected, and local endemic of specific regions, they are perceived by people as uncommon to them (or “exotic” due to their distant origin from other regions than those of the consumers), thus presenting a “new” attractive choice for the ornamental industry which is always “thirsty” for novel beauties [12].

Surprisingly, though not unexpectedly if previous research is considered [3][7][11], the UK dominates the electronic market over the internet related to the tulip bulb trade of Greek species, and this trend is followed by Dutch nurseries. Perhaps this dominance reflects the long-standing tradition of home gardening in UK and the developed industry [7]. In total, 11 Greek tulip species are readily available as bulbs over the internet; 10 of them are traded globally by 13 UK nurseries, five species are supplied from nine Dutch nurseries and two from others that are located in the USA (Table 1).

Table 1. Overview of the electronic trade and ex situ conservation of the 15 wild-growing Greek tulips (chorology, endemism, and protection status according to the official Vascular flora of Greece (http://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/ (accessed on 13 March 2021)) as well as species’ extinction risk assessments [25][26][27] and currently acquired accessions for their sustainable exploitation in the frame of the project TULIPS.GR.

Tulips (Tulipa spp.) Endemism Extinction Risk/Protection Status Nurseries/Countries BGs/Countries Accs/Wild
T. agenensis Irano-Turanian No/GPD 2/1 9/6 1/1
T. australis Mediterranean-SW Asiatic No/GPD 5/1 4/4 3/2
T. bakeri Greek (Cr) CR [27]/GPD 13/2 3/1 3/2
T. bithynica Balkan-Anatolia No/GPD No 1/1 1/1
T. clusiana Irano-Turanian No/GPD 8/2 22/9 2/1
T. cretica Greek (Cr) EN [27], *LC/GPD 3/1 9/5 4/3
T. doerfleri Greek (Cr) CR [27], VU [26]/GPD 1/1 2/2 2/2
T. goulimyi Greek (Cr, Pe) VU [25][27]/GPD No 2/2 4/3
T. hageri Greek (StE, Pe) EN [27], *DD/GPD 4/2 9/6 No
T. orphanidea Greek (StE, Pe) EN [27]/GPD 8/2 15/8 4/3
T. radii East Mediterranean No/GPD 1/1 2/2 3/3
T. rhodopea Balkan No/GPD No 2/2 2/2
T. saxatilis South Aegean subendemic No/GPD 7/2 26/12 5/4
T. scardica Balkan No/GPD No 2/2 No
T. undulatifolia Balkan-Anatolia VU [25]/GPD 2/1 8/7 4/4

Phytogeographical regions of Greece—StE: Sterea Ellada; Pe: Peloponnese; Cr: Crete; CR: Critically Endangered; EN: Endangered; VU: vulnerable; DD: data deficient; LC: least concern (according to criteria of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature) [25][26][27]; * Global IUCN Red List (www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 13 March 2021)); No: absence of information; GPD: Included in the Greek Presidential Decree 67/1981; BG: Botanic gardens; Accs: Total accessions documented; Wild: independent collections from a wild-growing population in a given locality.

Bulbs of most of the Greek tulip species are actually sold out every season according to the nurseries’ websites (namely stated as “out of stock”). As anticipated [3][7][11], it was not possible to determine the extent of this e-trade in terms of quantities dispatched [3][11][17]. Regularly, on the webpages of more than half of the nurseries involved there are specific “want lists” or “wish lists” (>15 nurseries) to inform customers promptly in order for the nurseries to be able to schedule and dispatch the requested materials. On the other hand, this also means that the customer may request a certain species that might not be available on the nurseries’ websites. Based on these demands, the nurseries are supposed to try to find and deliver the requested materials, either from collaborating nurseries or elsewhere [3][7][11]. None of these nurseries inform, however, about the original provenance of the traded materials. In this way, it is not known whether the traded plants are raised yearly from initial cultivated stocks, or if these materials have been sourced or collected directly or partly from wild habitats (some of them or sometimes). Of course, no nursery webpage states how and when the initial plant material (mother plants) was obtained. At least some of the nurseries’ websites state that they make regular collecting trips around the world [11], e.g., https://seedsofpeace.info/ (accessed on 13 March 2021). To this end, it has been suggested that perhaps a network of local collaborating collectors is activated upon such requests to try to find the selected materials, however without any authorization to collect and purchase tulip bulbs and/or seeds (see discussion in [3][7][11]). When true, such pressure exerted on local endemic and/or threatened species may have devastating effects on wild-growing populations.

There is a wide variety of prices for dispatched quantities (5–1000 bulbs) ranging from £0.16–0.50/bulb for the protected T. bakeri A. D. Hall which is a Cretan single-island endemic (e.g., https://www.rosecottageplants.co.uk/tulipa-bakeri-lilac-wonder/p525 (accessed on 13 March 2021)) to £1.50/bulb and £2.60/bulb for T. clusiana DC. and T. australis Link, respectively (1 £ = 1.16 € as of 1/3/2021).

Greek tulip seeds are rather hard to find over the internet, and when these are located, they are quite a lot more expensive in respect to bulbs. For example, the Mediterranean T. australis is currently available as seeds (packet) in UK at £2.85. The Irano-Turanian T. agenensis DC. as well as the protected and threatened (Table 1) Cretan endemics T. bakeri https://seedsofpeace.info/product/tulipa-bakeri/ (accessed on 13 March 2021)) and T. cretica Boiss. & Heldr. (https://seedsofpeace.info/product/tulipa-cretica/ (accessed on 13 March 2021)) are to be found only in an Israeli nursery; seeds of each of these three tulips are sold at 5 € for 10, 12 or 15 individual seeds, respectively. This high price of 0.3–0.5 € per individual seed is almost equivalent sometimes to that of the traded individual bulb (compare with above-mentioned prices of T. bakeri).

To date, we detected no availability over the internet regarding seeds for 11 of the Greek tulips (73.33%). Likewise, no bulbs were found as currently traded for 26.67% of the Greek tulips, i.e., the protected local Balkan subendemic T. bithynica Baker, the protected and threatened Greek endemic T. goulimyi Sealy & Turrill and the protected local Balkan endemics T. rhodopea (Velen.) Velen and T. scardica Bornm. (Table 1).

3. Current Sustainable Exploitation Challenges

The newly launched research project TULIPS.GR is focused on the ex situ conservation, domestication and sustainable exploitation of the 15 wild-growing Greek tulips. To this end, an integrated approach is followed beginning with well-documented collections performed with an authorized collection permit issued by the Greek ministry of Environment and Energy. Initially, as a first step towards the creation of a national collection of Greek tulips, the project has already documented and incorporated under ex situ conservation 12 accessions of eight wild-growing Greek tulips which were collected directly from wild-growing populations (Table 1Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 and Figure 4), prioritizing the nationally threatened species [25][26][27]. In an attempt to increase the genetic variability of Greek tulip germplasm, the project aims to collect over the next three years selected propagation material from as many spontaneous populations as possible, covering all wild-growing Greek tulip species.

Figure 1. Wild-growing Greek tulips endemic to the island of Crete and individual bulbs collected for ex situ conservation in the frame of TULIPS.GR: (ATulipa bakeri and (BT. doerfleri assessed as Critically Endangered [27], and (CT. cretica (photo: V. Papiomytoglou) assessed as Endangered [27].

Figure 2. Wild-growing, range-restricted Greek tulips and individual bulbs collected for ex situ conservation in the frame of TULIPS.GR: (ATulipa bithynica and (BT. rhodopea endemic to southern Balkans and/or Anatolia (Balkan subendemic); (CT. saxatilis (photo: M. Avramakis, Natural History Museum of Crete) endemic to major south Aegean islands (Crete, Karpathos, Rhodes) and south-western Turkey (south Aegean subendemic).

Figure 3. (A) Wild-growing individuals of the Mediterranean Tulipa australis at the summit area of Mt Vermion, Northern Greece; (B) underground individual bulb; and (C) repatriated well-documented bulbs of the same species from the Gothenburg Botanical Garden, Sweden that were originally collected close to the summit area of Mt Vourinos, northern Greece in 2001.

Figure 4. Dormant bulbs and capsules with ripe seeds collected for ex situ conservation from wild-growing and protected populations of Greek tulip species assessed as threatened with extinction [25][27]: (AT. goulimyi, a local endemic of Peloponnese, Kythira-Antikythira and west Crete, assessed as Endangered [27]; (BT. undulatifolia, an endemic to Southern Balkans and west and central Anatolia (Turkey), assessed as Vulnerable [25].

Additionally, a repatriation initiative has been launched through the Balkan Botanic Garden of Kroussia (BBGK), Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources (Agricultural Organization Demeter) concerning the range-restricted and local endemic species of Greek tulips. This procedure involved personalised letters sent by e-mail to the curators of a dozen BGs holding Greek tulip species. However, almost none responded positively in this call by informing explicitly about the stored materials. However, the Gothenburg BG in Sweden responded immediately to this call by sending 20 well-documented accessions of nine Greek tulip species for repatriation in the BBGK; these materials were added to the new Greek national collection (Table 1Figure 3). The repatriated materials from Sweden had been originally collected in the Greek territory at earlier times (1984–2009) by various famous botanists (e.g., A. Strid), and are currently under duplicated ex situ conservation for safety reasons (Swedish and Greek BGs). Some of the BGs contacted to date are not yet in a position of repatriating bulbs or seeds from tulips of Greek origin; however, some of these (e.g., Cambridge University BG) have already flagged their materials in order to be able to respond in the future. Additional requests will be made in the near future to more BGs holding accessions of tulips collected from Greece.

Furthermore, in an attempt to avoid trivial trial-and-error losses during propagation and cultivation procedures with domestic valuable phytogenetic resources, the selected material of five Greek tulip species (T. australis, T. bakeri, T. cretica, T. orphanidea, T. saxatilis) has already been purchased from specialized nurseries. This material has been obtained for e-commerce verification serving documentation purposes, and it will be used for basic experimentation and species-specific comparisons with wild type materials by molecular barcoding in the frame of TULIPS.GR (Table 1).

Overall, 38 documented accessions of 13 Greek tulip species are currently under evaluation in the frame of TULIPS.GR, 82% originating from the wild-growing populations of Greece. The experimentation in progress includes the development of species-specific propagation and cultivation protocols, study of mycorrhizal diversity, foliar symptoms diagnostics, fertilization regimes with innovative domestic organic fertilizers produced by Theofrastos company (https://theofrastos.com/en/theofrastos-liquid-organic-fertilizers/; accessed on 13 March 2021), as well as the development of a strategy for postharvest treatment.

References

  1. Sajeva, M.; Augugliaro, C.; Smith, M.J.; Oddo, E. Regulating Internet trade in CITES species. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27, 429–430.
  2. Shirey, P.D.; Kunycky, B.N.; Chaloner, D.T.; Brueseke, M.A.; Lamberti, G.A. Commercial trade of federally listed threatened and endangered plants in the United States. Conserv. Lett. 2013, 6, 300–316.
  3. Krigas, N.; Menteli, V.; Vokou, D. The electronic trade in Greek endemic plants: Biodiversity, commercial and legal aspects. Econ. Bot. 2014, 68, 85–95.
  4. Lavorgna, A. Wildlife trafficking in the Internet age. Crime Sci. 2014, 3, 5.
  5. Olmos-Lau, V.R.; Mandujano, M.C. An open door for illegal trade: Online sale of Strombocactus disciformis (Cactaceae). Nat. Conserv. 2016, 15, 1–9.
  6. Hensley, A.; Roberts, D.L. Assessing the extent of access and benefit sharing in the wildlife trade: Lessons from horticultural orchids in Southeast Asia. Environ. Conserv. 2017, 45, 261–268.
  7. Krigas, N.; Menteli, V.; Chrysanthou, P.; Vokou, D. The electronic trade in endemic plants of Cyprus through the Internet. Plant Biosyst. 2017, 151, 387–393.
  8. Vaglica, V.; Sajeva, M.; Mc Gough, H.N.; Hutchison, D.; Russo, C.; Gordon, A.D.; Ramarosandratana, A.V.; Stuppy, W.; Smith, M.J. Monitoring internet trade to inform species conservation actions. Endang. Species Res. 2017, 32, 223–235.
  9. Hensley, A.; De Boer, H.J.; Fay, M.F.; Gale, S.W.; Gardiner, L.M.; Gunasekara, R.S.; Kumar, P.; Masters, S.; Metusala, D.; Roberts, D.L.; et al. A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 186, 435–455.
  10. Hensley, A.; Lee, T.E.; Harrison, J.R.; Roberts, D.L. Estimating the extent and structure of trade in horticultural orchids via social media. Conserv. Biol. 2016, 30, 1038–1047.
  11. Menteli, V.; Krigas, N.; Avramakis, M.; Turalnd, N.; Vokou, D. Endemic plants of Crete in electronic trade and wildlife tourism: Current patterns and implications for conservation. J. Biol. Res. Thessalon. 2019, 26, 10.
  12. Krigas, N.; Tsoktouridis, G.; Anestis, I.; Khabbach, A.; Libiad, M.; Megdiche-Ksouri, W.; Ghrabi-Gammar, Z.; Lamchouri, F.; Tsiripidis, I.; Tsiafouli, M.A.; et al. Exploring the potential of neglected local endemic plants of three Mediterranean regions in the ornamental sector: Value chain feasibility and readiness timescale for their sustainable exploitation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2539.
  13. Sharrock, S.; Jones, M. Saving Europe’s threatened flora: Progress towards GSPC Target 8 in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20, 325–333.
  14. Krigas, N.; Menteli, V.; Vokou, D. Analysis of the ex-situ conservation of the Greek endemic flora at national European and global scales and of its effectiveness in meeting GSPC Target 8. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 573–582.
  15. Kell, S.P.; Knüpffer, H.; Jury, S.L.; Ford-Lloyd, B.V.; Maxted, N. Crops and wild relatives of the Euro-Mediterranean region: Making and using a conservation catalogue. In Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use; Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Kell, S.P., Iriondo, J., Dulloo, E., Turok, J., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2008.
  16. Perrino, E.V.; Wagensommer, R.P. Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) Priority in Italy: Distribution, Ecology, In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation and Expected Actions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1682.
  17. Phillips, O.L.; Meilleur, B. Usefulness and economic potential of the rare plants of the United States: A status survey. Econ. Bot. 1998, 52, 57–67.
  18. Medail, F. The specific vulnerablility of plant biodiversity and vegetation on Mediterranean islands in the face of global change. Reg. Environm. Chang. 2017, 17, 1775–1790.
  19. Moreno Saiz, J.C.; Lozano, F.D.; Gomez, M.M.; Baudet, A.B. Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants. Conserv. Biol. 2015, 29, 910–919.
  20. Underwood, E.C.; Viers, J.H.; Klausmeyer, K.R.; Cox, R.L.; Shaw, M.R. Threats and biodiversity in the Mediterranean biome. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15, 188–197.
  21. Bilz, M.; Kell, S.P.; Maxted, N.; Lansdown, V.R. European Red List of Vascular Plants; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2011.
  22. Grigoriadou, K.; Sarropoulou, V.; Krigas, N.; Maloupa, E.; Tsoktouridis, G. GIS-facilitated effective propagation protocols of the endangered local endemic of Crete Carlina diae (Rech. f.) Meusel and A. Kástner (Asteraceae): Serving ex situ conservation needs and its future sustainable utilization as an ornamental. Plants 2020, 9, 1465.
  23. Tsoktouridis, G.; Krigas, N.; Sarropoulou, V.; Papanastasi, K.; Grigoriadou, K.; Maloupa, E. Micropropagation and molecular characterization of Thymus sibthorpii Benth. (Lamiaceae), an aromatic-medicinal thyme with ornamental value and conservation concern. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 55, 647–658.
  24. RoyalFloraHolland. Digital Annual Report 2017. Available online: (accessed on 14 February 2021).
  25. Phitos, D.; Strid, A.; Snogerup, S.; Greuter, W. The Red Data Book of Rare and Threatened Plants of Greece; World Wide Fund for Nature: Gland, Switzerland, 1995; ISBN 9789607506047.
  26. Phitos, D.; Constantinidis, T.H.; Kamari, G. The Red Data Book of Rare and Threatened Plants of Greece; Hellenic Βotanical Society: Patra, Greece, 2009; Volume II, ISBN 978-960-9407-09-0.
  27. Kougioumoutzis, K.; Kokkoris, I.P.; Panitsa, M.; Strid, A.; Dimopoulos, P. Extinction risk assessment of the Greek endemic flora. Biology 2021, 10, 195.
More
Information
Subjects: Plant Sciences
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 508
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 15 Apr 2021
1000/1000