1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Ischemia and Reperfusion

    View times: 204
    Submitted by:


    Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) causes a reduction in arterial blood supply to tissues, followed by the restoration of perfusion and consequent reoxygenation. The reestablishment of blood flow triggers further damage to the ischemic tissue through reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, interference with cellular ion homeostasis, and inflammatory responses to cell death. In normal conditions, ROS mediate important beneficial responses. When their production is prolonged or elevated, harmful events are observed with peculiar cellular changes. In particular, during I/R, ROS stimulate tissue inflammation and induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation. The mechanisms underlying the activation of NLRP3 are several and not completely elucidated. It was recently shown that NLRP3 might sense directly the presence of ROS produced by normal or malfunctioning mitochondria or indirectly by other activators of NLRP3. Aim of the present review is to describe the current knowledge on the role of NLRP3 in some organs (brain, heart, kidney, and testis) after I/R injury, with particular regard to the role played by ROS in its activation. Furthermore, as no specific therapy for the prevention or treatment of the high mortality and morbidity associated with I/R is available, the state of the art of the development of novel therapeutic approaches is illustrated.

    1. Introduction

    The term ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) indicates a reduction of arterial blood supply to tissues followed by the restoration of perfusion and consequent reoxygenation [1]. In humans, ischemia, with the consequent fall in blood supply, is generally induced by the presence of an arterial embolus, which induces a severe tissue hypoxia in a coexistent inflammatory environment secondary to different risk factors, such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and aging. Experimental studies examining the mechanisms and the consequences of I/R use surgical methods to block specific vessels in otherwise healthy animals [2], therefore, these models are indicated to better understand the mechanisms involved in the injury induced by I/R.

    The restoration of blood flow causes further damage to the ischemic tissue through neutrophil infiltration, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, deregulation of cellular ion homeostasis, and cell death with consequent inflammatory responses. Furthermore, in addition to local damage, I/R can also induce deleterious remote effects, resulting in the development of systemic inflammatory responses and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [3].

    Reperfusion is characterized by an early and a late phase, during which, due to reduced adenylate cyclase activity and intracellular cAMP levels, free radicals, such as ROS, are generated [4], and the mechanisms of cell death are triggered.

    ROS are free radicals containing the oxygen atom, among which there are hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2 ∙−), and hydroxyl radical (OH). They originate mainly within the mitochondria, as a bioproduct of oxygen metabolism, but can also be generated by cellular enzymes, including lipoxygenase (LOX) and cyclooxygenase (COX) [5].

    Under normal conditions, ROS have beneficial effects, as they regulate several important, physiological responses by redox-responsive signaling pathways. In fact, ROS control cellular growth, differentiation, and migration, regulate the vascular tone and cellular adhesion, contribute to the production of iNOS at transcriptional and posttranscriptional level by redox-dependent Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB) or mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs), and modulate immune response and control angiogenesis and apoptosis [5][6][7].

    When ROS production is prolonged or elevated, detrimental events are observed with peculiar changes in cellular proteins, lipids, and ribonucleic acids, leading to cell dysfunction or death. Several enzymes with antioxidant activity are involved in neutralizing ROS: among them, superoxide dismutase (SOD), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), glutathione (GSH), glutathione reductase (GSSG-Rd), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and catalase (CAT) are included [8]. All these antioxidant systems are differently expressed in various organs. In fact, the GSH system shows moderate concentrations in kidney, heart, and brain, while GGT, GSSG-Rd, SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px are highest in the kidney, when compared to the brain [9], the heart [10], and the testis [10]. In addition, the antioxidant systems are differentially expressed in adult organs and in various embryonic stages [10].

    The imbalance between ROS formation and the detoxifying action of these oxidizing radicals induces a cellular condition, called oxidative stress [11]. In particular, ROS, during I/R, promote tissue inflammation and activate immune response through NLRP3 inflammasome [11] (Figure 1).

    An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is OMCL2016-2183026.001.jpg

    Schematic representation of ischemia/reperfusion injury and of potential therapeutic strategies to modulate oxidative stress and/or related NLRP3 activation.

    The innate immune system is based on pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) to sense pathogenic microbes and other endogenous or exogenous pathogens, such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). These immune activators initiate and regulate innate immune responses when identified by several classes of PRRs, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), Nod-like receptors (NLRs), AIM2-like receptors (ALRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and other DNA sensors [12][13]. PRRs trigger the activation of specific signaling pathways, which induce the production of many proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and present antigens to the adaptive immune system for long-lasting protection.

    NLRs form a large protein family of intracellular sensors, the members of which share a conserved central nucleotide-binding, oligomerization domain (NOD), a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region, and a variable N-terminal effector domain [14][15]. The family members of inflammasome are numerous [16], but NLRP3 inflammasome is the best characterized.

    In a series of experimental models in vitro [17][18], it was shown that two different steps, controlled by two different mechanisms, are required for the activation of NLRP3. The former is driven at transcriptional level by NF-κB, whose increased production in I/R injury is activated via TLR signaling through Myd88-dependent pathways, with the subsequent stimulation of interleukin- (IL-) 1β and IL-18 gene expression [19][20]. The latter is induced at posttranscriptional level and consists in the activation of NLRP3, driven by many activators, such as ROS in I/R injury [21].

    When activated, the NLRP3 inflammasome is formed by the NLRP3 protein belonging to the family of NLRs, by the adapter protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC), and by the procaspase-1 [15]. The assembly of NLRP3 moves procaspase-1 molecules near enough to transform them into active fragments [21], so that the conversion of the immature proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 to their active forms is induced [22][23]. These cytokines then initiate or amplify diverse downstream signaling pathways and drive proinflammatory processes [24], leading to cellular damage, such as autophagy and pyroptosis [22]. The former is a process of self-degradation of parts of the cells through sequestering of organelles or parts of the cytoplasm and subsequent fusion with lysosomes [25]. Pyroptosis is a programmed cell death with loss of the cellular membrane integrity, differently from apoptosis, associated with IL-1β and IL-18 secretion; for this reason, it is considered an inflammatory form of cell death [26]. NLRP3 activation is able to promote also the initiation and the progression of different autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases, such as metabolic disorders, inflammatory bowel syndrome [15], obesity, and cognitive diseases [27].

    The mechanisms driving the activation of NLRP3, that is, NLRP3 oligomerization, ASC recruitment, and caspase-1 activation, are generally classified as noncanonical and canonical. The noncanonical pathway involves caspase-4 and caspase-5 in human cells and caspase-11 in mice and is activated by the identification of cell wall ligands, such as LPS, from phagocytized bacteria [28]. The canonical pathway is based on the recognition of general cellular stress, such as the oxidative stress induced by I/R, bacterial toxins, and particulate substances [28]. Recent studies showed that NLRP3 might sense the presence of ROS produced into the same cell by normal or malfunctioning mitochondria [29]. In particular, it was proposed that increased ROS are sensed by a complex of TRX and TRX-interacting protein (TXNIP) and induce the dissociation of the complex. In normal cells, TXNIP is constitutively connected to and kept in the reduced state by the ubiquitous TRX [30]. Following an increase in cellular ROS concentration, this complex dissociates and TXNIP binds to the LRR region of NLRP3, leading to NLRP3 activation [31].

    Given the growing evidence that NLRP3 inflammasome activation is involved in many systemic diseases [32][33] and considering that conflicting data exist with respect to I/R injury, the present review was aimed to evaluate the current knowledge on the role of NLRP3 in some organs (brain, heart, kidney, and testis) after I/R injury, with particular regard to the role played by ROS in its activation. Furthermore, as no specific therapy exists for the prevention or treatment of the great mortality and morbidity associated with I/R, the state of the art of the development of therapeutic strategies was also evaluated.

    2. ROS and NLRP3 in I/R Injury of the Brain

    It is well known that reperfusion may exacerbate the brain injury initially caused by ischemia, producing an I/R injury [3]. Among the various underlying mechanisms of stroke, inflammation and oxidative stress are implicated in the pathogenesis of brain I/R, and an adequate regulation of inflammatory level may play a critical role in the prevention and treatment of stroke [34]. In the last years, the role of inflammasomes, particularly NLRP3, has been recognized in postischemic inflammation after stroke. Since the inflammasome initiates inflammation, modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome can regulate inflammatory response. However, from a molecular point of view, NLRP3 inflammasome pathway can be activated by a variety of molecular signaling systems in I/R brain and many mechanisms have not been fully defined yet.

    IL-1β is a crucial contributor to excitotoxic and ischemic brain injury and central inflammatory responses [35][36]. Specifically, this cytokine is produced during a central nervous system disease or after a brain injury by macrophages or microglial cells [37] and molecular mediators as mitochondria-derived ROS and lysosomal protease cathepsin B are necessary for the microglial cell production of interleukin-1β [38].

    So far, NLRP3 inflammasome dependent responses in vitro are linked to an initial stimulus by a pathogen or damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [18][39][40]. Recently, it has been shown that DAMPs could induce inflammatory responses through the production of IL-6 and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1) and the release of cathepsin B, in the absence of any bacterial infection or products in cultured mouse mixed glia [41]. Savage and coworkers [41] also revealed that IL-1 production contributed to increase of IL-6 and CXCL1 levels following cerebral ischemia by middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice, confirming that DAMPs amplify brain inflammation by directly stimulating production of glial derived inflammatory mediators. In this context, acute phase protein serum amyloid A could act as a priming stimulus on glial cells [41]. Together, these data add new helpful information on molecular pathways of brain inflammation and/or ischemic brain damage that involve glial cells and NLRP3 inflammasome-activating DAMPs, in the absence of cell priming and in the presence of a relevant endogenous priming stimulus, leading thus to new interesting perspectives from a therapeutic point of view.

    So far, a number of recent studies focused on pathophysiological mechanism and/or potential therapeutic strategy to modulate inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways involving NLRP3 inflammasome in stroke brain damage (Figure 1).

    Indeed, the expression pattern of the NLRP3 inflammasome in primary cortical neurons subjected to simulated ischemia, in a mouse model of focal ischemic stroke, and in brain tissue samples from stroke patients has been described [42]. Interestingly, these authors showed that intravenous immunoglobulin treatment protected brain cells in experimental stroke models by a mechanism involving suppression of NLRP3 activity [42].

    Likewise, another interesting paper of Fann et al. [43] reported that 16 hours of food deprivation, daily, for 4 months, can attenuate the inflammatory response and tissue damage following focal ischemic stroke in mice through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activity. Moreover, NLRP3 deficiency ameliorates neurovascular damage in experimental ischemic stroke [44].

    Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a tyrosine kinase involved in NLRP3 inflammasome activation leading, in turn, to caspase-1 activation and mature IL-1β production in the ischemic brain [45]. Interestingly, Ito and coworkers [45] showed that ibrutinib (PCI-32765), a potent BTK inhibitor [46], suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome signal in a focal brain I/R model. Specifically, ibrutinib exerts neuroprotective effects through the suppression of IL-1β maturation in infiltrating macrophages and neutrophils in the infarcted area.

    As mentioned before, oxidative stress is a crucial hallmark in the pathophysiology of brain damage after stroke. To this purpose, it has been indicated that ROS are proximal signals for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in inflammatory diseases [47]. Experimental evidences demonstrate that an increase in ROS concentration following cellular stress leads to TRX oxidation, TXNIP recruitment of NLRP3, and consequent NLRP3 activation [48]. In fact, the action of curcumin in the hippocampus subjected to glutamate neurotoxicity was recently demonstrated [48]; in vitro and in vivo results showed that curcumin attenuated glutamate neurotoxicity by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated TXNIP/NLRP3 activation via the regulation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and thereby protected the hippocampus from ischemic insult [48].

    Umbelliferone (UMB) is a natural compound belonging to the coumarin family with antioxidant properties. As a matter of fact, in an interesting paper of Wang et al. [49], pretreatment with UMB ameliorated the neurological outcomes, the infarct volume, and the brain edema in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia induced by middle cerebral artery I/R. These results indicate that UMB exerts partly these neuroprotective effects through the inhibition of TXNIP/NLRP3 signal. Moreover, another study suggests that TXNIP plays a critical role in acute ischemic stroke because it is directly linked to redox imbalance and NLRP3 activation. The latter also suggests the importance of the antioxidant effect of resveratrol on the TRX/TXNIP system in mice subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion [50].

    Recently, it has been shown that A151, a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing multiple telemeric TTAGGG motifs, reduces ischemic brain damage and NLRP3 mRNA levels in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats submitted to permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion [51].

    Collectively, these data strongly confirmed that NLRP3 represents a potential therapeutic target in the management of ischemic stroke. Therefore, an appropriate treatment of brain I/R injury with compounds showing anti-inflammatory/antioxidant activity and targeting different and complex molecular pathways, also including NLRP3 activation, remains a big therapeutic challenge in translational medicine. In fact, it is nowadays difficult to establish the appropriate timing about their use and/or the duration of treatment to counteract the brain parenchymal damage in the setting of I/R injury.

    3. ROS and NLRP3 in I/R Injury of the Heart

    Myocardial I/R injury is a pathological process causing cardiac cells necrosis and apoptosis, in particular when the coronary perfusion is restored [52].

    A large number of studies have demonstrated an increased ROS formation either during the ischemic phase or during the reperfusion period. Excessive ROS induce cell injury by disrupting cellular signaling transduction, activating inflammation factors, and inducing lipid peroxidation [53] and even cell death [54]. Additionally, ROS have been identified as an important NLRP3 inflammasome activator in cardiac diseases [55].

    When activated, NLRP3 forms an inflammasome complex with the adaptor molecule ASC, thus controlling the activation of caspase-1; the latter cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into the biologically active forms, thus initiating the sterile inflammatory disease [56]. In a recent work [52], KO mice for NLRP3 showed larger infarct size than wild type, so a protective role of NLRP3 inflammasome was suggested. However, the results of the study were critically discussed and disproved by Toldo et al [57].

    IL-1β and ASC are key players in I/R injury as they are important and early mediators of the inflammatory response in myocardial I/R injury (Figure 1). In fact, ASC deletion and IL-1β inhibition protect the myocardium from I/R injury in mice [58][59]. In myocardial I/R injury, an important role is played also by IL-18, whose expression is stimulated in cardiomyocytes by ROS [60]. Specifically, IL-18 may induce myocardial injury through the induction of inflammation, increased apoptosis, and changes in calcium overload [61]. The administration of human myocardiocytes of IL-18 binding protein, a potent inhibitor of IL-18 activity, improved contractile function [58] and showed a protective role in the cardiac inflammatory response against I/R injury in mice [62]. Similarly, the treatment of mice with IL-18 neutralizing antibodies prior to I/R injury reduced the infarct size [60].

    As to the mechanisms by which ROS induce inflammasome activation in the heart, many doubts are still present. TXNIP is ubiquitously expressed in normal tissues and is an endogenous inhibitor of TRX as, when directly connected, it prevents TRX activity to scavenge ROS [63]. Therefore, TXNIP KO mice showed a protection from I/R injury in cardiomyocytes [64]. However, the mechanism by which TXNIP mediates cardiac injury is still not clear. Recently, in myocardial I/R injury a role of TXNIP in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome was proposed through a direct interaction in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells, after intramyocardial administration of NLRP3 and TXNIP siRNA and of BAY 11-7028, an inflammasome inhibitor [63] (Figure 1).

    Many clinical studies examined the role of antioxidants in ROS-mediated I/R injury through the administration of antioxidant drugs after thrombolysis, but the results were not positive in reducing infarct size or enhancing heart function [65]. On the contrary, in mice KO for NADPH oxidases (Nox) 2 and 4, contributing to part of ROS production during I/R injury, a reduction in ROS production and a decrease of the infarct size were observed after I/R [66]. However, it was suggested that a total inhibition of Nox is not positive as it is involved in the physiological and beneficial production of ROS [66]. Among antioxidant drugs, resveratrol protects the heart during I/R injury by inhibition of NALP3 inflammasome and ROS production [67] (Figure 1).

    4. ROS and NLRP3 in I/R Injury of the Kidney

    I/R injury is one of the common causes of acute renal failure, thus playing a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality [33]. Kidneys are particularly vulnerable to ischemia; therefore, I/R injury may cause early graft rejection in renal transplantation and induce structural damage after suprarenal aneurysm repair, renal artery reconstruction, contrast agent-induced nephropathy, cardiac arrest, and shock [68]. Even if ischemia initiates a complex, organized series of events, resulting in damage and death of renal cells due to the dramatic decrease in oxygen and nutrition, reperfusion, though essential for tissue survival, determines an exacerbation of tissue injury and a profound inflammatory response, leading to renal dysfunction [1]. Increasing ischemia time worsens the histological changes, which are particularly severe at 24–72 hours after reperfusion.

    Epithelial cells, particularly those of the S3 segment of the proximal tubule in the outer renal medulla, are particularly exposed to both ischemia and reperfusion phases of I/R injury, which can lead to acute tubular necrosis [69][70]; on the contrary, glomerular vessels degeneration was described only in the reperfusion phase [69]. Histopathological evaluation revealed the presence of extensive vascular dilatation, slight interstitial edema, tubular dilatation, tubular cell swelling, brush border, and nuclear loss [71]. Furthermore, I/R injury induces an early infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly neutrophils [72], in addition to the rapid tubular necrosis determining an acute renal dysfunction [73]. However, it was observed that the less I/R-sensitive cells of the distal tubules might have a protective role, leading to reepithelialization of the injured tubules and preventing the progression to chronic kidney disease [74].

    There is now substantial evidence that ROS and NLRP3 inflammasome have a key role, even if not coincident, in the primary mechanism through which I/R induces the above indicated kidney damage.

    In fact, Iyer et al. [75] showed that nonlethal renal I/R injury resulted in a significant upregulation of NLRP3 gene expression, which was accompanied by pronounced acute tubular necrosis. It was suggested that specific forms of cellular injury result in the release of viable mitochondria into the extracellular space, triggering the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, in part through the release of ATP.

    Furthermore, upregulation of NLRP3 activates caspase-1 and, subsequently, IL-1β and IL-18; in addition, caspase-1 induces pyroptosis, a proinflammatory form of programmed cell death, characterized by pores in the plasma membrane at early time points [33].

    Several pharmacological approaches were proposed to reduce the functional and morphological damage induced by I/R in kidney. In particular, the pathways of oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome were examined by the administration of antioxidant drugs or by the study of NLRP3 knock-out (KO) animals (Figure 1).

    As to the drugs acting on the ROS production and/or scavenging in the kidney, the pretreatment with the pineal hormone melatonin had a protective effect against oxidative damage caused by free radicals in a number of models both in vivo and in vitro of I/R injury: in particular, when administered prior to ischemia and immediately before the reperfusion, melatonin reduced the renal structural changes and limited the neutrophils infiltration [69].

    Similar results were obtained from the pretreatment with naringin [76], aqueous garlic extract [77], rutin [78], propofol [79], celastrol [71], and allopurinol and apocynin, administered alone or together [80]; all these therapeutic strategies were based on the antioxidant properties of these substances, which are able to positively act on the exaggerated inflammatory responses and tissue damage dependent on the free radicals production and the inflammatory cells infiltration [53].

    The pretreatment with modified adenovirus expressing IL-13, which is known to display antioxidant properties, diminished renal tubulointerstitial damage and inflammation induced by I/R [81].

    Important data on the mechanisms involved in the I/R of kidney were obtained from the study of KO animals. In fact, in IL-18 KO mice, a reduced tubular damage and higher protection against I/R injury [82] were observed. In NLRP3 KO mice, an increased proliferation of tubular epithelial cells was observed, thus indicating that NLRP3 is detrimental to the repair response after the reperfusion phase of the I/R injury [83]. Similarly, in NLRP3 KO mice following I/R injury, an increased protection from lethal ischemic injury [56] and a reduced tubular necrosis and apoptosis, with consequent repopulation of the tubular epithelium, were observed after the reperfusion phase [84]. On the contrary, when ASC KO mice were examined, the protection from lethal ischemic injury was less pronounced [32][75] and the tubular necrosis and apoptosis were higher and similar to those observed in WT mice [84]. It was evident that, at least in the kidney, the NLRP3 protein, the essential component of the inflammasome, may play an independent role in injury signaling, different from that of the other components of the inflammasome (ASC, caspase-1).

    5. ROS and NLRP3 in I/R Injury of the Testis

    Testis torsion is a testicular lesion typical of the pediatric population and it is representative of the I/R injury observed in other organs [1][85]. Under these circumstances, the testis produces several proinflammatory cytokines, whose increased levels can be considered an indirect evidence of tissue inflammation [86].

    In normal conditions, enzymatic antioxidant defense systems, such as SOD, GPx, and CAT, protect testicular somatic and germinal cells from free radical damage. On the contrary, malondialdehyde (MDA) is an important indicator of lipid peroxidation induced by ROS [87].

    I/R induces early tissue injuries, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [4], and a damaged barrier function of endothelial cells, resulting from reduced adenylate cyclase activity and intracellular cAMP levels. In particular, during I/R, nucleotides in the form of ATP stimulate tissue inflammation and trigger NLRP3 inflammasome [88]. This pathological cascade causes a decreased number of germ cells induced by an enhanced apoptosis, the vacuolization of the seminiferous epithelium, a reduced number of spermatozoa, and a recruitment of neutrophils [89]; at a later stage, testicular atrophy and impaired spermatogenesis are observed [90][91][92].

    In order to prevent testicular I/R injury, the effects of different substances with antioxidant activities and the role of NLRP3 inflammasome have been investigated (Figure 1).

    Among antioxidant substances, lipoic acid (LA) has ROS scavenging and metal chelating ability and regenerates endogenous antioxidants, such as glutathione and vitamins E and C [87]. The pretreatment with LA induced an increase of SOD and GPx activity, reduced MDA levels, and abated cellular damage.

    Similar results have been obtained by the pre- or posttreatment with different antioxidant pharmacological approaches, including taurine [93], dehydroepiandrosterone [94], curcumin [95], Psoralea corylifolia [96], rutin [97], thymoquinone [98], and apocynin [99].

    As to the role of NLRP3 inflammasome, specific inhibitors, such as BAY 11-7082 [100] and Brilliant Blue G (BBG) [101], are able to inhibit its effects in a testicular I/R model [102]. In fact, BAY 11-7082, an I-κB kinase-β inhibitor, and BBG, blocking the membrane-bound purinergic P2X7 receptor, showed a significant reduction of IL-1β and IL-18 mRNA expression, blunted caspase-1 and caspase-3 expression, minor histological damage, low TUNEL activity, and preserved spermatogenesis, indicating a selectively reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activity [102]. It was also observed that NLRP3 KO mice responded to I/R insult with a lower activation of the inflammatory and apoptosis cascade than WT animals.

    Therefore, NLRP3 can be considered an interesting target for innovative drugs aimed at treating I/R injury after testicular torsion.

    6. Conclusions

    The restoration of blood flow as soon as possible is without any doubt the primary therapeutic approach to ischemia, even if reperfusion, although essential to restore oxygen and nutrients supply and to remove potentially harmful products of cellular metabolism, can induce further pathological processes in the same organ and tissue injuries in other organs.

    The main points to be stressed as a conclusion of this review can be summarized as follows:

    1. ROS have beneficial effects, as they regulate several important, physiological responses by redox-responsive signaling pathways, but, during I/R, they promote tissue inflammation and activate immune response through different pathways, including NLRP3 inflammasome.

    2. Not all organs demonstrate equal sensitivity to ischemia [2], the brain being the most sensitive to reductions in its blood supply; all organs demonstrate similar sensitivity to reperfusion injury, whose key events are inflammation and oxidative stress.

    3. The effects of ROS-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation in course of I/R injury in other experimental models are strongly suggested; in fact, by the examination of the existing literature, no data on limb, intestine, and ovary ischemia are present.

    4. In some of the already available experimental models, such as the heart, the testis, and the kidney, further studies using KO mice (NLRP3 or ASC) or antagonists of the NLRP3 cascade are needed to better understand the physiopathological events during I/R injury.

    In conclusion, despite the increased literature of the past decade, a definite comprehension of the role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the host responses to different danger signals is still lacking. A detailed examination of the molecular mechanisms driving NLRP3 inflammasome transcription, assembly, and activation is needed to elucidate these processes in the different organs. This experimental approach, given the role of NLRP3 in several sterile inflammatory diseases, could be the basis for the design and elaboration of novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, thus avoiding the exclusive use of substances with antioxidant activity in patients with ischemic damage.


    I/R: Ischemia and reperfusion
    ROS: Reactive oxygen species
    NLRP3: NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3
    LOX: Lipoxygenase
    COX: Cyclooxygenase
    TRX: Thioredoxin
    CAT: Catalase
    PRRs: Pattern-recognition receptors
    PAMPs: Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
    DAMPs: Damage-associated molecular patterns
    TLRs: Toll-like receptors
    RLRs: RIG-I-like receptors
    NF-κB: Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
    NLRs: Nod-like receptors
    ALRs: AIM2-like receptors
    CLRs: C-type lectin receptors
    IL-1β: Interleukin-1β
    IL-18: Interleukin-18
    TXNIP: TRX-interacting protein
    SOD: Superoxide dismutase
    GPx: Glutathione peroxidase
    MDA: Malondialdehyde
    KO: Knock-out
    BBG: Brilliant Blue G.

    Articles from Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Limited


    1. Eltzschig H. K., Eckle T. Ischemia and reperfusion—from mechanism to translation. Nature Medicine. 2011;17(11):1391–1401. doi: 10.1038/nm.2507.
    2. Kalogeris T., Baines C. P., Krenz M., Korthuis R. J. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 2012;298:229–317. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7.
    3. Carden D. L., Granger D. N. Pathophysiology of ischaemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Pathology. 2000;190(3):255–266. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200002)190:3<255::aid-path526>3.0.co;2-6.
    4. Lei X., Chao H., Zhang Z., et al. Neuroprotective effects of quercetin in a mouse model of brain ischemic/reperfusion injury via anti-apoptotic mechanisms based on the Akt pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2015;12(3):3688–3696. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3857.
    5. Martinon F. Signaling by ROS drives inflammasome activation. European Journal of Immunology. 2010;40(3):616–619. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940168.
    6. Ray P. D., Huang B.-W., Tsuji Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cellular Signalling. 2012;24(5):981–990. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.008.
    7. Valko M., Leibfritz D., Moncol J., Cronin M. T. D., Mazur M., Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2007;39(1):44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001.
    8. Limón-Pacheco J., Gonsebatt M. E. The role of antioxidants and antioxidant-related enzymes in protective responses to environmentally induced oxidative stress. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2009;674(1-2):137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.09.015.
    9. Dringen R. Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain. Progress in Neurobiology. 2000;62(6):649–671. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00060-X.
    10. Jurado J., Prieto-Álamo M.-J., Madrid-Rísquez J., Pueyo C. Absolute gene expression patterns of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin redox systems in mouse. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(46):45546–45554. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m307866200.
    11. Bryant C., Fitzgerald K. A. Molecular mechanisms involved in inflammasome activation. Trends in Cell Biology. 2009;19(9):455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.06.002.
    12. Bourgeois C., Kuchler K. Fungal pathogens-a sweet and sour treat for toll-like receptors. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2012;2:p. 142.
    13. Cui J., Chen Y., Wang H. Y., Wang R.-F. Mechanisms and pathways of innate immune activation and regulation in health and cancer. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2014;10(11):3270–3285. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.979640.
    14. Martinon F., Burns K., Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-β . Molecular Cell. 2002;10(2):417–426. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3.
    15. Shao B. Z., Xu Z. Q., Han B. Z., Su D. F., Liu C. NLRP3 inflammasome and its inhibitors: a review. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2015;6, article 262 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00262.
    16. Ozaki E., Campbell M., Doyle S. L. Targeting The NLRP3 Inflammasome in chronic inflammatory diseases: current perspectives. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2015;8:15–27. doi: 10.2147/jir.s51250.
    17. Kahlenberg J. M., Lundberg K. C., Kertesy S. B., Qu Y., Dubyak G. R. Potentiation of caspase-1 activation by the P2X7 receptor is dependent on TLR signals and requires NF-κB-driven protein synthesis. Journal of Immunology. 2005;175(11):7611–7622. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7611.
    18. Bauernfeind F. G., Horvath G., Stutz A., et al. Cutting edge: NF-κB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. Journal of Immunology. 2009;183(2):787–791. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901363.
    19. Zhao H., Perez J. S., Lu K., George A. J. T., Ma D. Role of toll-like receptor-4 in renal graft ischemia-reperfusion injury. American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology. 2014;306(8):F801–F811. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00469.2013.
    20. Vilahur G., Badimon L. Ischemia/reperfusion activates myocardial innate immune response: the key role of the toll-like receptor. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5, article 496 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00496.
    21. Rubartelli A. Redox control of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in health and disease. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2012;92(5):951–958. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0512265.
    22. Schroder K., Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140(6):821–832. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.040.
    23. Zheng Q., Ren Y., Reinach P. S., et al. Reactive oxygen species activated NLRP3 inflammasomes prime environment-induced murine dry eye. Experimental Eye Research. 2014;125:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.05.001.
    24. Niu L., Zhang S., Wu J., Chen L., Wang Y. Upregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome in the tears and ocular surface of dry eye patients. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126277.e0126277
    25. He C., Klionsky D. J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annual Review of Genetics. 2009;43:67–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910.
    26. Anders H.-J., Muruve D. A. The inflammasomes in kidney disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2011;22(6):1007–1018. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010080798.
    27. Choi A. J. S., Ryter S. W. Inflammasomes: molecular regulation and implications for metabolic and cognitive diseases. Molecules and Cells. 2014;37(6):441–448. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.0104.
    28. Rivers-Auty J., Brough D. Potassium efflux fires the canon: potassium efflux as a common trigger for canonical and noncanonical NLRP3 pathways. European Journal of Immunology. 2015;45(10):2758–2761. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545958.
    29. Gross O., Thomas C. J., Guarda G., Tschopp J. The inflammasome: an integrated view. Immunological Reviews. 2011;243(1):136–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2011.01046.x.
    30. Tschopp J., Schroder K. NLRP3 inflammasome activation: the convergence of multiple signalling pathways on ROS production? Nature Reviews Immunology. 2010;10(3):210–215. doi: 10.1038/nri2725.
    31. Zhou J., Chng W.-J. Roles of thioredoxin binding protein (TXNIP) in oxidative stress, apoptosis and cancer. Mitochondrion. 2013;13(3):163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2012.06.004.
    32. Kim H.-J., Lee D. W., Ravichandran K., et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome knockout mice are protected against ischemic but not cisplatin-induced Acute Kidney Injury. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2013;346(3):465–472. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.205732.
    33. Turner C. M., Arulkumaran N., Singer M., Unwin R. J., Tam F. W. Is the inflammasome a potential therapeutic target in renal disease? BMC Nephrology. 2014;15, article 21 doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-21.
    34. Ahmad M., Dar N. J., Bhat Z. S., et al. Inflammation in Ischemic Stroke: mechanisms, consequences and possible drug targets. CNS and Neurological Disorders—Drug Targets. 2014;13(8):1378–1396. doi: 10.2174/1871527313666141023094720.
    35. Marini H., Altavilla D., Bellomo M., et al. Modulation of IL-1 β gene expression by lipid peroxidation inhibition after kainic acid-induced rat brain injury. Experimental Neurology. 2004;188(1):178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.03.023.
    36. Fogal B., Hewett S. J. Interleukin-1β: a bridge between inflammation and excitotoxicity? Journal of Neurochemistry. 2008;106(1):1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05315.x.
    37. Denes A., Thornton P., Rothwell N. J., Allan S. M. Inflammation and brain injury: acute cerebral ischaemia, peripheral, and central inflammation. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2010;24(5):708–723. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.09.010.
    38. von Bernhardi R., Eugenín-von Bernhardi L., Eugenín J. Microglial cell dysregulation in brain aging and neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2015;7, article 124 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00124.
    39. Brough D., Le Feuvre R. A., Iwakura Y., Rothwell N. J. Purinergic (P2X7) receptor activation of microglia induces cell death via an interleukin-1-independent mechanism. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 2002;19(2):272–280. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2001.1054.
    40. Hornung V., Latz E. Critical functions of priming and lysosomal damage for NLRP3 activation. European Journal of Immunology. 2010;40(3):620–623. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940185.
    41. Savage C. D., Lopez-Castejon G., Denes A., Brough D. NLRP3-inflammasome activating DAMPs stimulate an inflammatory response in glia in the absence of priming which contributes to brain inflammation after injury. Frontiers in Immunology. 2012;3, article 288 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00288.
    42. Yang-Wei Fann D., Lee S.-Y., Manzanero S., et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin suppresses NLRP1 and NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuronal death in Ischemic Stroke. Cell Death & Disease. 2013;4(9, article e790) doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.326.
    43. Fann D. Y.-W., Santro T., Manzanero S., et al. Intermittent fasting attenuates inflammasome activity in Ischemic Stroke. Experimental Neurology. 2014;257:114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.017.
    44. Yang F., Wang Z., Wei X., et al. NLRP3 deficiency ameliorates neurovascular damage in experimental Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2014;34(4):660–667. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.242.
    45. Ito M., Shichita T., Okada M., et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase is essential for NLRP3 inflammasome activation and contributes to ischaemic brain injury. Nature Communications. 2015;6, article 7360 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8360.
    46. Herrera A. F., Jacobsen E. D. Ibrutinib for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2014;20(21):5365–5371. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0010.
    47. Abderrazak A., Syrovets T., Couchie D., et al. NLRP3 inflammasome: from a danger signal sensor to a regulatory node of oxidative stress and inflammatory diseases. Redox Biology. 2015;4:296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.008.
    48. Li Y., Li J., Li S., et al. Curcumin attenuates glutamate neurotoxicity in the hippocampus by suppression of ER stress-associated TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in a manner dependent on AMPK. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2015;286(1):53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.03.010.
    49. Wang X., Li R., Wang X., Fu Q., Ma S. Umbelliferone ameliorates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via upregulating the PPAR gamma expression and suppressing TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome. Neuroscience Letters. 2015;600:182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.06.016.
    50. Ishrat T., Mohamed I. N., Pillai B., et al. Thioredoxin-interacting protein: a novel target for neuroprotection in experimental thromboembolic Stroke in mice. Molecular Neurobiology. 2015;51(2):766–778. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8766-x.
    51. Zhao J., Mou Y., Bernstock J. D., et al. Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing multiple telemeric TTAGGG motifs suppress inflammasome activity in macrophages subjected to oxygen and glucose deprivation and reduce ischemic brain injury in Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140772.e0140772
    52. Sandanger Ø., Gao E., Ranheim T., et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation during myocardial ischemia reperfusion is cardioprotective. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2016;469(4):1012–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.051.
    53. Davidson S. M., Yellon D. M., Murphy M. P., Duchen M. R. Slow calcium waves and redox changes precede mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening in the intact heart during hypoxia and reoxygenation. Cardiovascular Research. 2012;93(3):445–453. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr349.
    54. Zhan K., Yu P., Liu C., Luo J., Yang W. Detrimental or beneficial: the role of TRPM2 in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2016;37(1):4–12. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.141.
    55. Wang Y., Wu Y., Chen J., Zhao S., Li H. Pirfenidone attenuates cardiac fibrosis in a mouse model of TAC-induced left ventricular remodeling by suppressing NLRP3 Inflammasome formation. Cardiology. 2013;126(1):1–11. doi: 10.1159/000351179.
    56. Takahashi M. Role of the inflammasome in myocardial infarction. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2011;21(2):37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.02.002.
    57. Toldo S., Marchetti C., Abbate A. Re. ‘NLRP3 inflammasome activation during myocardial ischemia reperfusion is cardioprotective’ Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2016;470(4):811–812. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.088.
    58. Pomerantz B. J., Reznikov L. L., Harken A. H., Dinarello C. A. Inhibition of caspase 1 reduces human myocardial ischemic dysfunction via inhibition of IL-18 and IL-1β . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(5):2871–2876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041611398.
    59. Kawaguchi M., Takahashi M., Hata T., et al. Inflammasome activation of cardiac fibroblasts is essential for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circulation. 2011;123(6):594–604. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.982777.
    60. Venkatachalam K., Prabhu S. D., Reddy V. S., Boylston W. H., Valente A. J., Chandrasekar B. Neutralization of interleukin-18 ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial injury. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(12):7853–7865. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m808824200.
    61. Wang M., Markel T. A., Meldrum D. R. Interleukin 18 in the heart. Shock. 2008;30(1):3–10. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e318160f215.
    62. Gu H., Xie M., Xu L., Zheng X., Yang Y., Lv X. The protective role of interleukin-18 binding protein in a murine model of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Transplant International. 2015;28(12):1436–1444. doi: 10.1111/tri.12683.
    63. Liu Y., Lian K., Zhang L., et al. TXNIP mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells as a novel mechanism in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Basic Research in Cardiology. 2014;109(5):p. 415. doi: 10.1007/s00395-014-0415-z.
    64. Yoshioka J., Chutkow W. A., Lee S., et al. Deletion of thioredoxin-interacting protein in mice impairs mitochondrial function but protects the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012;122(1):267–279. doi: 10.1172/jci44927.
    65. Yellon D. M., Hausenloy D. J. Myocardial reperfusion injury. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(11):1074–1135. doi: 10.1056/nejmra071667.
    66. Matsushima S., Kuroda J., Ago T., et al. Broad suppression of NADPH oxidase activity exacerbates ischemia/reperfusion injury through inadvertent downregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α . Circulation Research. 2013;112(8):1135–1149. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.111.300171.
    67. Dong W., Yang R., Yang J., et al. Resveratrol pretreatment protects rat hearts from ischemia/reperfusion injury partly via a NALP3 inflammasome pathway. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2015;8(8):8731–8741.
    68. Tirapelli L. F., Barione D. F., Trazzi B. F. M., et al. Comparison of two models for evaluation histopathology of experimental renal ischemia. Transplantation Proceedings. 2009;41(10):4083–4087. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.061.
    69. Sener G., Sehirli A. Ö., Keyer-Uysal M., Arbak S., Ersoy Y., Yeğen B. Ç. The protective effect of melatonin on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat. Journal of Pineal Research. 2002;32(2):120–126. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-079x.2002.1848.x.
    70. Schrier R. W., Wang W., Poole B., Mitra A. Acute renal failure: definitions, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;114(1):5–14. doi: 10.1172/jci200422353.
    71. Chu C., He W., Kuang Y., Ren K., Gou X. Celastrol protects kidney against ischemia-reperfusion-induced injury in rats. Journal of Surgical Research. 2014;186(1):398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.048.
    72. Friedewald J. J., Rabb H. Inflammatory cells in ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney International. 2004;66(2):486–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_3.x.
    73. Bonventre J. V., Zuk A. Ischemic acute renal failure: an inflammatory disease? Kidney International. 2004;66(2):480–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_2.x.
    74. Gobe G. C., Johnson D. W. Distal tubular epithelial cells of the kidney: potential support for proximal tubular cell survival after renal injury. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2007;39(9):1551–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.04.025.
    75. Iyer S. S., Pulskens W. P., Sadler J. J., et al. Necrotic cells trigger a sterile inflammatory response through The NLRP3 Inflammasome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(48):20388–20393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908698106.
    76. Singh D., Chopra K. The effect of naringin, a bioflavonoid on ischemia-reperfusion induced renal injury in rats. Pharmacological Research. 2004;50(2):187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.01.007.
    77. Kabasakal L., Şehirli Ö., Çetinel Ş., Cikler E., Gedik N., Şener G. Protective effect of aqueous garlic extract against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2005;8(3):319–326. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2005.8.319.
    78. Korkmaz A., Kolankaya D. Protective effect of rutin on the ischemia/reperfusion induced damage in rat kidney. Journal of Surgical Research. 2010;164(2):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.022.
    79. Yang S., Chou W.-P., Pei L. Effects of propofol on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2013;6(5):1177–1183. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1305.
    80. Choi E. K., Jung H., Kwak K. H., et al. Effects of allopurinol and apocynin on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Transplantation Proceedings. 2015;47(6):1633–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.007.
    81. Sandovici M., Henning R. H., van Goor H., Helfrich W., de Zeeuw D., Deelman L. E. Systemic gene therapy with interleukin-13 attenuates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney International. 2008;73(12):1364–1373. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.18.
    82. Wu H., Craft M. L., Wang P., et al. IL-18 contributes to renal damage after ischemia-reperfusion. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2008;19(12):2331–2341. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008020170.
    83. Bakker P. J., Butter L. M., Claessen N., et al. A tissue-specific role for Nlrp3 in tubular epithelial repair after renal ischemia/reperfusion. The American Journal of Pathology. 2014;184(7):2013–2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.04.005.
    84. Shigeoka A. A., Mueller J. L., Kambo A., et al. An inflammasome-independent role for epithelial-expressed Nlrp3 in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Immunology. 2010;185(10):6277–6285. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002330.
    85. Minutoli L., Antonuccio P., Polito F., et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3/mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 activates apoptosis during testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in a nuclear factor-κB-independent manner. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2009;604(1–3):27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.12.028.
    86. Lysiak J. J. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 in the mammalian testis and their involvement in testicular torsion and autoimmune orchitis. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2004;2, article 9 doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-9.
    87. Ozbal S., Ergur B. U., Erbil G., Tekmen I., Bagryank A., Cavdar Z. The effects of α-lipoic acid against testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. The Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:8. doi: 10.1100/2012/489248.489248
    88. Reyes J. G., Farias J. G., Henríquez-Olavarrieta S., et al. The hypoxic testicle: physiology and pathophysiology. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2012;2012:15. doi: 10.1155/2012/929285.929285
    89. Antonuccio P., Minutoli L., Romeo C., et al. Lipid peroxidation activates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Urology. 2006;176(4, part 1):1666–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.086.
    90. Srinivasan A. K., Freyle J., Gitlin J. S., Palmer L. S. Climatic conditions and the risk of testicular torsion in adolescent males. The Journal of Urology. 2007;178(6):2585–2588. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.049.
    91. Minutoli L., Antonuccio P., Squadrito F., et al. Effects of polydeoxyribonucleotide on the histological damage and the altered spermatogenesis induced by testicular ischaemia and reperfusion in rats. International Journal of Andrology. 2012;35(2):133–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01194.x.
    92. Wei S.-M., Yan Z.-Z., Zhou J. Beneficial effect of taurine on testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Urology. 2007;70(6):1237–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.030.
    93. Aksoy H., Yapanoglu T., Aksoy Y., Özbey I., Turhan H., Gursan N. Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment attenuates reperfusion injury after testicular torsion and detorsion in rats. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2007;42(10):1740–1744. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.05.033.
    94. Wei S.-M., Yan Z.-Z., Zhou J. Psoralea corylifolia protects against testicular torsion/detorsion-induced ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011;137(1):568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.06.010.
    95. Wei S.-M., Yan Z.-Z., Zhou J. Protective effect of rutin on testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2011;46(7):1419–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.09.044.
    96. Ayan M., Tas U., Sogut E., et al. Protective effect of thymoquinone against testicular torsion induced oxidative injury. Andrologia. 2016;48(2):143–151. doi: 10.1111/and.12424.
    97. Şener T. E., Yüksel M., Özyılmaz-Yay N., et al. Apocynin attenuates testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2015;50(8):1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.033.
    98. Juliana C., Fernandes-Alnemri T., Wu J., et al. Anti-inflammatory compounds parthenolide and bay 11-7082 are direct inhibitors of the inflammasome. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(13):9792–9802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.082305.
    99. Zhao J., Wang H., Dai C., et al. P2X7 blockade attenuates murine lupus nephritis by inhibiting activation of the NLRP3/ASC/caspase 1 pathway. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2013;65(12):3176–3185. doi: 10.1002/art.38174.
    100. Minutoli L., Antonuccio P., Irrera N., et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome involvement in the organ damage and impaired spermatogenesis induced by testicular ischemia and reperfusion in mice. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2015;355(3):370–380. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.226936.