Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Nutcracker Syndrome

    Subjects: Others
    View times: 12
    Submitted by: Giulio Distefano


    Left renal vein (LRV) entrapment, also known as nutcracker phenomenon if it is asymptomatic, is characterized by abnormality of outflow from the LRV into the inferior vena cava (IVC) due to extrinsic LRV compression, often accompanied by demonstrable lateral (hilar) dilatation and medial (mesoaortic) stenosis. Nutcracker syndrome, on the other hand, includes a well-defined set of symptoms, and the severity of these clinical manifestations is related to the severity of anatomic and hemodynamic findings. 

    1. Introduction

    Left renal vein (LRV) entrapment is an anatomical condition characterized by extrinsic compression of the renal vein and consequent altered outflow in inferior vena cava (IVC), with demonstrable dilation of the hilar region and narrowing of the para-aortic region of the renal vein. The term nutcracker phenomenon is used to refer to this specific anatomical condition when it is not associated with symptoms. Nutcracker syndrome, on the other hand, is the term used to define the LRV entrapment associated with a well-defined set of symptoms, and the severity of these clinical manifestations is related to the severity of anatomic and hemodynamic findings [1][2][3]. There is no unanimous agreement on what symptoms are severe enough to warrant the designation of a clinical syndrome. NS can be caused by compression of the LRV between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)—in this case it will be appropriate to speak of anterior nutcracker syndrome—or by the rarer compression of the LRV between vertebral bodies and the aorta—posterior nutcracker or pseudo-nutcracker syndrome [4].

    2. Pathogenesis and Mechanism of LRV Entrapment

    The LRV is between 6 and 10 cm long, and receives blood from the ipsilateral adrenal gland, gonadal vein(s), and lumbar veins. Along its course (in most cases), the LRV passes inferiorly to the SMA and anterior to the aorta. Anatomic variants of this vascular configuration must be taken into account, since these vessels have valves that prevent blood reflux, allowing the flow only toward the inferior vena cava. Incompetent valves or absent or ectopic venous outlets may increase the pressure within the LRV favoring the reflux. In addition to the anatomic variants, the individual’s somatic characteristics must also be taken into account. Low body mass index is regarded as a risk factor for LRV entrapment [5] because of two different proposed mechanisms both related to paucity of retroperitoneal adipose tissue: it can reduce the meso-aortic angle and it can cause dorsal migration of the kidney and renal pelvis (i.e., posterior renal ptosis) [6].

    NP may also arise due to anatomical variations, such as an LRV that is more cephalic upon union with the inferior vena cava and, as such, is immediately inferior to the SMA or an SMA that instantly descends, determining a very short angle with abdominal aorta.

    In most individuals, the aorto-mesenteric angle (AMA) is between 38° and 65°, while an AMA < 35° is compatible with the anatomical condition underlying the entrapment of the LRV, and may be associated with abnormal outflow from the LRV into the IVC, with a significant increase in the pressure gradient between the LRV and IVC [7]. Other causes of LRV compression include pancreatic neoplasms, para-aortic lymphadenopathy, retroperitoneal tumors, aortic aneurysms, or fibro lymphatic tissue between the SMA and aorta [5], but the terms NP and NS should not be used in connection with the compression of the LRV from these causes [8].

    On the basis of anatomic presentation, the NP is classified into two types: anterior and posterior. Anterior NP is described as a result from compression of the LRV between the SMA and abdominal aorta [9] (Figure 1 and Figure 2), while posterior NP refers to left renal venous hypertension secondary to compression of the retro aortic LRV between the abdominal aorta and the vertebral column [10]. Other rarer forms of entrapment of LRV are possible: Basile et al. described a case of compression of the LRV by an aberrantly ventral right renal artery at the renocaval junction with dilated lumbar varices [11]; Polguj et al. described anatomic variations of the anterior NP in which the compressive component is determined by a right renal artery emerging abnormally [9]. Combined (anterior and posterior) NS was also reported in a patient with duplication of the LRV [12]. Both anatomic configurations can determine a common clinical picture characterized by varicose veins of the renal pelvis and left gonadal vein dilatation. This reflects clinical symptoms quite comparable to flank pain, hematuria, and varicocele or abnormal menstrual bleeding [13].

    Figure 1. 3D volume rendering (VR) contrast enhanced CT scan (portal venous phase) shows the relationships between the aorta, the superior mesenteric artery, and the left renal vein in a patient with nutcracker syndrome; in this acquisition, an initial enhancement of the left gonadal vein is also appreciable, which appears dilated (varicocele).

    Figure 2. A patient with nutcracker syndrome: contrast enhanced CT scan during arterial phase, with sagittal reconstruction; in this image, it is possible to appreciate the entrapment of the left renal vein (white arrow) between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta.

    3. Diagnostic Criteria for NP

    A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with both arterial and portal venous phase or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using angiography sequences can be used to study the anatomy of the LRV and the relationships with the surrounding structures [8][14]. Both tests allow highlighting of the mesenteric artery origin from abdominal aorta and the compression and stenosis of the LRV; coronal and sagittal reconstructions also allow the characterization of the left gonadal vein and collateral circulation with lumbar veins. With sagittal reconstruction, it is possible to evaluate the AMA, which is the angle between the aorta and the SMA; AMA normally range from 38° to 65° [8][15], and is on average lower in patients affected by anterior NS, up to 14.5° [16]. An AMA lower than 35° is compatible with the diagnosis of entrapment of the LRV and, therefore, with NP or NS (Figure 3) [15]. In axial CT images, the most important signs are: the beck sign, which is the stenosis of the LRV between the aorta and the SMA (Figure 4), the beck angle, which is significant for the diagnosis of NP if it is <32° (Figure 5), and finally an LRV diameter ratio (hilar to aorto-mesenteric ratio) more than 4.9, which has a positive predictive value of 100% (Figure 6) [6].

    Figure 3. Patient affected by nutcracker syndrome. The sagittal reconstruction demonstrates an aorto-mesenteric angle of about 33°, lower than the norm (aorto-mesenteric angle normally ranges from 38° to 56°).

    Figure 4. Axial view of contrast enhancement CT scan demonstrating the beak sign (white arrow), caused by the compression of the left renal vein from the aorta and superior mesenteric artery.

    Figure 5. Another nutcracker syndrome patient; in this axial image, it is possible to appreciate a beck angle higher than 32°, suggestive of entrapment of the left renal vein.

    Figure 6. A left renal vein diameter ratio higher than 4.9 is specific for nutcracker syndrome; it is necessary to measure the axial diameter of the renal vein at the renal hilum and in correspondence with the stenosis between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta.

    Important findings demonstrated by MRI closely resemble findings using 3D-CT with similar levels of accuracy (Figure 7), and include dorsolateral torsion of the left kidney, abnormally high course and compression or pre-stenotic dilatation of the LRV, abnormal configuration of SMA, and peri-renal or gonadal vein varices [17][18]. For the posterior NS, obviously, there is not a defined angle criterion [19]. Even an ultrasound examination (US) performed by an expert operator can demonstrate the same specific findings for NP on axial and coronal planes (for example, the beck sign, LRV dilatation, and characteristic LRV diameter radio), and allows the addition of functional characteristics through the eco-color Doppler (ECD-US) evaluation (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Zhang et al. described two ECD criteria for the diagnosis of NS: (1) the flow velocity of stenosis of the LRV in the supine position accelerates remarkably, and the acceleration, which is more than 100 cm/s, is more obvious after the patient has stood for 15 min; and (2) the inner diameter ratio between the renal hilum and stenosis of the LRV in the supine position is >3, and is >5 after the patient has stood for 15 min [18]. As reported by Cheon et al., a peak systolic velocity ratio greater than 4.7 has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90% for diagnosis [20]. It is important to note that US may be the first diagnostic imaging test in outpatients with nephrological symptoms, and may address subsequent investigations. Angiography represents an invasive investigation useful for demonstrating morphological (such as LRV stenosis and dilated collateral vessels) and functional alterations. Retrograde venography is used to measure the reno-caval pressure gradient, and, through the injection of contrast medium, to characterize the dilation of the left gonadal vein and any side of peri-ureteral and pelvic venous circles [1]. The LRV to IVC pressure gradient is less than 1 mm Hg in healthy subjects, and (although a wide range of gradient values has been published) an elevated gradient > 3 mm Hg between the LRV and the IVC can be used as a diagnostic criterion for NCP [21][20][22][23][24][25][26].

    Figure 7. RMI, axial FIESTA sequence, shows the compression of the left renal vein between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery in a patient affected by nutcracker syndrome with flank pain and pelvic congestion syndrome. In this image, the beck sign (white arrow) is highlighted; SMA: superior mesenteric artery, A: aorta, LRV: left renal vein.

    Figure 8. A patient suffering from flank pain, varicocele, and hematuria evaluated at the ultrasound (US) laboratory of the Nephrology and Dialysis Unit. The axial grayscale sonogram demonstrates the anatomical relationships between the left renal vein, aorta, and superior mesenteric artery, with stenosis at the aorto-mesenteric angle (beck sign) and dilation of the hilar section of the left renal vein with a ratio of nutcracker phenomenon. A: aorta, SMA: superior mesenteric artery, LRV: left renal vein, IVC: inferior vena cava, VB: vertebral body, white asterisk: beck sign.

    Figure 9. A rare case of posterior nutcracker syndrome evaluated with US; in this axial image, it is possible to recognize the left renal vein that runs between the abdominal aorta and the vertebral column. A: aorta, LRV: left renal vein, IVC: inferior vena cava, VB: vertebral body.

    According to Hohenfellner, NP is defined when the size of the LRV is reduced by more than 50% as it passes through the aorto-mesenteric clamp [25]. The measurement is made on a longitudinal section of the vein and by measuring the maximum and minimum range. It shall be considered a gauge of 4–5 mm [25]. The reno-caval pull back gradient is helpful in establishing the diagnosis. Some analytical diagnostic parameters have been summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for nutcracker phenomenon; details are given in the text. AMA: aorto-mesenteric angle, CT: computed tomography, ECD-US: eco-color Doppler, IVC: inferior vena cava, LRV: left renal vein, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, NP: nutcracker phenomenon, PVR: peak velocity ratio, US: ultrasound.

    Criterion Instrumental Examination Technique Reference Values Compatible with the Diagnosis of NP References
    AMA CT (post contrast arterial and portal venous phase, sagittal reconstruction), MRI (angiography sequences, sagittal acquisition), US (b-mode, sagittal scans) <35° [15]
    Beck angle CT (post contrast arterial and portal venous phase, axial scans), MRI (angiography sequences, axial acquisition), US (b-mode, axial scans) <32° [6]
    LRV diameter ratio >4.9 [6]
    PVR ECD-US (Doppler sampling in correspondence with the hilar region and stenotic region of the LRV) >4.7 [20]
    LRV to IVC pressure gradient Invasive sampling of venous pressure values in correspondence with the LRV (distal to the stenosis) and in the IVC >3 mmHg [21][20][22][23][24][25][26]

    4. Treatment

    In NS patients, treatment is variable, and conservative management, interventional endovascular approaches, or more invasive surgical treatments are possible; the choice of whether to proceed with invasive treatment or not depends on the severity of the symptoms and clinical signs [27]. Conservative treatment is recommended for patients with modest hematuria and who are under 18 years of age, and any procedure should follow at least six months of conservative follow up [7]; it has been reported that in most patients with mild symptoms, there may be complete spontaneous resolution of symptoms [28]. There is no consensus on recommended pharmacological therapy for patients with NS; in mild cases, no therapy seems to be needed. It appears that renal perfusion could benefit from the administration of aspirin and that the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RAS-I) can help to relieve orthostatic proteinuria; alacepril has been recommended as the best compared with analogous RAS-I [7][28][29].

    When clinical symptoms of NS are not tolerable and result in significant clinical manifestations (chronic pain, recurrent hematuria, pelvic congestion), conservative treatment may not be enough. Many surgical approaches, including medial nephropexy, renal vein bypass, transposition of the left renal vein, transposition of the superior mesenteric artery, gonad-caval bypass, and auto-transplantation of the left kidney, were reported [30][31]. Ullery et al. reported a small experience of transposition of the LRV in pediatric patients with good short-term results [32]. Recently, Yun et al. proposed a new robotic-assisted surgical procedure for transposing the LRV, with encouraging results on a small sample of patients [4]. Despite the surgical approach, hematuria can be persistent, and it may still be necessary to perform a nephrectomy. In this case, renal auto-transplantation, which involves a wider surgical exposure, an additional arterial anastomosis, and longer renal ischemia, is much more invasive than LRV transposition [32].

    Endovascular treatment has now assumed a prominent role. After the first report in 1996 by Neste et al. [33], endovascular surgery becomes more important, because it is a minimally invasive procedure. In a series by Wang et al., 30 patients were treated with a self-expanding nitinol stent and (in three cases) whit gonadal vein embolization; authors declared that technical success was achieved in all of the patients, with improvement of symptoms and without any post-operative complications [34]. Hartung et al. reported a small series of five female patients who were treated for NS, and described that there were two cases of stent dislodgement with secondary recurrence of the symptoms, suggesting use of long stents protruding into the inferior vena cava to prevent this secondary failure of treatment [35]. Basile et al. reported a series of three young patients treated with a nitinol self-expandable stent, with complete resolution of symptoms and a normal CD-US pattern and without complications after a prolonged follow-up (18 months) [36] (Figure 10Figure 11 and Figure 12).

    Figure 10. Patient affected by nutcracker syndrome (with nutcracker phenomenon, flank pain, hematuria, and left varicocele) treated with endovascular procedures; diagnostic phlebography documented a significant stenosis of the left renal vein at the aorto-mesenteric clap; at the stenosis, a stent (visible in the image) dilated with a balloon catheter was released.

    Figure 11. Same patient as the previous figure, re-evaluated a year later for a new episode of hematuria; diagnostic phlebography documents that the stent is in the normal position and is normally patent; collateral circulation or varicose ectasias are not recognizable.

    Figure 12. Patient who previously underwent endovascular treatment with symptom resolution, subjected to imaging investigations for other reasons. Non-contrast axial CT passing through aorto-mesenteric clamp demonstrated the correct positioning of a stent in the left renal vein with resolution of the stenosis.

    In a case of stenosis of the LRV caused by an aberrant right renal artery, double stenting solved retrograde filling of lumbar collaterals [37]. As far as we know, there are no shared guidelines on the most correct methodology for positioning the stents and choosing the right device, but the opinions of experts are reported in the literature based on the available evidence. Policha et al., in order to minimize the risk of stent migration, recommend the use of a stent oversizing of 20% compared to the diameter of the vessel to engage the stent at the level of the first order branch of the renal vein, and the use of balloon-expandable stents over self-expanding stents, while no role is recognized in primary venoplasty [38]; the same authors attempted the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to obtain precise measurements of the LRV, without success [38].

    Many patients refuse an invasive surgical treatment, opting for endovascular procedures. However, these procedures are not free from complications. The most important (for incidence and potentially damage) is stent migration, while in-stent restenosis and venous occlusion resulting from fibromuscular hyperplasia or thrombosis rarely occur. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment is necessary to reduce the risk of thrombosis [39].

    Some authors have proposed the ligation of the left gonadal vein laparoscopically to reduce pelvic congestion syndrome caused by NS [40]. It is not clear if this procedure worsens hematuria and the other renal symptoms.

    The entry is from 10.3390/diagnostics11010101


    1. Shin, J.I.; Lee, J.S. Nutcracker phenomenon or nutcracker syndrome? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2005, 20, 2009.
    2. Cope, C.; Isard, H.J. Left renal vein entrapment: A new diagnostic finding in retroperitoneal disease. Radiology 1969, 92, 867–872.
    3. Barnes, R.W.; Fleisher, H.L., III; Redman, J.F.; Smith, J.W.; Harshfield, D.L.; Ferris, E.J. Mesoaortic compression of the left renal vein (the so-called nutcracker syndrome): Repair by a new stenting procedure. J. Vasc. Surg. 1988, 8, 415–421.
    4. Yun, S.J.; Lee, J.M.; Nam, D.H.; Ryu, J.K.; Lee, S.H. Discriminating renal nutcracker syndrome from asymptomatic nutcracker phenomenon using multidetector computed tomography. Abdom. Radiol. (NY) 2016, 41, 1580–1588.
    5. He, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, S.; Tian, L.; Li, D.; Li, M.; Jin, W.; Zhang, H. Nutcracker syndrome—How well do we know it? Urology 2014, 83, 12–17.
    6. Kurklinsky, A.K.; Rooke, T.W. Nutcracker Phenomenon and Nutcracker Syndrome. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010, 85, 552–559.
    7. Ananthan, K.; Onida, S.; Davies, A. Nutcracker Syndrome: An Update on Current Diagnostic Criteria and Management Guidelines. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017, 53, 886–894.
    8. Lamba, R.; Tanner, D.; Sekhon, S.; McGahan, J.; Corwin, M.; Lall, C. Multidetector CT of vascular compression syndromes in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 2014, 34, 93–115.
    9. Polguj, M.; Topol, M.; Majos, A. An unusual case of left venous renal entrapment syndrome: A new type of nutcracker phenomenon? Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2013, 35, 263–267.
    10. Lau, J.L.T.; Lo, R.; Chan, F.L.; Wong, K.K. The posterior ‘‘nutcracker’’: Hematuria secondary to retroaortic left renal vein. Urology 1986, 20, 437–439.
    11. Basile, A.; Tsetis, D.; Calcara, G.; Figuera, M.; Coppolino, F.; Patti, M.T.; Midiri, M.; Granata, A. Nutcracker Syndrome Due to Left Renal Vein Compression by an Aberrant Right Renal Artery. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007, 50, 326–329.
    12. Shaper, K.R.L.; Jackson, J.E.; Williams, G. The nutcracker syndrome: An uncommon cause of haematuria. Br. J. Urol. 1994, 74, 144–146.
    13. Lopatkin, N.; Morozov, A.; Lopatkina, L. Essential Renal Haemorrhages. Eur. Urol. 1978, 4, 115–119.
    14. Eliahou, R.; Sosna, J.; Bloom, A.I. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Clinical and Imaging Features of Vascular Compression Syndromes. Radiographics 2012, 32, E33–E49.
    15. Merrett, N.D.; Wilson, R.B.; Cosman, P.; Biankin, A.V. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008, 13, 287–292.
    16. Inal, M.; Bilgili, K.M.Y.; Sahin, S. Nutcracker syndrome accompanying pelvic congestion syndrome; Color Doppler sonography and multislice CT findings: A case report. Iran. J. Radiol. 2014, 11, e11075.
    17. Scultetus, A.H.; Villavicencio, J.; Gillespie, D.L. The nutcracker syndrome: Its role in the pelvic venous disorders. J. Vasc. Surg. 2001, 34, 812–819.
    18. Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Jin, W.; San, P.; Xu, P.; Pan, S. The Left Renal Entrapment Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 21, 198–203.
    19. Özkan, M.B.; Bilgici, C.M.; Hayalioglu, E. Anterior and posterior nutcracker syndrome accompanying left circumaortic renal vein in an adolescent: Case report. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2016, 114, e114–e116.
    20. Cheon, J.-E.; Kim, W.S.; Kim, I.-O.; Kim, S.H.; Yeon, K.M.; Ha, I.S.; Cheong, H.I.; Choi, Y. Nutcracker syndrome in children with gross haematuria: Doppler sonographic evaluation of the left renal vein. Pediatr. Radiol. 2006, 36, 682–686.
    21. Venkatachalam, S.; Bumpus, K.; Kapadia, S.R.; Gray, B.; Lyden, S.; Shishehbor, M.H. The Nutcracker Syndrome. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2011, 25, 1154–1164.
    22. Poyraz, A.K.; Firdolas, F.; Onur, M.R.; Kocakoç, E. Evaluation of left renal vein entrapment using multidetector computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2013, 54, 144–148.
    23. Beinart, C.; Sniderman, K.W.; Tamura, S.; Vaughan, E.D.; Sos, T.A. Left Renal Vein to Inferior Vena Cava Pressure Relationship in Humans. J. Urol. 1982, 127, 1070–1071.
    24. Reed, N.R.; Kalra, M.; Bower, T.C.; Vrtiska, T.J.; Ricotta, J.J.; Gloviczki, P. Left renal vein transposition for nutcracker syndrome. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 49, 386–394. discussion 393–394.
    25. Hohenfellner, M.; Steinbach, F.; Schultz-Lampel, D.; Schantzen, W.; Walter, K.; Cramer, B.; Thüroff, J. The Nutcracker Syndrome: New Aspects of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Urol. 1991, 146, 685–688.
    26. Ahmed, K.; Sampath, R.; Khan, M.S. Current trends in the diagnosis and management of renal nutcracker syndrome: A review. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2006, 31, 410–416.
    27. Avgerinos, E.D.; McEnaney, R.; A Chaer, R. Surgical and endovascular interventions for nutcracker syndrome. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 26, 170–177.
    28. Novaes, L.F.; Saguia, S.L.d.N.; Migueli, C.A.D.; Perin, M.A.d.C.; Lorrete, F.L.; Santana, N.P.; Chervin, E.L.N.; Singishalli, L.A.S.; Gimenez, M.P. Young woman with nutcracker syndrome without main clinic manifestation: Hematuria-Case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2017, 31, 225–228.
    29. Ha, T.-S.; Lee, E.-J. ACE inhibition can improve orthostatic proteinuria associated with nutcracker syndrome. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2006, 21, 1765–1768.
    30. Skeik, N.; Gloviczki, P.; Macedo, T.A. Posterior Nutcracker Syndrome. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011, 45, 749–755.
    31. Menard, M.T. Nutcracker syndrome: When should it be treated and how? Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 2009, 21, 117–124.
    32. Ullery, B.W.; Itoga, N.K.; Mell, M.W. Transposition of the Left Renal Vein for the Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome in Children: A Short-term Experience. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2014, 28, 1938.e5–1938.e8.
    33. Neste, M.G.; Narasimham, D.L.; Belcher, K.K. Endovascular Stent Placement as a Treatment for Renal Venous Hypertension. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 1996, 7, 859–861.
    34. Wang, L.; Yi, L.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.; Rao, J.; Liu, L.; Yang, J. Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience. Urology 2009, 73, 871–876.
    35. Hartung, O.; Grisoli, D.; Boufi, M.; Marani, I.; Hakam, Z.; Barthelemy, P.; Alimi, Y.S. Endovascular stenting in the treatment of pelvic vein congestion caused by nutcracker syndrome: Lessons learned from the first five cases. J. Vasc. Surg. 2005, 42, 275–280.
    36. Basile, A.; Tsetis, D.; Calcara, G.; Figuera, M.; Patti, M.T.; Ettorre, G.C.; Granata, A. Percutaneous Nitinol Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome in Young Adults. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2007, 18, 1042–1046.
    37. Wang, P.; Jing, T.; Qin, J.; Xia, D.; Wang, S. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Transposition of the Left Renal Vein for Treatment of the Nutcracker Syndrome. Urology 2015, 86, e27–e28.
    38. Policha, A.; Lamparello, P.J.; Sadek, M.; Berland, T.; Maldonado, T. Endovascular Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 36, 295.e1–295.e7.
    39. Kim, S.J.; Kim, C.W.; Kim, S.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, Y.S. Long-Term follow-Up after endovascular stent placement for treatment of nutcracker syndrome. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2005, 16, 428–431.
    40. Rogers, A.; Beech, A.; Braithwaite, B. Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Left Gonadal Vein Ligation Can Be the Right Treatment Option for Pelvic Congestion Symptoms Secondary to Nutcracker Syndrome. Vascular 2007, 15, 238–240.
    1. Please check and comment entries here.