1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Primary Healthcare

    Subjects: Nursing
    View times: 37
    Submitted by: Li Kuang


    Total health expenditure in China has grown considerably since a new round of health system reform was enacted in 2009. Researchers have shown that strengthening primary healthcare may be an option for countries to solve the rapid expansion of their medical expenditures. This study was designed to explore the association between the strength of primary healthcare and medical expenditures, in the context of the hospital-oriented healthcare system in China. A longitudinal ecological study was conducted using a 5-year panel dataset of 27 provinces in mainland China. The linear mixed effects regression model was used to assess the effects of primary healthcare-related metrics on medical expenditures, controlling for the provincial level specialty care physician supply and socio-economic parameters. All of the three primary healthcare-related metrics showed negative associations with the two medical expenditure parameters. Primary care physicians per 10,000 population was significantly associated with the per capita hospital medical expenditures (p < 0.05), and the percentage of public health expenditure in total health expenditure was significantly associated with both per capita total medical expenditure and per capita hospital medical expenditures (p < 0.01 for both). Our study found negative associations between the primary healthcare capacity and medical expenditure in the context of hospital-oriented healthcare systems in China, adding to the previous evidence that primary healthcare may play a positive role in reducing medical expenditure. Policies on increasing the primary care physician supply and the public share of total health expenditure should be conducted to strengthen the primary healthcare system. With the gradual advance of medical reform and the policy inclination to primary healthcare, this will play a more important role in controlling the rapid growth of medical expenditure.

    1. Introduction

    To maintain the sustainable growth of medical expenditure has become an important issue facing the health system reform in all countries since the health sector continues to expand faster than the economy [1]. Between 2000 and 2017, global health spending in real terms grew by 3.9% a year while the economy grew by 3.0% a year and this trend was even more serious in middle-income countries (expenditure 6.3% vs. GDP 5.9%) [2]. As one of the middle-income countries, China is also rapidly converging towards higher levels of spending since the new round of health system reforms was enacted in 2009 [3]. Total health expenditure in China grew at a rate of 14.45% per annum in 2009–2018, which is higher than that of GDP (12.89%), leading to an increase in the health expenditure share of GDP from 4.96% to 6.39% during the same period [4][5]. With the disease spectrum changing, population aging, medicinal and technological developments, and people’s health needs increasing, this problem will get worse in China [3]. According to one study that projected health expenditure in the period 2015–35 in China, the health expenditure is expected to rise to 9.1% of GDP in 2035 [6]. This rapid growth in health expenditure imposes pressures on the government budget as well as on the personal finances of patients, especially in the light of the slowdown in economic growth [7]. Without optimizing the structure of the health system and integrating health services, increased investment would not be transferred to improved access and the rising medical cost will not be effectively controlled, and thus the goal to implement UHC would be jeopardized [8]. In recent years, healthcare systems have been dedicated to better organizing health services to maximize both care effectiveness and efficiency [9].

    Primary healthcare (PHC) is recognized as the most cost-effective investment to solve the problem of increased medical expenditure [10][11][12]. The Declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978, followed by the 2008 World Health Report and the Declaration of Astana in 2018, all defined PHC as the foundation of an effective health system and emphasized that all countries should strengthen the PHC system to overcome the emerging challenges [13][14][15]. PHC has been widely considered to be an effective strategy to realize universal health coverage, achieve the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, and improve health outcomes by emphasizing disease prevention and health promotion, ensuring equity of access to the most essential interventions [16][17]. Researchers all over the world have shown that the PHC system plays an important role in achieving the effective control of medical costs. Many PHC-related programs have been confirmed to be cost-effective and sustainable [18]. Health systems with a PHC orientation or stronger PHC structure can reduce healthcare spending without lowering the quality of care [19][20][21]. Universal PHC is helpful in guiding the reasonable needs of patients, reducing the waste of resources, such as specialists in large hospitals dealing with simple diseases, and relieving the challenges of difficult and costly access to hospitals [22]. There is now an international consensus that all countries should enhance PHC to ensure the containment of rising medical expenditure [23].

    China has responded positively to international appeals to strengthen the PHC system. As the first tier of the healthcare system in China, the PHC system provides generalist clinical care and basic public health services [24]. In the current decade, the Chinese government has enacted a number of new policies and health reforms to build a stronger PHC system in terms of building infrastructure, training personnel, providing public health services, and developing other supporting programs [22][25]. The government increased its subsidies to primary healthcare institutions from CNY 19.8 billion (USD 2.8 billion) in 2008 to CNY 197.7 billion (USD 27.8 billion) in 2018 [26]. In addition, the government has significantly increased public health expenditure during the same period, with the public share of total health expenditure rising from 59.6% to 71.3% [4]. Adequate and equitable funding is crucial to protecting families with financial hardship from losing primary health services [20]. The implementation of the new “5 + 3” generalist training programs (5 years of undergraduate clinical medicine + 3 years of standardized training) and relevant incentives has led to an improved professional ability and an increase in the salary of primary healthcare workers [27]. All Chinese citizens have been entitled to 14 free public health services, which are provided by primary healthcare institutions and the subsidy for these services has risen from CNY 15 in 2009 to CNY 69 per capita in 2019 [28]. Despite these facts, people in China still heavily depend on hospital-based healthcare. In 2018, 43.1% of doctor’s visits were in hospitals [26], even if the primary healthcare system provided higher geographical coverage and economic affordability than hospitals. The average cost of an outpatient visit to a primary healthcare institution was about CNY 101.9 (USD 14.4), including the cost of prescribed drugs, compared to CNY 274.1 (USD 38.8) per hospital outpatient appointment in 2018 [4].

    Accumulating researches have been exploring the positive effects of PHC on reducing medical expenditures. Margatet et al. [20] reviewed plenty of existing studies to assess the contributions of major PHC-focused initiatives implemented in low- and middle-income countries and concluded that these initiatives have positive effects on impoverishing health spending by increased access to services and more rational drug use, as well as reducing the financial burden on families by reducing over-treatment and the excessive use of medication. A study in Greece showed that the lack of an integrated PHC system such as gatekeeping mechanisms, patient monitoring, and general population prevention programs may be the reason for the significant and consistent increases in both public and private expenditure [29]. But both conclusions above were just conjecture and the researchers did not confirm a quantitative association between PHC system and medical expenditure. Besides, existing evidence includes reports from developed and developing countries, but there are few studies from China. Addressing the association in China is essential to understand whether efforts to strengthen the PHC system have the potential to curb increasing health spending. As the rapid expansion of medical expenditure has become an important public health issue facing global health system reform, quantitative results from China may also provide evidence to support the expansion of the PHC system in countries all over the world.

    2. Results

    Table 1 shows descriptive statistics results of all variables from 2012 to 2016. Both per capita total medical expenditures and per capita hospital medical expenditures per capita grew rapidly during this period, from about CNY 1390 to CNY 2220, and from 1070 to CNY 1740, respectively. As for the three indicators of PHC, they all increased smoothly from 2012 to 2016, with the number of primary care physicians per 10,000 population increasing from 7.15 to 7.90. The proportion of public health expenditure among total health expenditure increased from 65.51% to 71.34%, and the popularity rate of sanitary toilets in rural areas rose from 68.83% to 77.82%. During the same period, the number of hospital-based specialty care physicians per 10,000 population also showed a steady increase, from 10.29 in 2012 to 12.95 in 2016.

    Table 1. Descriptive statistics among the 27 provinces in China, 2012–2016.

    Variable 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
    Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
    Per capita total medical expenditures (1000 Yuan) 1.39 0.28 1.58 0.33 1.74 0.38 1.96 0.43 2.22 0.48
    Per capita hospital medical expenditures (1000 Yuan) 1.07 0.26 1.22 0.30 1.35 0.33 1.52 0.37 1.74 0.41
    Primary care physicians per 10,000 population 7.15 1.38 7.38 1.35 7.44 1.33 7.66 1.40 7.90 1.45
    The proportion of public health expenditure, % 65.51 7.51 66.49 7.36 68.25 7.00 70.34 6.39 71.34 6.05
    Popularity rate of sanitary toilets in rural areas, % 68.83 13.63 71.46 13.74 73.27 13.76 76.21 12.32 77.82 11.74
    Specialty care physicians per 10,000 population 10.29 2.01 11.04 2.01 11.53 1.98 12.27 1.97 12.95 2.04
    GDP per capital (10,000 Yuan) 3.85 1.37 4.20 1.45 4.53 1.55 4.73 1.64 4.97 1.72
    Proportion of the population aged ≥65, % 8.76 1.60 9.01 1.67 9.35 1.85 9.78 1.87 10.06 2.10
    Proportion of illiterate population aged 15 and above, % 17.24 3.63 17.14 3.48 17.18 3.58 17.31 3.73 17.33 3.67
    Registered urban unemployment rate, % 3.40 0.54 3.35 0.57 3.30 0.56 3.28 0.59 3.27 0.59

    Table 2 presents the results of mixed effects linear regression models. All of the three PHC-related metrics showed a negative association with per capita total medical expenditures and per capita hospital medical expenditures, among which primary care physicians per 10,000 population was statistically significant in the hospital medical expenditure model (p < 0.05) and the proportion of public health expenditure was statistically significant in both models (p < 0.01). Take the proportion of public health expenditure for example, a per-unit increase in the proportion of public health expenditure was associated with a CNY 33.1 (USD 4.68) decrease in per capita total medical expenditures and a CNY 26.4 (USD 3.74) decrease in per capita hospital medical expenditures, while other variables were held constant. In order to make the relationship between PHC-related metrics and medical expenditure parameters more visual, we drew six plots of estimated medical expenditure versus three primary healthcare-related metrics (Figure 1).

    Table 2. Regression model results for the 27 provinces of China, 2012–2016.

    Variable Per Capita Total Medical Expenditure (1000 Yuan) Per Capita Hospital Medical Expenditure (1000 Yuan)
    Primary care physicians per 10,000 population −0.026 (−0.088 to 0.035) −0.046 * (−0.092 to −0.001)
    The proportion of public health expenditure, % −0.033 *** (−0.049 to −0.018) −0.026 ** (−0.039 to −0.014)
    Popularity rate of sanitary toilets in rural areas, % −0.004 (−0.012 to 0.005) −0.003 (−0.009 to 0.003)
    Specialty care physicians per 10,000 population 0.103 * (0.013 to 0.193) 0.102 * (0.027 to 0.176)
    GDP per capital (10,000 Yuan) 0.132 * (0.019 to 0.245) 0.118 * (0.014 to 0.221)
    Proportion of the population aged ≥65, % 0.025 (−0.027 to 0.077) 0.020 (−0.024 to 0.065)
    Proportion of illiterate population aged 15 and above, % 0.001 (−0.027 to 0.023) −0.001 (−0.015 to 0.014)
    Registered urban unemployment rate, % −0.008 (−0.138 to 0.123) 0.003 (−0.100 to 0.106)
    Constant 2.855 * (1.323 to 4.388) 2.109 (0.995 to 3.222)
    Observations 135 135
    Number of provinces 27 27
    R-squared (within) 0.939 0.931

    p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Year fixed effects not shown; 95% CI was in the parentheses.

    Specialty care physicians per 10,000 population and GDP per capital were both positively and significantly associated with both per capita total medical expenditures and per capita hospital medical expenditures. The goodness-of-fit results showed that the R2 of both models was over 93%, which meant that the regression models capture 93% of all variations of observed dependent variables and covariates. All independent variables used in the models were checked for multicollinearity, which was not found (results not shown).

    In each plot, the other two primary healthcare-related metrics and all covariates (specialty care physicians per 10,000 population, GDP, the proportion of the population aged ≥ 65, the proportion of illiterate population aged 15 and above, and registered urban unemployment rate) were set as the mean values.

    3. Discussion

    Few studies have investigated the association of PHC with medical expenditure in China. This study was intended to fill the gap by conducting an ecological study using a province-level panel dataset of China. We found a negative and significant association between PHC-related metrics and medical expenditure. These findings suggest that PHC may have positive effects on reducing health spending, which is especially meaningful in China since the contribution of PHC is neglected and hospital-based healthcare still dominates the health system.

    The three PHC-related metrics were all negatively associated with both per capita total medical expenditure and per capita hospital medical expenditure, and the proportion of public health expenditure as well as the primary care physician supply were statistically significant either in one model or both models after controlling for the specialty care physician supply and socio-economic status, confirming that PHC might play an overall positive role in reducing health spending in China. This result is consistent with the findings within countries such as the United States [30], the United Kingdom [31] and other low- and middle-income countries [32]. International comparisons also showed that those countries with weaker PHC systems had significantly higher costs [33][34]. Previous studies have explained that PHC may work through several mechanisms. From a macroeconomic perspective, PHC plays a key role in reducing health expenditure by addressing the underlying determinants of health, by emphasizing population-level services and by improving health equity [11][21]. This both reduces the need for individual care and can avoid the escalation of health issues to more complex and costly conditions. From a microeconomic perspective, the core functions of PHC, such as continuity, comprehensiveness, accessibility, coordination of care, and community-based services, play an important role in reducing wasteful use of healthcare resources (including avoidable hospitalizations, readmissions to hospital, additional specialty referrals, laboratory and diagnostic tests, and unnecessary use of emergency departments), thus reducing healthcare costs [35][36][37][38][39].

    Our study showed that the proportion of public health expenditure plays an important role in reducing the per capita total medical expenditures and hospital medical expenditures. Study showed that public health expenditure was an important factor of public participation in healthcare financing, which reflected how much attention the government paid to improve the public access to healthcare services among developing countries [40]. In China, public health expenditure consists of both government and social investment in healthcare enterprises, among which government funds are used for the construction of basic medical facilities and the provision of Basic Public Health Services, and the social health insurance funds enable more than 95% of the population in China to have basic health insurance. Public health expenditure plays an important role in reaching some millennium development goals such as achieving universal health coverage and improving health outcomes. Studies in Sub-Saharan Africa, EMR countries and OECD countries all confirmed that a higher proportion of public health expenditure over total health expenditure had a strong positive relationship in terms of health status [41][42][43]. With the improvement in health status, the rising medical cost has been controlled.

    As the backbone of the primary healthcare workforce, primary care physicians play a vital role in controlling medical expenses and guiding patients in terms of reasonable health needs [22]. Our study confirmed that, in the context of China, there is a significant negative correlation between the primary care physician supply and per capita hospital medical expenditure. Several studies in the United States also found that a higher proportion of primary care physicians in an area was associated with a lower level of spending (measured by per beneficiary Medicare spending and Medicare end-of-life spending) [21][30][44][45]. Evidence shows that, compared with specialists, primary care physicians lead to savings in public medical resources, such as hospitalizations, prescriptions, common tests, and procedures [45][46]. They also provide more comprehensive health services, better preventive care, and early management of health problems [21], which may also lead to a reduction in medical expenditure.

    Our study showed a negative association between the popularity rate of sanitary toilets in rural areas and two medical expenditure outcomes but the correlation was statistically insignificant. As an important part of the Patriotic Health Campaign and the Healthy Village Construction in China, the sanitary toilet revolution is committed to improving rural sanitary conditions and human settlements and the popularity rate of rural sanitary toilets is an important indicator to measure the effect of revolution. After years of unremitting effort, the rebuilding of rural toilets has demonstrated remarkable achievements, with the popularity rate of rural sanitary toilets increasing from 40.3% in 2000 to 81.8% in 2017 [47]. These sanitary toilets have met the basic standards of enclosed, ventilated, sealed, and covered septic tanks, with no fly maggots or persistent odors. The obvious improvement of basic sanitary conditions in rural areas effectively controls the occurrence and prevalence of diseases, obviously improving the quality of civilization and health literacy of peasants, and significantly promoting the improvement of the rural ecological environment, so that health, ecological, economic, and social benefits gradually emerged [48]. However, our study did not find a significant association between the provincial level popularity rate of sanitary toilets and medical expenditure, possibly because the panel data was too short to reflect the rapid increase in the popularity rate of sanitary toilets around 2015.

    Notably, specialty care physicians per 10,000 population was found to be significantly and positively associated with both per capita total medical expenditure and per capita hospital medical expenditure and the regression coefficient was larger than that of each PHC-related metric, implying that specialty care physicians may have an inescapable responsibility for the growth of medical expenditure. This result was consistent with the research in US which found that states with a higher proportion of specialists have a higher cost per beneficiary [30]. The more expensive medical resources and overuse of tests and diagnostics may be responsible for this association.

    Our study showed a strong positive relationship between GDP and medical expenditure, which is highly consistent with previous research [49][50]. GDP was identified as a significant statistical factor having positive influence on national healthcare expenditure increase [51]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that aging populations have a significant positive influence on total health expenditure [52]. Our study did discover a positive relationship between the proportion of the population aged ≥ 65 and medical expenditure, but the association was insignificant. Most literature showed that GDP and aging populations were two key explanatory variables for the growth of health expenditure [49][53]. Our consistent findings with existing studies showed the reliability of the results. After controlling for the two major confounders, our finding shows a real association between PHC-related metrics and medical expenditure.

    Our study demonstrates that health systems which depend heavily on PHC are more advantageous than those heavily based on specialist care in terms of reduction in medical expenditure. Findings support policies that encourage a shift of services away from specialist care to PHC. In order to maximize the potential of PHC on reducing medical expenditure, national efforts should be directed at enhancing the primary care workforce as well as increasing the public share of total health expenditure.

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/ijerph17186917


    1. Lu, C.; Schneider, M.T.; Gubbins, P.; Leach-Kemon, K.; Jamison, D.; Murray, C.J.L. Public financing of health in developing countries: A cross-national systematic analysis. Lancet 2010, 375, 1375–1387.
    2. WHO. Global Spending on Health: A World in Transition; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
    3. Zhai, T.; Goss, J.; Li, J. Main drivers of health expenditure growth in China: A decomposition analysis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017, 17, 185.
    4. National Health Commission. Statistical Bulletin on the Development of Health Services in China. 2018. Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s10748/201905/9b8d52727cf346049de8acce25ffcbd0.shtml (accessed on 7 May 2020). (In Chinese)
    5. National Health Commission. Statistical Bulletin on the Development of Health Services in China. 2010. Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s7967/201104/51512.shtml (accessed on 7 May 2020). (In Chinese)
    6. Zhai, T.; Goss, J.; Dmytraczenko, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Chai, P. China’s Health Expenditure Projections To 2035: Future Trajectory and The Estimated Impact of Reforms. Health Aff. 2019, 38, 835–843.
    7. Tang, S.; Tao, J.; Bekedam, H. Controlling cost escalation of healthcare: Making universal health coverage sustainable in China. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, S8.
    8. Marten, R.; McIntryre, D.; Travassos, C.; Shishkin, S.; Longde, W.; Reddy, K.S.; Vega, J. An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). Lancet 2014, 384, 2164–2171.
    9. Stefanini, A.; Aloini, D.; Benevento, E.; Dulmin, R.; Mininno, V. A data-driven methodology for supporting resource planning of health services. Socio-Economic Plan. Sci. 2020, 70, 100744.
    10. Guo, Y.; Sun, S. Revival of primary health care to realize universal health coverage and sustainable development goals: Viewing the progress of primary health care from Declaration of Alma-Ata and Declaration of Astana. Chin. Rural Health Serv. Adm. 2019, 39, 7–11.
    11. WHO. Building the Economic Case for Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
    12. Ayanian, J.Z.; Hamel, M.B. Transforming Primary Care—We Get What We Pay For. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2390–2392.
    13. WHO. Declaration of Alma-Ata; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1978.
    14. WHO. The World Health Report 2008—Primary Health Care: Now More than Ever; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
    15. Friedrich, M. Declaration of Astana Emphasizes Primary Care as Key to World Health. JAMA 2018, 320, 2412.
    16. WHO. A Vision for Primary Health Care in the 21st Century: Towards Universal Health Coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals; World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF): Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
    17. Basu, S.; Berkowitz, S.A.; Phillips, R.L.; Bitton, A.; Landon, B.E.; Phillips, R.S. Association of Primary Care Physician Supply With Population Mortality in the United States, 2005–2015. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019, 179, 506.
    18. Fairall, L.R.; Bateman, E.; Cornick, R.; Faris, G.; Timmerman, V.; Folb, N.; Bachmann, M.O.; Zwarenstein, M.; Smith, R. Innovating to improve primary care in less developed countries: Towards a global model. BMJ Innov. 2015, 1, 196–203.
    19. Atun, R. What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Restructuring a Health Care System to Be More Focused on Primary Care Services? WHO Regional Office for Europe’s Health Evidence Network: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004.
    20. Kruk, M.E.; Porignon, D.; Rockers, P.C.; Van Lerberghe, W. The contribution of primary care to health and health systems in low- and middle-income countries: A critical review of major primary care initiatives. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 70, 904–911.
    21. Starfield, B.; Shi, L.; Macinko, J. Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health. Milbank Q. 2005, 83, 457–502.
    22. Li, H.; Gu, J.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X. The development and impact of primary health care in China from 1949 to 2015: A focused review. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2017, 32, 339–350.
    23. Macinko, J.; Starfield, B.; Shi, L. The Contribution of Primary Care Systems to Health Outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Countries, 1970–1998. Health Serv. Res. 2003, 38, 831–865.
    24. Li, X.; Lu, J.; Hu, S.; Cheng, K.K.; De Maeseneer, J.; Meng, Q.; Mossialos, E.; Xu, D.R.; Yip, W.; Zhang, H.; et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet 2017, 390, 2584–2594.
    25. Yip, W.C.-M.; Hsiao, W.C.; Chen, W.; Hu, S.; Ma, J.; Maynard, A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet 2012, 379, 833–842.
    26. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook on Health 2019; China Union Medical College Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese)
    27. State Council. Guidance of the State Council on Establishing the General Practitioner System. 2011. Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/gfxwj/201304/b77fdc4825954db68bb436276005bba3.shtml (accessed on 7 May 2020). (In Chinese)
    28. Primary Health Department. Notice on Doing Well the National Basic Public Health Service Program of 2019. Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jws/s7881/201909/83012210b4564f26a163408599072379.shtml (accessed on 9 May 2020). (In Chinese)
    29. Souliotis, K.; Kartzi, G.; Athanasakis, K.; Golna, C.; Yfantopoulos, J. Determinants of health care expenditure in Greece: Can primary health care impact on their evolution? Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014, 5, 383–391.
    30. Baicker, K.; Chandra, A. Medicare Spending, The Physician Workforce, And Beneficiaries’ Quality Of Care. Health Aff. 2004, 23, W4-184.
    31. Dusheiko, M.; Gravelle, H.; Martin, S.; Rice, N.; Smith, P. Does better disease management in primary care reduce hospital costs? Evidence from English primary care. J. Health Econ. 2011, 30, 919–932.
    32. Diomidous, M.; Gougoumati, K.; Kalokairinou, A. Cost-effectiveness in primary health care in Greece. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2013, 190, 225–227.
    33. Starfield, B.; Shi, L. Policy relevant determinants of health: An international perspective. Health Policy 2002, 60, 201–218.
    34. Davis, K. Slowing the Growth of Health Care Costs—Learning from International Experience. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1751–1755.
    35. Bertakis, K.D.; Azari, R. Patient-Centered Care is Associated with Decreased Health Care Utilization. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2011, 24, 229–239.
    36. Bertakis, K.D.; Azari, R. Determinants and outcomes of patient-centered care. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011, 85, 46–52.
    37. Bruin, S.R.; Versnel, N.; Lemmens, L.C.; Molema, C.C.; Schellevis, F.G.; Nijpels, G.; Baan, C.A. Comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic literature review. Health Policy 2012, 107, 108–145.
    38. Forrest, C.B.; Starfield, B. The effect of first-contact care with primary care clinicians on ambulatory health care expenditures. J. Fam. Pract. 1996, 43, 40–48.
    39. Rosano, A.; Loha, C.A.; Falvo, R.; Van Der Zee, J.; Ricciardi, W.; Guasticchi, G.; De Belvis, A.G. The relationship between avoidable hospitalization and accessibility to primary care: A systematic review. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 23, 356–360.
    40. Kruk, M.E.; Galea, S.; Prescott, M.; Freedman, L.P. Health care financing and utilization of maternal health services in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2007, 22, 303–310.
    41. Novignon, J.; Olakojo, S.A.; Nonvignon, J. The effects of public and private health care expenditure on health status in sub-Saharan Africa: New evidence from panel data analysis. Health Econ. Rev. 2012, 2, 22.
    42. Rad, E.H.; Vahedi, S.; Teimourizad, A.; Esmaeilzadeh, F.; Hadian, M.; Pour, A.T. Comparison of the Effects of Public and Private Health Expenditures on the Health Status: A Panel Data Analysis in Eastern Mediterranean Countries. Int. J. Heal. Policy Manag. 2013, 1, 163–167.
    43. Asiskovitch, S. Gender and health outcomes: The impact of healthcare systems and their financing on life expectancies of women and men. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 70, 886–895.
    44. Bricker, N. Reducing the Geographic Variance in Medical Expenditures: The Benefits of a Primary-Care Oriented Health System. Undergrad. Econ. Rev. 2015, 11, 6.
    45. Fisher, E.S.; Wennberg, D.E.; Stukel, T.A.; Gottlieb, D.J.; Lucas, F.L.; Pinder, É.L. The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003, 138, 273.
    46. Mark, D.H.; Gottlieb, M.S.; Zellner, B.B.; Chetty, V.K.; Midtling, J.E. Medicare costs in urban areas and the supply of primary care physicians. J. Fam. Pract. 1996, 43, 33–39.
    47. NHFPC. China Statistical Yearbook on Health 2018; China Union Medical College Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2018. (In Chinese)
    48. Cheng, S.; Li, Z.; Uddin, S.M.N.; Mang, H.-P.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, L. Toilet revolution in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 216, 347–356.
    49. Matteo, L.D. The macro determinants of health expenditure in the United States and Canada: Assessing the impact of income, age distribution and time. Health Policy 2005, 71, 23–42.
    50. Han, K.; Cho, M.; Chun, K. Determinants of Health Care Expenditures and the Contribution of Associated Factors: 16 Cities and Provinces in Korea, 2003–2010. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2013, 46, 300–308.
    51. Kea, X.; Saksenaa, P.; Holly, A. The Determinants of Health Expenditure: A Country-Level Panel Data Analysis; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
    52. Seshamani, M.; Gray, A. Health care expenditures and ageing: An international comparison. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2003, 2, 9–16.
    53. Samadi, A.; Homaie, R.E. Determinants of Healthcare Expenditure in Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) Countries: Evidence from Panel Cointegration Tests. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2013, 1, 63–68.