Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Mitochondrial Transporter Protein Families

    View times: 22
    Submitted by: Gergely Gyimesi

    Definition

    Mitochondrial carriers facilitate the transfer of small molecules across the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) to support mitochondrial function and core cellular processes. In addition to the classical SLC25 (solute carrier family 25) mitochondrial carriers, the past decade has led to the discovery of additional protein families with numerous members that exhibit IMM localization and transporter-like properties. These include mitochondrial pyruvate carriers, sideroflexins, and mitochondrial cation/H+ exchangers. These transport proteins were linked to vital physiological functions and disease.

    1. Introduction 

    Mitochondria are believed to have evolved through an endosymbiotic event, where an α -proteobacteria has been engulfed by a host cell, possibly an archaeon [1][2]. This event is thought to have arisen only once, and in the last 2 billion years, mitochondria have evolved together and in close concordance with their host cells [1][3][4]. During this time, significant changes in the genome of the endosymbiont have taken place, which involved the transfer of most mitochondrial proteins to the nucleus, as well as the emergence of novel protein families in the nuclear genome that are targeted to mitochondria [4][5]. The vestigial mitochondrial genomes of vertebrates in general code for 13 internal membrane proteins that are involved in electron transport and coupled oxidative phosphorylation [6][7], while the part of the mitochondrial proteome related to transmembrane transport, i.e., the exchange of metabolites and ions with the host cell, is almost exclusively of eukaryotic origin [4][5].

    Proteins in the human inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) are quite distinct from one another in terms of their structure and sequence features as well as their trafficking and import mechanisms into mitochondria. Based on this diversity, they are likely polyphyletic in origin and presumably arose independently of each other. Membrane proteins that take part in transmembrane solute transport across the IMM include members of the following families: SLC25 (mitochondrial carriers), SLC8 (SLC8B1/NCLX Na+/Ca2+/Li+ exchanger), SLC54 (MPC, mitochondrial pyruvate carriers), SLC55 (LETM, leucine zipper-EF-hand-containing transmembrane proteins), SLC56 (sideroflexins), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (ABCB7, ABCB8, ABCB10) and various ion channels [8]. The discovery, biological function, physiological role and disease involvement of many of these transport proteins and channels are comprehensively presented in excellent articles of the present review series. In particular, ion channels are covered in detail in the review by Szabo et al. and will not be discussed here. Metabolite and ion transport between the cytoplasm and the mitochondria also require the broad-specificity channels of the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). The most prominent class of such channels, the voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs), is discussed in detail by Shoshan-Barmatz et al. in this review series [9], but other OMM transporters with unknown substrate specificity may also be present [10].

    1.1. Trafficking of Membrane Transporters into Mitochondria

    Transporters of the mitochondrial inner membrane are synthesized in the cytoplasm and imported into the mitochondria through specialized import machinery [11]. In contrast to most mitochondrial proteins, most mitochondrial carriers typically do not contain an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS). Instead, the nascent precursor transporter proteins bind to the ATP-hydrolyzing Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones in the cytoplasm, which deliver them to the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) complex. Here, the Tom70 receptor, part of TOM, binds both the precursor protein and the chaperones, and transfers the precursor protein to Tom22, where it then gets translocated in a loop-wise fashion through Tom40, the channel component of TOM [12][13]. Once in the intermembrane space, the hydrophobic regions of the precursor transporter proteins are shielded by the heterohexameric chaperone complex Tim9-Tim10-Tim12. This complex of the precursor protein and the chaperones then binds to the receptor-like protein Tim54, which is part of the translocase of the inner membrane (TIM22) complex in the IMM. Here, another member of TIM22, the channel-forming Tim22 protein, then inserts the precursor protein into the inner mitochondrial membrane [11] (Figure 1).

    As an alternative import mechanism, certain precursor transporter proteins do carry the MTS on their N-termini, which typically forms a short (15–50 residues) amphipathic helix with a net positive charge [14][15]. Transporters containing an N-terminal MTS, such as SLC55/LETM and mitochondrial ABCB transporters, are delivered from the cytoplasm by the Tom20 receptor of the TOM complex, recognizing the hydrophobic side of the amphipathic helix formed by the MTS [16]. Upon transfer to the intermembrane space through Tom40, the targeting sequence binds to the Tim50 receptor component of another inner membrane complex, TIM23 [17]. This activates the Tim23 channel subunit of the TIM23 complex to allow the translocation of the bound precursor protein through the IMM [11]. Precursor proteins that are destined to the lipid bilayer contain a hydrophobic stop-transfer signal sequence, which is recognized within the IMM by the small transmembrane protein Mgr2, initiating the lateral release of the imported precursor protein into the membrane [11][18][19] (Figure 1). Interestingly, an alternative mechanism exists, where Oxa1, the main component of the oxidase assembly (OXA) translocase complex, inserts the hydrophobic segment into the inner membrane bilayer after they pass through the Tim23 pore [11] (Figure 1). It has been shown that even a single protein with multiple membrane-spanning segments can use different mechanisms to import individual transmembrane segments into the membrane, such as the yeast protein Mdl1, a mitochondrial ABCB family homolog [20]. Further details about the molecular machinery for importing metabolite transporters into mitochondria are discussed by Rampelt et al. as part of the present special review series.

    Hydrogenosomes and mitosomes are cellular organelles that share a common evolutionary origin with mitochondria [21], and the comparison of their protein import machineries has shed light on important events shaping the early evolution of the mitochondrial import machinery [22]. Protein precursors destined to the hydrogenosomes and mitosomes may contain N-terminal presequences that are typically shorter than MTSs and also lack a marked positive charge [22]. Nevertheless, various hydrogenosomal proteins from the primitive eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis readily target into mitochondria when expressed in yeast, and vice versa [22]. Furthermore, the Tom20 receptor and the acidic N-terminal extension of the Tom22 receptor, both playing fundamental roles in the recognition of the positively charged amphipathic presequence, seem to have evolved independently after the last common eukaryotic ancestor [23], indicating that the primitive TOM import complex did not have these features. All these arguments suggest that the MTS and the corresponding recognition and import machinery evolved in a convergent way in various eukaryotic lineages on top of a pre-existing ancestral protein import machinery, which was most likely independent of the MTS [22]. Based on this reasoning, proteins utilizing the conserved MTS-independent import pathway, such as most SLC25 carriers, might have been one of the earliest groups of proteins that developed mitochondrial localization.

    Figure 1. Import machinery for mitochondrial transporters. The TOM (orange), TIM23 (purple) and TIM22 (yellow) complexes are depicted, with numbers representing the corresponding Tom/Tim protein names. Proteins with a single transmembrane helix (TMH) and OXA-dependent transporters employ the TIM23 import pathway, while carriers with no mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS) are imported through TIM22. For details, see text. Figure is based on [11][12][13][17][18][19].

    The development of a positively charged MTS has been linked to the appearance of the electron transport chain, which resulted in a markedly negative membrane potential across the IMM [22]. In this scenario, a positively charged presequence would confer an evolutionary advantage during the membrane translocation of the precursor protein due to the electrophoretic effect [22]. In addition, a functional MTS can arise de novo fairly easily through random mutations or DNA rearrangements [24][25][26][27]. The development of an MTS-dependent import machinery with an easily generatable MTS could thus have promoted the evolvability of the host organism [27].

    2. SLC25—Mitochondrial Carrier Family (MCF)

    The largest protein family of mitochondrial solute transporters is the SLC25 (mitochondrial carrier) family. In human there are a total of 53 members that fulfil the vital roles of uniport or exchange of ions, metabolites and other solutes across the IMM [28]. It has been recognized early on that the sequence of the ADP/ATP translocase (SLC25A4) has a repeating sequence element that contains two hydrophobic segments and repeats 3 times in the sequence [29]. Such an internal repeat symmetry is commonly found in membrane transporters [30]. Indeed, such features were later found in several other members of the protein family [31][32][33][34], along with conserved proline, glycine and acidic amino acid residues [35]. The conserved residues were later compiled into a consensus characteristic or "signature motif" for mitochondrial carriers, Px(D/E)xx(K/R) [36], and the conserved charged residues were indeed found to take part in specific conserved salt-bridge contacts, termed the matrix network [37][38][39][40][41][42], in the 3D structure of the proteins [43][44]. The signature motif can be extended in the C-terminal direction to include a proximal glutamine (Q) residue, which helps stabilize the salt-bridge contacts on the matrix side of the carrier, forming the "Q brace" [44][45]. There is a similar cluster of charged residues on the intermembrane side of the even-numbered TM helices, forming the cytoplasmic salt-bridge network, where the charged residues of a (Y/F)(D/E)xx(K/R) motif engage in salt-bridge contacts [42][44]. This network is stabilized by the so-called tyrosine (Y) brace, formed by the hydrogen bonding of the tyrosine residues of the motif to these salt bridges [45]. A further sequence motif, (Y/W/L/F)(K/R)GxxP, present in the connecting loop between each short matrix helix and the following transmembrane helix, has been described, replacement of which disrupts the function of the transporter [46]. In addition, close helix-helix contacts in the matrix-facing state are formed by two conserved sequence motifs, π G π x π G on the odd-numbered, and π xxx π on the even-numbered helices, where π stands for a residue with a small side-chain [45][47][48]. Further details of these sequence motifs, including their roles in the transport mechanism and a functional interpretation of individual amino acid residues is covered in detail by Kunji et al. in this special issue. In particular, disease-causing mutations in context of the 3D structure of SLC25 carriers and their sequence motifs are extensively reviewed by Palmieri et al. in the present review series [49].

    Interestingly, the sequence motif (QYKGxxDCxRK) in the short matrix helices has also been described, which is only conserved in a subset of mitochondrial carriers, such as ADP/ATP (SLC25A4–6, SLC25A31), aspartate/glutamate (SLC25A12–13), ornithine (SLC25A2, SLC25A15), glutamate (SLC25A18, SLC25A22), and carnitine (SLC25A20) carriers, one ATP/Pi carrier (SLC25A24) and three carriers with unknown function (SLC25A9, SLC25A34, SLC25A45) [50]. This motif was proposed to harbor residues that go through post-translational modification thereby locally altering the protein structure and thus modulating function. One example for this is acetylation at K163 of SLC25A5 (AAC2), corresponding to the last residue of the motif, while the cysteine residue of the motif might interact with oxidizing/reducing agents [50]. Further investigation is required to reveal the precise functional role of this sequence motif.

    Most SLC25 family proteins do not contain an MTS at their N-termini. Instead, they seem to hold mitochondrial targeting information in all three segments of their three-fold repeat sequence [51][52]. SLC25 proteins are embedded into the IMM by the TIM22 machinery, as described in the previous chapter. It was suggested that the three repeating segments of SLC25 proteins act in a cooperative manner to facilitate receptor binding and translocation into mitochondria [53], nevertheless, a single unit consisting of a matrix loop and the following transmembrane helix is enough for mitochondrial localization [52]. The net positive charge of the short matrix loop helices have been shown to be essential for import into mitochondria, and these regions are thought to interact with the Tom40 channel component of the TOM complex, which effectively functions as a selectivity filter [52].

    Interestingly, certain SLC25 proteins, such as the mitochondrial phosphate carrier (SLC25A3) and citrate/tricarboxylate carrier (SLC25A1) have been proposed to harbor an N-terminal MTS, based on physicochemical composition of their N-terminal sequences and observation of mature protein forms truncated at the anticipated cleavage site [31][54]. This is also partially supported by TargetP-2.0 predictions, which report an MTS of 49 amino acids with likelihood 0.5749 for SLC25A3, exactly as anticipated from experiments where a protein fragment N-terminally truncated at the same position was identified [31]. For SLC25A1, the presence of an MTS was predicted with likelihood 0.3753. Whether a functional N-terminal MTS is present in these proteins has not been investigated experimentally. For all other human SLC25 proteins, the likelihood of an MTS at the N-terminus was less than 0.17 according to TargetP-2.0 predictions.

    3. SLC54—Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carriers (MPC)

    The mitochondrial pyruvate carriers have been identified as IMM transporters responsible for pyruvate uptake into the mitochondria [55][56]. MPC1 (SLC54A1) and MPC2 (SLC54A2) function as heterodimers [56][57], while humans as well as other placental mammals also contain a paralog of MPC1 called MPC1L (SLC54A3), the two sharing 48.2% sequence identity in human [58]. A detailed discussion of the biological role and function of MPCs and their links to disease can be found in a comprehensive review by Martinou et al. and Taylor et al. in this special issue.

    MPCs have been predicted to harbor 2–3 transmembrane helices (TMHs) [55][56][59]. Interestingly, they are unrelated to SLC25 carriers and instead have been shown to be homologous to the 3-TMH repeating element in SWEET ("Sugars will eventually be exported transporters") transporters [60][61], which show a 3 + 1 + 3 TMH architecture [62][63]. Proteins from the SWEET family also exist as homodimers of half-transporters encompassing the 3-TMH repeat, called SemiSWEET [62][64]. While there are relatively few studies on the structure and transport mechanism of MPCs, the structure and mechanism of SWEET and SemiSWEET transporters are quite well described [62][65][66][67][68][69]. Based on the suggested similarity, it can be speculated that the structure of a functional MPC transporter is similar to those of the homodimers of SemiSWEET proteins, or a single protomer of a SWEET-fold transporter. Based on this proposed similarity and the available structures for SWEET and SemiSWEET transporters, it should be possible to interpret disease-causing mutations in a structural context in the future, such as L79H and R97W in human SLC54A1/MPC1 [55][70][71].

    Nevertheless, even without a structural context, one can analyze residue conservation in MPC proteins based on sequence alignment and the help of the "MPC" (PF03650) domain from the Pfam database [72]. The information of residue conservation encoded by profile hidden Markov models (HMM) of Pfam domains can be visualized as a HMM logo by a suitable software, such as Skylign [73] (Figure 2). We submitted the amino acid sequences of human SLC54A1–3 to three different methods to predict the location of transmembrane regions (HMMTOP [74], SPOCTOPUS [75], MEMSAT-SVM [76]) and secondary structural elements (PSIPRED [77]). Combining information on conservation with transmembrane region prediction pinpoints possible conserved charged/polar residues in transmembrane regions, which would imply that they might have a functional or structural role. Such residues may be S52/S54/S68, R68/R70/R84, H84/H86/N100 in MPC1/MPC1L/MPC2, respectively (Figure 2). Interestingly, residues N33/S35/K49 in MPC1/MPC1L/MPC2, respectively, represent a position which shows slight preference for polar/charged residues, but is asymmetric between MPC1/SLC54A1 and MPC2/SLC54A2 proteins, which could hint at a possible substrate-binding role [42]. We can also observe based on Figure 2 that the disease-associated mutation R97W [55] modifies an amino acid at a location that is considerably conserved in the family with a preference for basic sidechains, explaining the deleterious effects of the mutation. Intriguingly, the other currently known point mutation, L79H, is located at a poorly conserved position, and so is not expected to have a direct impact on the structure or function of the mature protein monomer. Several positions might contain structurally important residues with a clear preference for aromatic sidechains, such as F27/F29/F43, W28/W30/W44, W34/W36/W50, F66/F68/W82, F69/F71/Y85 in MPC1/MPC1L/MPC2, respectively. The detailed investigation of these residues in future studies might reveal more about their role in transporter function.

    Figure 2. Sequence analysis of human MPC (SLC54) proteins. The diagram above the alignment shows the part of the HMM logo corresponding to the sequence (see text). At each position in the HMM logo, higher columns correspond to higher sequence conservation, and letters are drawn proportional to their frequency of occurrence at that position. Vertical lines in the HMM logo show positions with non-zero insertion frequency. Transmembrane regions predicted by three different methods (HMMTOP, SPOCTOPUS, MEMSAT-SVM) are marked by black lines. Green lines mark transmembrane regions predicted to by pore-lining by MEMSAT-SVM. Secondary structure as predicted by PSIPRED is shown as magenta lines ( α -helix) and golden lines ( β -strand). Uniprot sequence identifiers are shown next to protein names for each sequence.

    4. SLC56—Sideroflexins

    Sideroflexin 1 (SLC56A1/SFXN1) has been described as the gene whose defects are responsible for the flexed-tail mouse phenotype with sideroblastic anemia [78]. Later, it was found that SLC56A1/SFXN1 plays a role in serine transport into the mitochondria, which in turn fuels one-carbon metabolism [79]. SLC56A3/SFXN3 and SLC56A2/SFXN2 can compensate for this function, as well as yeast and Drosophila homologues, indicating an ancestral function, while SLC56A4/SFXN4 and SLC56A5/SFXN5 were unable to do so, indicating a possible altered transport rate or substrate selectivity [79]. Regarding their mitochondrial targeting, sideroflexins do not show any canonical MTS [78], and instead are targeted to the mitochondria via the TIM22 import complex [80][81][82], similarly to SLC25 proteins.

    Very little is currently known about the structure and function of sideroflexin transporters. No structural homologs exist and, interestingly, no internal repeat symmetry has been described for SLC56 proteins. Five transmembrane helices were proposed to be conserved among family members and a few consensus motifs have been described [78]. Nevertheless, sequence analysis can potentially hint at functionally important regions in SLC56 proteins. Since the 3D structure and thus the membrane-spanning regions of SLC56 proteins are not known, we submitted the amino acid sequences of human SLC56A1–5 to various methods to predict the location of transmembrane regions and secondary structural elements as for MPC/SLC54 proteins. Interestingly, while four regions are more-less robustly predicted as transmembrane by various methods (Figure 3, alignment positions 140–160, 175–195, 225–250, 260–285, marked as Region 3–6, respectively), there appears to be significant inconsistency in predicting the first TM helical region (alignment region 75–125). The predictions by HMMTOP suggest two distinct regions (alignment positions 75–100 and 105–125, marked Region 1 and 2), and a third region overlapping with the first two (alignment position 90–110). However, the third region seems less likely due to the lack of sequence conservation as reported by the HMM logo, and the probability of residue insertions in alignment region 100–105 (Figure 3). SPOCTOPUS consistently does not report a TM segment in alignment region 75–125, while MEMSAT-SVM consistently reports the presence of a TM segment in Region 1 (Figure 3). Interestingly, MEMSAT-SVM also reports a sixth TM segment in Region 2 in SLC56A4, which is also predicted to be transmembrane by HMMTOP. This region is predicted to be helical by PSIPRED, and marked as pore-lining by SPOCTOPUS, likely hinting at its amphipathic nature. Region 2 also contains a sequence motif that is seemingly conserved in the protein family, and that has been described as "asparagine rich" already after the identification of SLC56A1/SFXN1 [78]. This motif could be described by the consensus WQWxNQSxNxxxN motif, where polar residues N, S and Q are in conserved positions. According to PSIPRED predictions, occasional coil and strand content can occur near the second Q and second N residues (Figure 3). Such local distortions of helical geometry typically signal the location of substrate-binding sites in transmembrane transporter proteins [42][43][83][84], which, combined with the conservation pattern of residues, suggests that this region could have a functional role. Given that this putative functional region is often missed by transmembrane segment prediction software, while region 75–100 is consistently predicted by MEMSAT-SVM as transmembrane, combined with the presence of a non-conserved, insertion-prone region at 100–105, it is tempting to speculate that in fact regions 75–100 and 105–125 constitute two independent transmembrane helices, leading to an overall topology with six transmembrane helices in all SLC56 proteins.

    Figure 3. Sequence analysis of human sideroflexin proteins (SLC56 family). The HMM logo is shown above the sequence alignment (see text). Vertical lines in the HMM logo show positions with non-zero insertion frequency. Transmembrane regions predicted by three different methods (HMMTOP, SPOCTOPUS, MEMSAT-SVM) are marked by black lines. Green lines mark transmembrane regions predicted to by pore-lining by MEMSAT-SVM. Secondary structure as predicted by PSIPRED is shown as magenta lines ( α -helix) and golden lines ( β -strand). Uniprot sequence identifiers are shown next to protein names for each sequence.

    Analysis of the other regions proposed as transmembrane also show remarkably conserved polar or charged residues that might play a role in shaping transport function. In Region 1, a conserved Arg residue is apparent from the HMM logo (Figure 3), corresponding to R92/R91/R91/R109/R108 in SLC56A1–5, respectively. Region 3 contains a conserved aromatic/hydrophobic residue (Y151/Y150/Y150/L166/Y167 in SLC56A1–5, respectively). Region 4 shows the consensus sequence pattern RxVPFxxVxxAxxxNxxxMR, of which P181/P180/P180/P201/P204 (SLC56A1–5, resp.) are conserved, indicating a possible structural role, while the N192/N191/N191/N212/N215 residues in the second half of the proposed transmembrane helix might play a functional role, and the highly conserved basic residue R197/R196/R196/R217/R220, proposed to be at the edge of the TM helix, might play a role in gating. Region 5 contains a conserved Ser-Arg (SR) motif with R233/R232/R232/R253/R256 highly preferred to be basic. In Region 6, the sequence pattern PxAxAxFPQ is apparent, with the first proline residue (P281/P280/P280/P301/P304, SLC56A1–5, resp.) being highly conserved, suggesting the presence of a functionally or structurally relevant kink in the transmembrane helix in this region. Interestingly, regions outside the predicted transmembrane segments also contain seemingly conserved sequence motifs. The region just N-terminal to the first predicted transmembrane segment (Region 1) harbors the HPDT motif that is well conserved in human sideroflexin proteins and has been recognized early on [78]. The proposed loop between Regions 4 and 5 also contains some remarkably conserved amino acid residues, such as E200/E199/E199/E220/E223, S218/S217/S217/S238/S241, (in SLC56A1–5, resp.), which might play a functional role; and G204/G203/G203/G224/G227, which could be important in maintaining structure, such as close helix-helix contacts. Finally, the last five C-terminal residues of human sideroflexin proteins contain the consensus sequence FNKGL of unknown function, with a highly conserved glycine residue. Notably, no disease-linked genetic defects that modify a single amino acid position have been described for SLC56 proteins so far, instead, only mutations causing frameshift and/or premature termination have been reported [85].

    Since the above descriptions are only based on computer predictions, they are speculative at this point. However, given the current scarcity of structure-function studies on sideroflexin proteins, these amino acid positions can be helpful to identify functionally relevant hot spots. These hypotheses, however, await validation by future experimental studies.

    5. The SLC55/LETM Mitochondrial Cation/Proton Exchanger Family

    LETM1 (SLC55A1) has had a controversial role, as it was first proposed to be a part of the mitochondrial K+/H+ exchanger (KHE) pathway [86][87]. However, later, through a genome-wide genetic screen, it was found to be responsible for altered Ca2+ levels in mitochondria [88], and subsequently the purified LETM1 protein in liposomes was shown to mediate Ca2+/H+ exchange [88][89][90]. However, later it was argued that K+/H+ and unspecific and electroneutral cation/H+ exchange better explain the effect seen upon knockout of LETM1 in model cells and the effects seen in the mitochondria of model animals and patients with LETM1 deletion [91]. For a more detailed review of mitochondrial K+ homeostasis, see the comprehensive reviews by Szabo et al. and Szewczyk et al. in this special issue. Nevertheless, the structure of LETM1 was proposed to be a hexamer and the predicted single TMH (alignment region 60–80 in Figure 4 [86]) contains a conserved acidic residue (E221), the mutation of which causes loss of the ability for the protein to take up Ca2+ into liposomes [90], which can be interpreted as E221 being part of the substrate-binding site. Interestingly, this residue is not conserved in LETMD1/SLC55A3 (N151, Figure 4), while other polar residues are present in the transmembrane region, such as S145, hinting at a substrate spectrum or a function that is likely different from LETM1/SLC55A1 and LETM2/SLC55A2. Nevertheless, the transport mechanism of the protein remains unknown, even though it has been shown that a change in external pH causes conformational changes in LETM1 [90]. In the proposed transmembrane region of SLC55 proteins, two proline residues seem to be conserved based on our sequence alignment and the HMM logo (Figure 4, P211/P180/F140 and P219/P188/P148 in SLC55A1–3, respectively). Conserved proline residues often signal positions with structurally important kinks in helices [92][93]. LETM1 contains the mitochondrial signal peptide [90], similarly to LETM2 (likelihood 0.3338) and LETMD1 (likelihood 0.9889) according to TargetP-2.0 [94] predictions, indicating that SLC55 proteins likely get translocated into the mitochondria via the TIM23 translocation complex. Currently, no single-point mutations linked to disease have been reported for SLC55 proteins.

    Figure 4. Sequence analysis of human LETM proteins (SLC55 family). HMM logo is shown over the alignment, based on the "LETM1" HMM model from Pfam (see text). Only the alignment region covered by the HMM model is shown. Certain non-conserved residue positions with ambiguous matches with the protein sequences have been removed from the HMM logo.

    6. ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters in Mitochondria

    Currently, 3 of the 48 human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters have been shown to be present in mitochondria, which are ABCB7, ABCB8 and ABCB10 (also known as ABC7 [95], M-ABC1 [96], and M-ABC2 [97], respectively). ABCB6 has also been suggested to be a mitochondrial transporter [98], but this has later been challenged [99][100]. The three mitochondrial ABC transporter proteins, in contrast to solute carriers, contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence at their N-termini [95][96][97][101], indicating that they are most likely translocated into the mitochondrial inner membrane via the TIM23 machinery. The presence of an N-terminal cleavable targeting signal is also supported by TargetP-2.0 predictions (likelihoods 0.9634, 0.7184, and 0.207 for human ABCB7, ABCB8, and ABCB10, respectively), while human ABCB6 was not predicted to contain a signal peptide (likelihood 0.0001).

    A yeast ABC transporter protein (Mdl1) showing considerable sequence similarity to human ABCB proteins [102], was shown to use both the conservative Oxa1-mediated import machinery and lateral release from the TIM23 complex to translocate to the IMM [20]. Based on this, it is likely that human ABCB proteins also use the same pathway for mitochondrial targeting. In addition, the homologous yeast Mdl2 protein and Atm1 (human ABCB7 ortholog) have also been suggested to employ OXA-mediated membrane insertion into the IMM [103]. Nevertheless, while it is plausible that human mitochondrial ABCB proteins also employ a similar mechanism, this has not yet been experimentally studied.

    ABCB transporters in the mitochondria are so-called "half transporters", consisting of one nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) and one transmembrane domain (TMD), with homodimeric complexes forming the functional transporter unit. Recent structural studies of human ABCB10 [104] and yeast Atm1 [105] have highlighted conserved sequence motifs that are located along cavities forming the putative substrate-binding site in the TMD. Interestingly, they are not lying in overlapping locations in the two different proteins. For human ABCB7, residues R315, R319, N378, N425, T429, R432 and E433 (corresponding to R280, R284, N343, N390, S394, R397, D398 in yeast Atm1, respectively) in TMH4, TMH5 and TMH6 near the cytoplasmic membrane interface have been proposed to take part in substrate binding based on the yeast Atm1 structure with bound glutathione [105]. While one of these positions, E433 have been found to be mutated to lysine in patients with X-linked sideroblastic anemia (XLSA) [106], biochemical validation of these binding site residues is still missing [105]. For human ABCB10, a conserved signature sequence of (N/I)xxR (containing N229 and R232) and NxxDGxR (containing N289, D292, R295) in TMH2 and TMH3, respectively, were found and have been proposed to take part in substrate binding [104]. In the case of ABCB10, the missing identity of the transported substrate hampers biochemical studies on the functional role of individual residues. It has been proposed that ABCB10 transports an intermediate in the heme biosynthesis pathway [107]. Structure-function studies elucidating functionally relevant residues or sequence motifs of human ABCB8 are still missing. In neither ABCB8 nor in ABCB10 have disease-linked single-point mutations been described yet.

    7. Mitochondrial Calcium Transport via SLC8 Family

    SLC8B1 (NCLX, Na+/Ca2+/Li+ exchanger) was identified as the ion exchanger protein responsible for the exit of Ca2+ from the mitochondria [108]. SLC8B1 is thought to exchange 3 Na+ ions for 1 Ca2+ ion based on similarity to other Na+/Ca2+ exchangers [109][110][111], and is unique in the property that Li+ ions can replace Na+ ions in transport [112]. Recently, it has been reported that Na+ taken up into the mitochondrial matrix by SLC8B1 in exchange for Ca2+ derived from calcium precipitates upon matrix acidification controls hypoxic signaling via the mitochondrial respiratory chain [113]. Specifically, it was reported that the Na+ imported into the matrix reduces membrane fluidity through interaction with phospholipids. This in turn was shown to lead to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by altering certain elements of the electron transport chain, thereby promoting an adaptive short-time elevation of mitochondrial complex III-dependent ROS production during acute hypoxia. Indeed, inhibition of Na+ import via SLC8B1 was sufficient to prevent this pathway leading to adaptation to acute hypoxia [113].

    While the mechanism of mitochondrial targeting of SLC8B1 has not yet been studied, the sequence of human SLC8B1 does not seem to contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence according to TargetP-2.0 predictions (likelihood 0.0016). This suggests that other internal targeting signals are present that direct the protein into the mitochondria, possibly similarly to SLC25, MPC and sideroflexin proteins.

    Disease-releated mutations have not been reported for SLC8B1 thus far. However, residues responsible for the unique Li+-exchange capacity of SLC8B1 have been investigated in detail. Based on the determined structure of an archaeal NCX homologue, NCX_Mj, it was found that only 3 of the 12 ion-coordinating residues were shared with human SLC8B1 [114]. By mutating the 9 different residues to their human counterparts, it was possible to engineer a mutant of NCX_Mj that can also mediate Li+-dependent Ca2+ exchange [114]. In a later study, it was found that mutation of residue D471 to alanine can shift the selectivity toward Na+, while mutations at several positions can render SLC8B1 a Li+-selective exchanger [115]. All these positions cluster close to the Na+-binding sites shown by the X-ray structures of NCX_Mj [116][117] and the homologous H+/Ca2+ exchanger CAX_Af from the euryarchaeota A. fulgidus [118].

    8. Additional Families with Members Proposed to be Localized in the IMM

    8.1. The SLC9 Na+/H+ Exchanger Family

    SLC9B2 (NHA2, Na+/H+ antiporter 2) might localize to the mitochondria [119][120], but this has been disputed [121]. Otherwise, SLC9B2 is more similar to prokaryotic Na+/H+ exchangers (NHEs) than to eukaryotic ones [121], and is the only human member of the Cation/Proton Antiporter 2 (CPA2) subfamily [122]. SLC9B2 does not seem to contain a MTS according to TargetP-2.0 predictions (likelihood 0).

    8.2. The SLC1 Glutamate/Neutral Amino Acid Transporter Family

    A splice variant of SLC1A5 (SLC1A5_var) was recently reported to have a mitochondrial localization and to function as the "long sought-after mitochondrial glutamine transporter" [123]. However, several inconsistencies urge us to treat this conclusion with caution. Firstly, the software the authors used for signal peptide detection (PrediSi) is designed to detect the signal peptides of proteins secreted through the Sec pathway [124], and is therefore unsuitable to detect a MTS. In contrast, methods that were specifically developed to detect MTS, such as TargetP-2.0, do not detect the presence of an MTS in SLC1A5_var (likelihood 0). Furthermore, the antibodies used by the authors to detect SLC1A5_var are claimed to "recognize the SLC1A5_var after peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F) treatment" [123]. However, the only N-linked glycosylation sites on SLC1A5 are N163 and N212 [125], which are present in exon 1 that is in fact not present in the splice variant SLC1A5_var. Therefore, PNGase F treatment should not affect SLC1A5_var recognition. Due to the missing N-glycosylation sites, it is also likely, contrary to what the authors claim, that SLC1A5_var is not glycosylated. Finally, SLC1A5_var, in line with what is reported by the authors in their Figure 1A, is missing residues 2–203 of, but is otherwise identical to, canonical SLC1A5. According to sequence alignment of human SLC1 family members and the structure of a thermostable variant of the paralogous human SLC1A3 [126], this would mean that SLC1A5_var is missing the first 4 TMHs of the transporter protein, constituting most of the scaffold subdomain of the transporter. The importance of this region in transport is underlined by the fact that TMH3 forms part of the binding site for the allosteric SLC1A3 inhibitor UCPH101, and TMH1 has been proposed to interact extensively with the lipid bilayer, harboring a possible lipid-binding site [126]. Thus, these regions are likely to be important in SLC1A5 as well, and it is questionable whether SLC1A5_var could function as a transporter with such an N-terminal truncation. Therefore, given the above-mentioned issues with the antibody used and the detection of an MTS, it is somewhat doubtful whether SLC1A5_var is truly a mitochondrial glutamine transporter. As an alternative, glutamine may be converted to glutamate in the mitochondrial intermembrane space via the phosphate-dependent glutaminase GLS [127] that is thought to be attached to the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane [128]. Glutamate that is generated may then cross the IMM by the mitochondrial glutamate carriers SLC25A22 or SLC25A12. On the other hand, should GLS face the intra-mitochondrial matrix, a mitochondrial glutamine carrier is required. The need for such a carrier has been reviewed in detail in [129]. However, to clarify this subject matter, a conclusive subcellular localization study of GLS in the mitochondrial inner membrane is still required, in order to reveal whether the enzyme is active on the intermembrane space or within the mitochondrial matrix.

    The entry is from 10.3390/biom10121611

    References

    1. Koonin, E.V. The Origin and Early Evolution of Eukaryotes in the Light of Phylogenomics. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, 209.
    2. Gray, M.W. Mitochondrial Evolution. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a011403.
    3. Sicheritz-Pontén, T.; Kurland, C.G.; Andersson, S.G. A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Cytochrome b and Cytochrome c Oxidase I Genes Supports an Origin of Mitochondria from within the Rickettsiaceae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1365, 545–551.
    4. Kurland, C.G.; Andersson, S.G. Origin and Evolution of the Mitochondrial Proteome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 786–820.
    5. Karlberg, O.; Canbäck, B.; Kurland, C.G.; Andersson, S.G. The Dual Origin of the Yeast Mitochondrial Proteome. Yeast 2000, 17, 170–187.
    6. Gray, M.W.; Lang, B.F.; Cedergren, R.; Golding, G.B.; Lemieux, C.; Sankoff, D.; Turmel, M.; Brossard, N.; Delage, E.; Littlejohn, T.G.; et al. Genome Structure and Gene Content in Protist Mitochondrial DNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 865–878.
    7. Wolstenholme, D.R. Animal Mitochondrial DNA: Structure and Evolution. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1992, 141, 173–216.
    8. Vothknecht, U.C.; Szabo, I. Mitochondrial Ion Channels and Transporters in Plants: Prediction and Facts. Mitochondrion 2020, 53, 224–233.
    9. Shoshan-Barmatz, V.; Shteinfer-Kuzmine, A.; Verma, A. VDAC1 at the Intersection of Cell Metabolism, Apoptosis, and Diseases. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1485.
    10. Becker, T.; Wagner, R. Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Channels: Emerging Diversity in Transport Processes. Bioessays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2018, 40, e1800013.
    11. Wiedemann, N.; Pfanner, N. Mitochondrial Machineries for Protein Import and Assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 685–714.
    12. Mokranjac, D.; Neupert, W. Cell Biology: Architecture of a Protein Entry Gate. Nature 2015, 528, 201–202.
    13. Shiota, T.; Imai, K.; Qiu, J.; Hewitt, V.L.; Tan, K.; Shen, H.H.; Sakiyama, N.; Fukasawa, Y.; Hayat, S.; Kamiya, M.; et al. Molecular Architecture of the Active Mitochondrial Protein Gate. Science 2015, 349, 1544–1548.
    14. von Heijne, G.; Steppuhn, J.; Herrmann, R.G. Domain Structure of Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Targeting Peptides. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 180, 535–545.
    15. Garg, S.G.; Gould, S.B. The Role of Charge in Protein Targeting Evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 894–905.
    16. Abe, Y.; Shodai, T.; Muto, T.; Mihara, K.; Torii, H.; Nishikawa, S.; Endo, T.; Kohda, D. Structural Basis of Presequence Recognition by the Mitochondrial Protein Import Receptor Tom20. Cell 2000, 100, 551–560.
    17. Mokranjac, D.; Neupert, W. The Many Faces of the Mitochondrial TIM23 Complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1797, 1045–1054.
    18. Ieva, R.; Schrempp, S.G.; Opaliński, L.; Wollweber, F.; Höß, P.; Heißwolf, A.K.; Gebert, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guiard, B.; Rospert, S.; et al. Mgr2 Functions as Lateral Gatekeeper for Preprotein Sorting in the Mitochondrial Inner Membrane. Mol. Cell 2014, 56, 641–652.
    19. Steffen, J.; Koehler, C.M. The Great Escape: Mgr2 of the Mitochondrial TIM23 Translocon Is a Gatekeeper Tasked with Releasing Membrane Proteins. Mol. Cell 2014, 56, 613–614.
    20. Bohnert, M.; Rehling, P.; Guiard, B.; Herrmann, J.M.; Pfanner, N.; van der Laan, M. Cooperation of Stop-Transfer and Conservative Sorting Mechanisms in Mitochondrial Protein Transport. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1227–1232.
    21. van der Giezen, M.; Slotboom, D.J.; Horner, D.S.; Dyal, P.L.; Harding, M.; Xue, G.P.; Embley, T.M.; Kunji, E.R.S. Conserved Properties of Hydrogenosomal and Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carriers: A Common Origin for Both Organelles. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 572–579.
    22. Garg, S.; Stölting, J.; Zimorski, V.; Rada, P.; Tachezy, J.; Martin, W.F.; Gould, S.B. Conservation of Transit Peptide-Independent Protein Import into the Mitochondrial and Hydrogenosomal Matrix. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015, 7, 2716–2726.
    23. Fukasawa, Y.; Oda, T.; Tomii, K.; Imai, K. Origin and Evolutionary Alteration of the Mitochondrial Import System in Eukaryotic Lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1574–1586.
    24. Baker, A.; Schatz, G. Sequences from a Prokaryotic Genome or the Mouse Dihydrofolate Reductase Gene Can Restore the Import of a Truncated Precursor Protein into Yeast Mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 3117–3121.
    25. Kaiser, C.A.; Preuss, D.; Grisafi, P.; Botstein, D. Many Random Sequences Functionally Replace the Secretion Signal Sequence of Yeast Invertase. Science 1987, 235, 312–317.
    26. Lemire, B.D.; Fankhauser, C.; Baker, A.; Schatz, G. The Mitochondrial Targeting Function of Randomly Generated Peptide Sequences Correlates with Predicted Helical Amphiphilicity. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 20206–20215.
    27. Dunn, C.D.; Paavilainen, V.O. Wherever I May Roam: Organellar Protein Targeting and Evolvability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2019, 58, 9–16.
    28. Palmieri, F. The Mitochondrial Transporter Family SLC25: Identification, Properties and Physiopathology. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 465–484.
    29. Saraste, M.; Walker, J.E. Internal Sequence Repeats and the Path of Polypeptide in Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Translocase. FEBS Lett. 1982, 144, 250–254.
    30. Forrest, L.R. Structural Symmetry in Membrane Proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2015, 44, 311–337.
    31. Runswick, M.J.; Powell, S.J.; Nyren, P.; Walker, J.E. Sequence of the Bovine Mitochondrial Phosphate Carrier Protein: Structural Relationship to ADP/ATP Translocase and the Brown Fat Mitochondria Uncoupling Protein. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 1367–1373.
    32. Runswick, M.J.; Walker, J.E.; Bisaccia, F.; Iacobazzi, V.; Palmieri, F. Sequence of the Bovine 2-Oxoglutarate/Malate Carrier Protein: Structural Relationship to Other Mitochondrial Transport Proteins. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 11033–11040.
    33. Indiveri, C.; Iacobazzi, V.; Giangregorio, N.; Palmieri, F. The Mitochondrial Carnitine Carrier Protein: cDNA Cloning, Primary Structure and Comparison with Other Mitochondrial Transport Proteins. Biochem. J. 1997, 321 (Pt 3), 713–719.
    34. Palmieri, F. Mitochondrial Carrier Proteins. FEBS Lett. 1994, 346, 48–54.
    35. Walker, J.E. The Mitochondrial Transporter Family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1992, 2, 519–526.
    36. Nelson, D.R.; Felix, C.M.; Swanson, J.M. Highly Conserved Charge-Pair Networks in the Mitochondrial Carrier Family. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 277, 285–308.
    37. Falconi, M.; Chillemi, G.; Di Marino, D.; D’Annessa, I.; Morozzo della Rocca, B.; Palmieri, L.; Desideri, A. Structural Dynamics of the Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carrier Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies. Proteins 2006, 65, 681–691.
    38. Giangregorio, N.; Tonazzi, A.; Indiveri, C.; Palmieri, F. Conformation-Dependent Accessibility of Cys-136 and Cys-155 of the Mitochondrial Rat Carnitine/Acylcarnitine Carrier to Membrane-Impermeable SH Reagents. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 1331–1339.
    39. Cappello, A.R.; Miniero, D.V.; Curcio, R.; Ludovico, A.; Daddabbo, L.; Stipani, I.; Robinson, A.J.; Kunji, E.R.S.; Palmieri, F. Functional and Structural Role of Amino Acid Residues in the Odd-Numbered Transmembrane Alpha-Helices of the Bovine Mitochondrial Oxoglutarate Carrier. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 400–412.
    40. Palmieri, F. Diseases Caused by Defects of Mitochondrial Carriers: A Review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1777, 564–578.
    41. Lauria, G.; Sanchez, P.; Della Rocca, B.M.; Pierri, C.L.; Polizio, F.; Stipani, I.; Desideri, A. Structural-Dynamical Properties of the Transmembrane Segment VI of the Mitochondrial Oxoglutarate Carrier Studied by Site Directed Spin-Labeling. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2008, 25, 236–244.
    42. Robinson, A.J.; Overy, C.; Kunji, E.R.S. The Mechanism of Transport by Mitochondrial Carriers Based on Analysis of Symmetry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17766–17771.
    43. Pebay-Peyroula, E.; Dahout-Gonzalez, C.; Kahn, R.; Trézéguet, V.; Lauquin, G.J.M.; Brandolin, G. Structure of Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carrier in Complex with Carboxyatractyloside. Nature 2003, 426, 39–44.
    44. Ruprecht, J.J.; Hellawell, A.M.; Harding, M.; Crichton, P.G.; McCoy, A.J.; Kunji, E.R.S. Structures of Yeast Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carriers Support a Domain-Based Alternating-Access Transport Mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E426–E434.
    45. Ruprecht, J.J.; Kunji, E.R.S. The SLC25 Mitochondrial Carrier Family: Structure and Mechanism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2020, 45, 244–258.
    46. Cappello, A.R.; Curcio, R.; Valeria Miniero, D.; Stipani, I.; Robinson, A.J.; Kunji, E.R.S.; Palmieri, F. Functional and Structural Role of Amino Acid Residues in the Even-Numbered Transmembrane Alpha-Helices of the Bovine Mitochondrial Oxoglutarate Carrier. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 363, 51–62.
    47. Ruprecht, J.J.; Kunji, E.R. Structural Changes in the Transport Cycle of the Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carrier. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019, 57, 135–144.
    48. Ruprecht, J.J.; King, M.S.; Zögg, T.; Aleksandrova, A.A.; Pardon, E.; Crichton, P.G.; Steyaert, J.; Kunji, E.R.S. The Molecular Mechanism of Transport by the Mitochondrial ADP/ATP Carrier. Cell 2019, 176, 435.e15–447.e15.
    49. Palmieri, F.; Scarcia, P.; Monné, M. Diseases Caused by Mutations in Mitochondrial Carrier Genes SLC25: A Review. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 655.
    50. Pierri, C.L.; Palmieri, F.; De Grassi, A. Single-Nucleotide Evolution Quantifies the Importance of Each Site along the Structure of Mitochondrial Carriers. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 349–364.
    51. Brix, J.; Rüdiger, S.; Bukau, B.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Pfanner, N. Distribution of Binding Sequences for the Mitochondrial Import Receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 in a Presequence-Carrying Preprotein and a Non-Cleavable Preprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 16522–16530.
    52. Kreimendahl, S.; Schwichtenberg, J.; Günnewig, K.; Brandherm, L.; Rassow, J. The Selectivity Filter of the Mitochondrial Protein Import Machinery. BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 156.
    53. Wiedemann, N.; Pfanner, N.; Ryan, M.T. The Three Modules of ADP/ATP Carrier Cooperate in Receptor Recruitment and Translocation into Mitochondria. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 951–960.
    54. Kaplan, R.S.; Mayor, J.A.; Wood, D.O. The Mitochondrial Tricarboxylate Transport Protein. cDNA Cloning, Primary Structure, and Comparison with Other Mitochondrial Transport Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 13682–13690.
    55. Bricker, D.K.; Taylor, E.B.; Schell, J.C.; Orsak, T.; Boutron, A.; Chen, Y.C.; Cox, J.E.; Cardon, C.M.; Van Vranken, J.G.; Dephoure, N.; et al. A Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Required for Pyruvate Uptake in Yeast, Drosophila, and Humans. Science 2012, 337, 96–100.
    56. Herzig, S.; Raemy, E.; Montessuit, S.; Veuthey, J.L.; Zamboni, N.; Westermann, B.; Kunji, E.R.S.; Martinou, J.C. Identification and Functional Expression of the Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier. Science 2012, 337, 93–96.
    57. Tavoulari, S.; Thangaratnarajah, C.; Mavridou, V.; Harbour, M.E.; Martinou, J.C.; Kunji, E.R. The Yeast Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Is a Hetero-Dimer in Its Functional State. EMBO J. 2019, 38.
    58. Vanderperre, B.; Cermakova, K.; Escoffier, J.; Kaba, M.; Bender, T.; Nef, S.; Martinou, J.C. MPC1-like Is a Placental Mammal-Specific Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Subunit Expressed in Postmeiotic Male Germ Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 16448–16461.
    59. Bender, T.; Pena, G.; Martinou, J.C. Regulation of Mitochondrial Pyruvate Uptake by Alternative Pyruvate Carrier Complexes. EMBO J. 2015, 34, 911–924.
    60. Chen, L.Q.; Hou, B.H.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.Q.; Guo, W.J.; Kim, J.G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar Transporters for Intercellular Exchange and Nutrition of Pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532.
    61. Chen, L.Q. SWEET Sugar Transporters for Phloem Transport and Pathogen Nutrition. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 1150–1155.
    62. Xu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Cheung, L.S.; Fan, C.; Chen, L.Q.; Xu, S.; Perry, K.; Frommer, W.B.; Feng, L. Structures of Bacterial Homologues of SWEET Transporters in Two Distinct Conformations. Nature 2014, 515, 448–452.
    63. Medrano-Soto, A.; Ghazi, F.; Hendargo, K.J.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Myers, S.; Saier, M.H. Expansion of the Transporter-Opsin-G Protein-Coupled Receptor Superfamily with Five New Protein Families. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231085.
    64. Xuan, Y.H.; Hu, Y.B.; Chen, L.Q.; Sosso, D.; Ducat, D.C.; Hou, B.H.; Frommer, W.B. Functional Role of Oligomerization for Bacterial and Plant SWEET Sugar Transporter Family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E3685–E3694.
    65. Wang, J.; Yan, C.; Li, Y.; Hirata, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Yan, N.; Hu, Q. Crystal Structure of a Bacterial Homologue of SWEET Transporters. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1486–1489.
    66. Jaehme, M.; Guskov, A.; Slotboom, D.J. Crystal Structure of the Vitamin B3 Transporter PnuC, a Full-Length SWEET Homolog. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21, 1013–1015.
    67. Lee, Y.; Nishizawa, T.; Yamashita, K.; Ishitani, R.; Nureki, O. Structural Basis for the Facilitative Diffusion Mechanism by SemiSWEET Transporter. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6112.
    68. Han, L.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, G.; Lan, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.C. Molecular Mechanism of Substrate Recognition and Transport by the AtSWEET13 Sugar Transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10089–10094.
    69. Latorraca, N.R.; Fastman, N.M.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Frommer, W.B.; Dror, R.O.; Feng, L. Mechanism of Substrate Translocation in an Alternating Access Transporter. Cell 2017, 169, 96.e12–107.e12.
    70. Brivet, M.; Garcia-Cazorla, A.; Lyonnet, S.; Dumez, Y.; Nassogne, M.C.; Slama, A.; Boutron, A.; Touati, G.; Legrand, A.; Saudubray, J.M. Impaired Mitochondrial Pyruvate Importation in a Patient and a Fetus at Risk. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2003, 78, 186–192.
    71. Oonthonpan, L.; Rauckhorst, A.J.; Gray, L.R.; Boutron, A.C.; Taylor, E.B. Two Human Patient Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Mutations Reveal Distinct Molecular Mechanisms of Dysfunction. JCI Insight 2019, 5.
    72. El-Gebali, S.; Mistry, J.; Bateman, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Luciani, A.; Potter, S.C.; Qureshi, M.; Richardson, L.J.; Salazar, G.A.; Smart, A.; et al. The Pfam Protein Families Database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D427–D432.
    73. Wheeler, T.J.; Clements, J.; Finn, R.D. Skylign: A Tool for Creating Informative, Interactive Logos Representing Sequence Alignments and Profile Hidden Markov Models. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 7.
    74. Tusnády, G.E.; Simon, I. The HMMTOP Transmembrane Topology Prediction Server. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 849–850.
    75. Viklund, H.; Bernsel, A.; Skwark, M.; Elofsson, A. SPOCTOPUS: A Combined Predictor of Signal Peptides and Membrane Protein Topology. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2928–2929.
    76. Nugent, T.; Jones, D.T. Detecting Pore-Lining Regions in Transmembrane Protein Sequences. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 169.
    77. Jones, D.T. Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Position-Specific Scoring Matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 292, 195–202.
    78. Fleming, M.D.; Campagna, D.R.; Haslett, J.N.; Trenor, C.C.; Andrews, N.C. A Mutation in a Mitochondrial Transmembrane Protein Is Responsible for the Pleiotropic Hematological and Skeletal Phenotype of Flexed-Tail (f/f) Mice. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 652–657.
    79. Kory, N.; Wyant, G.A.; Prakash, G.; Uit de Bos, J.; Bottanelli, F.; Pacold, M.E.; Chan, S.H.; Lewis, C.A.; Wang, T.; Keys, H.R.; et al. SFXN1 Is a Mitochondrial Serine Transporter Required for One-Carbon Metabolism. Science 2018, 362.
    80. Acoba, M.G.; Alpergin, E.S.S.; Renuse, S.; Fernández-del-Río, L.; Lu, Y.W.; Clarke, C.F.; Pandey, A.; Wolfgang, M.J.; Claypool, S.M. The Mitochondrial Carrier SFXN1 Is Critical for Complex III Integrity and Cellular Metabolism. bioRxiv 2020.
    81. Jackson, T.D.; Hock, D.; Palmer, C.S.; Kang, Y.; Fujihara, K.M.; Clemons, N.J.; Thorburn, D.R.; Stroud, D.A.; Stojanovski, D. The TIM22 Complex Regulates Mitochondrial One-Carbon Metabolism by Mediating the Import of Sideroflexins. bioRxiv 2020.
    82. Horten, P.; Colina-Tenorio, L.; Rampelt, H. Biogenesis of Mitochondrial Metabolite Carriers. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1008.
    83. Yamashita, A.; Singh, S.K.; Kawate, T.; Jin, Y.; Gouaux, E. Crystal Structure of a Bacterial Homologue of Na+/Cl—Dependent Neurotransmitter Transporters. Nature 2005, 437, 215–223.
    84. Boudker, O.; Ryan, R.M.; Yernool, D.; Shimamoto, K.; Gouaux, E. Coupling Substrate and Ion Binding to Extracellular Gate of a Sodium-Dependent Aspartate Transporter. Nature 2007, 445, 387–393.
    85. Hildick-Smith, G.J.; Cooney, J.D.; Garone, C.; Kremer, L.S.; Haack, T.B.; Thon, J.N.; Miyata, N.; Lieber, D.S.; Calvo, S.E.; Akman, H.O.; et al. Macrocytic Anemia and Mitochondriopathy Resulting from a Defect in Sideroflexin 4. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 906–914.
    86. Nowikovsky, K.; Froschauer, E.M.; Zsurka, G.; Samaj, J.; Reipert, S.; Kolisek, M.; Wiesenberger, G.; Schweyen, R.J. The LETM1/YOL027 Gene Family Encodes a Factor of the Mitochondrial K+ Homeostasis with a Potential Role in the Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 30307–30315.
    87. Froschauer, E.; Nowikovsky, K.; Schweyen, R.J. Electroneutral K+/H+ Exchange in Mitochondrial Membrane Vesicles Involves Yol027/Letm1 Proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1711, 41–48.
    88. Jiang, D.; Zhao, L.; Clapham, D.E. Genome-Wide RNAi Screen Identifies Letm1 as a Mitochondrial Ca2+/H+ Antiporter. Science 2009, 326, 144–147.
    89. Tsai, M.F.; Jiang, D.; Zhao, L.; Clapham, D.; Miller, C. Functional Reconstitution of the Mitochondrial Ca2+/H+ Antiporter Letm1. J. Gen. Physiol. 2014, 143, 67–73.
    90. Shao, J.; Fu, Z.; Ji, Y.; Guan, X.; Guo, S.; Ding, Z.; Yang, X.; Cong, Y.; Shen, Y. Leucine Zipper-EF-Hand Containing Transmembrane Protein 1 (LETM1) Forms a Ca2+/H+ Antiporter. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34174.
    91. Nowikovsky, K.; Bernardi, P. LETM1 in Mitochondrial Cation Transport. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 83.
    92. Cordes, F.S.; Bright, J.N.; Sansom, M.S.P. Proline-Induced Distortions of Transmembrane Helices. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323, 951–960.
    93. Law, E.C.; Wilman, H.R.; Kelm, S.; Shi, J.; Deane, C.M. Examining the Conservation of Kinks in Alpha Helices. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157553.
    94. Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Salvatore, M.; Emanuelsson, O.; Winther, O.; von Heijne, G.; Elofsson, A.; Nielsen, H. Detecting Sequence Signals in Targeting Peptides Using Deep Learning. Life Sci. Alliance 2019, 2.
    95. Csere, P.; Lill, R.; Kispal, G. Identification of a Human Mitochondrial ABC Transporter, the Functional Orthologue of Yeast Atm1p. FEBS Lett. 1998, 441, 266–270.
    96. Hogue, D.L.; Liu, L.; Ling, V. Identification and Characterization of a Mammalian Mitochondrial ATP-Binding Cassette Membrane Protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 379–389.
    97. Zhang, F.; Hogue, D.L.; Liu, L.; Fisher, C.L.; Hui, D.; Childs, S.; Ling, V. M-ABC2, a New Human Mitochondrial ATP-Binding Cassette Membrane Protein. FEBS Lett. 2000, 478, 89–94.
    98. Krishnamurthy, P.C.; Du, G.; Fukuda, Y.; Sun, D.; Sampath, J.; Mercer, K.E.; Wang, J.; Sosa-Pineda, B.; Murti, K.G.; Schuetz, J.D. Identification of a Mammalian Mitochondrial Porphyrin Transporter. Nature 2006, 443, 586–589.
    99. Kiss, K.; Brozik, A.; Kucsma, N.; Toth, A.; Gera, M.; Berry, L.; Vallentin, A.; Vial, H.; Vidal, M.; Szakacs, G. Shifting the Paradigm: The Putative Mitochondrial Protein ABCB6 Resides in the Lysosomes of Cells and in the Plasma Membrane of Erythrocytes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37378.
    100. Kiss, K.; Kucsma, N.; Brozik, A.; Tusnady, G.E.; Bergam, P.; van Niel, G.; Szakacs, G. Role of the N-Terminal Transmembrane Domain in the Endo-Lysosomal Targeting and Function of the Human ABCB6 Protein. Biochem. J. 2015, 467, 127–139.
    101. Graf, S.A.; Haigh, S.E.; Corson, E.D.; Shirihai, O.S. Targeting, Import, and Dimerization of a Mammalian Mitochondrial ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporter, ABCB10 (ABC-Me). J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 42954–42963.
    102. Dean, M.; Allikmets, R.; Gerrard, B.; Stewart, C.; Kistler, A.; Shafer, B.; Michaelis, S.; Strathern, J. Mapping and Sequencing of Two Yeast Genes Belonging to the ATP-Binding Cassette Superfamily. Yeast 1994, 10, 377–383.
    103. Stiller, S.B.; Höpker, J.; Oeljeklaus, S.; Schütze, C.; Schrempp, S.G.; Vent-Schmidt, J.; Horvath, S.E.; Frazier, A.E.; Gebert, N.; van der Laan, M.; et al. Mitochondrial OXA Translocase Plays a Major Role in Biogenesis of Inner-Membrane Proteins. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 901–908.
    104. Shintre, C.A.; Pike, A.C.W.; Li, Q.; Kim, J.I.; Barr, A.J.; Goubin, S.; Shrestha, L.; Yang, J.; Berridge, G.; Ross, J.; et al. Structures of ABCB10, a Human ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter in Apo- and Nucleotide-Bound States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9710–9715.
    105. Srinivasan, V.; Pierik, A.J.; Lill, R. Crystal Structures of Nucleotide-Free and Glutathione-Bound Mitochondrial ABC Transporter Atm1. Science 2014, 343, 1137–1140.
    106. Bekri, S.; Kispal, G.; Lange, H.; Fitzsimons, E.; Tolmie, J.; Lill, R.; Bishop, D.F. Human ABC7 Transporter: Gene Structure and Mutation Causing X-Linked Sideroblastic Anemia with Ataxia with Disruption of Cytosolic Iron-Sulfur Protein Maturation. Blood 2000, 96, 3256–3264.
    107. Seguin, A.; Takahashi-Makise, N.; Yien, Y.Y.; Huston, N.C.; Whitman, J.C.; Musso, G.; Wallace, J.A.; Bradley, T.; Bergonia, H.A.; Kafina, M.D.; et al. Reductions in the Mitochondrial ABC Transporter Abcb10 Affect the Transcriptional Profile of Heme Biosynthesis Genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 16284–16299.
    108. Palty, R.; Silverman, W.F.; Hershfinkel, M.; Caporale, T.; Sensi, S.L.; Parnis, J.; Nolte, C.; Fishman, D.; Shoshan-Barmatz, V.; Herrmann, S.; et al. NCLX Is an Essential Component of Mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ Exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 436–441.
    109. Khananshvili, D. Distinction between the Two Basic Mechanisms of Cation Transport in the Cardiac Na+-Ca2+ Exchange System. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 2437–2442.
    110. Pitts, B.J. Stoichiometry of Sodium-Calcium Exchange in Cardiac Sarcolemmal Vesicles. Coupling to the Sodium Pump. J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 6232–6235.
    111. Reeves, J.P.; Hale, C.C. The Stoichiometry of the Cardiac Sodium-Calcium Exchange System. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 7733–7739.
    112. Palty, R.; Ohana, E.; Hershfinkel, M.; Volokita, M.; Elgazar, V.; Beharier, O.; Silverman, W.F.; Argaman, M.; Sekler, I. Lithium-Calcium Exchange Is Mediated by a Distinct Potassium-Independent Sodium-Calcium Exchanger. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25234–25240.
    113. Hernansanz-Agustín, P.; Choya-Foces, C.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Ramos, E.; Oliva, T.; Villa-Piña, T.; Moreno, L.; Izquierdo-Álvarez, A.; Cabrera-García, J.D.; Cortés, A.; et al. Na+ Controls Hypoxic Signalling by the Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain. Nature 2020, 586, 287–291.
    114. Refaeli, B.; Giladi, M.; Hiller, R.; Khananshvili, D. Structure-Based Engineering of Lithium-Transport Capacity in an Archaeal Sodium-Calcium Exchanger. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 1673–1676.
    115. Roy, S.; Dey, K.; Hershfinkel, M.; Ohana, E.; Sekler, I. Identification of Residues That Control Li+ versus Na+ Dependent Ca2+ Exchange at the Transport Site of the Mitochondrial NCLX. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 997–1008.
    116. Liao, J.; Li, H.; Zeng, W.; Sauer, D.B.; Belmares, R.; Jiang, Y. Structural Insight into the Ion-Exchange Mechanism of the Sodium/Calcium Exchanger. Science 2012, 335, 686–690.
    117. Liao, J.; Marinelli, F.; Lee, C.; Huang, Y.; Faraldo-Gómez, J.D.; Jiang, Y. Mechanism of Extracellular Ion Exchange and Binding-Site Occlusion in a Sodium/Calcium Exchanger. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 590–599.
    118. Nishizawa, T.; Kita, S.; Maturana, A.D.; Furuya, N.; Hirata, K.; Kasuya, G.; Ogasawara, S.; Dohmae, N.; Iwamoto, T.; Ishitani, R.; et al. Structural Basis for the Counter-Transport Mechanism of a H2+/Ca2+ Exchanger. Science 2013, 341, 168–172.
    119. Battaglino, R.A.; Pham, L.; Morse, L.R.; Vokes, M.; Sharma, A.; Odgren, P.R.; Yang, M.; Sasaki, H.; Stashenko, P. NHA-Oc/NHA2: A Mitochondrial Cation-Proton Antiporter Selectively Expressed in Osteoclasts. Bone 2008, 42, 180–192.
    120. Fuster, D.G.; Zhang, J.; Shi, M.; Bobulescu, I.A.; Andersson, S.; Moe, O.W. Characterization of the Sodium/Hydrogen Exchanger NHA2. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 1547–1556.
    121. Donowitz, M.; Ming Tse, C.; Fuster, D. SLC9/NHE Gene Family, a Plasma Membrane and Organellar Family of Na+/H+ Exchangers. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 236–251.
    122. Masrati, G.; Dwivedi, M.; Rimon, A.; Gluck-Margolin, Y.; Kessel, A.; Ashkenazy, H.; Mayrose, I.; Padan, E.; Ben-Tal, N. Broad Phylogenetic Analysis of Cation/Proton Antiporters Reveals Transport Determinants. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4205.
    123. Yoo, H.C.; Park, S.J.; Nam, M.; Kang, J.; Kim, K.; Yeo, J.H.; Kim, J.K.; Heo, Y.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, M.Y.; et al. A Variant of SLC1A5 Is a Mitochondrial Glutamine Transporter for Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Cells. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 267–283.e12.
    124. Hiller, K.; Grote, A.; Scheer, M.; Münch, R.; Jahn, D. PrediSi: Prediction of Signal Peptides and Their Cleavage Positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W375–W379.
    125. Console, L.; Scalise, M.; Tarmakova, Z.; Coe, I.R.; Indiveri, C. N-Linked Glycosylation of Human SLC1A5 (ASCT2) Transporter Is Critical for Trafficking to Membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1853, 1636–1645.
    126. Canul-Tec, J.C.; Assal, R.; Cirri, E.; Legrand, P.; Brier, S.; Chamot-Rooke, J.; Reyes, N. Structure and Allosteric Inhibition of Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 1. Nature 2017, 544, 446–451.
    127. Kandasamy, P.; Gyimesi, G.; Kanai, Y.; Hediger, M.A. Amino Acid Transporters Revisited: New Views in Health and Disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 752–789.
    128. Welbourne, T.; Routh, R.; Yudkoff, M.; Nissim, I. The Glutamine/Glutamate Couplet and Cellular Function. News Physiol. Sci. 2001, 16, 157–160.
    129. Scalise, M.; Pochini, L.; Galluccio, M.; Console, L.; Indiveri, C. Glutamine Transport and Mitochondrial Metabolism in Cancer Cell Growth. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 306.
    More
    1. Please check and comment entries here.