1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Children with Hemiplegia

    Subjects: Pediatrics
    View times: 50
    Submitted by:


    It is a great research to know the importance of applying unimanual therapies with containment at home in children with hemiplegia.

    1. Introduction

    Infantile cerebral palsy (ICP) is a non-progressive encephalopathy that produces a series of permanent disorders, affecting motor and postural development in children[1]. The disease prevalence in developed countries is 2–2.5 cases per 1000 live births[1]. One of the most frequently occurring forms of ICP is hemiplegia, where one vertical body side is affected, as a consequence of brain damage that primarily affects one hemisphere[2]. Movements in the affected upper limb are slower and clumsy and accompanied by mirror movements. Moreover, there are deficits in the selective control in the fingers of the affected hand. Consequently, there is a reduction in the use of the affected hand, commonly known as “developmental disregard”, which interferes with activities of daily living[3]. Children with hemiplegia do not acquire a typical movement experience in their affected upper limb, unlike adults who have suffered a stroke later in their lifetime. Thus, the therapy used must provide the opportunity to experiment with the affected side, granting as much functionality as possible to the affected upper limb[4].

    2. Treatment

    Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is designed to improve the affected upper limb motor function after stroke, and consists of three key components: (1) repetitive, unimanual task-oriented training for six consecutive hours per day during 10–12 days; (2) adherence-enhancing behavioral strategies (transfer package); and (3) constraining the use of the less affected arm, usually by wearing a glove during waking hours[6][7]. CIMT modifications were proposed by Page et al.[8][9] using less than three non-consecutive hours of therapy per day applying the unaffected arm containment. These studies reported an increased use in the affected arm[8][9].

    Interventions with modified CIMT (mCIMT)[8][9] at an early age could expand primary neural networks through the experience and practice of their affected upper limb, since it implies a structured practice, demands attention to the task and encourages the practice and use of the affected segment. Thus, the training and repetitive tasks would be aimed at treating children from four years of age, who have the ability to execute the task for longer periods of time[8].

    The mCIMT is effective at promoting the functional use of the affected upper limb in children with hemiplegia[10][11][12][13]. Different studies in stroke patients have shown that mCIMT improves performance in tasks such as picking up a cup, grasping a spoon or holding a book[8][9][14][15]. The home environment provides a rich natural context to facilitate motivation, engagement and repetition in functional activities of daily living[16][17]. A “transfer package” technique facilitates treatment gains into real-world activities, such as reinforcement of treatment adherence and the emergence of new behaviors, thereby improving the spontaneous use of the trained affected upper limb in infantile hemiplegia[18][19]. Thus, mCIMT improves functionality in the affected upper through enhanced practice.

    The use of unaffected manual containment in mCIMT would result in improvements in affected upper extremity function in children with hemiplegia (4-8 years) compared to the same protocol without containment (UTWC). Unaffected hand restraint may reduce "developmental neglect or nonuse," thereby increasing spontaneous use and quality of movement in the affected upper extremity in children with hemiplegia.

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/jcm9092992


    1. Rosenbaum, P.; Paneth, N.; Leviton, A.; Goldstein, M.; Bax, M.; Damiano, D.; Dan, B.; Jacobsson, B. A report: The definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. Suppl. 2007, 109, 8–14.
    2. Bax, M.; Goldstein, M.; Rosenbaum, P.; Leviton, A.; Paneth, N.; Dan, B.; Jacobsson, B.; Damiano, D. Executive Committee for the Definition of Cerebral Palsy. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2005, 47, 571–576.
    3. Huang, W.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Chien, C.L.; Kashima, H.; Lin, K.C. Constraint-induced movement therapy as a paradigm of translational research in neurorehabilitation: Reviews and prospects. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2010, 3, 48–60.
    4. Boyd, R.N.; Sakzewski, L.; Ziviani, J.; Abbott, D.F.; Badawy, R.; Gilmore, R.; Provan, K.; Tournier, J.D.; Al Macdonell, R.; Jackson, G.D. INCITE: A randomised trial comparing constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with congenital hemiplegia. BMC Neurol. 2010, 10, 4.
    5. Ferrel, C.; Bard, C.; Fleury, M. Coordination in childhood: Modifications of visuomotor representations in 6- to 11-year-old children. Exp. Brain Res. 2001, 138, 313–321.
    6. Mark, V.W.; Taub, E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2004, 22, 317–336.
    7. Morris, D.M.; Taub, E.; Mark, V.W. Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Eur. Medicophys. 2006, 42, 257.
    8. Page, S.J.; Sisto, S.; Johnston, M.V.; Levine, P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2002, 16, 290–295.
    9. Page, S.J.; Levine, P.; Leonard, A.C. Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2005, 19, 27–32.
    10. Charles, J.R.; Wolf, S.L.; Schneider, J.A.; Gordon, A.M. Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized control trial. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2006, 48, 635.
    11. Chen, C.L.; Kang, L.J.; Hong, W.H.; Chen, F.C.; Chen, H.C.; Wu, C.Y. Effect of therapist-based constraint-induced therapy at home on motor control, motor performance and daily function in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled study. Clin. Rehabil. 2012, 27, 236–245.
    12. Chen, H.C.; Chen, C.L.; Kang, L.J.; Wu, C.Y.; Chen, F.C.; Hong, W.H. Improvement of upper extremity motor control and function after home-based constraint induced therapy in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: Immediate and long-term effects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, 1423–1432.
    13. Choudhary, A.; Gulati, S.; Kabra, M.; Singh, U.P.; Sankhyan, N.; Pandey, R.M.; Kalra, V. Efficacy of modified constraint induced movement therapy in improving upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Dev. 2013, 35, 870–876.
    14. Miltner, W.H.; Bauder, H.; Sommer, M.; Dettmers, C.; Taub, E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999, 30, 586–592.
    15. Brogårdh, C.; Sjölund, B.H. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: A pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin. Rehabil. 2006, 20, 218–227.
    16. Eliasson, A.C.; Krumlinde-sundholm, L.; Shaw, K.; Wang, C. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: An adapted model. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2005, 47, 266–275.
    17. Novak, I.; Honan, I. Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2019, 66, 258–273.
    18. Taub, E.; Griffin, A.; Nick, J.; Gammons, K.; Uswatte, G.; Law, C.R. Pediatric CI therapy for stroke-induced hemiparesis in young children. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2007, 10, 3–18.
    19. Taub, E.; Griffin, A.; Uswatte, G.; Gammons, K.; Nick, J.; Law, C.R. Treatment of congenital hemiparesis with pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy. J. Child Neurol. 2011, 26, 1163–1173.