Natural Thermal Convection of Nanofluids
Definition
Nanofluids are considered as advanced heat transfer media for thermal management and conversion systems. Research on the convective heat transfer is of paramount importance for their numerous applications. This paper presents development of experimental research on the natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids in different geometries. Experimental results and available experimentderived correlations for the natural thermal convection of nanofluids are critically analysed. Other features such as nanofluid preparation and thermophysical properties of nanofluids that are important for convection heat transfer are also briefly reviewed and discussed. It is demonstrated that there is considerable inconsistencies of available results on these properties and features of nanofluids.
Although nanofluids exhibit enhanced thermophysical properties like viscosity and thermal conductivity, convective heat transfer coefficients were also observed to deteriorate in some cases when nanofluids were used, especially for higher concentration of nanoparticles (> 0.1 vol%). However, the underlying mechanisms are also not yet wellunderstood despite its great importance for practical applications.
1. Introduction
Nanofluids (NF) which are considered as advanced cooling media, have received immense attention from researchers worldwide. Although the main application of this new class of fluids is in the thermal management and energy conversion systems, most of the research on nanofluids are on their thermal conductivity. Despite of huge importance and potential research works related to their cooling application and thermal energy conversion like applying in solar thermal systems are still very limited. Figure 1 illustrates the global record of publication outputs on NF, its thermal conductivity (TC), natural convection and convective heat transfer (CHT) application of NF as obtained from the Web of Science platform (Clarivate) spanning 2012 to 2019. It is noted that the records of publications (Figure 1) include all types articles from experimental, theoretical, numerical as well as review studies. As can be seen from Figure 1, research on NF continued to grow except last year’s slight declination (for the first time), and TC is still dominating as the primary thermophysical property of NF being published. On the other hand, research on the CHT remained considerably behind the publications on the TC of NF with the ups and downs for the period considered. Furthermore, natural convection which doesn’t require pumping power cost and is also a key cooling mode which has not received considerable attention from researchers (Figure 1). Also, natural convection studies of NF are significantly smaller compared with those of TC of NF and slightly less than those of CHT (forced convection). Thus, there is a clear need for more comprehensive works on the thermoconvection of NF under various thermal and concentration conditions in different geometries of cavities for their broad applications, particularly in thermal management and conversion.
Before employing NF in any application systems and characterizing their properties, NF must be engineered properly to ensure their longterm stability. Nanoparticles (NP) in NF agglomerate and sediment, which signify a poor degree of stability. This can impact negatively on both the experimental measurements of the thermal properties and convective behaviour of NF in any geometry and flow conditions ^{[1]}^{[2]}^{[3]}^{[4]}. Basically, NF are formulated using single and twostep approaches ^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}. The formal entails a single process of both synthesising the NP and suspending the same in the base fluid, (mainly at a volume concentration) whereas the latter involves a separate process of nanoparticles’ synthesis and their suspension into the base fluid. Since the stability of NP prepared by the twostep process is generally not satisfactory, it is important to undertake a proper dispersion process (e.g., sonication, surfactant addition, etc) to ensure their improved stability.
Figure 1 Publication records of NF, its TC and CHT over the past several years (Web of Science).
Apart from the NF preparation and stability condition, the thermophysical properties particularly TC and viscosity of NF are very important for their convective heat transfer performance, and these properties of NF are considerably higher than those of their base fluids ^{[8]}^{[9]}^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]}. Numerous works have also been carried out on the CNT and flow under natural and forced (laminar, transition and turbulence) convection of NF in various geometries (cavities, ducts, macro to microchannels, etc.) ^{[13]}^{[14]}^{[15]}^{[16]}^{[17]}. Literature results showed even larger enhancement (compared with thermophysical properties) of these singlephase heat transfer features of NF^{[18]}. In natural convection, studies are mostly performed using numerical simulations while only a handful conducted experiments and the results are again not consistent and conclusive. Although NF’ research focuses have been expanded rapidly from properties characterization to energy harvesting, the main target of using NF in different engineering applications is to improve the cooling performance of conventional cooling media through increased convection heat transfer.
Tuckerman and Pease ^{[19]} invented the microchannel heat sink/system (MCHS) as an electronic cooling system, which was later investigated by Lee and Choi ^{[20]} for the CNT capability using novel NF. They experimentally demonstrated that the utilization of NF in an MCHS caused thermal cooling in addition to lower thermal resistance and higher power density compared with water ^{[20]}. The study of NF’s thermal transport behaviour in an enclosure was pioneered by Putra et al. who demonstrated experimentally that heat transfer was not enhanced but deteriorated when NF were used in a horizontal cylinder enclosure. However, no scientific test except visual inspection was conducted to check the stability of the prepared NF.
Another early experimental study on the thermoconvection of NF (TiO_{2}/water) was conducted by Wen and Ding in a miniscale (several mm) enclosure. They measured the steady and transient heat transfer coefficients and reported a detraction of the convective heat transfer coefficient with a rise in particle concentration. Possible mechanisms (Brownian motion, slip, thermophoresis, electrophoresis, etc.) for such deterioration of heat transfer were attributed to convection brought about by the difference in concentration and temperature, particle/particle and particle/surface relations, change of the dispersion properties, degree of stability, and viscosity. The findings of these early studies have pioneered research in this area of NF. The stable TiO_{2}/water NF was prepared by employing the pH control method while the zeta potential (ZP) technique was used to monitor the stability.
The engineering importance of thermal fluids in enclosures for cooling purposes has spurred the study into the heat transfer capability and behaviour of NF in various shapes and sizes of cavities and channels. Numerical studies have inundated the public domain regarding the deployment of NF as transport media in MCHS and cavities with the presence of very few experimental works. However, the experimental study is very vital for a deeper understanding of the physics and mechanisms of thermal cooling afforded using NF in addition to the contribution provided via computational and theoretical methods. The open literature remains uncertain concerning the heat transfer performance of NF in cavities under thermoconvection conditions while that of MCHS appears to be apparent.
Thus, this work took a specific interest in reviewing experimental studies based on the heat transfer capability of NFin diverse cavity geometries. We delved into the accuracy of measurements on the thermal properties and convective heat transport of NF in these enclosures. Preparation and stability of NF, experimental methods (intrusive and nonintrusive) and conditions were also reviewed and discussed.
2. Formulation and stability of nanofluids
The preparation of involves the suspension of NP of interest into specific base fluids. NF are formulated using the onestep and twostep approach with the synthesis of NPs for the latter carried out under different manufacturing techniques ^{[21]}^{[22]}^{[23]}^{[24]}. As NF are formulated by the dispersion of NP into conventional fluids (liquids), the stability of the resultant biphasic nanobased fluids is essential. The onestep approach involves the preparation of NF by the simultaneous synthesis of NP and dispersion in a base fluid. This approach offers the advantage of better stability and homogeneity of NF, and the elimination of laborious processes such as storing and drying compared to the onestep approach by reducing NP agglomeration ^{[21]}^{[25]}. Conversely, the industrial use of this method is not practicable except for fluids with low vapour pressure, and it is capital intensive ^{[26]}.
The twostep approach of NF preparation has been mostly reported in the literature, especially for metallic oxides and carbon nanotubes NP; this is due to the possibility of largescale production of NF for industrial application and cost economy. The demerit of this method has to do with sedimentation and agglomeration of the NP because of the Van der Waal force of attraction among particles ^{[27]}. Various manufacturing techniques used by numerous researchers under both the onestep and twostep approach of NF preparation have been well documented, and details can be foundin the literature ^{[28]}^{[29]}^{[30]}.
Preparation of NF using both methods requires the need for agitation to achieve homogeneity and better stability of NF. The use of a homogenizer, stirrer (magnetic), ultrasonicator and highershear devices to provide energy for even suspension of the NP into the base fluids is a must for and NF formulation ^{[29]}. Furthermore, the agitation time, intensity of agitation, volume/weight concentration or fraction, pH, temperature, surfactants’ types and quantity, types, and sizes of NP, and base fluid types are factors that are very important to the stability of the prepared NF ^{[22]}^{[23]}^{[24]}.
The stability of NF is strongly linked to the thermal and convective properties of NF which consequently determine their application as heat transfer media ^{[31]}^{[32]}^{[33]}. The use of surfactants is to minimize the interfacial tension between NP and base fluid by increasing the EDL, thus, enhancing stability ^{[34]}. The choice of surfactants depends on the base fluid and NP types engaged in the formulation of NF ^{[32]}^{[33]}. It is worth stressing that the use of surfactants to improve the stability of NF is achievable at an optimum weight fraction above and below which instability is experienced ^{[35]}^{[36]}^{[37]}^{[38]}^{[39]}. The optimal weight fraction equivalent to the critical micelle concentration is very important to NF stability.
Experimental works on the convection heat transfer of NF involved the determination of both the thermal and convective properties which required good stability of the NF. To enhance the stability of NF, researchers have employed the use of diverse surfactants (e.g. sodium dodecyl sulphate and gum Arabic), pH and surface (functionalization) modification ^{[37]}^{[38]}^{[39]}. The agitation period (stirring and sonication) of few minutes to few hours has been reported in the literature ^{[40]}. It is worthy of note that the optimum agitation time, surfactants’ quantity, temperature, and pH are key to the stability and thermophysical properties (TC, density, and viscosity) of NF.
Experimental methods have been devised to check the stability of NF. These include sedimentation, centrifugation, spectral absorbency, viscosity, electron microscopy, ZP, polydisparity index, and light scattering ^{[41]}^{[42]}^{[43]}. In studies involving CHT in enclosures, the sedimentation, centrifugation, spectral absorbency, viscosity, density, ZP, and polydisparity index are mostly engaged to check the stability of NF ^{[44]}^{[45]}^{[46]}^{[47]}^{[48]}. To monitor the duration of stability of NF, the spectral absorbency, light scattering, density, and viscosity methods are engaged while the onthespot stability of NF is inspected using other techniques. However, the visual method of stability inspection which is not suitable to a large extent as it is not scientific and has been the most reported of the methods for NF stability monitoring.
In order to determine the dispersion/stability state of the colloidal suspensions zeta potential is widely used. Researchers also confirmed that NF having ZP of above 30 mV (absolute value) showed relatively good stability character ^{[49]}. However, the ZP of suspensions can be significantly changed by using dispersion techniques like ultrasonication and by changing the pH value. NF has better stability when its pH is distanced from the isoelectric point (IEP). For example, good stability of Al_{2}O_{3}/distilled water (DW) NF was found at a pH value of above 8 which was the IEP ^{[38]}.
3. Thermophysical properties of nanofluids
Thermal properties of NF namely thermal conductivity and viscosity play a prominent role in convective heat transfer performance of NF. Since extensive studies have been conducted on these two properties of NF, a breif overview of these properties as related to NF was briefly presented here.
3.1 Thermal conductivity
Several researchers have contributed to the body of knowledge on the TC augmentation of NF. Early works showed TC improvement of up to 20% above the base fluids for NF when volume/mass fractions of less than 5% were studied ^{[50]}^{[51]}^{[52]}^{[53]}^{[54]}. Diverse mechanisms (clustering, thermal interfacial resistance, Brownian motion, interfacial Kapitsa resistance, percolation, aggregation, nanolayer, etc.) have been proposed for the uncharacteristic TC augmentation ^{[55]}^{[56]}^{[57]}. Masuda ^{[53]} pioneered the investigation of the TC of NF when 13 nm alumina NP were dispersed in water. An enhancement of 30% over the base fluid was recorded for 4.3 vol%. Thereafter, several studies have been carried out using diverse NP (Cu, CuO, etc.) with different nanosizes and various base fluids (water, ethylene glycol, etc.) to prepare NF and reported various degrees of enhancements under diverse ranges of temperatures and volume/mass fractions or concentrations. The literature revealed the enhancement of TC of NF in comparison with the respective base fluids as the temperature and volume/mass fraction or concentration increased ^{[58]}^{[59]}^{[60]}^{[61]}^{[62]}^{[63]}^{[64]}^{[65]}^{[66]}^{[67]}. The influence of magnetic field on the TC of NF has been investigated by a few researchers ^{[68]}^{[69]}^{[70]}^{[71]}^{[72]}^{[73]}. They reported that the TC was enhanced as magnetic field intensity was increased.
The TC of NF was observed to be influenced by volume/mass fraction or concentration, NP type, shape, and size, base fluid, temperature, etc. Despite being the most researched property of NF, TC results from various groups are not consistent but NF exhibit considerably higher TC compared with the base fluids even when the concentration of NP is very low. The enhanced TC further increased with the loading of NP (until some critical concentration). Some representative TC results (ratio of TCs of NF (k_{nf}) and base fluids (k_{f}) ) are shown in Figure 2. However, the underlying mechanisms behind the observed increase in the measured TC are not yet fully understood.
Figure 2 Enhanced thermal conductivity of various nanofluids as related to nanoparticles loading [abreviation note, CNT: carbon nanotubes, EG: ethylene glycol, W: water] (adapted from authors’ earlier study ^{[74]}).
3.2 Viscosity
The open literature showed that more studies had been conducted on the TC of NF than the viscosity. The dispersion of NP and HNP into the base fluid leads to an enhancement of viscosity of the base fluid. Several factors have been reported to be responsible for the viscosity enhancement of NF compared with those of base fluids. These include volume/weight fraction, temperature, nanosize, interfacial nanolayer etc., with a recent study revealing that nanoconfinement, nanoparticlefluid interaction and viscous dissipation as other factors have an effect on the viscosity of NF ^{[75]}^{[76]}. This viscosity enhancement affects the heat and flow characteristics of NF as the pumping power is increased. This appears to be one of the downsides of the applications of NF. The primary purpose of engaging NF as cooling media is because of the improved TC leading to the circulation of fewer coolant liquids with less pumping power. However, enhancing the viscosity of NF above a certain limit would rub off the benefit afforded by the augmentation of TC. Conclusively, the viscosity of NF has a substantial impact on the overall CHT performance.
Pak and Choi ^{[77]} pioneered the measurement of the viscosity of NF. They engaged DWbased Al_{2}O_{3} and TiO_{2} NF (Φ = 1 – 10 vol%) and measured the viscosity at temperatures of 20 to 65 °C. At 10 vol%, the viscosity of Al_{2}O_{3}/DW NF was enhanced by 200fold while that of TiO_{2}/DW NF was 3fold, when compared with DW. Several studies have been conducted on the experimental determination of the viscosity of NF in relation to temperature and volume/mass concentration or fraction ^{[78]}^{[79]}^{[80]}^{[81]}^{[82]}^{[83]}. These works involved different types of NP dispersed in various base fluids and measured at different ranges of temperatures and concentrations or fractions. The result revealed that the viscosity of NF was more than the corresponding base fluids and that as volume/mass fraction or concentration increased viscosity was enhanced. Also, an increase in temperature caused the augmentation of NF viscosity. Additionally, the viscosity of NF was found to be dependent on nanosize, shear rate, and sonication time.
The viscosity of NF is also crucial for their practical applications as cooling or heating media in flow systems. Some selective results of relative viscosity (ratio of the viscosity of NF (subscript, nf), and base fluids (subscript, f)) are shown in Figure 3 in which the data is used from the author´s previous study. In most cases, the viscosity of NF was found to decline with increasing temperature.
Figure 3 Enhanced viscosity of various nanofluids as related to nanoparticles loading [abreviation note, TCNT: treated carbon nanotubes, GO: gear oil, SO: silicone oil, PG: propylene glycol] (data adapted from author´s previous study).
4. Convective heat transfer performance of nanofluids
In this section, findings from available experimental studies on the convective heat transfer of NF in diverse geometries and under different flow regimes and thermal conditions have been critically analyzed. It was observed that most of the experimental studies employed square cavities. Thus, based on the geometry of the system available findings and their discussion are grouped into four subsections; square, rectangular, cylindrical and other geometries. In addition, a detailed summary of natural convection heat transfer of nanofluids in various cavity geometries is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of natural thermoconvection of nanofluids in various cavity geometries.
Researchers 
NF (Φ) 
Cavity Dimension 
Rayleigh Number(Ra) 
Measured Thermal Properties 
Preparation Method (Stability Test) 
Remark 
Kouloulias et al. ^{[48]} 
γAl_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.01–0.12 vol.%) 
Cubic with 1 × 10^{−3}m^{3}. 
2.5 × 10^{9}–5.2 × 10^{9} 
 
2step () 
Nu and h deteriorate with Φ increase at different ΔT conditions. 
Ilyas et al. ^{[84]} 
MWCNT/Thermal oil (0–1 mass%) 
Vertical rectangular (12 × 4 × 3 cm) with AR = 4. 
2.5 × 10^{5}–2.7 × 10^{6} 
μ, C_{p}, β and κ 
2step () 
Deterioration of h_{av} (21.3%) and Nu_{av}(35.74%) as Φ increases despite high TC. 
Rao and Srivastava ^{[85]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.01–0.04 vol.%) 
Rectangular (l = 60 mm, b = 25 mm, h = 20 mm) 
5.0 × 10^{4}–3.5 × 10^{5} 
 
2step (visual) 
Enhancements of h_{av} (28.43–38.03) and Nu_{av} (1.92–14.97) of NF in comparison to BF with increasing Φ at different ΔT regimes. 
Ho et al. ^{[86]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/W (1–4 vol.%) 
Vertical rectangular (l = 60 mm, b = 25 mm, h = 25 mm) 
5.78 × 10^{5}–3.11 × 10^{6} 
 
(visual) 
Enhancement of Nu_{av} with . Sedimentation has more impact than Brownian motion and LudwigSoret effect. 
Amiri et al. ^{[47]} 
MWCNThexylamine/TO ((0.001 and 0.005 wt%) 
Cubic (203 × 100 × 221 mm^{3}) 
ND 
μ, ρ, PP, σ, C_{p}, voltage breakdown, FP, and κ 
2step (UVvis, ZP and polydisparity index) 
Both Nu and h are enhanced with . 
Choudhary and Subudhi ^{[87]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DW (0.01 and 0.1 vol.%) 
Rectangular (120 × 120 × 365 (h) mm^{3}) with AR (0.3–2.5) 
10^{7}–10^{12} 
 
2step (visual) 
At low Φ, heat transfer is enhanced but deteriorated at high . Heat transfer is related to AR, Ra, and . 
Qi et al. ^{[88]} 
TiO_{2}W (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 wt%) 
Three rectangles with AR = 0.25, 0.5 and 1, and inclined at −45°, 0°, 45° and 90°) 
ND 
 
2step (UVVis, visual) 
Nu is augmented with increasing Φ and Q. Highest heat transfer is achieved using the cavity with AR = 1 and at 0°. 
Hu et al. ^{[89]} 
TiO_{2}/DIW (3.85, 7.41 and 10.71 wt%) 
Vertical square (180 × 80 × 80 mm^{3}) 
4.04 × 10^{7}–21.07 × 10^{7} 
μ and κ 
2step () 
Heat transfer of NF is deteriorated when compared with the base fluid. 
Joshi and Pattamatta ^{[90]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DW, MWCNT/DW and Graphene/DW (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 vol.%) 
Square (40 × 40 × 200) 
7 × 10^{5}–1 × 10^{7} 
μ and κ 
1step (G), 2step (Al_{2}O_{3} and MWCNT) (visual) 
At Ra = 10^{6}, DWbased MWCNT and Graphene NF enhance heat transfer for 0.1 and 0.3 vol.%, whereas at Ra = 10^{7}, only MWCNT/DW and Al_{2}O_{3}/DW NF reveal the same at similar concentrations. 
Dixit and Pattamatta ^{[91]} 
SiO_{2}/DW, MWCNT/DW, Graphene/DW, and Cu/DW (0.057, 1, and 2 vol.%) 
Cubic (25 × 50 × 50 mm^{3}) + magnetic field (0.13 T and 0.3 T) 
1 × 10^{6}–1 × 10^{7} 
μ and κ 
2step (ZP) 
Heat transfer is augmented for all the graphene samples and MWCNT at 0.1 vol.%, without magnetic field. Generally, heat transfer in all the NF samples is deteriorated with magnetic field. 
Li et al. ^{[92]} 
ZnO/EGDW (75:25, 85:15 and 95:5 vol) (5.25 wt%) 
Square (180 × 80 × 80 mm^{3}) 
5.25 × 10^{7}–1.08 × 10^{8} 
μ and κ 
2step (PVP) 
Under the experimental condition, heat transfer is deteriorated with an increase in EG content. 
Nnanna ^{[93]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.2–7.9 vol.%) 
Cuboid (35 mm × 40.32 mm × 215 mm) 
0.3 × 10^{7}–3.2 × 10^{7} 
μ and κ 
1step (visual) 
Heat transfer is augmented at low concentration of NF (0.2–2 vol.%) but detracts at higher concentration. 
Ho et al. ^{[94]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.1–4 vol.%) 
Cuboid (25 × 25 × 60, 40 × 40 × 90, and 80 × 80 × 180) 
6.21 × 10^{5}–2.56 × 10^{8} 
μ, ρ, and κ 
2step () 
Enhancement of heat transfer at lower concentrations (0.1 and 0.3 vol.%) is observed, which increases with cavity size. 
Yamaguchi et al. ^{[95]} 
MgZn ferrite/kerosene (ND) 
Cubic (7.5 mm each side) with a heatgenerating object (brass and square) 
Gr = 0–160; Gr_{m} = 1.22 × 10^{3}–4.4 × 10^{4} 
μ, ρ, C_{p}, β, M, and κ 
2step () 
Exposure to the magnetic field enhanced heat transfer and irrespective of the size of the heatgenerating objects. 
Sharifpur et al. ^{[17]} 
TiO_{2}/DIW (0.05–0.8 vol.%) 
Rectangular (96 × 103 × 120 mm^{3}) 
4.9 × 10^{8}–1.47 × 10^{9} 
 
1step () 
Heat transfer is enhanced for 0.05–0.2 vol.% and thereafter decreased, with maximum of 8.2% attained with 0.05 vol.% at ΔT of 50 °C. 
Solomon et al. ^{[44]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.1–0.6 vol.%) 
Rectangular with AR = 1,2 and 4. 
6.9 × 10^{6}–4.0 × 10^{8} 
 
1step (UVVis and viscosity) 
Enhancement of heat transfer is observed to be related to AR, Ra and . Highest heat transfer occurs at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 vol.% for AR = 1,2, and 4, respectively. 
Ghodsinezhad et al. ^{[15]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.05–0.6 vol.%) 
Rectangular (96 × 120 × 102 mm^{3}) 
3.49 × 10^{8}–1.05 × 10^{9} 
μ 
1step (ZP, UVvis and visual) 
Enhancement of h up till 0.1 vol.% is observed. At 0.1 vol.%, h is 15% augmented compared to base fluid 
Garbadeen et al. ^{[16]} 
MWCNT/DIW (0–1 vol.%) 
Cuboid (96 × 96 × 105 mm^{3}) 
1 × 10^{8} 
μ and κ 
2step (viscosity and visual) 
Optimum heat transfer occurred at 0.1 vol.% with 45% enhancement of hrelative to the base fluid. 
Ilyas et al. ^{[96]} 
fMWCNT/THO (0.5–3 wt%) 
Cuboid (12 × 4 × 3 cm^{3}) 
4.43 × 10^{5}–2.59 × 10^{6} 
μ, ρ, C_{p}, and κ 
2step () 
The h is enhanced as volume concentration increased whereas Nu is attenuated. 
Solomon et al. ^{[97]} 
Mango bark/DIW NF (0.01–0.5 vol.%) 
Cuboid (120 × 96 × 103 mm^{3}) 
0.2 x10^{8}–6 × 10^{8} 
μ and κ 
2step (UVvis and viscosity) 
Deterioration of NF is observed with increase in volume concentration. 
Roszko and FornalikWajs ^{[98]} 
Ag/DW (0.1 vol.%) 
Cubical with 0.032 m under magnetic field (10 T) 
2.5 × 10^{6}–2.2 × 10^{7} 
 
2step () 
Nu is dependent on the magnetic field and structure of the flow. The energy transfer is altered because of the magnetic field. 
Solomon et al. ^{[99]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/EG (60%)DIW (40%) (0.05–0.4 vok%) 
Cuboid (120 × 96 × 103 mm^{3}) 
3 × 10^{3}–1.3 × 10^{4}and 1.2 × 10^{8}–4 × 10^{8} 
μ and κ 
1step (UVvis, viscosity and visual) 
Heat transfer is enhanced by 10% for the porous cavity at 0.1 vol.% and ΔT = 50 °C, compared to the base fluid. 
Joubert et al. ^{[33]} 
Fe_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.05–0.3 vol.%) 
Rectangle (99 × 96 × 120 mm^{3}) under magnetic field intensity of 300 G and 700 G. 
1.77 × 10^{8}–4.26 × 10^{8} 
μ 
2step (visual and viscosity) 
Without magnetic field, Nu is maximally enhanced by 5.63% for 0.1 vol.% NF while with magnetic field, an additional maximum augmentation of 2.81% is recorded. 
Putra et al. ^{[6]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DW and CuO/DW (1 and 4 vol.%) 
Horizontal cylinder (inner diameter = 40 mm) at AR = 0.5 and 1. 
1.6 × 10^{7}–9.2 × 10^{7} 
ρ, μ, κ, and γ 
2step (visual) 
For both NF, heat transfer deteriorates as AR and concentration increased but decreased with Nu. 
Ali et al. ^{[5]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/W (0.21, 0.51 and 0.75 vol.%) 
Two vertical cylinders (D = 0.2 m) with AR = 0.0635 and 0.127. Heated on the top wall. 
3.0 × 10^{5}–1.3 × 10^{8} 
ρ, μ, and κ 
1step () 
The Nu and h of the NF are more deteriorated than the base fluid, which is related to volume concentration and AR. 
Cadenade la Peña et al. ^{[100]} 
AIN and TiO_{2}/mineral oil (0.01, 0.1 and 0.5 wt%) 
Annular and vertical (opened) with AR of 3.98 and 4.78. 
1.4 × 10^{9}–3.2 × 10^{13} 
μ, and κ (at 24 and 40 °C) 
2step (visual) 
Nu_{av} and h_{av} are improved relative to the base fluid at certain conditions (low AR and φ, and high Ra). TiO_{2}/mineral oil NF (h_{av} = 2.63 5.35% and Nu_{av} = 3.45% maximum) performing better than the AIN/mineral oil NF (h_{av} = 3.91% maximum) 
Ali et al. ^{[101]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/W (0.21, 0.51 and 0.75 vol.%) 
Two vertical cylinders (D = 0.2 m) with AR = 0.0635 and 0.127. Heated at the bottom. 
3.0 × 10^{5}–1.3 × 10^{8} 
ρ, μ, and κ 
1step (visual) 
Compared to the base fluid, h is augmented for 0.21 vol.% and attenuated with concentration increase. HTC is AR dependent with higher h for lower AR. 
Wen and Ding ^{[7]} 
TiO_{2}/DW (0.8, 1.5, and 2.5 wt%) 
Horizontal cylinder (240 mm diameter) 
2.3 × 10^{4}–1.4 × 10^{5} 
μ and κ 
2step (ZP and visual) 
HTC attenuates with increase in NF concentration with maximum reduction of 30% recorded. 
Mahian, et al. ^{[3]} 
SiO_{2}/W (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 vol.%) 
Square, inclined square (45°) and triangular 
1.0 × 10^{5}–1.0 × 10^{6} 
ρ, μ, and κ. 
2step (visual) 
For all the cavities, the maximum HTC ratio is observed at Ra = 10^{6} and 0.5% concentration. High prediction accuracy of the HTC is noticed when the thermophysical properties of the NF are measured. 
Mahrood et al. ^{[46]} 
Al_{2}O_{3} and TiO_{2}/CMC (0.1 ≤ φ ≤ 1.5 vol.%) 
Vertical cylinder with AR = 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5. 
4.0 × 10^{6}–3.0 × 10^{7} 
n.d. 
2step () 
Heat transfer is enhanced below 0.5 and 1 vol.% with optimum values at 0.1 and 0.2 vol.%, for CMCbased TiO_{2} and Al_{2}O_{3} NF, respectively. TiO_{2} NF is a better heat transfer medium than Al_{2}O_{3}NF. Increasing AR is found to enhance heat transfer for both NF. 
Moradi et al. ^{[102]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW and TiO_{2}/DIW (0.1 ≤ φ ≤ 1.5 vol.%) 
Inclined (30°, 60° and 90°) vertical cylindrical (diameter = 80 mm and length = 250 mm) with AR (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5) 
1.2 × 10^{8}–3.7 × 10^{8} 
Ρ 
2step (visual) 
Maximum enhancements of Nu (6.76% and 2.33% relative to DIW) occur at 0.2 vol.% and 0.1 vol.% for Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW and TiO_{2}/DIW NF, respectively. Nu is noticed to augment with increase in AR. 
Yamaguchi et al. ^{[103]} 
MgZn ferrite/alkylnaphthalene 
Cubic with a magnetic field. 
Ra (3.0 × 10^{3}–8.0 × 10^{3}), Ra_{m} (1.0 × 10^{8}–1.25 × 10^{8}) 
 
2step () 
Heat transfer is enhanced on exposure to magnetic field. An increase in the magnetic strength enhanced heat transfer further. 
Ni et al. ^{[104]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/W (0.0108 vol.%) 
Cylindrical (ID = 19.3 cm, h = 2.00 cm) 
2.6 × 10^{8}–7.7 × 10^{8} 


1step () 
Deterioration of Nu. 
Babu and Rao ^{[105]} 
Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (0.05–0.6 vol.%) 
Vertical cylinder (D = 12.7mm, l = 250mm) 
2.7 × 10^{9}–6.4 × 10^{9} 
 
2step (UVvis) 
Improvement of heat transfer by 13.8% for 0.1 vol.%. 
Torki and Etesami ^{[106]} 
SiO_{2}/DIW (0.01–1.0 vol.%) 
Inclined rectangle (60 × 60 × 135 mm^{3}) 
1.0 × 10^{7}–8.0 × 10^{7} 
 
2step () 
Maximum h and Nu at Φ = 0.01 vol.% and θ = 0°. Attenuation are observed at >0.01 vol.% and >0°. 
Haddad et al. ^{[108]} 
ZnO/W (0.01–0.1 vol.%) 
Inclined hemisphere with a cubical object. 
5.21 × 10^{7}–7.29 × 10^{10} 
μ, κ, Cp, β, Φ, and B. 
2step () 
Heat transfer is slightly enhanced with an increase in Φ while increasing θ does not affect it. 
Dixit and Pattamatta ^{[109]} 
Fe_{3}O_{4}/DI (0.05 and 0.2 vol.%) and Fe/DI (0.2 vol.%) 
Cubic (25 mm each) with a magnetic field of 0.3 T. 
4.23 × 10^{5}–1.0 × 10^{7} 
μ, κ, and B. 
2step (ZP) 
For both types of NF, deterioration is observed on exposing the vertical walls (heated and nonheated) to the magnetic field. Heat transfer is enhanced by 11.0% (0.05 vol) and 28% (0.2 vol) for Fe_{3}O_{4}/DI NF on exposing the heated bottom wall to the magnetic field. 
4.1. Convection in square cavities
The convective heat transfer behaviour of ZnO/DIWEG (Φ = 5.25 wt%) NF enclosed in a squareshaped enclosure was experimented by Li et al. ^{[93]}. The result showed that the heat transfer capability of the NF was deteriorated in relation to the base fluid as the EG content was increased. In a vertical square cavity, Hu et al. ^{[90]} utilized DIWbased TiO_{2}(3.85 – 10.71 wt%) NF to investigate the free convection heat transfer performance. They noticed the detraction of heat transfer for the NF when compared with DIW. Kouloulias et al. experimented the thermoconvection behaviour in a square enclosure saturated with Al_{2}O_{3}/water (0.01 – 0.12 vol%) NF. Their result also revealed the attenuation of heat transfer for the studied NF in relation to water. Nevertheless, the work of Garbadden et al. reported enhancement of heat transfer when DIWbased MWCNT (0 – 1 vol%) NF was engaged in a square cavity to investigate the thermoconvection performance. Maximum heat transfer enhancement of 45% at Φ = 0.1 vol% was reported. In addition, the convective heat transfer of Al_{2}O_{3}/DW (0.1 – 4 vol%) NF in a square geometry with three different square cavities was experimented by Ho et al. ^{[95]}. They demonstrated that heat transfer was enhanced at lower Φ (maximum at 0.1 vol%) for all the cavities and increased with cavity size. In comparison with DW, maximum heat transfer coefficient enhancement of 18% was achieved with the largest cavity. On investigating the natural convection heat transfer behaviour of graphene, MWCNT, and Al_{2}O_{3}, /DW (0.1 – 0.5 vol%) NF in a square cavity, Joshi and Pattamatta ^{[91]}also reported heat transfer augmentation of the NF relative to DW, which agreed with the works of Garbadden et al. and Ho et al. ^{[95]}.
The current trend of investigations on NF has established that the thermal and convective properties of NF can be improved through the utilization external magnetic field ^{[99]}. The influence of a uniform magnetic field on the thermoconvection characteristics in a square enclosure filled with a magnetic NF was examined by Yamaguchi et al. ^{[104]}. The imposition of the magnetic field was observed to increase thermal transport in the cavity, which was further enhanced with increased magnetic field intensity. Using an identical experimental set up as Yamaguchi et al. ^{[104]} and mounting heatproducing objects within the cavity, Yamaguchi et al. ^{[96]} examined the natural convection thermal transport performance. An increase in the size of the heatproducing objects was observed to slightly decrease heat transfer. By engaging a nonmagnetic NF (Ag/water) in a cubic enclosure and stimulated by a variable magnetic field, the influence of ΔT and magnetic field on the thermoconvection performance was experimentally investigated ^{[99]}. The result demonstrated that the enhancement of Nu depended on ΔT and magnetic field strength. This finding was found to be contrary to that reported by Dixit and Pattamatta [92] as they revealed the attenuation of heat transfer on the exposure of nonmagnetic NF (graphene/, SiO_{2}/, MWCNT/, and Cu/DW; 0.057 – 2 vol%) contained in a squareenclosure to magnetic fields. However, without a magnetic field, they reported augmentation of heat transfer for DWbased graphene and MWCNT NF at 0.1 vol%.
Recently, Dixit and Pattamatta ^{[109]} experimented the impact of magnetic field orientation on the convective heat transfer performance in a square cavity containing DIbased Fe_{3}O_{4} (0.05 vol% and 0.2 vol%) and Fe (0.2 vol%) NF. They reported heat transfer attenuation on exposing the heated and nonheated vertical walls to the magnetic field for both types of NF. However, heat transfer was enhanced by 11% and 28% on exposing the heated bottom surface to the magnetic field for 0.05 vol% and 0.2 vol%, respectively. The orientation of the magnetic field and heated surface were observed to be accountable for the attenuation and enhancement of heat transfer for both types of NF.
4.2. Convection in rectangular cavities
Ilyas et al. ^{[85]} studied the thermoconvection inside a vertical rectangular cavity (AR = 4) filled with thermal oilbased MWCNT (0 – 1.0 wt%) NF. They reported that h_{av} and Nu_{av} were attenuated with an increase in . Deterioration of 21.3% and 35.7% was observed for h_{av} and Nu_{av} respectively, relative to thermal oil at Φ = 1.0 wt.%. It was stressed that the observed deterioration was due to high enhancement of viscosity by 62% for Φ = 1.0 wt.% despite the high TCafforded by MWCNT. Contrary to the results highlighted above, Ilyas et al. ^{[97]} and some studies showed that heat transfer of NF in rectangular cavities was enhanced with an increase in volume concentration. Using thermal oilbased Al_{2}O_{3} (0 – 3 wt%) NF in a rectangular geometry with AR = 4, Ilyas et al. ^{[97]} revealed that heat transfer was enhanced as h increased from 1594 to 3175 W/m^{2} in comparison with thermal oil. Ho et al. ^{[87]} and Amiri et al. ^{[47]} reported that heat transfer was enhanced as the volume concentration increased when the thermoconvection behaviour of Al_{2}O_{3}/water (1 – 4 vol%) NF and MWCNThexylamine/transformer oil (0.001 – 0.005 wt%) NF filled into rectangular cavities were investigated. Nnanna et al. ^{[94]} experimented the thermoconvection behaviour of DIWbased Al_{2}O_{3} (0.2 – 8 vol%) NF in a rectangular enclosure and observed enhancement of heat transfer for 0.2 – 2 vol% after which it detracted (>2%). The highest augmentation of heat transfer was achieved with 0.2 vol%.
Ghodsinezhad et al. reported the highest increase (15%) in convective heat transfer coefficient (HTC) for DIWbased Al_{2}O_{3} (0.05 – 0.6 vol%) NF inside a rectangular enclosure with 0.1 vol% in relation to DIW. In addition, Rao and Srivastava employed a nonintrusive method (interferometer) of measurement to study the thermoconvection of Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW (1 – 4 vol.%) NF in a rectangular geometry. They revealed that the convective HTC of the NF was enhanced by 38% in comparison to DIW. Also, increasing the volume concentration was observed to enhance heat transfer. The considerable enhancement in heat transfer achieved with a small temperature difference of 2.3 °C can be connected to the use of a nonintrusive temperature measurement technique in the cavity. It should be noted that this result is hard to come by using the intrusive method of temperature measurement via thermocouples. Also, the use of interferometric measurement by these authors led to the provision of conceivable explanations for the heat transfer augmentations accomplished by engaged Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW NF. Furthermore, they showed that three plausible mechanisms existed within the cavity and were accountable for the overall enhancement of the heat transfer rates recorded in the study. These were; dominant convection structures, thermal boundary layer disruption phenomenon, and TCenhancement.
Sharifpur et al. experimented the thermoconvection behaviour of DIWbased TiO_{2 }(0.05 – 0.8 vol%) NF in a rectangular cavity and noticed that heat transfer was enhanced for 0.05 – 0.2 vol% and after that, it decreased. A maximum enhancement of 8.2% was recorded for 0.05 vol%. With the use of Rao and Babu ^{[106]} examined the effects of heat inputs (30 – 50 W) and Φ (0.05 – 0.6 vol%) on the thermoconvection thermal transport behaviour in a cylindrical cavity (AR = 0.0508) containing Al_{2}O_{3}/W NF. In comparison with water, their results exhibited enhancement of heat transfer for ≤ 0.1 vol% and attenuation for > 0.1 vol%. The maximum Nu augmentation of 13.8% was recorded as h harmoniously increased from 382 W/m^{2} – 435 W/m^{2} for 0.1 vol% and heat input of 50 W.
Some authors also studied the influence of AR and inclination angle (θ) as active techniques for the enhancement of thermoconvection performance of NF in rectangular cavities. Choudhary and Subudhi ^{[88]} studied the thermoconvection of Al_{2}O_{3}/DW (0.01 and 0.1 vol%) NF in a rectangular cavity with varying AR (0.3 to 2.5). They revealed that Nu enhancement was dependent on Φ, thermal boundary layer, AR, and Ra. For both samples of NF, Nu was observed to be enhanced in comparison with DW. The highest enhancements of 29.5% (at AR = 0.5 and Ra = 7.89 x 10^{8}) and 14.2% (at AR = 0.3 and Ra = 1.86 x 10^{8}) were recorded for Φ = 0.01 vol% and 0.1 vol%, respectively.
Solomon et al. ^{[44]} experimented the convective heat transfer behaviour of DIWbased Al_{2}O_{3} (0.1 – 0.6 vol.%) NF in an enclosure with varying AR (1, 2, and 4). They observed that heat transfer was related to AR, Ra, and . The cavity with AR = 1 (for 0.1 vol.%) has the highest augmentation of heat transfer. Qi et al. ^{[89]} also experimented the effects of AR (0.25, 0.5, and 1) and θ (45° – 90°) on the thermoconvection of TiO_{2}water NF in a rectangular enclosure. They observed that the Nu was enhanced with power input and . Peak heat transfer was observed with the enclosure having AR = 1 and θ = 0°. In recent work, Torki and Etesami ^{[107]} examined the impact of Φ (0.01 – 1.0 vol.%), ΔT (2.3 – 30.9 °C), and θ (0° – 120°) on the thermoconvection performance in a rectangular enclosure saturated with waterbased SiO_{2} NF. Result showed maximum enhancement of h and Nu for Φ = 0.01 vol% at θ = 0°. Increasing θ (> 0°) and Φ (> 0.01 vol%) was observed to attenuate h and Nu while an increase in Ra and ΔT enhanced h and Nu. For the influence of Φ on the natural convection performance of the NF in the cavity, increasing θ was observed to lead to deterioration.
Furthermore, the influence of porous media on the thermoconvection in a rectangular cavity containing Al_{2}O_{3}/EG (60%)DIW (40%) (0.05 – 0.4 vol%) NF was experimented by Solomon et al. ^{[100]}. The result showed that the enhancement of heat transfer was a function of φ and porous media. By engaging the porous media and NF in the enclosure, heat transfer was enhanced by 10% with Φ = 0.1 vol% at ΔT = 50 °C, in comparison to DIW. Biobased NF was investigated for the thermoconvection performance in a cavity. The pioneering work of Solomon et al. [98] in which a biobased NF was engaged showed attenuation of heat transfer for all tested samples on investigating the hydrothermal behaviour in a rectangular enclosure filled with mango bark/DIW NF (0.01 – 0.5 vol%).
The influence of Φ and magnetic field using three configurations of permanent magnets on the thermoconvection behaviour in a rectangular cavity saturated with Fe_{2}O_{3}/DIW NF (0.05 – 0.3 vol%) was investigated. The result demonstrated that heat transfer enhancement pertaining to the NF depended on magnets’ configuration, φ, and magnetic field intensity. Maximum enhancement of heat transfer was achieved with Φ = 0.1 vol% when 700 G magnets were placed on the hot side (above and below) of the enclosure. On exposing the cavity to the magnetic field, Nu was improved by 2.81% (Φ = 0.1 vol%) in comparison with the case in which no magnetic field was applied.
4.3. Convection in circular cavities
Ni et al. ^{[105]} experimented the turbulent thermoconvection of Al_{2}O_{3}/water NF in the classical Rayleigh–Bénard system with a cylindrical convection cell. They found a transition at Ra_{c} (2.5×10^{9}). When Ra > Ra_{c}, almost no changes in Nu of NF (compared with water) was observed while at Ra < Ra_{c}, Nu of NF was found to be lower than water and the reduction in trend was larger with decreasing Ra. They suggested that the significant decrease in the Nuof NF relative to water was due to the mass diffusion of NP. Ali et al. experimented the thermoconvection performance of aqueous Al_{2}O_{3} NF with different volume concentrations (0.21 – 0.75 vol.%) inside vertical circular enclosures having AR = 0.0635 and 0.127 and heated below the cavities. They demonstrated that heat transfer was enhanced up to Φ ≤ 0.51 vol%, and the coefficient of heat transfer was also enhanced by AR. The heat transfer coefficients were noticed to be enhanced by 40% (when Φ = 0.21 vol% and AR = 0.0635) and 8% (with AR = 0.127 and Φ = 0.51 vol%), respectively.
On heating the same cavity engaged in the work of Ali et al. on the top, Ali et al. ^{[102]} experimented thermoconvection in a cylinder (having AR of 0.0635 and 0.127) saturated with DWbased Al_{2}O_{3} (0.21 – 0.75 vol%) NF. They demonstrated the attenuation of heat transfer of NF in the enclosure, which was related to AR and Φ in relation to DW.
Putra et al. examined the thermoconvection in a horizontal cylinder (with AR of 0.5 – 1.5) containing DWbased Al_{2}O_{3} and CuO (Φ = 1 – 4 vol%) NF. The result showed that heat transfer was detracted for the NF samples. The attenuation observed was found to depend on AR, Φ, nanoparticle density. Mahrood et al. [46] engaged carboxymethyl cellulosebased Al_{2}O_{3 }and TiO_{2} NF in a cylinder (having AR = 0.5 – 1.5) to study the convective heat transfer behaviour. They reported the highest heat transfer for Φ = 0.1 vol% (TiO_{2} NF) and 0.2 vol% (Al_{2}O_{3} NF), with TiO_{2} NF appearing to be a better thermal fluid. By increasing AR, heat transfer was found to be enhanced for both types of NF.
A combination of two active techniques (θ and AR) for the improvement of heat transfer of NF in cavities was also examined. To study the impact of heat fluxes (500 – 1500 W/m^{2}), AR (0.5 – 1.5), and θ (30° – 90°) on the thermoconvection performance in a cylindrical cavity heated below, Moradi et al. [103] engaged DIWbased Al_{2}O_{3} and TiO_{2}(Φ = 0.1 – 1.5 vol%) NF. An attenuation of the heat transfer for TiO_{2}/DIW NF was observed whereas heat transfer was augmented for Al_{2}O_{3}/DIW NF. Maximum heat transfer improvement was attained when Φ = 0.2 vol%, AR = 1, and θ = 30°.
4.4. Convection in other cavities
Most of the experimental studies on the thermoconvection transport of NF were performed with square, cylindrical, and rectangular geometries and only a couple of studies with other geometries can be found in the literature. The significance of two empirical models and an experimentbased model on the Nu and h ratio of SiO_{2}/water (0.5 – 2.0 vol%) NF in a triangular cavity was studied by Mahian et al. . They showed that Nu deteriorated as Φ increased, which was independent of Ra. At any Ra, h of NF was observed to be higher than water. Also, the highest heat transfer for the NF occurred at Φ = 0.5 vol%. Moreover, the authors stressed the use of measured thermophysical properties in thermoconvection studies against those of empirical models. Umar et al. performed experiments on the thermoconvection of waterbased ZrO_{2} NF in triangular and rectangular subchannels and reported augmentation of HTC of 5 – 10 % for Φ = 0.05 vol% in comparison to water.
Cadenade la Peña et al. ^{[101]} experimented the thermoconvection of MObased AIN and TiO_{2} (0.01 – 0.50 wt%) NF contained in a vertical annular cylinder. The result revealed that for both NF, Nu was enhanced when Φ = 0.10 wt% and it deteriorated at higher Φ. The h_{av} and Nu_{av} of TiO_{2}/MO NF were noticed to be higher than those of OA treated AIN/MO NF and AIN/MO NF. Both h_{av} and Nu_{av} were found to augment with an increase in Ra and a reduction in AR. The highest enhancement of h_{av} and Nu_{av} for TiO_{2}/MO NF was noticed with Φ = 0.10 vol%, while that of AIN/MO NF occurred at Φ = 0.10 vol%, all at AR = 3.98.
The applicability of hemispherical enclosures for the management of convective heat transfer in electronic assembly and device was investigated by Haddad et al. ^{[108]}. Haddad et al. ^{[108]} experimented the impact of θ (0° – 180°) and Φ(0.01 – 0.1 vol.%) on the thermoconvection thermal transport performance of waterbased ZnO NF filled into a hemisphericalshaped enclosure (with AR = 1.79) containing a cubeshaped object. The hemispherical dome was heated while the base was thermally insulated, and the object mounted inside the cavity was maintained at a cold temperature. They showed that the Nu was slightly augmented as Φ increased. It was also observed that as θ increased no noticeable enhancement on Nu was found. Figure 4 provides the heat transfer enhancements of different NF in diverse cavities using different parameters.
Figure 4 Heat transfer enhancement of different NF in diverse cavities.
Subject to the aforediscussed studies, three characteristics of heat transfer have been reported in the open literature for thermoconvection of NF in cavities; deterioration and augmentation of heat transfer with volume/mass concentration, and the occurrence of optimum heat transfer at certain concentration NP (after which a decline was noticed). Nevertheless, no specific mechanisms behind such results were identified and discussed except that reported by Rao and Srivastava .
5. Conclusions
In the context of this study, the following conclusions and remarks are herein highlighted:
The diversity in the preparation of NF in terms of the base fluid type, the size and type of NP, and agitation time and method can seriously affect the stability, thermal properties and convective heat transfer of NF in cavities. There is outright nonuniformity in the manner NF preparation was reported in the literature and hence, such cannot be reproduced. Detailed and reproducible procedure for the preparation of NF is highly recommended in future studies. To reproduce NF, the sonication time, frequency, and amplitude, stirring duration and weight fraction of surfactant (if used) are to be provided. Measurement of stability is suggested to be conducted before, during and after the thermoconvective experiment.
Literature results showed three different characteristics of natural thermoconvection of NF: deterioration of heat transfer, especially for Φ > 0.1 vol%, (in most cases) and the occurrence of optimum heat transfer at certain Φ value after which a decline was noticed. The sensitivity of convective heat transfer of NF in various cavity geometries to viscosity and other variables such as natural convection of base fluid, poor stability, high Φ values, AR values of AR (in some cases), increase in θ, and orientation magnetic field has been attributed to the deterioration reported outside the slip mechanisms, Brownian motion, thermophoresis, etc. However, there is a clear scarcity in identifying the underlying mechanisms behind such results. On the other hand, each NF may enhance heat transfer in an exact volume fraction for an exact case (like natural convection) depending on the stability, base fluid, thermal condition, cavity geometry, etc. Therefore, the experimental results of a few volume fractions cannot conclude in general that an NF is good or bad, and more investigations are needed to conclude about an NF heat transfer capability in a known cavity geometry.
It is again suggested that the thermophysical properties used for data reduction should be experimentally determinedfor the NF being studied and not from empirical or theoretical or empirical correlation. It is observed that for the same type of NF, the NP size, preparation, and stability are different, which may cause a change in the thermophysicalproperties and subsequently affect the thermoconvection performance. Future studies are to focus on the effects of other NP (apart from Al_{2}O_{3} and MWCNT), hybrid nanofluids, porous media, bio (green)nanoparticles as well as θ, magnetic and electric fields intensity and orientation, AR, microorganisms, and base fluids (ionic, green and others) on the thermoconvective heat transfer performance in various cavity geometries. A combination of some of these enhancement techniques (passive and active) on the convective heat transfer in cavities would herald a new dawn in this field of study, particularly for thermal management and conversion systems.
Furthermore, it was noticed that the intrusive nature of temperature measurement via thermocouples mounted in the cavity can affect the convective flow and thermal transport and must be investigated further. Finally, depending on the cavity geometry and thermal condition imposed, the deployment of AR, θ, Φ, porous media, and magnetic field have been experimented to yield augmentation or attenuation of heat transfer. The use of baffle and diverse types, partition and other CNT enhancing techniques is missing in the public domain in relation to this study.
From the state of the art of nanofluids, there is a clear need for more systematic research on the thermal convection of NF under various conditions and cavities for their applications in thermal management and energy conversion systems.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal through grant numbers: PTDC/NANMAT/29989/2017 and UID/EEA/50009/2013.
The entry is from 10.3390/nano10091855
References
 Asadi, A.; Alarifi, I. M.; Ali, V.; Nguyen, H. M. An Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Ultrasonication Time on Stability and Thermal Conductivity of MWCNTWater Nanofluid: Finding the Optimum Ultrasonication Time. Sonochem., 2019, 58, 104639.
 Chen, Z.; Shahsavar, A.; AlRashed, A. A. A. A.; Afrand, M. The Impact of Sonication and Stirring Durations on the Thermal Conductivity of AluminaLiquid Paraffin Nanofluid: An Experimental Assessment. Powder Technol., 2020, 360, 1134–1142.
 Mahian, O.; Kianifar, A.; Heris, S. Z.; Wongwises, S. Natural Convection of Silica Nanofluids in Square and Triangular Enclosures: Theoretical and Experimental Study. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 99, 792–804.
 Yıldız, C.; Arıcı, M.; Karabay, H. Comparison of a Theoretical and Experimental Thermal Conductivity Model on the Heat Transfer Performance of Al2O3SiO2/Water HybridNanofluid. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2019, 140, 598–605.
 Ali, M.; Zeitoun, O.; Almotairi, S. Natural Convection Heat Transfer inside Vertical Circular Enclosure Filled with WaterBased Al2O3 Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2013, 63, 115–124.
 Putra, N.; Roetzel, W.; Das, S. K. Natural Convection of NanoFluids. Heat Mass Transf. 2003, 39 (8–9), 775–784.
 Wen, D.; Ding, Y. Natural Convective Heat Transfer of Suspensions of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (Nanofluids). IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 2006, 5 (3), 220–227.
 Murshed, S. M. S.; Leong, K. C.; Yang, C. Investigations of Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Nanofluids. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2008, 47 (5), 560–568.
 Murshed, S. M. S.; Leong, K. C.; Yang, C. Thermophysical and Electrokinetic Properties of Nanofluids  A Critical Review. Therm. Eng., 2008, 28 (17–18), 2109–2125.
 Adio, S. A.; Mehrabi, M.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Investigation and Model Development for Effective Viscosity of MgOEthylene Glycol Nanofluids by Using Dimensional Analysis, FCMANFIS and GAPNN Techniques. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 72, 71–83.
 Murshed, S. M. S.; Estell., P. A State of the Art Review on Viscosity of Nanofluids. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2017, 76, 1134–1152.
 Sharifpur, M.; Tshimanga, N.; Meyer, J. P.; Manca, O. Experimental Investigation and Model Development for Thermal Conductivity of αAl2O3Glycerol Nanofluids. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, 85, 12–22.
 Murshed, S. M. S.; Leong, K. C.; Yang, C.; Nguyen, N. T. Convective Heat Transfer Characteristics of Aqueous TiO2 Nanofluid under Laminar Flow Conditions. J. Nanosci., 2008, 7 (6), 325–331.
 Murshed, S. M. S.; Nieto De Castro, C. A.; Loureno, M. J. V.; Lopes, M. L. M.; Santos, F. J. V. A Review of Boiling and Convective Heat Transfer with Nanofluids. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2011, 15 (5), 2342–2354.
 Ghodsinezhad, H.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Investigation on Cavity Flow Natural Convection of Al2O3–Water Nanofluids. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 76, 316–324.
 Garbadeen, I. D.; Sharifpur, M.; Slabber, J. M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Study on Natural Convection of MWCNTWater Nanofluids in a Square Enclosure. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, 88, 1–8.
 Sharifpur, M.; Solomon, A. B.; Ottermann, T. L.; Meyer, J. P. Optimum Concentration of Nanofluids for Heat Transfer Enhancement under Cavity Flow Natural Convection with TiO2 – Water. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2018, 98, 297–303.
 Lomascolo, M.; Colangelo, G.; Milanese, M.; De Risi, A. Review of Heat Transfer in Nanofluids: Conductive, Convective and Radiative Experimental Results. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2015, 43, 1182–1198.
 Vanaki, S. M.; Ganesan, P.; Mohammed, H. A. Numerical Study of Convective Heat Transfer of Nanofluids: A Review. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 54, 1212–1239.
 Chein, R.; Huang, G. Analysis of Microchannel Heat Sink Performance Using Nanofluids. Therm. Eng.,2005, 25 (17–18), 3104–3114.
 Hamzah, M. H.; Sidik, N. A. C.; Ken, T. L.; Mamat, R.; Najafi, G. Factors Affecting the Performance of Hybrid Nanofluids: A Comprehensive Review. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 630–646.
 Kamalgharibi, M.; Hormozi, F.; Zamzamian, S. A. H.; Sarafraz, M. M. Experimental Studies on the Stability of CuO Nanoparticles Dispersed in Different Base Fluids: Influence of Stirring, Sonication and Surface Active Agents. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 52 (1), 55–62.
 Li, F.; Li, L.; Zhong, G.; Zhai, Y.; Li, Z. Effects of Ultrasonic Time, Size of Aggregates and Temperature on the Stability and Viscosity of CuEthylene Glycol (EG) Nanofluids. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2019, 129, 278–286.
 Mahbubul, I. M.; Elcioglu, E. B.; Amalina, M. A.; Saidur, R. Stability, Thermophysical Properties and Performance Assessment of Alumina–Water Nanofluid with Emphasis on Ultrasonication and Storage Period. Powder Technol., 2019, 345, 668–675.
 Ijam, A.; Saidur, R.; Ganesan, P.; Moradi Golsheikh, A. Stability, ThermoPhysical Properties, and Electrical Conductivity of Graphene OxideDeionized Water/Ethylene Glycol Based Nanofluid. J. Heat Mass Transf.,2015, 87, 92–103.
 Nabil, M. F.; Azmi, W. H.; Hamid, K. A.; Zawawi, N. N. M.; Priyandoko, G.; Mamat, R. ThermoPhysical Properties of Hybrid Nanofluids and Hybrid Nanolubricants: A Comprehensive Review on Performance. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, 83, 30–39.
 Ghadimi, A.; Saidur, R.; Metselaar, H. S. C. A Review of Nanofluid Stability Properties and Characterization in Stationary Conditions. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2011, 54 (17–18), 4051–4068.
 Babar, H.; Ali, H. M. Towards Hybrid Nanofluids: Preparation, Thermophysical Properties, Applications, and Challenges. Mol. Liq., 2019, 281, 598–633.
 Gupta, M.; Singh, V.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Dilbaghi, N.; Said, Z. Up to Date Review on the Synthesis and Thermophysical Properties of Hybrid Nanofluids. Cleaner Prod. 2018, 190,169–192.
 Kumar, D. D.; Arasu, A. V. A Comprehensive Review of Preparation, Characterization, Properties and Stability of Hybrid Nanofluids. Sustain. En. Rev. 2018, 81, 1669–1689.
 Said, Z. Thermophysical and Optical Properties of SWCNTs Nanofluids. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 78, 207–213.
 Joubert, J. C.; Sharifpur, M.; Solomon, A. B.; Meyer, J. P. Enhancement in Heat Transfer of a Ferrofluid in a Differentially Heated Square Cavity through the Use of Permanent Magnets. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2017, 443, 149–158.
 Giwa, S. O.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Effects of Uniform Magnetic Induction on Heat Transfer Performance of Aqueous Hybrid Ferro Fluid in a Rectangular Cavity. Therm. Eng., 2020, 170, 115004.
 Kumar, S.; Kumar, A.; Darshan Kothiyal, A.; Singh Bisht, M. A Review of Flow and Heat Transfer Behaviour of Nanofluids in Micro Channel Heat Sinks. Sci. Eng. Prog., 2018, 8, 477–493.
 Giwa, S. O.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Investigation into Heat Transfer Performance of WaterBased Magnetic Hybrid Nano Fluids in a Rectangular Cavity Exposed to Magnetic Excitation. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2020, 116, 104698.
 Giwa, S. O.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P.; Wongwises, S.; Mahian, O. Experimental Measurement of Viscosity and Electrical Conductivity of WaterBased γAl2O3/MWCNT Hybrid Nanofluids with Various Particle Mass Ratios. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2020.
 Torki, M.; Etesami, N. Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer of SiO2/Water Nanofluid inside Inclined Enclosure. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2020, 139,15651574.
 Zawrah, M. F.; Khattab, R. M.; Girgis, L. G.; El Daidamony, H.; Abdel Aziz, R. E. Stability and Electrical Conductivity of WaterBase Al2O3 Nanofluids for Different Applications. HBRC J., 2016, 12 (3), 227–234.
 Adio, S. A.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Investigation into Effective Viscosity, Electrical Conductivity, and PH of γAl2O3Glycerol Nanofluids in Einstein Concentration Regime. Heat Transf. Eng. 2015, 36 (14–15), 1241–1251.
 Mahbubul, I. M.; Saidur, R.; Amalina, M. A.; Niza, M. E. Influence of Ultrasonication Duration on Rheological Properties of Nanofluid: An Experimental Study with AluminaWater Nanofluid. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.2016, 76, 33–40.
 Valan, A. A.; Dhinesh, K. D.; Idrish, K. A. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Stability of TiO2Ag/Water Nanocomposite fluid with SDBS and SDS Surfactants. Acta, 2019, 678,178308.
 Arani, A. A. A.; Pourmoghadam, F. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity Behavior of MWCNTSAl2O3/Ethylene Glycol Hybrid Nanofluid: Providing New Thermal Conductivity Correlation. Heat Mass Transf.2019, 55 (8), 2329–2339.
 Mousavi, S. M.; Esmaeilzadeh, F.; Wang, X. P. Effects of Temperature and Particles Volume Concentration on the Thermophysical Properties and the Rheological Behavior of CuO/MgO/TiO2 Aqueous Ternary Hybrid Nanofluid Experimental Investigation. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2019, 137, 879901.
 Brusly Solomon, A.; van Rooyen, J.; Rencken, M.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Study on the Influence of the Aspect Ratio of Square Cavity on Natural Convection Heat Transfer with Al2O3/Water Nanofluids. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, 88, 254–261.
 Ghodsinezhad, H.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J. P. Experimental Investigation on Cavity Flow Natural Convection of Al2O3Water Nanofluids. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 76, 316–324.
 Khadangi Mahrood, M. R.; Etemad, S. G.; Bagheri, R. Free Convection Heat Transfer of Non Newtonian Nanofluids under Constant Heat Flux Condition. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 2011, 38 (10), 1449–1454.
 Amiri, A.; Kazi, S. N.; Shanbedi, M.; Mohd Zubir, M. N.; Yarmand, H.; Chew, B. T. Transformer Oil Based MultiWalled Carbon NanotubeHexylamine Coolant with Optimized Electrical, Thermal and Rheological Enhancements. RSC Adv., 2015, 5 (130), 107222–107236.
 Kouloulias, K.; Sergis, A.; Hardalupas, Y. Sedimentation in Nanofluids during a Natural Convection Experiment. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2016, 101, 1193–1203.
 Beheshti, A.; Shanbedi, M.; Heris, S. Z. Heat Transfer and Rheological Properties of Transformer OilOxidized MWCNT Nanofluid. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2014, 118 (3), 1451–1460.
 Choi, S.U.S.; Eastman, J.A. Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids with Nanoparticles. ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. 1995, 66, 99–105.
 Lee, S.; Choi, S.U.S.; Li, S.; Eastman, J.A. Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Fluids Containing Oxide Nanoparticles. Heat Transfer, 1999, 121, 280–289.
 Eastman, J.A.; Choi, S.U.S.; Li, S.; Yu, W.; Thompson, L.J. Anomalously Increased Effective Thermal Conductivities of Ethylene GlycolBased Nanofluids Containing Copper Nanoparticles. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 718–720.
 Masuda, H.; Ebata, A.; Teramae, K.; Hishinuma, N. Alteration of Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Liquid by Dispersing UltraFine Particles. Netsu Bussei 1993, 7, 227–233.
 Li, Q.; Xuan, Y.; Wang, J. Experimental Investigations on Transport Properties of Magnetic Fluids. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2005, 30, 109–116.
 Keblinski, P.; Prasher, R.; Eapen, J. Thermal Conductance of Nanofluids: Is the Controversy Over? Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 10, 1089–1097.
 Prasher, R.; Song, D.; Wang, J.; Phelan, P. Measurements of Nanofluid Viscosity and Its Implications for Thermal Applications. Phys. Lett., 2006, 89, 1–4.
 Marín, E.; Bedoya, A.; Alvarado, S.; Calderón, A.; Ivanov, R.; GordilloDelgado, F. An Explanation for Anomalous Thermal Conductivity Behaviour in Nanofluids as Measured Using the HotWire Technique. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 085501.
 Azizian, R.; Doroodchi, E.; Moghtaderi, B. Influence of Controlled Aggregation on Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids. Heat Transf. 2015, 138, 1–6.
 Lee, G.J.; Kim, C.K.; Lee, M.K.; Rhee, C.K.; Kim, S.; Kim, C. Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of ZnO Nanofluid Using a OneStep Physical Method. Acta 2012, 542, 24–27.
 Awua, J.T.; Ibrahim, J.S.; Kwaghger, A.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J.P. Investigation into thermal Conductivity of palm kernel fibre nanofluids with mixture of ethylene glycol/water as base fluid. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Costa de Sol, Spain, 11–13 July 2016; pp. 1719–1725.
 Xuan, Y.; Li, Q. Heat Transfer Enhancement of Nanofluids. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2000, 21, 58–64.
 Karimi, A.; Afghahi, S.S.S.; Shariatmadar, H.; Ashjaee, M. Experimental Investigation on Thermal Conductivity of MFe2O4 (M = Fe and Co) Magnetic Nanofluids under Influence of Magnetic Field. Acta 2014,598, 59–67.
 Karimi, A.; Goharkhah, M.; Ashjaee, M.; Shafii, M.B. Thermal Conductivity of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanofluids under the Influence of Magnetic Field. J. Thermophys. 2015, 36, 2720–2739.
 Patel, J.; Parekh, K.; Upadhyay, R.V. Maneuvering Thermal Conductivity of Magnetic Nanofluids by Tunable Magnetic Fields. Appl. Phys., 2015, 117, 1–8.
 Abdolbaqi, M.K.; Azmi, W.H.; Mamat, R.; Sharma, K.V.; Najafi, G. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Conductivity of BioGlycolWater Mixture Based Al2O3 Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 102, 932–941.
 Agarwal, R.; Verma, K.; Agrawal, N.K.; Singh, R. Sensitivity of Thermal Conductivity for Al2O3 Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 80, 19–26.
 Parekh, K.; Lee, H.S. Magnetic Field Induced Enhancement in Thermal Conductivity of Magnetite Nanofluid. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 1–4.
 Shima, P.D.; Philip, J. Tuning of Thermal Conductivity and Rheology of Nanofluids Using an External Stimulus. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 20097–20104.
 Nkurikiyimfura, I.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Z. Effect of Chainlike Magnetite Nanoparticle Aggregates on Thermal Conductivity of Magnetic Nanofluid in Magnetic Field. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2013, 44, 607–612.
 Murshed, S.M.S.; Sharifpur, M.; Giwa, S.; Meyer, J.P. Stability evaluation, measurements and presentations of convective heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. In The Art of Measuring in Thermal Sciences; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020.
 Machrafi, H. Universal Relation between the Density and the Viscosity of Dispersions of Nanoparticles and Stabilized Emulsions. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 15081–15101.
 Lebon, G.; Machrafi, H. A Thermodynamic Model of Nanofluid Viscosity Based on a Generalized MaxwellType Constitutive Equation. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 2018, 253, 1–6.
 Pak, B.C.; Cho, Y.I. Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Study of Dispersed Fluids with Submicron Metallic Oxide Particles. Heat Transf. 1998, 11, 151–170.
 Dehghani, Y.; Abdollahi, A.; Karimipour, A. Experimental Investigation toward Obtaining a New Correlation for Viscosity of WO3 and Al2O3 NanoparticlesLoaded Nanofluid within Aqueous and NonAqueous Basefluids Problem of Water Consumption and Waste Production. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 135, 713–728.
 Adio, S.A.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J.P. Influence of Ultrasonication Energy on the Dispersion Consistency of Al2O3–Glycerol Nanofluid Based on Viscosity Data, and Model Development for the Required Ultrasonication Energy Density. Exp. Nanosci. 2016, 11, 630–649.
 Kallamu, U.M.; Ibrahim, J.S.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J.P. Experimental Investigation on Viscosity of Nanofluids Prepared from Banana FibreNanoparticles. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Costa de Sol, Spain, 11–13 July 2016; pp. 1713–1718.
 Sharifpur, M.; Solomon, A.B.; Meyer, J.P.; Ibrahim, J.S.; Immanuel, B. Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Mango Bark/Water Nanofluids. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Portoroz, Slovenia, 17–19 July 2017.
 Minea A.A, Murshed S.M.S. A review on development of ionic liquid based nanofluids and their heat transfer behaviour. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 584599.
 Dhahri, M.; Aouinet, H.; Sammouda, H. A New Empirical Correlating Equation for Calculating Effective Viscosity of Nanofluids. Heat Transf. Asian Res. 2019, 48, 1547–1562.
 Ilyas, S.U.; Pendyala, R.; Narahari, M. Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer Characteristics in MWCNTThermal Oil Nanofluid. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 135, 1197–1209.
 Rao, S.S.; Srivastava, A. Interferometric Study of Natural Convection in a DifferentiallyHeated Cavity with Al2O3–Water Based Dilute Nanofluids. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 92, 1128–1142.
 Ho, C.J.; Liu, W.K.; Chang, Y.S.; Lin, C.C. Natural Convection Heat Transfer of AluminaWater Nanofluid in Vertical Square Enclosures: An Experimental Study. J. Therm. Sci. 2010, 49, 1345–1353.
 Choudhary, R.; Subudhi, S. Aspect Ratio Dependence of Turbulent Natural Convection in Al2O3/Water Nanofluids. Therm. Eng. 2016, 108, 1095–1104.
 Qi, C.; Wang, G.; Ma, Y.; Guo, L. Experimental Research on Stability and Natural Convection of TiO2Water Nanofluid in Enclosures with Different Rotation Angles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 1–14.
 Hu, Y.; He, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q.; Schlaberg, H.I. Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Natural Convection Heat Transfer of TiO2Water Nanofluids in a Square Enclosure. Heat Transf. 2014, 136, 022502.
 Joshi, P.S.; Pattamatta, A. Buoyancy Induced Convective Heat Transfer in Particle, Tubular and Flake Type of Nanoparticle Suspensions. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 122, 1–11.
 Dixit, D.D.; Pattamatta, A. Natural Convection Heat Transfer in a Cavity Filled with Electrically Conducting Nano Particle Suspension in the Presence of Magnetic Field. Fluids 2019, 31, 023302.
 Li, H.; He, Y.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, B.; Huang, Y. Thermophysical and Natural Convection Characteristics of Ethylene Glycol and Water Mixture Based ZnO Nanofluids. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 91, 385–389.
 Nnanna, A.G.A. Experimental Model of TemperatureDriven Nanofluid. Heat Transf. 2007, 129, 697–704.
 Ho, C. J.; Chen, D. S.; Yan, W. M.; Mahian, O. BuoyancyDriven Flow of Nanofluids in a Cavity Considering the LudwigSoret Effect and Sedimentation: Numerical Study and Experimental Validation. J. Heat Mass Transf.,2014, 77, 684–694.
 Yamaguchi, H.; Niu, X.D.; Zhang, X.R.; Yoshikawa, K. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Natural Convection of Magnetic Fluids in a Cubic Cavity. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 3665–3670.
 Ilyas, S.U.; Pendyala, R.; Narahari, M. An Experimental Study on the Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Rectangular Enclosure Using Functionalized Alumina Thermal OilBased Nanofluids. Therm. Eng. 2017, 127, 765–775.
 Solomon, A.B.; Sharifpur, M.; Meyer, J.P.; Ibrahim, J.S.; Immanuel, B. Convection heat transfer with water based mango bark nanofluids. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Portoroz, Slovenia, 17–19 July 2017.
 Roszko, A.; FornalikWajs, E. Extend of Magnetic Field Interference in the Natural Convection of Diamagnetic Nanofluid. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 54, 2243–2254.
 Solomon, A.B; Sharifpur, M.; Ottermann, T.; Grobler, C.; Joubert, M.; Meyer, J.P. Natural Convection Enhancement in a Porous Cavity with Al2O3Ethylene Glycol/Water Nanofluids. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 108, 1324–1334.
 Cadenade La Pe., N.L.; RiveraSolorio, C.I.; PaynRodrguez, L.A.; GarcaCullar, A.J.; LpezSalinas, J.L. Experimental Analysis of Natural Convection in Vertical Annuli Filled with AlN and TiO2/Mineral OilBased Nanofluids. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 111, 138–145.
 Ali, M.; Zeitoun, O.; Almotairi, S.; AlAnsary, H. The Effect of Alumina–Water Nanofluid on Natural Convection Heat Transfer Inside Vertical Circular Enclosures Heated from Above. Heat Transf. Eng. 2013, 34, 1289–1299.
 Moradi, H.; Bazooyar, B.; Moheb, A.; Etemad, S.G. Optimization of Natural Convection Heat Transfer of Newtonian Nanofluids in a Cylindrical Enclosure. Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 1266–1274.
 Yamaguchi, H.; Zhang, X.R.; Niu, X.D.; Yoshikawa, K. Thermomagnetic Natural Convection of ThermoSensitive Magnetic Fluids in Cubic Cavity with Heat Generating Object Inside. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 698–704.
 Ni, R.; Zhou, S.Q.; Xia, K.Q. An Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Thermal Convection in WaterBased Alumina Nanofluid. Fluids 2011, 23, 022005.
 Babu, S.R.; Rao, G.S. BuoyancyInduced Natural Convective Heat Transfer along a Vertical Cylinder Using WaterAl2O3 J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2018, 10, 1–7.
 Torki, M.; Etesami, N. Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer of SiO2/Water Nanofluid inside Inclined Enclosure. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020, 139,1565–1574.
 Haddad, O.; Baïri, A.; Alilat, N.; Bauzin, J.G.; Laraqi, N. Free Convection in ZnOWater NanofluidFilled and Tilted Hemispherical Enclosures Containing a Cubic Electronic Device. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 87, 204–211.
 Dixit, D.D.; Pattamatta, A. Effect of Uniform External MagneticField on Natural Heat Transfer in a Cubical Cavity Filled with Magnetic NanoDispersion. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 146, 118828.
 Shahsavar, A.; Salimpour, M.R.; Saghafian, M.; Shafii, M.B. Effect of Magnetic Field on Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of a Magnetic Nanofluid Loaded with Carbon Nanotubes. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 809–815.
 Umar, E.; Kamajaya, K.; Tandian, N.P. Experimental Study of Natural Convective Heat Transfer of WaterZrO2 Nanofluids in Vertical Sub Channel. Contemp. Eng. Sci. 2015, 8, 1593–1605.
 Lebon, G.; Machrafi, H. A Thermodynamic Model of Nanofluid Viscosity Based on a Generalized MaxwellType Constitutive Equation. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 2018, 253, 1–6.
 Pak, B.C.; Cho, Y.I. Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Study of Dispersed Fluids with Submicron Metallic Oxide Particles. Exp. Heat Transf. 1998, 11, 151–170.
 Pak, B.C.; Cho, Y.I. Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Study of Dispersed Fluids with Submicron Metallic Oxide Particles. Exp. Heat Transf. 1998, 11, 151–170.