Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Centromere Flexibility

    Subjects: Genetics
    View times: 117
    Submitted by: Laura Leo


    Centromeres are the complex structures responsible for the proper segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Structural or functional alterations of the centromere cause aneuploidies and other chromosomal aberrations that can induce cell death with consequences on health and survival of the organism as a whole. Because of their essential function in the cell, centromeres have evolved high flexibility and mechanisms of tolerance to preserve their function following stress, whether it is originating from within or outside the cell.Despite the differences in DNA sequences, protein composition and centromere size, all of these diverse centromere structures promote efficient chromosome segregation, balancing genome stability and adaptability, and ensuring faithful genome inheritance at each cellular generation.

    1. Introduction

    Figure 1. Schematic representation of the functional role of Ash1, CBP, and Trx proteins in the centromeric region. These proteins work by modifying the epigenetic state of the centromeric chromatin. In particular, on H3 histones, Ash1 dimethylates lysine 4 (H3K4me2) and CBP acetylates lysine 27 (H3K27ac) within the centromeric region. Trx works by inducing chromatin opening which, in turn, favours both CENP-A/Cid deposition and activation of transcription.

    It has been shown that Sat III in both Drosophila and mammals, and centromeric transposons, are weakly transcribed [21][32], but it is not clear what their role in centromeric function could be. There is also the possibility that centromeres’ basal transcription is not causative but a mere consequence of the chromatin opening for Cid/CENP-A loading, without holding being necessary for centromeric functionality. However, given several studies have shown that the direct inhibition of centromeric RNAs causes overall reduction in CENP-A at centromeres [50][51][54][69][70][71][72][73][74], the alternative possibility would imply that transcription may be a consequence of chromatin opening, while transcription products play a direct role in CENP-A deposition and centromeric stability. Despite the differences in DNA sequences, proteins composition and centromere size, all of these diverse centromere structures promote efficient chromosome segregation, balancing genome stability and adaptability, and ensuring faithful genome inheritance at each cellular generation.

    3. Neocentromere as a Functional and Evolutionary Model for Centromere Biology

    How and why neocentromeres appear in a given chromosome region are intriguing questions. It has been proposed that de novo centromeres might represent different scenarios: “latent” centromeres [75][76][77], which are locations of ancestral centromeres following centromere repositioning events [78], (reviewed in [79]), or euchromatic regions, where centromeric markers have spread from adjacent areas, inducing neocentromere formation near endogenous centromeres. Some studies in Drosophila support the model that formation of the neocentromere may depend on the proximity to an endogenous centromere. However, some observations suggest that neocentromeres are often formed in distal chromosomal regions, usually separated from endogenous centromeres by long tracts of DNA, and they cannot be explained as formed by the spread of centromeric activity in cis [80].   A different model for neocentromere formation called the “lateral inhibition model” [81] supports the existence of many sites along a chromosome that are potentially able to perform centromeric activity, but that are normally repressed by a dominant centromere. It has been shown that a neocentromere is capable of forming near telomeres at the end of the chromosome [82]. This substantiates the hypothesis formulated by Agudo et al. [83] (reviewed in [84]) that the centromere evolved from telomere during the evolutionary origin of the eukaryotic chromosome. Recently, Palladino et al. [82] has shown that targeting Cal1 to chromosomal regions outside the original centromere induces the deposition of Cid and the formation of a new centromere at different locations, even at large genomic distance from the endogenous site. Zeitlin et al. [85] speculated that a neocentromere could emerge at site of breaks, following the observation that CENP-A is rapidly recruited to DNA double-strand breaks. This point of view is also supported by Ventura et al. [78], who noticed the closeness of the breakpoint to the neocentromere location in some studies. It has been shown that CENP-A is produced in excess of the needs for centromeres and that it is deposited around the original centromere and on islands of nucleosomes scattered along the chromosomes [21][86][87], only to be cleared during replication [21][88]. It is possible that some of these islands accumulate a quantity of CENP-A that predisposes them to acquire a potential centromeric function in case the endogenous centromere is damaged. In this case, not all chromosomal regions are equally and simultaneously predisposed to acquire a centromeric activity. Another mode of neocentromere formation may involve transposable elements (TE). Notably, stress induces the activation of TE, causing their transposition to new locations [41][89][90][91][92]. It is then possible that following chromosomal insult or rearrangements, a single TE may be sufficient to initiate CENP-A recruitment via its nascent transcription, breaks generation and other specific chromatin alterations associated with the “jump” and/or the TE reintegration into a new locus [64]. However, we favor an alternative hypothesis, that a random insertion of a TE per se does not trigger neocentromere formation unless it hits a CENP-A ectopic site. The concomitance of preexisting ectopic CENP-A and transposition may represent the first step towards the formation of a new centromere. Over time, the accumulation of other repetitive sequences through new transpositions or duplications of existing sequences in these CENP-A ectopic “hot spots” would create a genetic and epigenetic landscape for the evolution of a complex centromere that can functionally replace the endogenous one.

    4. Holocentromere

    Nematodes, some insects and species of plants belonging to the flowering plants have diffused centromeres throughout their chromosomes, and these are described as “holocentric”. From a cytological point of view, holocentric chromosomes do not present a primary constriction in metaphase—a hallmark narrowing found in stereotypical metacentric or sub-metacentric chromosomes—and do not have a designated place along the chromosome for spindle microtubule attachment. Instead, the whole chromosomal surface is bound and segregated. Genomic evidence suggests that many holocentric chromosomes lack tandem repeats and have cenH3 binding sites distributed over a wide variety of unique sequences throughout the chromosome, as expected. The nematode C. elegans is the exemplar case of a holocentric organism. Recently, the chromosomal localization of histone cenH3 was determined in C. elegans by ChIP–chip analysis [93]. It was found that ~50% of the genome can be associated with cenH3, showing complete absence of particular DNA sequences to control cenH3 incorporation. Fundamental studies on the regulation of diffuse centromeres have been carried out on the nematode Parascaris equorum. In this organism, as in C. elegans, development is strictly mosaic, and each cell performs a predetermined number of cell divisions before differentiation. A consequence of this developmental system is that an induced death of a single cell can be lethal to the embryo because it cannot be replaced at the embryonic stage. Furthermore, in Parascaris, there is the phenomenon of chromatin diminution in somatic cells, which does not occur in germ cells. In embryonic somatic cells, both terminal and intercalary heterochromatin with no detectable kinetochore activity is eliminated by fragmentation, producing about 60 small chromosomes that are equipped with centromeres and that segregate correctly during mitosis [94]. In gonial cells, heterochromatin is not eliminated, and both heterochromatin and euchromatin retain kinetochore activity. Finally, in meiotic cells, centromeric activity is restricted to the terminal heterochromatic regions to which the spindle microtubules attach in the absence of a kinetochore plate. Therefore, in Parascaris, there is both structural and regional variability in relation to the cell type. In the embryo’s somatic cells, the centromeric activity is restricted to euchromatin, while in gonial cells it is diffused over different chromatin environments, and in meiotic cells is restricted to telomeric heterochromatin. Therefore, Parascaris and other nematodes represent interesting models to study epigenetic centromere organization for the presence of three different centromere states under physiological conditions.

    5. Conclusions

    Proper segregation of chromosomes during cell division is essential for the survival of the cell and the whole organism. Therefore the centromere, a complex structure used for this function, has adapted during evolution to respond to changes in the cellular microenvironment as well to those in the external environment. The conflict between the need for functional stability and variability dictated by the environmental changes has been resolved with a wide flexibility through various epigenetic mechanisms. In order to keep the correct centromere functionality, epigenetic mechanisms can buffer possible centromere structural variations.

    The entry is from 10.3390/genes11070809


    1. Karpen, G.H.; Allshire, R.C. The case for epigenetic effects on centromere identity and function. Trends Genet. 1997, 13, 489-496.
    2. Earnshaw, W. C.; Rothfield, N. Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma. Chromosoma 1985, 91:313-321.
    3. Sullivan, K.F.; Hechenberger, M.; Masri, K. Human CENP-A Contains a Histone H3 Related Histone Fold Domain That Is Required for Targeting to the Centromere. Cell. Biol. 1994, 127, 581-592.
    4. Buchwitz, B. J.; Ahmad, K.; Moore, L.L.; Roth, M.B.; Henikoff, S. A histone-H3-like protein in elegans. Nature 1999, 401, 547–548.
    5. Takahashi, K.; Chen, E.S.; Yanagida, M. Requirement of Mis6 centromere connector for localizing a CENP-A-like protein in fission yeast. Science 2000, 288, 2215–2219.
    6. Howman, E.V.; Fowler, K.J.; Newson, A.J.; Redward, S.; MacDonald, A.C.; Kalitsis, P.; Choo, K.H. Early disruption of centromeric chromatin organization in centromere protein A (Cenpa) null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97, 1148–1153.
    7. Oegema, K.; Desai, A.; Rybina, S.; Kirkham, M.; Hyman, A. Functional analysis of kinetochore assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 2001, 153:1209–1226.
    8. Blower, M.D.; Karpen, G.H. The Role of Drosophila CID in Kinetochore Formation, Cell-Cycle Progression and Heterochromatin Interactions. Cell. Biol. 2001, 3, 730-739.
    9. Régnier, V.; Vagnarelli, P.; Fukagawa, T.; Zerjal, T.; Burns, E.; Trouche, D.; Earnshaw, W. Brown, W. CENP-A is required for accurate chromosome segregation and sustained kinetochore association of BubR1. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 3967–3981.
    10. McKinley, L.M.; Cheeseman, I.M. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016, 17:16–29.
    11. De Rop, V.; Padeganeh, A.; Maddox, P.S. CENP-A: the key player behind centromere identity, propagation, and kinetochore assembly. Chromosoma 2012, 121, 527–538.
    12. Chen, C.C.; Mellone, B.G. Chromatin assembly: Journey to the CENter of the chromosome. Cell Biol. 2016, 214, 13–24.
    13. Jansen, L.E.T.; Black, B.E.; Foltz, D.R.; Cleveland, D.W. Propagation of centromeric chromatin requires exit from mitosis. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:795–805.
    14. Ahmad, K.; Henikoff, S. Centromeres are specialized replication domains in heterochromatin. J Cell. Biol. 2001, 153:101–110.
    15. Schuh, M.; Lehner, C.F.; Heidmann, S. Incorporation of Drosophila CID/CENP-A and CENP-C into centromeres during early embryonic anaphase. Biol. 2007, 17, 237–243.
    16. Mellone, B.G.; Grive, K.J.; Shteyn, V.; Bowers, S.R.; Oderberg, I.; Karpen, G.H. Assembly of Drosophila centromeric chromatin proteins during mitosis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002068.
    17. Dunleavy, E.M.; Beier, N.L.; Gorgescu, W.; Tang, J.; Costes, S.V.; Karpen, G.H. The Cell Cycle Timing of Centromeric Chromatin Assembly in Drosophila Meiosis Is Distinct from Mitosis Yet Requires CAL1 and CENP-C. PLoS Biol. 2012 10, e1001460.
    18. Lidsky, P.V.; Sprenger, F.; Lehner, C.F.; Distinct modes of centromere protein dynamics during cell cycle progression in Drosophila S2R+ cells. Cell Sci 2013, 126,4782-4793.
    19. Takayama, Y.; Sato, H.; Saitoh, S.; Ogiyama, Y.; Masuda, F.; Takahashi, K. Biphasic Incorporation of Centromeric Histone CENP-A in Fission Yeast. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 682–690.
    20. Cheng, Z.; Dong, F.; Langdon, T.; Ouyang, S.; Buell, C.R.; Gu. M.; Blattner, F.R.; Jiang, J. Functional Rice Centromeres Are Marked by a Satellite Repeat and a Centromere-Specific Retrotransposon. Plant Cell 2002 14, 1691-1704.
    21. Chang, C.H.; Chavan, A.; Palladino, J.; Wei, X.; Martins, N.M.C.; Santinello, B.; Chen, C.C.; Erceg, J.; Beliveau, B.J.; Wu, C.T.; Larracuente, A.M.; Mellone, B.G. Islands of retroelements are major components of Drosophila PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000241.
    22. Chueh, A.C.; Northrop, E.L.; Brettingham-Moore, K.H.; Choo, K.H.A.; Wong, L, H. LINE Retrotransposon RNA Is an Essential Structural and Functional Epigenetic Component of a Core Neocentromeric Chromatin. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000354.
    23. Liu, Y.; Su, H., Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, C.; Han, F. Back-spliced RNA from retrotransposon binds to centromere and regulates centromeric chromatin loops in maize. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000582.
    24. Brown, J.B.; O’Neill, R. J. Chromosomes, Conflict, and Epigenetics: Chromosomal Speciation Revisited. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2010, 11, 291-316.
    25. Hartley, G.; O’Neill, R.J. Centromere Repeats: Hidden Gems of the Genome. Genes, 2019, 10, 223.
    26. Black, E.M.; Giunta, S. Repetitive Fragile Sites: Centromere Satellite DNA as a Source of Genome Instability in Human Diseases. Genes 2018, 9, 615.
    27. Guerrero, A.A.; Gamero, M.C.; Trachana, V.; Fütterer, A.; Pacio-Bras, C.; Dìaz-Concha, N.P.; Cogidosa, J.C.; Martínez-A.C.; van Welya, K.H.M. Centromere-localized breaks indicate the generation of DNA damage by the mitotic spindle. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4159–4164.
    28. Zeman, M.K.; Cimprich, K.A. Causes and Consequences of Replication Stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 2-9.
    29. Garavis, M.; Mendez-Lago, M.; Gabelica, V.; Whitehead, S.L.; Gonzales, C.; Villasante, A. The structure of an endogenous Drosophila centromeres reveals the prevalence of tandemly repeated sequences able to form i-motif. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 13307.
    30. Aze, A.; Sannino, V.; Soffientini, P.; Bachi, A.; Costanzo, Vi. Centromeric DNA replication reconstitution reveals DNA loops and ATR checkpoint suppression. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 684–691.
    31. Barra, V.; Fachinetti, D. The dark side of centromeres: types, causes and consequences of structural abnormalities implicating centromeric DNA. Commun. 2018, 9, 4340.
    32. Valgardsdottir, R.; Chiodi, I.; Giordano, M.; Rossi, A.; Bazzini, S.; Ghigna, C.; Riva, S.; Biamonti, G. Transcription of Satellite III non-coding RNAs is a general stress response in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36, 423–434.
    33. Sengupta, S.; Parihar, R.; Ganesh, S. Satellite III Non-Coding RNAs Show Distinct and Stress-Specific Patterns of Induction. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 382, 102–107.
    34. Hernández-Saavedra, D.; Strakovsky, R.S.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P.; Pan, Y.-X. Epigenetic Regulation of Centromere Chromatin Stability by Dietary and Environmental Factors. Nutr. 2017, 8, 889–904.
    35. Herr, I.; Debatin, K.M. Cellular stress response and apoptosis in cancer therapy. Blood 2001, 98, 2603-2614.
    36. Giunta, S.; Funabiki, H. Integrity of the Human Centromere DNA Repeats Is Protected by CENP-A, CENP-C, and CENP-T. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017, 114, 1928-1933.
    37. Gaubatz, J.W.; Cutler, R.G. Mouse Satellite DNA Is Transcribed in Senescent Cardiac Muscle. J Biol. Chem. 1990, 265(29):17753-8.
    38. Bouzinba-Segard, H.; Guais, A.; Francastel, C. Accumulation of Small Murine Minor Satellite Transcripts Leads to Impaired Centromeric Architecture and Function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(23):8709-14.
    39. Pezer, Z.; Ugarkovic, D. Satellite DNA-associated siRNAs as Mediators of Heat Shock Response in Insects. RNA Biol. 2012, 9(5):587-95.
    40. Pecinka, A.; Dinh, H.Q.; Baubec, T.; Rosa, M.; Lettner; N.; Scheid, O. M.Epigenetic Regulation of Repetitive Elements Is Attenuated by Prolonged Heat Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2010, 22(9):3118-29.
    41. Tittel-Elmer, M.; Bucher, E.; Broger, L.; Mathieu, O.; Paszkowski, J.; Vaillant, I. Stress-induced Activation of Heterochromatic Transcription. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001175.
    42. Vourc'h, C.; Biamonti, G. Transcription of Satellite DNAs in Mammals. Mol. Subcell. Biol. 2011, 51, 95-118.
    43. Biscotti, M.A.; Canapa, A.; Forconi, M.; Olmo, E.; Barruca, M. Transcription of Tandemly Repetitive DNA: Functional Roles. Chromosome Res. 2015, 23(3):463-77.
    44. Grady, D. L.; Ratliff, R. L.; Robinson, D. L.; McCanlies, E. C.; Meyne, J.; Moyzis, R. K. Highly conserved repetitive DNA sequences are present at human centromeres. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 1695-1699.
    45. Jolly, C.; Metz, A.; Govin, J.; Vigneron, M.; Turner, B.M.; Khochbin, S.; Vourc’h, C. Stress-induced transcription of satellite III repeats. Cell Biol. 2004, 164, 25–33.
    46. Rizzi, N.; Denegri, M.; Chiodi, I.; Corioni, M.; Valgardsdottir, R.; Cobianchi F.; Riva, S.; Biamonti, G. Transcriptional Activation of a Constitutive Heterochromatic Domain of the Human Genome in Response to Heat Shock. Biol. Cell. 2004, 15, 543–551.
    47. Choi, E. S.; Strålfors, A.; Catania, S.; Castillo, A.G.; Svensson, J.P.; Pidoux, A.L.; Ekwall, K.; Allshine, R.C. Factors That Promote H3 Chromatin Integrity During Transcription Prevent Promiscuous Deposition of CENP-ACnp1 in Fission Yeast. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8,
    48. Carone, D.M.; Zhang, C.; Hall, L.E.; Obergfell, C.; Carone, B.R.; O’Neill, M.J.; O’Neill, R. Hypermorphic expression of centromeric retroelement-encoded small RNAs impairs CENP-A loading. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21, 49–62.
    49. Chan, F.L.; Wong, L.H. Transcription in the maintenance of centromere chromatin identity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 11178–11188.
    50. McNulty, S.M.; Sullivan, L.L.; Sullivan, B.A. Human centromeres produce chromosome-specific and array-specific alpha satellite transcripts that are complexed with CENP-A and CENP-C. Cell. 2017, 42, 226–240.
    51. Rošić, S.; Köhler, F.; Erhardt, S. Repetitive centromeric satellite RNA is essential for kinetochore formation and cell division. Cell. Biol. 2014, 207, 335–349.
    52. Bobkov, G.O.M.; Gilbert, N.; Heun, P. Centromere transcription allows CENP-A to transit from chromatin association to stable incorporation. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 1957–1972.
    53. Jiang, J.; Birchler, J.A.; Parrott, W.A.; Dawe, R.K. A molecular view of plant centromeres. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 570-575.
    54. Topp, C.N.; Zhong, C.X.; Dawe, R.K. Centromere-encoded RNAs are integral components of the maize kinetochore. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2004, 101, 15986–15991.
    55. Lermontova, I.; Schubert, V.; Fuchs, J.; Klatte, S.; Macas, J.; Schubert, I. Loading of Arabidopsis Centromeric Histone CENH3 Occurs Mainly during G2 and Requires the Presence of the Histone Fold Domain. Plat Cell, 2006, 18, 2443–2451.
    56. Ohkuni, K.; Kitagawa, K. Role of transcription at centromeres in budding yeast. Transcription 2012, 3, 193-197.
    57. Feng, Q.; Moran, J.V.; Kazazian Jr, H.H.; Boeke, J.D. Human L1 Retrotransposon Encodes a Conserved Endonuclease Required for Retrotransposition. Cell 1996, 87(5):905-16.
    58. Jurka, J. Sequence Patterns Indicate an Enzymatic Involvement in Integration of Mammalian Retroposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94(5):1872-7.
    59. Pimpinelli, S.; Berloco, M.; Fanti, L.; Dimitri, P.; Bonaccorsi, S.; Marchetti, E.; Caizzi, R.; Caggese, C.; Gatti, M. Transposable elements are stable structural components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995 92(9):3804-8.
    60. Sun, X.; Le, H.D., Wahlstrom, J.M.; Karpen, G.H. Sequence Analysis of a Functional Drosophila Centromere. Genome Res 2003, 13(2):182-94.
    61. Neumann, P.; Yan, H.; Jiang, J. The Centromeric Retrotransposons of Rice Are Transcribed and Differentially Processed by RNA Interference. Genetics, 2007, 176, 749-761.
    62. De Cecco, M.; Criscione, S.W.; Peterson, A.L.; Neretti, N.; Sedivy, J.M.; Kreiling, J.A. Transposable elements become active and mobile in the genomes of aging mammalian somatic tissue. Aging 2013, 5, 867-883.
    63. Smurova, K.; De Wulf, P. Centromere and Pericentromere Transcription: Roles and Regulation… In Sickness and in Health. Genet. 2018, 9, 674.
    64. Klein, S. J.; O’Neill, R. J. Transposable elements: genome innovation, chromosome diversity, and centromere conflict. Chromosome Res. 2018, 26, 5–23.
    65. Sullivan, B.A.; Karpen, G. H. Centromeric chromatin exhibits a histone modification pattern that is distinct from both euchromatin and heterochromatin. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 1076–1083.
    66. Bergmann, J.H.; Rodríguez, M.G.; Martins, N.M.; Kimura, H.; Kelly, D.A.; Masumoto, H.; Larionov, V.; Jansen, L.E.; Earnshaw, W.C. Epigenetic engineering shows H3K4me2 is required for HJURP targeting and CENP-A assembly on a synthetic human kinetochore. Embo J. 2011, 30, 328–340.
    67. Piacentini, L.; Marchetti, M.; Bucciarelli, E.; Casale, A.M.; Cappucci, U.; Bonifazi, P.; Renda, F.; Fanti, L. A role of the Trx-G complex in Cid/CENP-A deposition at Drosophila melanogaster centromeres. Chromosoma, 2019, 128, 503-520.
    68. Ohzeki, J.; Bergmann, J.H.; Kouprina, N.; Noskov, V.N.; Nakano, M.; Kimura, H.; Earnshaw. W.C.; Larionov, V.; Masumoto, H. Breaking the HAC Barrier: Histone H3K9 acetyl/ methyl balance regulates CENP-A assembly. EMBO J. 2012, 31, 2391–2402.
    69. Wong, L.H.; Brettingham-Moore, K.H.; Chan, L.; Quach, J.M.; Anderson, M.A.; Northrop, E.L.; Hannan, R.; Saffery, R.; Shaw, M.L.; Williams, E.; Choo, K.H.A. Centromere RNA Is a Key Component for the Assembly of Nucleoproteins at the Nucleolus and Centromere. Genome Res., 2007, 17, 1146-1160.
    70. Quenet, D.; Dalal, Y. A long non-coding RNA is required for targeting centromeric protein A to the human centromere. ELife 2014, 3, e03254.
    71. Catania, S.; Pidoux, A.L.; Allshire, R.C. Sequence Features and Transcriptional Stalling within Centromere DNA Promote Establishment of CENP-A Chromatin. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1004986.
    72. Liu, H.; Qu, Q.; Warrington, R.; Rice, A.; Cheng, N.; Yu, H. Mitotic Transcription Installs Sgo1 at Centromeres to Coordinate Chromosome Segregation. Cell., 2015, 59, 426-36.
    73. Blower, M. D. Centromeric transcription regulates Aurora-B localization and activation. Rep. 2016, 15, 1624–1633.
    74. Grenfell, A.W.; Heald, R.; Strzelecka, M. Mitotic Noncoding RNA Processing Promotes Kinetochore and Spindle Assembly in Xenopus. J Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 133-141.
    75. Voullaire, L.E.; Slater, H.R.; Petrovic. V.; Andy Choo, K.H. A Functional Marker Centromere with No Detectable Alpha-Satellite, Satellite Ill, or CENP-B Protein: Activation of a Latent Centromere? J. Hum. Genet. 1993, 52, 1153-1163.
    76. du Sart, D.; Cancilla, M.R.; Earle, E.; Mao, J.; Saffery, R.; Tainton, K.M.; Kalitsis, P.; Martyn, J.; Barry, A.E.; Choo, K.H.A. A functional neo-centromere formed through activation of a latent human centromere and consisting of non-alpha-satellite DNA. Genet. 1997, 16, 144-153.
    77. Choo K.H.A. Centromere DNA Dynamics: Latent Centromeres and Neocentromere Formation. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61, 1225-1233.
    78. Ventura, M.; Mudge, J.M.; Palumbo, V.; Burn, S.; Blennow, E.; Pierluigi, M.; Giorda, R.; Zuffardi, O.; Archidiacono, N.; Jackson, M.S.; Rocchi, M. Neocentromeres in 15q24-26 Map to Duplicons Which Flanked an Ancestral Centromere in 15q25. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2059–2068.
    79. Rocchi, M.; Archidiacono, N.; Schempp, W.; Capozzi, O.; Stanyon, R. Centromere repositioning in mammals. Heredity 2012, 108, 59–67.
    80. Platero, J.S.; Ahmad, K.; Henikoff, S. A Distal Heterochromatic Block Displays Centromeric Activity When Detached from a Natural Centromere. Cell 1999, 4, 995-1004.
    81. Amor, D.J.; Choo, K.H.A. Neocentromeres: Role in Human Disease, Evolution, and Centromere Study. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 71, 695–714.
    82. Palladino, J.; Chavan, A.; Sposato, A.; Mason, T.D.; Mellone, B.G. Targeted De Novo Centromere Formation in Drosophila Reveals Plasticity and Maintenance Potential of CENP-A Chromatin. Cell 2020, 52, 379-394.
    83. Agudo, M.; Losada, A.; Abad, J.P.; Pimpinelli, S.; Ripoll, P.; Villasante, A. Centromeres from telomeres? The centromeric region of the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster contains a tandem array of telomeric HeT-A- and TART-related sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 1999, 27, 3318–3324.
    84. Villasante, A.; Abad, J.P.; and Mendez-Lago, M. Centromeres were derived from telomeres during the evolution of the eukaryotic chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104, 10542-10547.
    85. Zeitlin, S.G.; Baker, N.M.; Chapados, B.R.; Soutoglou, E.; Wang, J.Y.J.; Berns, M.W.; Cleveland, D.W. Double-strand DNA Breaks Recruit the Centromeric Histone CENP-A. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2009, 106, 15762-15767.
    86. Bodor, D.L.; Rodríguez, M.G.; Moreno, N.; Jansen, N.M.L. Analysis of Protein Turnover by Quantitative SNAP-based Pulse-Chase Imaging. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2012, 8, Unit8.8.
    87. Shang, W.H.; Hori, T.; Martins, N.M.C.; Toyoda, A.; Misu, S.; Monma, N.; Hiratani, I.; Maeshima, K.; Ikeo, K.; Fujiyama, A.; Kimura, H.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Fukagawa, T. Chromosome Engineering Allows the Efficient Isolation of Vertebrate Neocentromeres. Cell 2013, 24, 635–648.
    88. Nechemia-Arbely, Y.; Miga, K.H.; Shoshani, O.; Aslanian, A.; McMahon, M.A.; Lee, A.Y.; Fachinetti, D.; Yates, J.R.; Ren, B.; Cleveland, D.W. DNA Replication Acts as an Error Correction Mechanism to Maintain Centromere Identity by Restricting CENP-A to Centromeres. Cell. Biol., 2019, 21, 743-754.
    89. Liu, Y.G.; Whittier, R.F. Thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR: automatable amplification and sequencing of insert end fragment from PI and Yac clones for chromosomal walking. Genomics 1995, 25, 674-681.
    90. Li, T.H.; Schmid, C.W. Differential stress induction of individual Alu loci: implications for transcription and retrotransposition. Gene 2001, 276, 135-141.
    91. Zeller, G.; Henz, S.R.; Widmer, C.K.; Sachsenberg, T.; Ratsch, G.; Weigel, D.; Laubinger, S. Stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome analyzed using whole-genome tiling arrays. The Plant Journal 2009, 58, 1068-1082.
    92. Fanti, L.; Piacentini, L.; Cappucci, U.; Casale, A.M.; Pimpinelli, S. Canalization by Selection of de Novo Induced Mutations. Genetics 2017, 206, 1995-2006.
    93. Gassmann, R.; Rechtsteiner, A.; Yuen, K.W.; Muroyama, A.; Egelhofer, T.; Gaydos, L.; Barron, F.; Maddox, P.; Essex, A.; Monen, J.; Ercan, S.; Lieb, J.D.; Oegema, K.; Strome, S.; Desai, A. An inverse relationship to germline transcription defines centromeric chromatin in elegans. Nat. 2012, 484, 534–537.
    94. Goday, C.; Pimpinelli, S. Chromosome Organization and Heterochromatin Elimination in Parascaris. Science, 1984, 224, 411-413.