- Please check and comment entries here.
The STEM Curriculum for Future Engineers
While higher education has been facing the consequences of low fertility, remodeling it from the inside out has seemed inevitable. The current study sought to apply the concept of theme-based STEM curriculum design to the new engineering education program by planning several thematic clusters during the university period, covering various professional fields within the department.
1. The Current Reality
2. The Role of STEM Education in Higher Education
This entry is adapted from 10.3390/su132212450
- Ministry of Education. Responding to Low Birth Rate of Children in Taiwan; Ministry of Education: Taipei, Taiwan, 2021; p. 129.
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The World Factbook 2021. Available online: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/ (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Mok, K.H.; Xiong, W.; Bin Aedy Rahman, H.N. COVID-19 pandemic’s disruption on university teaching and learning and competence cultivation: Student evaluation of online learning experiences in Hong Kong. Int. J. Chin. Educ. 2021, 10, 22125868211007011.
- Law, K.M.Y.; Geng, S.; Li, T. Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Comput. Educ. 2019, 136, 1–12.
- Ford, V.B.; Roby, D.E. Why Do High School Students Lack Motivation in the Classroom? Glob. Educ. J. 2013, 2013, 101–113.
- Hong, J.-C.; Lee, Y.-F.; Ye, J.-H. Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 174, 110673.
- Kennedy, B.; Hefferon, M.; Funk, C. Half of Americans Think Young People Don’t Pursue STEM because It Is too Hard. Available online: Pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/17/half-of-americans-think-young-people-dont-pursue-stem-because-it-is-too-hard/ (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Hancock, D.W.; Bray, M.; Nason, S.A. Influencing university students’ achievement and motivation in a technology course. J. Educ. Res. 2002, 95, 365–372.
- Albrecht, J.R.; Karabenick, S.A. Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Education. J. Exp. Educ. 2018, 86, 1–10.
- Barrot, J.S. K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: Towards making students future ready. Asia Pac. J. Educ. 2021, 1–15.
- Gleeson, J. Evolution of Irish curriculum culture: Understandings, policy, reform and change. Ir. Educ. Stud. 2021, 1–21.
- Gleeson, J.; Klenowski, V.; Looney, A. Curriculum change in Australia and Ireland: A comparative study of recent reforms. J. Curric. Stud. 2020, 52, 478–497.
- Pietarinen, J.; Pyhalto, K.; Soini, T. Shared Sense-making in Curriculum Reform: Orchestrating the Local Curriculum Work. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 2019, 63, 491–505.
- Yao, J.X.; Guo, Y.Y. Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2018, 40, 1913–1933.
- Ryder, J. Being professional: Accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform. Stud. Sci. Educ. 2015, 51, 87–120.
- Broom, C.A. Power, politics, democracy and reform: A historical review of curriculum reform, academia and government in British Columbia, Canada, 1920 to 2000. J. Curric. Stud. 2016, 48, 711–727.
- Lin, C.-H.; Yu, C.-C.; Shih, P.-K.; Wu, L.Y. STEM based Artificial Intelligence Learning in General Education for Non-Engineering Undergraduate Students. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2021, 24, 224–237.
- Nasri, N.; Rahimi, N.M.; Nasri, N.M.; Abd Talib, M.A. A Comparison Study between Universal Design for Learning-Multiple Intelligence (UDL-MI) Oriented STEM Program and Traditional STEM Program for Inclusive Education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 554.
- Honey, M.; Alberts, B.; Bass, H.; Castillo, C.; Lee, O.; Strutchens, M.M.; Vermillion, L.; Rodriguez, F. STEM Education for the Future. USA: National Science Foundation Retrieved; National Science Foundation: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2020.
- Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J.; Dúo-Terrón, P.; Ramos Navas-Parejo, M.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, C.; Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. Scientific Performance and Mapping of the Term STEM in Education on the Web of Science. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2279.
- Ulmeanu, M.-E.; Doicin, C.-V.; Spânu, P. Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Framework in STEM Intensive Programs for Secondary and Tertiary Education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 978.
- Serdyukov, P. Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn. 2017, 10, 4–33.
- Spyropoulou, N.; Glaroudis, D.; Iossifides, A.; Zaharakis, I.D. Fostering Secondary Students’ STEM Career Awareness through IoT Hands-On Educational Activities: Experiences and Lessons Learned. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 86–92.