1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Others

    Bamboo Bambusa tulda Roxb

    Subjects: Plant Sciences
    View times: 7
    Submitted by:

    Abstract

    Bamboos belong to the monocotyledonous plant family Poaceae and subfamily Bambusoideae. They are globally distributed from 51° North to 47° South except in the polar regions. There are ~125 genera and 1670 species of bamboos identified so far. Compared to other grasses, flowering in bamboo is quite divergent, yet complex with respect to time to flower, number of individual culms in a population that have been induced at a time (sporadic vs. gregarious), nature of monocarpy, morphology of inflorescences (solitary spikelet vs. pseudospikelet), biology of pollen and nature of genetic compatibility. Wide diversity exists even across species and genotypes. However, due to the rarity of flowering and inaccessibility, few studies have been done to systematically analyse diverse aspects of the reproductive behaviour of bamboo.

    1. Introduction

    Bamboos belong to the monocotyledonous plant family Poaceae and subfamily Bambusoideae. They are globally distributed from 51° North to 47° South except in the polar regions [1]. There are ~125 genera and 1670 species of bamboos identified so far [1][2]. Herbaceous bamboos are found in Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay and West Indies; paleotropical woody bamboos are distributed in Africa, India, Japan, Madagascar, Oceania, South China and Sri Lanka; neotropical woody bamboos are found in Argentina, Chile, Southern Mexico and West Indies; whereas north temperate woody bamboos are observed in Africa, India, Madagascar and Sri Lanka [2]. With respect to species diversity, Asia is at the top, followed by South America and Africa [3]. Among Asian countries, China contains ~6.01 million hectares of bamboo vegetation [4], followed by India having with ~160,037 sq km (India State of Forest Report 2019, https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2019?pgID=forest-report-2019 accessed between the period of October 2017 to February 2018). Worldwide ethnic populations are heavily dependent on bamboo bioresources, due to their various uses, such as food and beverage, fodder, medicine, fishing gear, handicrafts and artefacts [5][6][7][8].
    The flowering behaviour of bamboo is distinctive. Four diverse flowering types have been identified in bamboos. They are (i) sporadic, (ii) massively synchronised (gregarious), (iii) sporadic followed by massively synchronised, and (iv) partial [9][10]. The sporadic flowering events occur in few culms of a population and have been observed in Bambusa bambos [11]Bambusa pallida [12]B. tulda [13]Dendrocalamus asper [14], and Dendrocalamus longispathus [15]. In contrast, gregarious flowering happens in a synchronised manner in almost every culm growing over a large geographical area and had been observed in many species, such as Bambusa nutans [16]B. tulda [12][17][18][19][20][21][22]Dendrocalamus racemosa [22]Melocanna baccifera [21]Thamnocalamus spathiflorus [23] and Thamnocalamus aristatus [24]. Quite often, sporadic events may be followed by mass flowering in subsequent years and are defined as sporadic-massively synchronised flowering. It has been observed in B. tulda [23]Chusquea culeouChusquea montanaM. bacciferaPhyllostachys heterocladaPhyllostachys reticulata and Sasa cernua [10]. Partial flowering events take place in small, discrete populations, and it is neither extended like gregarious, nor restricted like the sporadic type concerning the number of culms flowered. It had been observed in Pleioblastus simonii [10]. The flowering time varies between 1–120 years across different species [10]. Another complexity of bamboo flowering is related to the nature of monocarpy, which differs between sporadic and gregarious flowering types. Mass death of the entire population takes place in cases of gregarious flowering, which is not common for sporadic and partial flowering.

    2. Observations on Recurrent, Sporadic Flowering Cycle of B. tulda for Seven Years

    The number of flowering clumps (=genet) varied from 1–4 among four studied populations (Table 1Figure 1). Similarly, the number of flowering culms (=ramet) also varied among the clumps. For instance, 1–8 out of 33–59 culms flowered sporadically for four consecutive years in the case of SHYM7. Whereas, it was 2–8 out of 24–41 culms in SHYM16, 1–17 out of 43–93 culms in BNDL23 and 6–11 out of 29–84 culms in the case of BNDL24 (Table 1).
    Figure 1. Gregarious and sporadic flowering incidents of B. tulda previously reported from different regions of India and the study sites used in these analyses. Data sources for Map: Esri, Maxer, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN and the GIS user Community. Blue bubbles represent gregarious flowering, and green bubbles represents sporadic flowering events (Troup, 1921; Perry, 1931; Mohan Ram and Gopal, 1981; Rawat, 1987; Gupta, 1987; Naithani, 1993; Bhattacharya et al., 2006; Sarma et al., 2010; Naithani et al., 2013). Those with a flowering cycle that continued until June, 2021, have been marked with asterisks. Flowering year marked in red font identified in this study.
    Table 1. Comparison between numbers of flowering vs. non-flowering clump and culm observed for seven years in four populations of B. tulda studied. Absence of flowering was indicated by (--).
    Population Number Duration of Flowering Clump and Culm Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
    SHYM7 2013–16 Number of flowering clumps 1 1 2 1 0 -- --
    Total culm number in a flowering clump 42 45 59 33 -- -- --
    Number of flowering culms 3 5 8 1 -- -- --
    Number of withered culms 0 1 2 7 -- -- --
    SHYM16 2016–19 Number of flowering clumps 2 2 2 1 0 -- --
    Total culm number in a flowering clump 38 41 40 24 -- -- --
    Number of flowering culms 7 8 5 2 -- -- --
    Number of withered culms 0 0 5 9 -- -- --
    BNDL23 2013–19 Number of flowering clumps 4 4 3 3 3 3 1
    Total culm number in a flowering clump 77 93 86 87 79 55 43
    Number of flowering culms 11 14 17 15 6 5 1
    Number of withered culms 2 5 9 6 11 12 8
    BNDL24 2017–to date Number of flowering clumps 1 1 2 1 2 -- --
    Total culm number in a flowering clump 31 33 71 29 84 -- --
    Number of flowering culms 6 10 9 8 11 -- --
    Number of withered culms 1 0 5 2 1 -- --
    All these populations were closely observed for seven years to study the flowering cycle. During the initiation of the flowering cycle in spring (February to March, Light 11 h: Dark 13 h), solitary spikelets started emerging in only a few culms of each population (Figure 2). However, by summer, i.e., from April to May (Light 13 h: Dark 11 h), the number of solitary spikelets increased and pseudospikelets started emerging. The maximum number of pseudospikelets emerged from the nodes of flowering branches during July (Figure 2). Subsequently, from August, both solitary and pseudospikelets decreased in numbers and withered by October (Figure 2). Flowering was always followed by the death of the flowered branches, but the flowering culm remained alive until 2-3 recurrent flowering cycles and subsequently underwent senescence.
    Figure 2. Induction of sporadic flowering and seasonal effect on emergence of solitary spikelet and pseudospikelet in B. tulda. Abbreviations used: SB—Senesced flowering branch, SL—Solitary spikelets, PSL—Pseudospikelets, NL—New leaf, DFC—Dead flowering culm.
    However, rhizomes of the flowering clump remained active and young culms sprouted from the rhizomes. These sprouted culms attained maximum height before winter (Figure 2). New leaves, as well as branches emerged from old culms from August to October.

    3. Macro- and Micro-Morphology of Solitary Spikelet and Pseudospikelet

    Solitary spikelets were observed either on top of the young growing branches or tillers arising from the rhizome of the flowering culm (Figure 3A–D). It was initially bright green in colour and became pale, straw-coloured on withering, 4.5–9.3 cm long, 0.5–1 cm wide. Each solitary spikelet was subtended by a flag leaf, which was smaller in size than other vegetative leaves (Figure 3A,C). They usually developed in a basipetal manner. Mature inflorescences were observed at the top, whereas young ones were located at the base and remained covered by the leaf sheath. The SEM analysis of inflorescence bud revealed a single apical inflorescence meristem (IM, Figure 3D). In contrast, pseudospikelets grew in clusters on the nodes of flowering branches and were devoid of flag leaves (Figure 3E–H). They were 4.3–9.5 cm in diameter and comprised of ~3–34 spikelet units. Here, each inflorescence unit develops on an axis (rachis), which may bear secondary axes (rachilla; Figure 3G). Rachilla bears several bracts. The basal bracts subtended multiple inflorescence buds, while the bracts in the upper region of the rachilla subtended single spikelet units (Figure 3G). The SEM analysis of inflorescence bud revealed multiple inflorescence meristems arranged in a capitate manner (Figure 3H).
    Figure 3. Morphological observation and Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the inflorescence of B. tulda. (A) Solitary spikelet from the lateral branch. (B) Organisation of a solitary spikelet. (C) Solitary spikelet from a rhizome as a tiller. (D) SEM images of spikelet with single inflorescence meristem. (E) Pseudospikelet. (F) Pseudospikelet in a capitate form. (G) Rachis (RCS) and rachilla (RCL) of pseudospikelet. (H) SEM images of pseudospikelet with multiple inflorescence meristem. Abbreviations used: FL—Flag leaf, IM—Inflorescence meristem.
    Both solitary spikelets and pseudospikelets were composed of indistinguishable spikelet units, which were subtended by 17–50 mm long, distichous, shining, chaffy bracts. The lower most 2–4 florets were reduced to empty glumes, whereas 4–18 fertile florets were located on the top (Figure 4A).
    Figure 4. Morphological observation of different floral parts of B. tulda and Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the abaxial epidermis of palea and lemma; (A) Single floret with six basifixed anthers. (B) Dorsal view of a lemma. (C) Dorsal view of a palea. (D) Lodicule. (E) Anther showing two lobes. (F) Apical suture of the anther. (G) Gynoecium with trifid stigma. (H) Longitudinal section of ovary. (I) Presence of prickles (P) and silica cells (SC). (J) Presence of macro hair (MH) and long cells (LC; magnified view inset). (K) Presence of SC and LC, (LC; magnified view inset). (L) Presence of macro hairs (MH). Abbreviations used: F—Floret, G—Glume, AL—Anther lobes, AS—Apical suture, DL—Dehiscence line, OV—Ovary, O—Ovule, MH—Macro hair, LC—Long cells, SC—Silica cells, P—Prickles.

    4. Morphology of Florets and Micro Morphology of Floral Bracts

    In a spikelet unit, florets matured in an acropetal manner. Florets were bisexual, 15–19 mm long and 4.5–7 mm broad at the base (Figure 4A–H). Lemmas were broadly acuminate, mucronate, concave, glabrous, many nerved, bright green, 14.5–21.5 mm long and 4.5–6.5 mm broad (Figure 4B). They were overlapping with paleas. Paleas were membranous, penicillate, 2-keeled, 5–7 nerved, 9–14 mm long, 3–5 mm broad at the base and ciliated at the top (Figure 4C). Lodicules were three in numbers, 1.5–2.5 mm long and fleshy. It was they were pale green, waxy, cuneate, oblong, hyaline at the base and whitish fimbriate at the apex (Figure 4D).
    Since palea and lemma contain many species diagnostic characters, SEM analyses were performed. The abaxial surface of paleas contained dumbbell-shaped silica cells (SC, Figure 4I) and long cells (LC) with dense prickles in between (Figure 4J). In the middle part of the palea, prickles were higher in number than were SC. On the contrary, SC were dominant in margins (Figure 4K). However, the abaxial surface of the lemma was comparatively smoother. LC were observed, and prickles were lower in abundance (Figure 4K). Both lemma and palea contained trichome-like macro hairs on the margin (Figure 4L). Also, stomatal guard cells were observed in both lemma and palea.
    Mature florets of B. tulda contained six stamens. Anthers were basifixed, purple or yellow at maturity (Figure 4E). Each anther had two lobes, and the tip of the anther lobes were emarginated (Figure 4E). At the apical part of an anther, a pore-like linear dehiscence suture was observed (Figure 4F). Anther filaments were thread-like and attained 10–17 mm length during anthesis. The ovary was pear-shaped, 2–2.6 mm long; style 2–3 mm long, hairy. Stigma was trifid, 2–3 mm long, having whitish stigmatic papillae (Figure 4G,H).
    Studies on developing florets (F1–F9) within a spikelet revealed different rates of developmental progression between androecium and gynoecium (Figure 5A–H). Initially, androecium and gynoecium primordia grew simultaneously in the most immature floret (F1, Figure 5B). Subsequently, differentiation of androecium primordia was initiated in the floret F2 (Figure 5C), while the gynoecium differentiation started in the F3 (Figure 5D). Eventually, the mature anthers protruded ~3 h earlier than gynoecium (F6, Figure 5G). In contrast, gynoecium attained maturity after completion of anthesis and subsequent senescence of anthers (F9, Figure 5H).
    Figure 5. Developmental progression of androecium and gynoecium in florets of B. tulda. Floret numbers are marked from apex to base in order of maturity (F1—youngest, F7—oldest floret). (A) Arrangement of florets in a spikelet. (BE) Developmental stages of androecium and gynoecium primordia. (F) Unopened flower with matured anthers and immature gynoecium. (G) Open floret with matured anthers and immature stigma. (H) Floret with anther filaments and developed stigma. Abbreviations used: AP—Androecium primordia, GP—Gynoecium primordia, A—Androecium, G—Gynoecium, MA—Mature anther, AF—Anther filament, S—Stigma.

    5. Morphology, Cytology and Germination of Pollen Grains

    Microscopic observations revealed that pollen grains were globose, mono-ulcerate and their diameter ranged from 22.37–43.2 µm (Figure 6A). SEM analyses revealed that pollen grains were monoporate, with a distinct annulus and granular exine with regulated ridges (Figure 6A). Cytological studies revealed that the dividing microspores exhibited various meiotic stages that included metaphase I, late anaphase I, late telophase I, metaphase II, anaphase II and late telophase II (Figure S1). In many instances, microspores having multiple nuclei were observed. However, no meiotic abnormalities were recorded. To assess the viability of pollen grains, a 2,3,5 triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) assay was performed. Viable pollen grains appeared red, whereas non-viable ones remained unstained (Figure 6B). Among 2460 pollen grains obtained from B. tulda, 602 were viable, and the rate of viability varied from 23.94 ± 4.28% to 25.35 ± 1.87%. This finding was further supported by an in vitro pollen germination assay, although the absolute values were lower in in vitro germination than the TTC assay (Figure 6C–D). This could be due to a higher false positivity rate for the TTC assay. The maximum percentage (14.29 ± 0.8%) of pollen germination was observed in Brewbaker and Kwack’s medium supplemented with 15% sucrose [Table S1]. Among 396 pollen grains, 57 germinated and the germination percentage varied from 13.48 ± 4.05% to 15.16 ± 5.49% across B. tulda populations.
    Figure 6. Studies on pollen morphology and viability. (A) SEM image of a monoporate pollen having granular exine. (B) Pollen grains stained using 2,3,5 triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) and (C) Germinated pollen grain. (D) Bargraph of the pollen viability based on TTC staining (black bar) and germination assay (grey bar). Pearson’s chi-squared test revealed that the differences in proportion were statistically not significant across B. tulda populations for both TTC and germination assay. Abbreviations used: AN—Annulus, NP—Non-viable pollen, VP—Viable pollen, PT—Pollen tube.

    This entry is adapted from 10.3390/plants10112375

    References

    1. Soreng, R.; Peterson, P.; Romaschenko, K.; Davidse, G.; Teisher, J.; Clark, L.; Barbera, P.; Gillespie, L.; Zuloaga, F. A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae) II: An update and a comparison of two 2015 classifications. J. Syst. Evol. 2017, 55, 259–290.
    2. Das, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Singh, P.; Filgueiras, T.S.; Pal, A. Bamboo taxonomy and diversity in the era of molecular markers. Adv. Bot. Res. 2008, 47, 225–268.
    3. Bystriakova, N.; Kapos, V.; Lysenko, I.; Stapleton, C. Distribution and conservation status of forest bamboo biodiversity in the Asia-Pacific region. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 1833–1841.
    4. Liu, W.; Hui, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, M.; Liu, G. Review of the Resources and Utilization of Bamboo in China; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–10.
    5. Patel, A.B. Traditional bamboo uses by the tribes of Gujarat. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2005, 4, 179–184.
    6. Ju, Y.; Zhuo, J.; Liu, B.; Long, C. Eating from the wild: Diversity of wild edible plants used by Tibetans in Shangri-la region, Yunnan, China. J. Ethnobiol. 2013, 9, 28.
    7. Dhyani, S.; Dhyani, D. Significance of provisioning ecosystem services from moist temperate forest ecosystems: Lessons from upper Kedarnath valley, Garhwal, India. Energ. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 1, 109–121.
    8. Banerjee, S.; Basak, M.; Dutta, S.; Chanda, C.; Dey, A.; Das, M. Ethnobamboology: Traditional uses of bamboos and opportunities to exploit genomic resources for better exploitation. In Biotechnological Advances in Bamboo: The “Green Gold” on the Earth; Ahmad, Z., Ding, Y., Shahzad, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021.
    9. Lin, S.Y.; Mao, G.X. The habit and regeneration of bamboo flowering. Forest Sci. Technol. 2007, 32, 23–25.
    10. Zheng, X.; Lin, S.; Fu, H.; Wan, Y.; Ding, Y. The bamboo flowering cycle sheds light on flowering diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 381.
    11. Jeeva, S.; Kiruba, S. Flowering of bamboos in two biodiversity hotspots of India. Indian For. 2010, 136, 137–140.
    12. Naithani, H.B. Contribution to the Taxonomic Studies of Indian Bamboos. Ph.D. Thesis, Garhwal University, Srinagar, India, 1993.
    13. Bhattacharya, S.; Das, M.; Bar, R.; Pal, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Bambusa tulda with a note on flowering. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 529–535.
    14. Thapliyal, M. Flowering in Dendrocalamus Asper; FRI: Dehradun, Indian, 2011; Unpublished.
    15. Sharma, H.R.; Yadav, S.; Deka, B.; Meena, R.K.; Bisht, N.S. Sporadic flowering of Dendrocalamus longispathus (Kurz) Kurz in Mizoram, India. Tropic. Plant Res. 2014, 1, 26–27.
    16. Bahadur, K.N. A note on the flowering of Bambusa nutans. Indian For. 1980, 106, 314–316.
    17. Troup, R.S. The Silviculture of Indian Trees; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1921.
    18. Perry, N.E. On the flowering of bamboos. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 1931, 34, 1099–1101.
    19. Mohan Ram, H.Y.; Gopal, B.H. Some observation on the flowering of bamboos in Mizoram. Curr. Sci. 1981, 50, 708–710.
    20. Rawat, B.S. Flowering of bamboos. Indian For. 1987, 113, 760–761.
    21. Sarma, H.; Sarma, A.M.; Sarma, A.; Borah, S. A case of gregarious flowering in bamboo, dominated lowland forest of Assam, India: Phenology, regeneration, impact on rural economy, and conservation. J. Forest. Res. 2010, 21, 409.
    22. Naithani, H.B.; Deka, A.K.; Banerjee, G. Gregarious flowering of bamboos in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian For. 2013, 139, 746.
    23. Bhattacharya, S.; Ghosh, J.S.; Das, M.; Pal, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Thamnocalamus spathiflorus subsp. spathiflorus at population level. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 282, 13–20.
    24. Verma, P.K.; Rawat, K.K.; Das, N.; Yadav, A.; Kaushik, P.K. A note on recent flowering in Thamnocalamus aristatus (Gamble) E.G Camus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) in East Sikkim. Research 2013, 5, 19–21.
    More