1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2

    View times: 4
    Submitted by: Giuseppina Basta

    Definition

    The interaction between the membrane spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the transmembrane angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor of the human epithelial host cell is the first step of infection, which has a critical role for viral pathogenesis of the current coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

    1. Introduction

    Over the last two decades, there have been three deadly human outbreaks of coronaviruses (CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV (SARS-CoV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-CoV (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2. The latter is causing the current pandemic called CoV disease 2019 (COVID-19). They target the human respiratory tract causing severe progressive pneumonia and could spread to other organs, causing damage to the central nervous system in SARS-CoV, severe renal failure in MERS-CoV, and multi-organ failure in SARS-CoV-2 [1].
    Despite a high percentage of people with a positive screening test results asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, COVID-19 can manifest as a respiratory tract infection with a serious spectrum of infection [2]. Severe symptoms, with hypoxia and pneumonia was reported in 15 to 20 percent of infections [3], with a critical associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which can rapidly progress to a multi-organ failure, irreversible and lethal in some cases [4][5]. Genomic studies confirmed the role of viral spike glycoprotein (S protein) in virulence and pathogenicity for SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 [1].
    The inflammatory cascade, fibrotic and coagulative events of COVID-19 start from the interaction between the membrane S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and the transmembrane angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) used as site of attachment to the host cell. However, its entry into the host cells is mediated by transmembrane proteases, of which the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is the main one. Recent studies have identified several key amino-acidic residues for S-protein interactions with the human ACE2 receptor and the TMPRSS2 membrane protease to initiate infection [6].
    Although ACE2 is a target receptor for both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, the genetic variance observed in the homologous sequence of the gene encoding the S protein allows SARS-CoV-2 to bind efficiently to the receptor with firm attachment, improving virulence compared to SARS-CoV, and then causing very high morbidity and mortality worldwide.
    Since ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are co-expressed in a limited number of tissues, the high viral transmissibility and the tissue tropism suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may use other proteases for cellular entry [7]. In fact, several proteases have been found to be involved in the transmission or infection process, including furin (a membrane-bound protease expressed in different tissues, mainly in the lungs [6]), ADAM17 (short for a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17), and cathepsin L.
    Several studies have also focused on identifying additional mediators which may increase SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and contribute to the tissue/organ tropism. Some data are emerging for other cell mediators/receptors, including neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), integrins, sialic acids (SA), factor Xa, heparan sulfate (HS), cluster of differentiation 147 (CD147) and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) [8].
    Given the complexity of interactions between viral proteins and host receptors with differing binding specificity and affinity, the differential prognosis for COVID-19 in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients may depend on the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphism in ACE2, serine proteases, mediators or co-receptors, either individually or combined with each other or even in combination with SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants resulting in more or less virulent and lethal strains [9].
    To date, effective antivirals for counteract COVID-19 have not been found and many bio-molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection remain elusive.
    The identification of key factors, such as receptors and proteases, involved in the dynamic of infection, could provide a way to stop the spread of the virus and suggest single or combined therapeutic treatments to counteract host binding and multi-protease activation.

    2. The Binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 Receptor Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: The Submerged Front of Multi-Proteases

    Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 utilize ACE2 as a host-cell entry receptor and proteases as entry activators [10] (Table 1). ACE2 is a negative regulator of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), which is essential for maintaining blood pressure homeostasis and the balance of salts and fluid. This regulation is critical for the physiopathology of various organs, including lungs, kidneys, and heart. ACE2 also regulates the absorption of amino acids in the gut and kidney, then modulating the expression of transporters for amino acids [10][11].
    Table 1. Receptors, co-receptors and proteases involved in the infection of the three recent coronavirus outbreaks.
    SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV MERS-CoV
    Receptor ACE2 [10] ACE2 [12] DPP4 (CD26) [10]
    Priming protease TMPRSS2 [13] TMPRSS2 [12]  
    Furin [14] Furin [15] TMPRSS2 [16]
    Cathepsin-L [16] Cathepsin-L [17] Furin [16]
    ADAM17 [17] ADAM 17 [12] Cathepsin-L [18]
    Factor Xa [19] Factor Xa [20]  
    Co-receptors Sialic Acids [21]    
    NRP-1 [22] Integrins [23] Sialic Acids [21]
    Integrins [24] Heparan Sulfate [25]  
    Heparan Sulfate [26]    
    Other receptors CD147 [27] CD147 [17] GRP78 [28]
    GRP78 [28] GRP78 [28]  
    ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; DPP4; dipeptidyl peptidase-4; TMPRSS2: transmembrane serine protease 2; ADAM17: a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17; NRP-1: neuropilin-1; CD147: cluster of differentiation 147; GRP78: glucose regulated protein 78.
    ACE2 contains a single catalytic domain with zinc-binding motif located at the extracellular side of the cell, which can be cleaved and released into the bloodstream by ADAM17 [12].
    COVID-19 patients exhibit multi-organ dysfunction, due to the expression of ACE2 in the lung, heart, vascular system (endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells), brain, kidney, gut and testis [29][30]. Particularly, 80% of all ACE2-expressing cells were identified in type II pneumocyte cells, followed by the nasal and oral mucosa and alveolar macrophages [31]. ACE2 is also expressed in pericytes—undifferentiated and contractile cells that surround the capillary endothelial cells particularly in renal circulatory plexus—and in cardiac myocytes. This latter would explain the high renal microvascular damage and heart failure incidence in COVID-19 [32].
    The S protein, by which SARS-CoV-2 recognizes the host ACE2 receptor, consists of three glycoprotein monomers and each monomer comprises two subunits, S1 and S2. S1 subunit can be further divided into an N-terminal domain (NTD) and a C-terminal domain (CTD). This latter domain is referred to as the ACE2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) for SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 1A) [14][16]. S1 RBD is the most variable part of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and key residue substitutions in this region can enhance the interaction ability and lead to a higher binding affinity between the S protein and ACE2 [33]. Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been emerging and circulating around the world and are frequently monitored through sequence-based surveillance, laboratory studies, and epidemiological investigations [34][35].
    Figure 1. (A) The membrane spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 consists of three glycoprotein monomers, and each monomer contains two subunits, S1 and S2. The S1 subunit is divided into the N-terminal (NTD) and C-terminal (CTD) domain, which is referred to as the receptor-binding domain (RBD), while the S2 subunit contains membrane fusion activity. (B) SARS-CoV-2 entry mediated by TMPRSS2 and cathepsin-L. Once the S protein interacts with ACE2, TMPRSS2 cleaves S protein at the S1/S2 cleavage site and then the furin cleaves the S2 region (S2’) to initiate conformational changes for membrane fusion. The S protein can also activate ADAM17 which can cleave ACE2, resulting in shedding and soluble ACE2. In a second route, the S protein is cleaved and activated by the cathepsin-L pathway, where virions are taken up into endosomes. (C) Co-receptors are involved in SARS-CoV-2 attack. S proteins can recognize sialic acids, NRP-1, integrins and heparan sulfate for the first step of attachment to host cells. (D) CD147 and GRP78 have been identified as other potential receptors for SARS-CoV-2 entry.
    There are two proteolytic activation events associated with the virus–cell membrane fusion process, mediated by the S protein, which can involve several proteases [14][15][36].
    The first is a priming cleavage at the interface of the S1 and S2 subunit, which allows both to expose hidden cleavage sites and to increase binding affinity for the receptor. The second is a triggering cleavage that occurs within the S2 region (S2′) and allows the liberation and the conformational changes of S2 fusion peptide that mediate the fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane [37].
    The protease activity of ACE2 has no role in facilitating viral entry and it merely appears to act as a receptor to guide attachment and fusion of the S protein. In fact, following the binding between S1 subunit and ACE2 receptor, different serine proteases, such as TMPRSS2, cathepsin-L, and the metalloproteinase ADAM17, trigger the cleavage of ACE2 and the consequent fusion of the viral membrane to the host. Differently from SARS-CoV, the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is activated by the serine protease furin, which facilitates conformational changes required for S1 RBD exposure and binding to surface receptors (Figure 1B) [38].
    S protein has a closed and an open conformation: in the closed form, all three RBDs of the S trimer are inaccessible to ACE2 binding, while in the opened form, RBDs are exposed to ACE2 binding. After furin cleavage between the S1 and S2 domains (priming), the proportion of the S trimers in the open conformation increases. The final link between RBD and ACE2 leads to a fully open form, in which the S1 subunit remains limitedly bound to the core S2 trimer through intermediate S1 subdomains. This arrangement leaves the top of the S2 fully exposed for the next fusion of the membranes [14].

    2.1. Furin Priming

    Furin is a Ca2+-dependent endopeptidase, responsible for activating precursor proteins like fusion proteins of viruses. Furin is capable of cleaving and activating viral fusion proteins of HIV, Ebola [39], MERS-CoV [40], SARS-CoV [15], and SARS-CoV-2) [16] (Table 1). Furin accumulates mainly in the Golgi complex, but it can be transported to the cell surface via the endosomal pathway or can be released into the extracellular space [41]. For this reason, furin can cleave the S protein in the Golgi complex, and also in the extracellular space [38].
    The addition of a furin cleavage site to S1/S2 is essential for efficient viral entry into human lung cells, and its presence expands the versatility, transmissibility and tropism of SARS-CoV-2 due to the wide cellular expression of furin proteases [42][43].
    Many health conditions, like diabetes, obesity and hypertension, are associated with elevated furin levels, and this circumstance can explain why patients with such pre-existent comorbidities are subject to severe forms of COVID-19 [44]. High levels of furin suggest testing for potential furin inhibitors to counteract COVID-19. Some of them, such as the furin convertase inhibitor (chloromethyl ketone) and peptidyl chloromethyl ketones have already been reported for HIV [45], but not yet evaluated for SARS-CoV-2. There are also ongoing studies that use phytochemicals, like bromhexine and phyto-flavonoid luteolin, which are validated to block the S-protein cleavage activation and membrane fusion [46] (Table 2). Another potential candidate for adjuvant treatment is the trypsin inhibitor tamarind, which in addition to several beneficial effects on the reduction of inflammatory markers, could inhibit alone or in combination with other drugs the action of proteases that facilitate the SARS-CoV-2 infection [47].
    Table 2. Targets and mechanism of action of repurposed anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs.
    Targets Potential Drugs Mechanism of Action Refs
    Furin ambroxol, bromhexine and luteolin
    tamarind, polyphenols, limonin and gedunin
    Block the S-protein cleavage activation and membrane fusion [13][46][47]
    TMPRSS2 camostat, nafamostat, limonin, gedunin, otamixaban dabigatran and α-1-antitrypsin Block S-protein cleavage mediated not only by TMPRSS2 but also by other proteases [13][48][49][50]
    ADAM17 α-1-antitrypsin Blocks S-protein cleavage [50]
    Syncytia formation niclosamide, trifluoperazine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, ivermectin Suppress the activity of TMEM16F, involved in syncytia formation [51][52]
    Cathepsin L chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine
    and 8P9R
    Interfere with the endosomial pathway, increasing pH [53][54][55][56]
    NRP-1 heparin, natural products and small molecules Block C-end rule peptide on NRP-1 [57]
    Heparan sulfate heparin/HS mimetics Preclude the interaction between HS and S protein [58][59]
    Integrins ATN-161 Inhibits the interaction between S protein and integrins [60]
    CD147 azithromycin, cyclophilin A,
    doxycycline
    Interfere with ligands/CD147 interaction [61][62][63][64]
    GRP78 epigallocatechin gallate, omoeriodictyol, isorhamnetin, and curcumin, berbamine, OSU-03012 Interfere with ligands/GRP78 interaction [65][66]
    Factor Xa heparin Blocks S protein cleavage by Factor Xa and inhibits the coagulation [20]
    Cyclo-oxygenase-2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Prevent inflammatory cytokine storm [67]

    TMPRSS2: transmembrane serine protease 2; ADAM17: a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17; NRP-1: neuropilin-1; CD147: cluster of differentiation 147; GRP78: glucose-regulated protein 78.

    2.2. TMPRSS2

    TMPRSS2 is a multi-domain type II transmembrane serine protease, that mainly cleaves the S protein of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 to trigger fusion of viral envelope with the host cell membrane (Table 1). It is also important for the entry of the influenza virus into the host cell [1]. TMPRSS2 plays a dual role in the infection process: it proteolytically cleaves both the S protein, to trigger fusion of viral envelope with the host cell membrane, and the ACE2 tail, to increase the virion uptake, also through the cathepsin L -dependent pathway [68] (Figure 1).
    TMPRSS2 and ACE2 are co-expressed in the lung, heart, gut, smooth muscle, liver, kidney, neurons, and immune cells [68][69][70][71]. In particular, they are both observed within the type II pneumocyte cells [72]. The TMPRSS2 gene is also expressed in the adult prostate, as reported in a research in which men were at higher risk for developing the disease with severe symptoms [73]. Indeed, the possible role of androgen receptors in increasing SARS-CoV-2 infection through the regulation of TMPRSS2 transcription has recently emerged, suggesting crosstalk between COVID-19 and prostate cancer, caused by the elevated expression of TMPRSS2 [74].
    The exact sequence of cleavage events is not yet clear, but it appears that first furin cleaves at S1/S2 domain and then TMPRSS2 cleaves at the S2 cleavage site to produce fusion peptide and S2′ to trigger membrane fusion (Figure 1B) [16]. However, TMPRSS2 plays a dual role during the infection process. Beyond the afore-mentioned cleavage of the S protein, it proteolytically cleaves the ACE2 tail that event promotes the uptake of virions through the cathepsin L-dependent pathway [68].
    Thus, there are two pathways for SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cells either by endocytosis, which leads to the fusion of the viral membrane with the host cell membrane or via endosomal mechanism activated by cathepsins [75].
    Given the crucial role of TMPRSS2 in favouring viral entry and the absence of approved therapies for treating the ongoing pandemic, initial attention has focused on drug repurposing opportunities to inhibit this protease (Table 2). TMPRSS2 is a protein that can be inhibited by camostat, nafamostat, and gabexate, clinically approved chemical agents in Japan for the treatment of pancreatitis [48]. There are currently several clinical trials listed on “https://clinicaltrials.gov/” to investigate the use of these repurposing drugs against SARS-CoV-2. Some data suggest that nafamostat and camostat have the potential to block S-protein cleavage mediated not only by TMPRSS2 but also by other proteases [49].
    A more recent study has highlighted the correlation between a TMPRSS2 variant with a high number of cases and/or deaths of COVID-19 observed in different countries [76]. This epidemiological evidence strengthens the usefulness of TMPRSS2 inhibitors for COVID-19 management.
    An in silico molecular docking study was recently performed targeting potential phytochemicals and drugs that prevent the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells by inhibiting the proteolytic activity of furin and TMPRSS2 [13]. Among these, the drug nafamostat may be more beneficial than camostat in suppressing the activity of TMPRSS2. Among the phytochemicals, polyphenols in green tea were found also be potentially useful in suppressing the furin activity [13]. Limonin and gedunin found mainly in the citrus fruits and neem showed the highest binding energy at the active site of furin and TMPRSS2, respectively [13].
    The activation of TMPRSS2 and other proteases also facilitates cell–cell fusion mediated by SARS-COV-2, leading to the formation of multinucleated cells, called syncytia, which contribute to tissue damage [77]. It has recently been reported that high concentrations of bromhexine, an expectorant and inhibitor of TMPRSS2 currently used in clinical trials against COVID-19 [78][79], unlike another expectorant, ambroxol, may favor the formation of syncytia [80]. These results suggest greater caution in the use of high-dose bromhexine until its effects on COVID-19 are fully understood.
    From a screening of more than 3000 existing approved drugs, about 83 drugs were shown to be efficient for inhibition of S-protein-mediated cell fusion [51]. By focusing on effective drugs that also protect against virus replication and associated cytopathy, one of the most effective drugs was the anthelmintic drug niclosamide, suppressing the activity of TMEM16F (also known as anoctamin 6), a calcium-activated ion channel involved in syncytia formation [51]. In addition, it seems likely that, similar to niclosamide, all drugs, as trifluoperazine [81], serotonin reuptake inhibitors [82][83] and ivermectin [52] (Table 2), that inhibit TMEM16 proteins, block SARS-CoV-2 S-protein-induced syncytia.

    2.3. Cathepsin L-Dependent P-Pathway

    Cathepsins are cysteine proteases with a crucial role in protein catabolism in the endosomes and lysosomes. They require low pH (between 4.5–5.0) for optimal proteolytic activity of protein antigens resulting from pathogen endocytosis [84].
    Cathepsin L is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian cells and seems to be important for SARS-CoV-2 entry in human cells as a result of cleaving the S2′ position and activate the fusion between virus and endosomal membrane, leading to the release of the viral genome into the host cells (Figure 1B) [85][86].
    Drug repurposing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have targeted endosomal cathepsins [87]. Some studies have suggested the use of the chloroquine, a broadly used antimalarial drug, and of its derivative hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment [53][54][55][88]. Chloroquine inhibited the SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, influenza virus, Ebola and other viruses in vitro, perhaps through interference with the endocytic pathway [89]. However, until now, its clinical effectiveness is limited in COVID-19 patients and its potential cardiac side effects are the main concerns [53][54][55][88].
    The cross-linking peptide, named 8P9R, can be another potential interferent with the endocytic pathway. Beyond its direct action of virus cross-linking activity, it could reduce the endosomal acidification inhibiting the viral entry [90]. The combined use of two endosomal acidification inhibitors (8P9R and chloroquine) improved the antiviral efficiency of the drug umifenovir, a S-protein–ACE2 fusion inhibitor, clinically available for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza in China and Russia, and now in Phase III and IV clinical trials in the USA [91] (Table 2). Since ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are individually or co-expressed in human cells, the approach of simultaneous inhibition of virus entry through blockage of both endosomal and surface fusion pathways may have better antiviral results.

    2.4. ADAM17 and Soluble ACE2

    The type-I transmembrane protease ADAM17 is expressed in many tissues, including lungs, muscles, heart, kidney, small intestine, pancreas, placenta, ovaries and testicles, and is involved in ectodomain shedding of cell membrane proteins [92].
    The viral S protein can activate ADAM17 to cleave ACE2, resulting in a soluble ACE2 (sACE2) shedding and release (Figure 1B). How ADAM17 facilitates viral entry is not yet clear, but it might contribute to the fusion of viral particles with the host cell membrane [70].
    The involvement of ADAM17 in the SARS-CoV-2 cell entry is still unclear, although it is involved in the RAS imbalance associated with virus infection [17].
    According to Zoufaly et al. [93], the administration of recombinant sACE2 could act through two mechanisms either by binding to S protein and neutralizing the viral particles and the other by increasing the concentration of angiotensin II, thus helping to reduce multi-organ damage. In addition, Monteil et al. [94] showed that the administration of recombinant soluble ACE2 along with the antiviral remdesivir has an additive effect at sub-toxic concentrations and may improve the effect of remdesivir during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    The entry is from 10.3390/biomedicines9070710

    References

    1. Hussain, M.; Jabeen, N.; Amanullah, A.; Baig, A.A.; Aziz, B.; Shabbir, S.; Raza, F.; Uddin, N. Molecular docking between human TMPRSS2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Conformation and intermolecular interactions. AIMS Microbiol. 2020, 6, 350–360.
    2. Gavriatopoulou, M.; Korompoki, E.; Fotiou, D.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; Psaltopoulou, T.; Kastritis, E.; Terpos, E.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Organ-specific manifestations of COVID-19 infection. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020, 20, 493–506.
    3. Xie, J.; Covassin, N.; Fan, Z.; Singh, P.; Gao, W.; Li, G.; Kara, T.; Somers, V.K. Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1138–1147.
    4. Devaux, C.A.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. ACE2 receptor polymorphism: Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, hypertension, multi-organ failure, and COVID-19 disease outcome. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 425–435.
    5. Borczuk, A.C.; Salvatore, S.P.; Seshan, S.V.; Patel, S.S.; Bussel, J.B.; Mostyka, M.; Elsoukkary, S.; He, B.; Del Vecchio, C.; Fortarezza, F.; et al. COVID-19 pulmonary pathology: A multi-institutional autopsy cohort from Italy and New York City. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 2156–2168.
    6. Senapati, S.; Banerjee, P.; Bhagavatula, S.; Kushwaha, P.P.; Kumar, S. Contributions of human ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in determining host-pathogen interaction of COVID-19. J. Genet. 2021, 100.
    7. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734.
    8. Zamorano Cuervo, N.; Grandvaux, N. ACE2: Evidence of role as entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 and implications in comorbidities. Elife 2020, 9, e61390.
    9. Chiappelli, F. CoViD-19 Susceptibility. Bioinformation 2020, 16, 501–504.
    10. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, L.; Niu, S.; Song, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, G.; Qiao, C.; Hu, Y.; Yuen, K.Y.; et al. Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2. Cell 2020, 181, 894–904.
    11. Perlot, T.; Penninger, J.M. ACE2—From the renin-angiotensin system to gut microbiota and malnutrition. Microbes Infect. 2013, 15, 866–873.
    12. Heurich, A.; Hofmann-Winkler, H.; Gierer, S.; Liepold, T.; Jahn, O.; Pohlmann, S. TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 cleave ACE2 differentially and only proteolysis by TMPRSS2 augments entry driven by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 1293–1307.
    13. Vardhan, S.; Sahoo, S.K. Virtual screening by targeting proteolytic sites of furin and TMPRSS2 to propose potential compounds obstructing the entry of SARS-CoV-2 virus into human host cells. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, in press.
    14. Benton, D.J.; Wrobel, A.G.; Xu, P.; Roustan, C.; Martin, S.R.; Rosenthal, P.B.; Skehel, J.J.; Gamblin, S.J. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature 2020, 588, 327–330.
    15. Belouzard, S.; Chu, V.C.; Whittaker, G.R. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5871–5876.
    16. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pohlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784.
    17. Aguiar, J.A.; Tremblay, B.J.; Mansfield, M.J.; Woody, O.; Lobb, B.; Banerjee, A.; Chandiramohan, A.; Tiessen, N.; Cao, Q.; Dvorkin-Gheva, A.; et al. Gene expression and in situ protein profiling of candidate SARS-CoV-2 receptors in human airway epithelial cells and lung tissue. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 3.
    18. Zhou, N.; Pan, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Bai, C.; Huang, F.; Peng, T.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; et al. Glycopeptide Antibiotics Potently Inhibit Cathepsin L in the Late Endosome/Lysosome and Block the Entry of Ebola Virus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV). J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 9218–9232.
    19. Kastenhuber, E.R.; Jaimes, J.A.; Johnson, J.L.; Mercadante, M.; Muecksch, F.; Weisblum, Y.; Bram, Y.; Schwartz, R.E.; Whittaker, G.R.; Cantley, L.C. Coagulation factors directly cleave SARS-CoV-2 spike and enhance viral entry. bioRxiv 2021.
    20. Frydman, G.H.; Streiff, M.B.; Connors, J.M.; Piazza, G. The Potential Role of Coagulation Factor Xa in the Pathophysiology of COVID-19: A Role for Anticoagulants as Multimodal Therapeutic Agents. TH Open 2020, 4, e288–e299.
    21. Wielgat, P.; Rogowski, K.; Godlewska, K.; Car, H. Coronaviruses: Is Sialic Acid a Gate to the Eye of Cytokine Storm? From the Entry to the Effects. Cells 2020, 9, 1963.
    22. Daly, J.L.; Simonetti, B.; Klein, K.; Chen, K.E.; Williamson, M.K.; Anton-Plagaro, C.; Shoemark, D.K.; Simon-Gracia, L.; Bauer, M.; Hollandi, R.; et al. Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Science 2020, 370, 861–865.
    23. Dakal, T.C. SARS-CoV-2 attachment to host cells is possibly mediated via RGD-integrin interaction in a calcium-dependent manner and suggests pulmonary EDTA chelation therapy as a novel treatment for COVID 19. Immunobiology 2021, 226, 152021.
    24. Sigrist, C.J.; Bridge, A.; Le Mercier, P. A potential role for integrins in host cell entry by SARS-CoV-2. Antivir. Res. 2020, 177, 104759.
    25. Clausen, T.M.; Sandoval, D.R.; Spliid, C.B.; Pihl, J.; Perrett, H.R.; Painter, C.D.; Narayanan, A.; Majowicz, S.A.; Kwong, E.M.; McVicar, R.N.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2. Cell 2020, 183, 1043–1057.
    26. Yan, L.; Song, Y.; Xia, K.; He, P.; Zhang, F.; Chen, S.; Pouliot, R.; Weiss, D.J.; Tandon, R.; Bates, J.T.; et al. Heparan sulfates from bat and human lung and their binding to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 260, 117797.
    27. Wang, K.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Lian, J.Q.; Du, P.; Wei, D.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.X.; Gong, L.; et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 283.
    28. Ibrahim, I.M.; Abdelmalek, D.H.; Elshahat, M.E.; Elfiky, A.A. COVID-19 spike-host cell receptor GRP78 binding site prediction. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 554–562.
    29. Iba, T.; Connors, J.M.; Levy, J.H. The coagulopathy, endotheliopathy, and vasculitis of COVID-19. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 69, 1181–1189.
    30. Del Turco, S.; Vianello, A.; Ragusa, R.; Caselli, C.; Basta, G. COVID-19 and cardiovascular consequences: Is the endothelial dysfunction the hardest challenge? Thromb. Res. 2020, 196, 143–151.
    31. Xu, H.; Zhong, L.; Deng, J.; Peng, J.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Q. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2020, 12, 8.
    32. Guzik, T.J.; Mohiddin, S.A.; Dimarco, A.; Patel, V.; Savvatis, K.; Marelli-Berg, F.M.; Madhur, M.S.; Tomaszewski, M.; Maffia, P.; D’Acquisto, F.; et al. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: Implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 1666–1687.
    33. Lan, J.; Ge, J.; Yu, J.; Shan, S.; Zhou, H.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 2020, 581, 215–220.
    34. Volz, E.; Hill, V.; McCrone, J.T.; Price, A.; Jorgensen, D.; O’Toole, A.; Southgate, J.; Johnson, R.; Jackson, B.; Nascimento, F.F.; et al. Evaluating the Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutation D614G on Transmissibility and Pathogenicity. Cell 2021, 184, 64–75.
    35. Khan, A.; Zia, T.; Suleman, M.; Khan, T.; Ali, S.S.; Abbasi, A.A.; Mohammad, A.; Wei, D.Q. Higher infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 new variants is associated with K417N/T, E484K, and N501Y mutants: An insight from structural data. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021.
    36. Du, L.; Kao, R.Y.; Zhou, Y.; He, Y.; Zhao, G.; Wong, C.; Jiang, S.; Yuen, K.Y.; Jin, D.Y.; Zheng, B.J. Cleavage of spike protein of SARS coronavirus by protease factor Xa is associated with viral infectivity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359, 174–179.
    37. Tang, T.; Jaimes, J.A.; Bidon, M.K.; Straus, M.R.; Daniel, S.; Whittaker, G.R. Proteolytic Activation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike at the S1/S2 Boundary: Potential Role of Proteases beyond Furin. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 264–272.
    38. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 183, 1735.
    39. Sakurai, Y.; Kolokoltsov, A.A.; Chen, C.C.; Tidwell, M.W.; Bauta, W.E.; Klugbauer, N.; Grimm, C.; Wahl-Schott, C.; Biel, M.; Davey, R.A. Ebola virus. Two-pore channels control Ebola virus host cell entry and are drug targets for disease treatment. Science 2015, 347, 995–998.
    40. Gunaratne, G.S.; Yang, Y.; Li, F.; Walseth, T.F.; Marchant, J.S. NAADP-dependent Ca2+ signaling regulates Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus pseudovirus translocation through the endolysosomal system. Cell Calcium. 2018, 75, 30–41.
    41. Oz, M.; Lorke, D.E. Multifunctional angiotensin converting enzyme 2, the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor, and critical appraisal of its role in acute lung injury. Biomed. Pharm. 2021, 136, 111193.
    42. Andersen, K.G.; Rambaut, A.; Lipkin, W.I.; Holmes, E.C.; Garry, R.F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 450–452.
    43. Seyran, M.; Pizzol, D.; Adadi, P.; El-Aziz, T.M.A.; Hassan, S.S.; Soares, A.; Kandimalla, R.; Lundstrom, K.; Tambuwala, M.; Aljabali, A.A.A.; et al. Questions concerning the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1204–1206.
    44. Fitzgerald, K. Furin Protease: From SARS CoV-2 to Anthrax, Diabetes, and Hypertension. Perm. J. 2020, 24, 24.
    45. Van Lam van, T.; Ivanova, T.; Hardes, K.; Heindl, M.R.; Morty, R.E.; Bottcher-Friebertshauser, E.; Lindberg, I.; Than, M.E.; Dahms, S.O.; Steinmetzer, T. Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Macrocyclic Inhibitors of the Proprotein Convertase Furin. ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 673–685.
    46. Palit, P.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Thomas, S.; Kundu, A.; Kim, H.S.; Rezaei, N. Phytopharmaceuticals mediated Furin and TMPRSS2 receptor blocking: Can it be a potential therapeutic option for Covid-19? Phytomedicine 2021, 85, 153396.
    47. Morais, A.H.A.; de Medeiros, A.F.; Medeiros, I.; de Lima, V.C.O.; Luz, A.B.S.; Maciel, B.L.L.; Passos, T.S. Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Seed a Candidate Protein Source with Potential for Combating SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Obesity. Drug Target. Insights 2021, 15, 5–12.
    48. Yamaya, M.; Nishimura, H.; Deng, X.; Kikuchi, A.; Nagatomi, R. Protease Inhibitors: Candidate Drugs to Inhibit Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Replication. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2020, 251, 27–30.
    49. Yamamoto, M.; Kiso, M.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Imai, M.; Takeda, M.; Kinoshita, N.; Ohmagari, N.; Gohda, J.; Semba, K.; et al. The Anticoagulant Nafamostat Potently Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 S Protein-Mediated Fusion in a Cell Fusion Assay System and Viral Infection In Vitro in a Cell-Type-Dependent Manner. Viruses 2020, 12, 629.
    50. de Loyola, M.B.; Dos Reis, T.T.A.; de Oliveira, G.; da Fonseca Palmeira, J.; Arganaraz, G.A.; Arganaraz, E.R. Alpha-1-antitrypsin: A possible host protective factor against Covid-19. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 31, e2157.
    51. Braga, L.; Ali, H.; Secco, I.; Chiavacci, E.; Neves, G.; Goldhill, D.; Penn, R.; Jimenez-Guardeno, J.M.; Ortega-Prieto, A.M.; Bussani, R.; et al. Drugs that inhibit TMEM16 proteins block SARS-CoV-2 spike-induced syncytia. Nature 2021, 594, 88–93.
    52. Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhai, W.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Yi, J. Inhibition of TMEM16A Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channels by avermectins is essential for their anticancer effects. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 156, 104763.
    53. Maisonnasse, P.; Guedj, J.; Contreras, V.; Behillil, S.; Solas, C.; Marlin, R.; Naninck, T.; Pizzorno, A.; Lemaitre, J.; Goncalves, A.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature 2020, 585, 584–587.
    54. Rebeaud, M.E.; Zores, F. SARS-CoV-2 and the Use of Chloroquine as an Antiviral Treatment. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 184.
    55. Borba, M.G.S.; Val, F.F.A.; Sampaio, V.S.; Alexandre, M.A.A.; Melo, G.C.; Brito, M.; Mourao, M.P.G.; Brito-Sousa, J.D.; Baia-da-Silva, D.; Guerra, M.V.F.; et al. Effect of High vs. Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e208857.
    56. Hoffmann, M.; Mosbauer, K.; Hofmann-Winkler, H.; Kaul, A.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Kruger, N.; Gassen, N.C.; Muller, M.A.; Drosten, C.; Pohlmann, S. Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 585, 588–590.
    57. Perez-Miller, S.; Patek, M.; Moutal, A.; Duran, P.; Cabel, C.R.; Thorne, C.A.; Campos, S.K.; Khanna, R. Novel Compounds Targeting Neuropilin Receptor 1 with Potential To Interfere with SARS-CoV-2 Virus Entry. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2021, 12, 1299–1312.
    58. Yu, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Q.; Li, H.; Li, J.P. Elucidating the Interactions Between Heparin/Heparan Sulfate and SARS-CoV-2-Related Proteins-An Important Strategy for Developing Novel Therapeutics for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 628551.
    59. Tandon, R.; Sharp, J.S.; Zhang, F.; Pomin, V.H.; Ashpole, N.M.; Mitra, D.; McCandless, M.G.; Jin, W.; Liu, H.; Sharma, P.; et al. Effective Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Heparin and Enoxaparin Derivatives. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e01987-20.
    60. Beddingfield, B.J.; Iwanaga, N.; Chapagain, P.P.; Zheng, W.; Roy, C.J.; Hu, T.Y.; Kolls, J.K.; Bix, G.J. The Integrin Binding Peptide, ATN-161, as a Novel Therapy for SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2021, 6, 1–8.
    61. Ulrich, H.; Pillat, M.M. CD147 as a Target for COVID-19 Treatment: Suggested Effects of Azithromycin and Stem Cell Engagement. Stem. Cell Rev. Rep. 2020, 16, 434–440.
    62. Liu, C.; von Brunn, A.; Zhu, D. Cyclophilin A and CD147: Novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of COVID-19. Med. Drug Discov. 2020, 7, 100056.
    63. Malek, A.E.; Granwehr, B.P.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Doxycycline as a potential partner of COVID-19 therapies. IDCases 2020, 21, e00864.
    64. Yates, P.A.; Newman, S.A.; Oshry, L.J.; Glassman, R.H.; Leone, A.M.; Reichel, E. Doxycycline treatment of high-risk COVID-19-positive patients with comorbid pulmonary disease. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2020, 14, 1753466620951053.
    65. Allam, L.; Ghrifi, F.; Mohammed, H.; Hafidi, N.E.; Jaoudi, R.E.; Harti, J.E.; Lmimouni, B.; Belyamani, L.; Ibrahimi, A. Targeting the GRP78-Dependant SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry by Peptides and Small Molecules. Bioinform. Biol. Insights. 2020, 14, 1177932220965505.
    66. Balmeh, N.; Mahmoudi, S.; Mohammadi, N.; Karabedianhajiabadi, A. Predicted therapeutic targets for COVID-19 disease by inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 and its related receptors. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2020, 20, 100407.
    67. Suter, F.; Consolaro, E.; Pedroni, S.; Moroni, C.; Pastò, E.; Paganini, M.V.; Pravettoni, G.; Cantarelli, U.; Rubis, N.; Perico, N.; et al. A Simple, Home-Therapy Algorithm to Prevent Hospitalization for COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Matched-Cohort Study. medRxiv 2021.
    68. Fuentes-Prior, P. Priming of SARS-CoV-2 S protein by several membrane-bound serine proteinases could explain enhanced viral infectivity and systemic COVID-19 infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 100135.
    69. Gemmati, D.; Bramanti, B.; Serino, M.L.; Secchiero, P.; Zauli, G.; Tisato, V. COVID-19 and Individual Genetic Susceptibility/Receptivity: Role of ACE1/ACE2 Genes, Immunity, Inflammation and Coagulation. Might the Double X-chromosome in Females Be Protective against SARS-CoV-2 Compared to the Single X-Chromosome in Males? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3474.
    70. Guney, C.; Akar, F. Epithelial and Endothelial Expressions of ACE2: SARS-CoV-2 Entry Routes. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 24, 84–93.
    71. Fathema, K.; Hassan, M.N.; Mazumder, M.W.; Benzamin, M.; Ahmed, M.; Islam, M.R.; Haque, N.; Sutradhar, P.K.; Rahman, A.R.; Rukunuzzaman, M. COVID 19 in Children: Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Manifestation. Mymensingh Med. J. 2021, 30, 570–579.
    72. Kaur, U.; Chakrabarti, S.S.; Ojha, B.; Pathak, B.K.; Singh, A.; Saso, L.; Chakrabarti, S. Targeting Host Cell Proteases to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Invasion. Curr. Drug Targets 2021, 22, 192–201.
    73. Dalpiaz, E.L.; Lamas, A.Z.; Caliman, I.F.; Ribeiro, R.F., Jr.; Abreu, G.R.; Moyses, M.R.; Andrade, T.U.; Gouvea, S.A.; Alves, M.F.; Carmona, A.K.; et al. Correction: Sex Hormones Promote Opposite Effects on ACE and ACE2 Activity, Hypertrophy and Cardiac Contractility in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133225.
    74. Bahmad, H.F.; Abou-Kheir, W. Crosstalk between COVID-19 and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020, 23, 561–563.
    75. Thunders, M.; Delahunt, B. Gene of the month: TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2). J. Clin. Pathol. 2020, 73, 773–776.
    76. Latini, A.; Agolini, E.; Novelli, A.; Borgiani, P.; Giannini, R.; Gravina, P.; Smarrazzo, A.; Dauri, M.; Andreoni, M.; Rogliani, P.; et al. COVID-19 and Genetic Variants of Protein Involved in the SARS-CoV-2 Entry into the Host Cells. Genes 2020, 11, 1010.
    77. Buchrieser, J.; Dufloo, J.; Hubert, M.; Monel, B.; Planas, D.; Rajah, M.M.; Planchais, C.; Porrot, F.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Van der Werf, S.; et al. Syncytia formation by SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e106267.
    78. Maggio, R.; Corsini, G.U. Repurposing the mucolytic cough suppressant and TMPRSS2 protease inhibitor bromhexine for the prevention and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104837.
    79. Depfenhart, M.; de Villiers, D.; Lemperle, G.; Meyer, M.; Di Somma, S. Potential new treatment strategies for COVID-19: Is there a role for bromhexine as add-on therapy? Intern. Emerg. Med. 2020, 15, 801–812.
    80. Olaleye, O.A.; Kaur, M.; Onyenaka, C.C. Ambroxol Hydrochloride Inhibits the Interaction between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Spike Protein’s Receptor Binding Domain and Recombinant Human ACE2. bioRxiv 2020.
    81. Tian, Y.; Kongsuphol, P.; Hug, M.; Ousingsawat, J.; Witzgall, R.; Schreiber, R.; Kunzelmann, K. Calmodulin-dependent activation of the epithelial calcium-dependent chloride channel TMEM16A. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 1058–1068.
    82. Maertens, C.; Wei, L.; Voets, T.; Droogmans, G.; Nilius, B. Block by fluoxetine of volume-regulated anion channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 508–514.
    83. Yang, Y.D.; Cho, H.; Koo, J.Y.; Tak, M.H.; Cho, Y.; Shim, W.S.; Park, S.P.; Lee, J.; Lee, B.; Kim, B.M.; et al. TMEM16A confers receptor-activated calcium-dependent chloride conductance. Nature 2008, 455, 1210–1215.
    84. Gomes, C.P.; Fernandes, D.E.; Casimiro, F.; da Mata, G.F.; Passos, M.T.; Varela, P.; Mastroianni-Kirsztajn, G.; Pesquero, J.B. Cathepsin L in COVID-19: From Pharmacological Evidences to Genetics. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 589505.
    85. Wang, N.; Shang, J.; Jiang, S.; Du, L. Subunit Vaccines against Emerging Pathogenic Human Coronaviruses. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 298.
    86. Kumar, B.K.; Sekhar, K.; Kunjiappan, S.; Jamalis, J.; Balana-Fouce, R.; Tekwani, B.L.; Sankaranarayanan, M. Druggable targets of SARS-CoV-2 and treatment opportunities for COVID-19. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 104, 104269.
    87. Riva, L.; Yuan, S.; Yin, X.; Martin-Sancho, L.; Matsunaga, N.; Pache, L.; Burgstaller-Muehlbacher, S.; De Jesus, P.D.; Teriete, P.; Hull, M.V.; et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature 2020, 586, 113–119.
    88. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Kruger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.
    89. Wang, M.; Cao, R.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Xiao, G. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 269–271.
    90. Zhao, H.; To, K.K.W.; Lam, H.; Zhou, X.; Chan, J.F.; Peng, Z.; Lee, A.C.Y.; Cai, J.; Chan, W.M.; Ip, J.D.; et al. Cross-linking peptide and repurposed drugs inhibit both entry pathways of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1517.
    91. McKee, D.L.; Sternberg, A.; Stange, U.; Laufer, S.; Naujokat, C. Candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104859.
    92. Zipeto, D.; Palmeira, J.D.F.; Arganaraz, G.A.; Arganaraz, E.R. ACE2/ADAM17/TMPRSS2 Interplay May Be the Main Risk Factor for COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 576745.
    93. Zoufaly, A.; Poglitsch, M.; Aberle, J.H.; Hoepler, W.; Seitz, T.; Traugott, M.; Grieb, A.; Pawelka, E.; Laferl, H.; Wenisch, C.; et al. Human recombinant soluble ACE2 in severe COVID-19. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 1154–1158.
    94. Monteil, V.; Dyczynski, M.; Lauschke, V.M.; Kwon, H.; Wirnsberger, G.; Youhanna, S.; Zhang, H.; Slutsky, A.S.; Hurtado Del Pozo, C.; Horn, M.; et al. Human soluble ACE2 improves the effect of remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2 infection. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021, 13, e13426.
    More