1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Discovery of NPs by Genomics/Metabolomics

    Subjects: Biology
    View times: 8
    Submitted by: Linda Sukmarini


    Natural products (NPs) are evolutionarily optimized as drug-like molecules and remain the most consistently successful source of drugs and drug leads. Due to traditional discovery approaches’ limitations relying on untargeted screening methods, there is a growing trend to employ unconventional secondary metabolomics techniques.

    1. Introduction

    Natural products (NPs) originating from plants, animals, marine organisms, and particularly from microbial sources continue to inspire novel discoveries in chemistry [1], biology [2], and medicine [3]. They possess immense structural and chemical diversity with a wide variety of biological properties. Most pharmacologically relevant antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory and analgesic, and antitumor agents and approved small molecule drugs have either been NPs, their derivatives, synthetic compounds with NP pharmacophore, or their synthetic mimics. Notably, more than half of the new small molecule drugs have been developed from microbial NPs over the past decades [4][5].

    However, finding novel NPs has become more difficult as the rediscovery of known NPs is still an increasing challenge. A high rate of the discovery of NPs was yielded by classical methods that recover only a fraction or even none of the desired secondary metabolites. The sharp decline in discoveries arose with limitations of the traditional top-down screening approaches. Those approaches, including bioassay- and chemical signature-guided isolations, have largely been exhausted and may no longer be capable of delivering novel lead compounds [6].

    In the search for alternative methods, advancements made in bioinformatics and chemical analysis might hold the key to lead a renaissance in the field of microbial NP discovery. The growing knowledge of different biosynthetic machinery, drug targets, and resistance mechanisms has served as a launch platform to a new era in the methodological approach for drug discovery [7][8]. Given the rising limitations imposed by uncultivable strains and silent gene clusters, the integrative approach of bottom-up targeted screening, employing advanced analytical methods and guided by bioinformatics analysis, provides a promising alternative for unlocking the microbial metabolomes on an unprecedented scale. This approach eventually leads to disclosing the potential of microbial NP discovery [9][10][11].

    2. Bioinformatics- and Genomics-Driven Discovery

    Genomics and metagenomics (which has also been described as environmental genomics, relating to the genomic DNA from an environmental sample) revealed the remarkable biosynthetic potential of microbial NPs and their vast chemical inventory that can be prioritized and systematically mined for novel or new secondary metabolites with desirable bioactivities. The growing application of bioinformatics into a standard practice in discovery projects has varied approaches to identify novel lead structures [12].

    2.1. Genome Mining Approach

    Fueled by the fast development of genome sequencing technologies, genome mining evolved during the last decades and is currently an essential part of drug discovery efforts. The genome mining approach detects and analyzes the BGCs of the chemical compounds automatically (computationally) and subsequently connects those genes to molecules. Furthermore, the significance of this approach associated with other techniques leading to drug discovery, especially of microbial NP origin, has been extensively described elsewhere [13][14][15][16]. Although the genome mining approach showcases the full biosynthetic potential of a strain, it is not very worthwhile without linking the predicted secondary metabolite BGCs to their product. Moreover, to take full advantage of NP diversity, BGCs must be prioritized by product novelty or function. BGCs hold the key information to understanding and predicting a specific or a group of related metabolites. By identifying open reading frames (ORFs) in a gene sequence, one can set the borders of the protein-encoding genes, and therein the protein sequence can be predicted through bioinformatics tools. As in some cases, bioinformatics can reveal BGCs with high similarities as a fast evaluation for target novelty; consequently, the time invested with computational work would save extensive resources and efforts only to re-isolate a previously described compound [11][16][17][18][19].

    2.2. Culture-Independent Strategies and Revolution in Metagenomics

    Moreover, the other culture-independent approach of metagenomics has also been established. Metagenomics relies on sampling environmental DNA (eDNA) and assessing their metabolomics independent from the producing organism. This has great implications when considering strains challenging to isolate or cultivate, such as strains from extreme environments and symbionts of marine organisms [12][20]. The revolution in this approach encompassing the phenotypic and homology DNA screening strategies in situ has been ameliorated by the advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies [21][22][23]. By directly capturing eDNA from the environment and subsequently identifying, isolating, and expressing BGCs in a heterologous host, metagenomics has the potential to bring biosynthetic diversity from the environment into drug discovery pipelines.

    3. Technological Advancements in Bioanalytics: Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics

    The key step in compound detection and identification relies directly on analytical instrumentation and data processing software for increased sensitivity and accuracy. Given the need for increased sensitivity in metabolomics, mass spectrometry (MS) is a predominant analytical technique with wide applicability in high-throughput screening programs. It has the potential to uncover elemental composition; structural information, i.e., mass-to-charge ratios (m/z); isotopic patterns; and abundance, as well as fragmentation patterns of molecules. Current separation techniques, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC), as well as gas chromatography (GC), are routinely coupled to MS towards efficient detectability of the generated ions. This coupled system has proved a powerful technique that has contributed towards metabolic profiling [24][25][26].

    Recent advances in MS that integrate molecular networking (MN) of the MS/MS data have allowed for more rapid dereplication of known molecules from complex mixtures (Figure 4), which in turn have enabled not only the identification of related analogs but also contributed towards unraveling novel compounds by avoiding re-isolation of known compounds.

    Molecules 26 02542 g004 550

    Figure 4. Schematic of molecular networking (MN)-based dereplication.

    4. Summary

    Remarkably, advancements in bioinformatics tools, genomics, and bioanalytics (particularly in MS) have recently enhanced the field of microbial NP research. These strategies outlined above offer alternatives to accelerate NP drug discovery over conventional methods efficiently. With continued significant progress in both genomics and metabolomics approaches and/or combined with synthetic biology, the microbial NPs discovery field shows strong signs of developing and is ready to lead at the forefront of delivering drugs or drug leads.

    The entry is from 10.3390/molecules26092542


    1. Trost, B.M.; Wang, Y.; Buckl, A.K.; Huang, Z.; Nguyen, M.H.; Kuzmina, O. Total Synthesis of Bryostatin 3. Science 2020, 368, 1007–1011.
    2. Yasuda-Yamahara, M.; Kume, S.; Maegawa, H. Roles of mTOR in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 321.
    3. Dugger, S.A.; Platt, A.; Goldstein, D.B. Drug Development in the Era of Precision Medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 183–196.
    4. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades From 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803.
    5. Demain, A.L. Importance of Microbial Natural Products and the Need to Revitalize their Discovery. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 185–201.
    6. Pye, C.R.; Bertin, M.J.; Lokey, R.S.; Gerwick, W.H.; Linington, R.G. Retrospective Analysis of Natural Products Provides Insights for Future Discovery Trends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 2017, 114, 5601–5606.
    7. Johnston, C.W.; Skinnider, A.M.; DeJong, A.C.; Rees, P.N.; Chen, G.M.; Walker, C.G.; French, S.; Brown, E.D.; Bérdy, J.; Liu, D.Y.; et al. Assembly and Clustering of Natural Antibiotics Guides Target Identification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 233–239.
    8. Kohanski, M.A.; Dwyer, D.J.; Collins, J.J. How Antibiotics Kill Bacteria: From Targets to Networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 8, 423–435.
    9. Harvey, A.L.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Quinn, R.J. The Re-Emergence of Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the Genomics Era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 111–129.
    10. Wright, G.D. Unlocking the Potential of Natural Products in Drug Discovery. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 55–57.
    11. Luo, Y.; Cobb, E.R.; Zhao, H. Recent Advances in Natural Product Discovery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 230–237.
    12. Zhang, M.M.; Qiao, Y.; Ang, E.L.; Zhao, H. Using Natural Products for Drug Discovery: The Impact of the Genomics Era. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 475–487.
    13. Yang, Z.; He, J.; Wei, X.; Ju, J.; Ma, J. Exploration and Genome Mining of Natural Products from Marine Streptomyces. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 104, 67–76.
    14. Albarano, L.; Esposito, R.; Ruocco, N.; Costantini, M. Genome Mining as New Challenge in Natural Products Discovery. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 199.
    15. Sekurova, O.N.; Schneider, O.; Zotchev, S.B. Novel Bioactive Natural Products from Bacteria via Bioprospecting, Genome Mining and Metabolic Engineering. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 828–844.
    16. Ziemert, N.; Weber, T.; Medema, M.H. Genome Mining Approaches to Bacterial Natural Product Discovery. In Comprehensive Natural Products III; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 6, pp. 19–33.
    17. Ziemert, N.; Alanjary, M.; Weber, T. The Evolution of Genome Mining in Microbes—A Review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 988–1005.
    18. Kalkreuter, E.; Pan, G.; Cepeda, A.J.; Shen, B. Targeting Bacterial Genomes for Natural Product Discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 13–26.
    19. Wohlleben, W.; Mast, Y.; Stegmann, E.; Ziemert, N. Antibiotic Drug Discovery. Microb. Biotechnol. 2016, 9, 541–548.
    20. Charlop-Powers, Z.; Milshteyn, A.; Brady, S.F. Metagenomic Small Molecule Discovery Methods. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 19, 70–75.
    21. Loman, N.J.; Pallen, M.J. Twenty Years of Bacterial Genome Sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 13, 787–794.
    22. Alves, L.D.F.; Westmann, C.A.; Lovate, G.L.; De Siqueira, G.M.V.; Borelli, T.C.; Guazzaroni, M.-E. Metagenomic Approaches for Understanding New Concepts in Microbial Science. Int. J. Genom. 2018, 2018, 1–15.
    23. Datta, S.; Rajnish, K.N.; Samuel, M.S.; Pugazlendhi, A.; Selvarajan, E. Metagenomic Applications in Microbial Diversity, Bioremediation, Pollution Monitoring, Enzyme and Drug Discovery. A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 1229–1241.
    24. Kind, T.; Fiehn, O. Seven Golden Rules for Heuristic Filtering of Molecular Formulas Obtained by Accurate Mass Spectrometry. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 105.
    25. Maurer, H.H. What is the Future of (Ultra) High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Low and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Toxicological Drug Screening? J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1292, 19–24.
    26. Hernández, F.H.; Sancho, J.V.; Ibáñez, M.; Abad, E.; Portolés, T.; Mattioli, L. Current Use of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry in the Environmental Sciences. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403, 1251–1264.