1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Insect Sex Pheromone

    Subjects: Agronomy
    View times: 13
    Submitted by: Gadi VP Reddy


    Insect pheromones are specific natural compounds that meet modern pest control requirements, i.e., species-specificity, lack of toxicity to mammals, environmentally benign, and a component for the Integrated Pest Management of agricultural pests. Mass trapping and mating disruption strategies using sex pheromones have significantly reduced the use of conventional insecticides, thereby providing sustainable and ecofriendly pest management in agricultural crops. 

    1. Introduction

    Sex pheromones are chemical signals emitted by an organism that elicit a sexual response in a member of the opposite sex of the same species [1][2]. Since the structural characterization of the first sex pheromone of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori in 1959 [3][4], more than 600 species [5] of lepidopteran pheromones have been identified. Their main features, e.g., species-specificity, non-toxicity to mammals and other beneficial organisms, their activity in minute amounts, and rapid degradation in the environment were soon envisioned to be promising tools for controlling insect pests, estimating pest populations, detecting the entry and progress of invasive pests, and preserving endangered species [6][7][8]. In fact, in recent years the most successful practical applications of sex pheromones in integrated pest management (IPM) have been the monitoring of pest populations, mass trapping, mating disruption, and push-pull strategies [7][9][10][11].

    Sex pheromones are mainly produced by females and used as attractant compounds to show the presence of potential mating partners and their reproductive status [8][11]. Sex pheromones comprise sex attractant pheromones, which induce upwind oriented movements to the conspecific individual, and courtship pheromones, which elicit a variety of close-range responses in the insect partner [12][13]. Since the first pheromone discovery, the rapid progress of methodologies developed to identify new pheromones, mainly GC, GC-MS, NMR, electrophysiological techniques [electroantennography (EAG), gas chromatography coupled to electroantennography (GC-EAD), single sensillum recordings (SSR), and coupled GC-SSR], have allowed the identification of thousands of compounds as insect sex pheromones [14]

    2. Sex Pheromone Biosynthesis

    Sex pheromone components are C10–C18 straight chain unsaturated compounds with an oxygenated functional group [15]. In many Lepidoptera species, sex pheromone production is regulated by the pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide (PBAN), a neurohormone originated in the subesophageal ganglion and released into the hemolymph to operate directly on the pheromone gland (PG) [16], which in turn activates functional group modification enzymes [17] or acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC) [18]. In the first step of pheromone biosynthesis, the carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA is catalyzed by ACC, followed by fatty acid synthase action which leads to production of saturated fatty acids (C18:0 and C16:0) [18]. Through a series of enzymatic reactions, i.e., desaturation, chain-shortening reaction, reduction, acetylation, and oxidation, the palmitic or stearic acids are then converted to the final pheromone components in a stepwise manner [17][19]

    3. Mechanisms of Insect Sex Pheromone Perception

    Insects detect volatile odorants/pheromone molecules using olfactory receptor (OR) sensilla present on their antennae and maxillary palps [20]. Pheromones and other odorant molecules that are absorbed on the cuticular surface of an olfactory sensillum diffuse inside through olfactory pores and the pore tubule [21]. The sensillum lymph contains the pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) that bind with volatile pheromones and solubilize them to pass across the sensillum lymph to activate pheromone receptors [22]. The structure and arrangement of olfactory sensilla and olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) on the antennae and palps of insects are very specialized and optimized to detect odorants, especially sex pheromones in the case of male antennae. OSNs carry the olfactory information from the periphery to the antennal lobe in the insect brain.

    The peripheral olfactory hairs or olfactory sensilla that house the OSNs play an essential role in odorants perception, especially sex pheromones. Different morphological types and distribution of olfactory sensilla have been reported in multiple insect species based on their ecological niches. 

    Many studies have been published to understand the role of odorant binding proteins (OBPs), pheromone binding proteins (PBPs), sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs), and sex pheromone receptors that are involved in the transport and central processing of pheromone molecules in Drosophila and different moth species [22][23][24]. An insect’s age and the physiological state also affect its responsiveness to sex pheromones and other host plant volatiles. Recent studies have shown a significant interest in understanding the neurophysiological mechanisms that regulate the interaction between female sex pheromone and behaviorally active host plant odorants by using functional imaging of the antennal lobe (AL) and intracellular recordings (IRs) of projection neurons (PNs) that transmit olfactory signals to higher centers of insect brain [25].

    4. Sex Pheromone Autodetection

    The phenomenon of a sex pheromone producer insect capable of detecting its conspecific sex pheromone components is termed autodetection [26]. One of the first cases recorded on autodetection was reported by Schneider et al. [27] in which electroantennographic responses to both pheromone components released by females of Panaxia quadripunctaria Poda (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae) were equally detected and with similar amplitude by both sexes. It revealed that not only males could detect the female-produced pheromones, but females were not ‘anosmic’ (unable to detect their conspecific sex pheromone) for their own attractant. In some cases, the pheromone only attracts males, thus acting as a sex pheromone, but may induce other behavioral effects on females, e.g., a repellent effect, an advance or delay in calling initiation, or an increase in calling frequency, among others [28]. Sex pheromones are secreted by one sex and cause an intraspecific attractant response and mating in individuals of the opposite sex, but in some rare cases, the pheromone attracts both sexes, functioning more like an aggregation pheromone. The aggregation pheromones are emitted by insects of one sex and cause individuals of both sexes to join for feeding and reproduction. In sex pheromone autodetection, female aggregation may increase the possibilities of mating success or induce dispersal at high population levels.

    5. Resistance of Insects to Sex Pheromones

    The continuous exposure or pre-exposure to high concentrations of sex pheromone as in mating disruption experiments can elicit habituation or desensitization [29]. This mechanism implies a reduction of response when pest species are treated with species-specific dispensers [30]. Adaptation of the peripheral neurons system to the sex pheromone has been shown to occur in most moths, but not in all cases where it has been examined, including G. molesta [29], C. pomonella [31], or E. postvittana [32].

    6. Application of Insect Sex Pheromones

    6.1. Interactions between Pheromones and Insects Biological Control Agents

    It is believed that entomopathogenic fungi act slowly and take time to cause mortality in insects. On the other hand, the combined use of entomopathogenic fungi with chemical insecticides [33] or other entomopathogenic fungi [34] improves microbial control agents’ efficacy. In the same approach, entomopathogenic fungi and pheromones can be used to increase the effectiveness (additive or synergistic) against the target insects. Thus, the simultaneous application of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum and the aggregation pheromone phenylacetonitrile to Schistocerca gregaria Forsskål (Orthoptera: Acrididae) fifth-instar nymphs exhibited an additive interaction [35].

    Sammani et al. [36] studied the effects of the sex pheromone components (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate and (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-yl acetate of Cadra cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the presence of botanical oils on insect mating, and the burrowing ability of C. cautella larvae in different types of flour treated with spinosad (Saccharopolyspora spinosa), a bacterial organism isolated from soil. The mating success was higher with botanical oils alone but declined with pheromone exposure either alone or combined with botanical oils [36].

    6.2. Monitoring

    One of the most widespread and successful applications of sex pheromones is in the detection and monitoring of pest populations [11]. Monitoring systems are based on the relationship between trap captures and the pest population or damage induced by the pest species. The number of male catches is used to establish thresholds for making decisions on when it is advisable to take treatment actions. Sex pheromones are very useful for evaluating trap catches because they are highly sensitive when detecting low insect population levels and are species-specific. These features also allow for the detection and survey of invasive species, and permit growers to perform timely insecticidal applications, thereby reducing economic and environmental costs [2].

    6.3. Mass Trapping

    Mass trapping is a direct control strategy that uses a large number of pheromone traps to reduce the population density of the target species and/or pest damage [37][38]. Compared to mating disruption, mass trapping is more efficient when both control methods have an equal number of pheromone sources [39].

    6.4. Mating Disruption

    Mating disruption (MD) is a strategy based on the permeation of the crop with synthetic sex pheromone to disrupt chemical communication between sexes and, thus, preventing mating. To date, MD is the most developed pheromone-based technology for the direct control of moth pests [40]. The species-specificity and low toxicity of pheromone applications have led to consider MD a reliable tool for use in area-wide programs to control insect pests and manage invasive species. Microencapsulation, hand application, aerial dispensers, and matrix formulations (SPLAT, Specialized Pheromone and Lure Application Technology), have been used for pheromone emission [41]. Ideally, the dispensers should release pheromones at a constant rate, should be mechanically applicable, completely biodegradable, and made from renewable and cheap organic materials, be economically cheap, and eco-toxicologically inert [42].

    6.5. Push-Pull Strategy

    The push-pull strategy, the simultaneous use of an attractant and repellent stimulus to divert pests, is an increasingly employed sustainable alternative to traditional pesticides. This strategy aims at reducing crop injury by modifying pest distribution using repellent stimuli to ‘push’ the insect pest away from the crop, and at the same time attractant stimuli to ‘pull’ the pest to other areas out of the crop. The development of push-pull strategies has been mainly directed to agricultural systems to manage insecticide resistance threats or diminish the use of insecticides. This strategy requires knowledge of insect biology, chemical ecology, and interaction between host plants and natural enemies [43].

    The entry is from 10.3390/insects12060484


    1. Seybold, S.J.; Bentz, B.J.; Fettig, C.J.; Lundquist, J.E.; Progar, R.A.; Gillette, N.E. Management of western North American bark beetles with semiochemicals. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 407–432.
    2. Smart, L.; Aradottir, G.; Bruce, T. Role of semiochemicals in integrated pest management. In Integrated Pest Management; Abrol, D.P., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 93–109.
    3. Butenandt, V.A. Uber den sexsual-lockstoff des seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung und Konstitution. Z. Naturforsch. B 1959, 14, 283.
    4. Karlson, P.; Lüscher, M. ‘Pheromones’: A new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 1959, 183, 55–56.
    5. Petkevicius, K.; Löfstedt, C.; Borodina, I. Insect sex pheromone production in yeasts and plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 65, 259–267.
    6. Larsson, M.C. Pheromones and other semiochemicals for monitoring rare and endangered species. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 853–868.
    7. Tewari, S.; Leskey, T.C.; Nielsen, A.L.; Piñero, J.C.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.R. Use of pheromones in insect pest management, with special attention to weevil pheromones. In Integrated Pest Management; Abrol, D.P., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 141–168.
    8. Yew, J.Y.; Chung, H. Insect pheromones: An overview of function, form, and discovery. Prog. Lipid Res. 2015, 59, 88–105.
    9. Reddy, G.V.; Guerrero, A. New pheromones and insect control strategies. Vitam. Horm. 2010, 83, 493–519.
    10. Trematerra, P. Advances in the use of pheromones for stored-product protection. J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 285–299.
    11. Witzgall, P.; Kirsch, P.; Cork, A. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 80–100.
    12. Hostachy, C.; Couzi, P.; Portemer, G.; Hanafi-Portier, M.; Murmu, M.; Deisig, N.; Dacher, M. Exposure to conspecific and heterospecific sex-pheromones modulates gustatory habituation in the moth Agrotis ipsilon. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1518.
    13. Molander, M.A.; Eriksson, B.; Winde, I.B.; Zou, Y.; Millar, J.G.; Larsson, M.C. The aggregation-sex pheromones of the cerambycid beetles Anaglyptus mysticus and Xylotrechus antilope ssp. antilope: New model species for insect conservation through pheromone-based monitoring. Chemoecology 2019, 29, 111–124.
    14. El-Sayed, A.M. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. 2021. Available online: (accessed on 19 January 2021).
    15. Jurenka, R. Insect pheromone biosynthesis. Top. Curr. Chem. 2004, 239, 97–132.
    16. Jurenka, R. Regulation of pheromone biosynthesis in moths. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 24, 29–35.
    17. Tillman, J.A.; Seybold, S.J.; Jurenka, R.A.; Blomquist, G.J. Insect pheromones--an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 29, 481–514.
    18. Blomquist, G.J.; Jurenka, R.; Schal, C.; Tittiger, C. Pheromone production: Biochemistry and molecular biology. In Insect Endocrinology, Gilbert, L., Ed.; Academic London: London, UK, 2012.
    19. Park, H.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Paek, A.; Jeong, S.E.; Knipple, D.C. An abundant acyl-CoA (Delta9) desaturase transcript in pheromone glands of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, encodes a catalytically inactive protein. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 581–595.
    20. Hansson, B.S.; Stensmyr, M.C. Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron 2011, 72, 698–711.
    21. Hansson, B.S. Insect Olfaction; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; p. 458.
    22. Leal, W.S. Odorant reception in insects: Roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 373–391.
    23. Brito, N.F.; Moreira, M.F.; Melo, A.C. A look inside odorant-binding proteins in insect chemoreception. J. Insect Physiol. 2016, 95, 51–65.
    24. Jiang, X.J.; Guo, H.; Di, C.; Yu, S.; Zhu, L.; Huang, L.Q.; Wang, C.Z. Sequence similarity and functional comparisons of pheromone receptor orthologs in two closely related Helicoverpa species. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 48, 63–74.
    25. Trona, F.; Anfora, G.; Balkenius, A.; Bengtsson, M.; Tasin, M.; Knight, A.; Janz, N.; Witzgall, P.; Ignell, R. Neural coding merges sex and habitat chemosensory signals in an insect herbivore. Proc. R. Soc. B 2013, 280, 20130267.
    26. Ochieng, S.A.; Anderson, P.; Hansson, B.S. Antennal lobe projection patterns of olfactory receptor neurons involved in sex pheromone detection in Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Tissue Cell 1995, 27, 221–232.
    27. Schneider, D.; Schulz, S.; Priesner, E.; Ziesmann, J.; Francke, W. Autodetection and chemistry of female and male pheromone in both sexes of the tiger moth Panaxia quadripunctaria. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1998, 182, 153–161.
    28. Holdcraft, R.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Stelinski, L.L. Pheromone autodetection: Evidence and implications. Insects 2016, 7, 17.
    29. Stelinski, L.L.; Vogel, K.J.; Gut, L.J.; Miller, J.R. Seconds-long pre-exposures to pheromone from rubber septum or polyethelene tube dispensers alters subsequent behavioral responses of male Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) in a sustained-flight tunnel. Environ. Entomol. 2005, 34, 696–704.
    30. Miller, J.R.; Gut, L.J. Mating disruption for the 21st century: Matching technology with mechanism. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 427–453.
    31. Judd, G.J.R.; Gardiner, M.G.T.; DeLury, N.C.; Karg, G. Reduced antennal sensitivity, behavioural response, and attraction of male codling moths, Cydia pomonella, to their pheromone (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol following various pre-exposure regimes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2005, 114, 65–78.
    32. Suckling, D.M.; Stringer, L.D.; Jiménez-Pérez, A.; Walter, G.H.; Sullivan, N.; El-Sayed, A.M. With or without pheromone habituation: Possible differences between insect orders? Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1259–1264.
    33. Bitsadze, N.; Jaronski, S.; Khasdan, V.; Abashidze, E.; Abashidze, M.; Latchininsky, A.; Samadashvili, D.; Sokhadze, I.; Rippa, M.; Ishaaya, I. Joint action of Beauveria bassiana and the insect growth regulators diflubenzuron and novaluron, on the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 293–300.
    34. Reddy, G.V.; Zhao, Z.; Humber, R.A. Laboratory and field efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi for the management of the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 122, 10–15.
    35. Abdellaoui, K.; Miladi, M.; Mkhinini, M.; Boughattas, I.; Hamouda, A.B.; Hajji-Hedfi, L.; Tlili, H.; Acheuk, F. The aggregation pheromone phenylacetonitrile: Joint action with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum and physiological and transcriptomic effects on Schistocerca gregaria nymphs. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 167, 104594.
    36. Sammani, A.M.; Dissanayaka, D.M.; Wijayaratne, L.K.; Bamunuarachchige, T.C.; Morrison, W.R. Effect of pheromones, plant volatiles and spinosad on mating, male attraction and burrowing of Cadra cautella (Walk.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insects 2020, 11, 845.
    37. Jones, O.T. Practical applications of pheromones and other semiochemicals. In Insect Pheromones and Their Use in Pest Management; Howse, P., Stevens, I., Jones, O., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1998; pp. 261–355.
    38. Trematerra, P.; Colacci, M. Recent advances in management by pheromones of Thaumetopoea moths in urban parks and woodland recreational areas. Insects 2019, 10, 395.
    39. Byers, J.A. Modelling female mating success during mass trapping and natural competitive attraction of searching males or females. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2012, 145, 228–237.
    40. Lance, D.R.; Leonard, D.S.; Mastro, V.C.; Walters, M.L. Mating disruption as a suppression tactic in programs targeting regulated lepidopteran pests in US. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 590–605.
    41. Welter, S.; Pickel, C.; Millar, J.; Cave, F.; Van Steenwyk, R.; Dunley, J. Pheromone mating disruption offers selective management options for key pests. Calif. Agric. 2005, 59, 16–22.
    42. Hummel, H.E.; Langner, S.S.; Eisinger, M.T. Pheromone dispensers, including organic polymer fibers, described in the crop protection literature: Comparison of their innovation potential. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2013, 78, 233–252.
    43. Cook, S.M.; Khan, Z.R.; Pickett, J.A. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 375–400.